新浪科技讯 2月24日上午消息，正月初八开工首日，吉利汽车集团CEO淦家阅（阿甘）在新春贺词中披 露集团智能化推进节奏与产品落地安排，强调以"技术普惠、长期主义"应对更趋激烈的市场竞争，并提 及2026年竞争强度将进一步提升，坚持正确价值观，避免陷入内卷式恶性竞争，走内涵式、可持续发展 路径。 他透露了智能化上的两项核心进展：1、"千里浩瀚H7"加速下放：高阶辅助驾驶方案将应用至全集团更 多车型，重点覆盖更多领克车型，并延伸至吉利银河相关车型； 2、G-ASD新版本首发车型确认：G-ASD辅助驾驶系统下一版本将由极氪8X首发，极氪8X将成为首个 搭载该版本G-ASD的产品。 淦家阅表示，将在坚持价值观与长期投入的基础上，推动核心智能化能力更大范围普及，以更稳健的方 式穿越未来竞争周期。 淦家阅表示，将在坚持价值观与长期投入的基础上，推动核心智能化能力更大范围普及，以更稳健的方 式穿越未来竞争周期。 责任编辑：宋雅芳 责任编辑：宋雅芳 新浪科技讯 2月24日上午消息，正月初八开工首日，吉利汽车集团CEO淦家阅（阿甘）在新春贺词中披 露集团智能化推进节奏与产品落地安排，强调以"技术普惠、长期主义"应对更趋激烈的市 ...

吉利汽车1月15日放量上涨1.76% 17.26 +0.26 +1.53% 昨日收盘价17.00；当日收盘价：17.26 当日开盘价17.00；交易量70.28万手 2025年，吉利汽车成绩亮眼，销量首次突破300万辆，达302万辆，同比增长39%;新能源销量169万辆， 同比大增90%，超越特斯拉成全球第二大新能源汽车企业。吉利家族各细分赛道表现出色，吉利银河最 快达成年销百万，吉利星愿是全品类车型销量冠军。2024-2025年，完成吉利汽车与极氪合并，前三季 度核心归母净利润达106.2亿元，同比增长近六成。2026年，吉利确定345万辆的销量目标。 ｜事件正负面性质分析 换手率0.64%；放量幅度0.03% 3日涨幅+2.00%；5日涨幅-0.75% 成交额：12.15亿；总市值：1881.07亿 较过去一年的平均收盘价-0.02%；较过去一年的日均交易量-0.05% "吉利汽车2025年成绩亮眼并展望2026"舆情分析 截止1月15日，此事件匹配的到全网舆情信息总量为49638条，正面信息35171条，占比70.9%，负面信 息820条，占比1.7%，中性信息13647条，占比27.4%，事件舆论呈现 ...

以下文章来源于36氪企业舆情报告 ，作者36氪 36氪企业舆情报告 . 舆情大数据，帮你看清市场全貌、看懂涨跌原因。 吉利汽车公司日报 来源｜ 36氪企业全情报（ID：EV36kr） 吉利汽车1月15日放量上涨1.76% 17.26 +0.26 +1.53% 昨日收盘价17.00；当日收盘价：17.26 当日开盘价17.00；交易量70.28万手 换手率0.64%；放量幅度0.03% 3日涨幅 +2.00% ；5日涨幅 -0.75% " 吉利汽车2025年成绩亮眼并展望2026 "舆情分析 2025年，吉利汽车成绩亮眼，销量首次突破300万辆，达302万辆，同比增长39%;新能源销量169万辆，同比大增90%，超越 特斯拉成全球第二大新能源汽车企业。吉利家族各细分赛道表现出色，吉利银河最快达成年销百万，吉利星愿是全品类车型销量 冠军。2024-2025年，完成吉利汽车与极氪合并，前三季度核心归母净利润达106.2亿元，同比增长近六成。2026年，吉利确 定345万辆的销量目标。 ｜事件正负面性质分析 截止1月15日，此事件匹配的到全网舆情信息总量为 49638条 ，正面信息 35171条 ，占比 70.9% ...

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is undergoing a transformation characterized by electrification, intelligence, and ecological integration, with companies facing strategic choices based on their understanding of the industry's essence [1][6]. Group 1: Conservative Approach - Conservative companies focus on core automotive technologies, aiming for breakthroughs in battery energy density and intelligent driving algorithms, which helps maintain profitability during market fluctuations [2]. - The conservative strategy is driven by a deep understanding of the industry and a rational focus on resources, allowing companies like Great Wall Motors and Leap Motor to establish strong user recognition in specific market segments [1][2]. - The conservative approach may lead to challenges such as price wars due to hardware standardization and global overcapacity pressures, necessitating continuous software innovation [2]. Group 2: Transformative Approach - Transformative companies view the automotive industry as part of a larger interconnected ecosystem, leveraging AI and cross-industry collaborations to create competitive advantages [3][4]. - Companies like Xpeng and Geely are investing in technologies such as intelligent robots and satellite communications to enhance their product offerings and create unique selling points [3][4]. - The transformative strategy is supported by strong capital backing and the ability to repurpose existing technology for new applications, although it carries higher risks due to significant R&D investments and complex management challenges [4][5]. Group 3: Strategic Divergence and Integration - The fundamental difference between conservative and transformative strategies lies in their strategic motivations and technological paths, with conservative firms focusing on survival and stability while transformative firms pursue growth and innovation [5]. - Companies like BYD and Huawei exemplify a blend of both strategies, integrating vertical control and ecosystem collaboration to enhance their core business while exploring new opportunities [5]. - The future of the automotive industry may see a dynamic integration of both strategies, where conservative firms extend their boundaries after achieving technological breakthroughs, and transformative firms reinforce their core strengths through ecosystem development [5][6][7].