Core Points - The article discusses the introduction of a new visa program called the "Golden Card" by U.S. President Trump, aimed at attracting foreign individuals with exceptional abilities who are willing to support the U.S. [2] - The program includes three tiers of cards: a personal "Gold Card" priced at $1 million, a corporate-sponsored "Corporate Gold Card" at $2 million, and a "Platinum Card" at $5 million [2] - The White House claims that applicants can obtain U.S. residency at a record speed through this program [2] - Trump anticipates that the "Golden Card" initiative will generate over $100 billion in revenue, which will be allocated for tax cuts, economic growth projects, and debt repayment [2] Summary by Categories Visa Program Details - The "Golden Card" program is designed for foreign individuals with extraordinary abilities [2] - Three types of cards are available: personal "Gold Card" ($1 million), corporate "Gold Card" ($2 million), and "Platinum Card" ($5 million) [2] - The program promises expedited residency for applicants [2] Financial Implications - The initiative is expected to generate more than $100 billion in revenue [2] - Funds from the program will be used for tax reductions, economic growth initiatives, and to pay down national debt [2]

Core Points - The article discusses the significant changes in the U.S. government structure under Trump's administration, particularly the renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, reflecting a broader ideological shift [1] - It highlights the ongoing political battles between the Democratic and Republican parties, emphasizing the constitutional challenges posed by Trump's executive orders [2] - The article also examines Trump's strategic use of executive power to bypass traditional legislative processes, showcasing a trend of expanding executive authority [8][23] Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to assert control, often bypassing legislative approval, as seen in the renaming of the Department of Defense [1][6] - The article notes that Trump's approach to executive orders has become more sophisticated, exploiting legal loopholes to challenge the traditional bureaucratic structure [3][6] - The use of "parallel nomenclature" to rename government departments illustrates a tactical maneuver to consolidate power without formal legislative changes [6] Group 2: Political and Legal Challenges - Trump's opponents have reacted strongly against his executive actions, with plans to challenge them in court, indicating a deepening partisan divide [2][4] - The article describes the legal battles surrounding the appointment of federal officials, highlighting the complexities and conflicts arising from Trump's appointments [4][5] - The ongoing struggle between the executive branch and the judiciary reflects broader concerns about the erosion of checks and balances in the U.S. political system [2][8] Group 3: Ideological Implications - The article argues that Trump's actions represent a challenge to the post-World War II ideological framework of the U.S. government, aiming to reshape its foundational principles [1][23] - It suggests that Trump's expansion of executive power is not unique but part of a historical trend among U.S. presidents, raising questions about the nature of governance and authority [8][15] - The concept of a "deep state" is explored, indicating a belief that entrenched bureaucratic interests oppose Trump's agenda, complicating his efforts to implement change [16][23] Group 4: Economic Policies and Globalization - Trump's recent policies, such as imposing high fees on H1B visa applications and introducing a "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, reflect a shift in economic strategy towards leveraging foreign capital [17][18] - The article discusses how these policies aim to attract investment while simultaneously asserting national control over economic resources [17][19] - It highlights the tension between traditional neoliberal globalization and Trump's more nationalist economic approach, suggesting a potential reconfiguration of U.S. economic policy [17][19]

环球网消息，美国总统特朗普19日签署公告，将企业为H-1B签证申请人支付的费用提高至10万美元，并称 此举旨在确保美国引进的是高技能、不能被美国人替代的人才。此前H-1B签证费用通常为数千美元。这笔 巨额资金将对亚马逊、微软、Meta、谷歌等科技巨头造成直接冲击，它们一直依赖H-1B项目雇用包括软件 开发工程师在内的外国员工。在刚过去的周末，美国企业陷入一片混乱，紧急叫回正在海外旅行的受影响 员工，评估政策调整产生的影响。尽管白宫20日对新规的适用人群等具体内容作出进一步解释，但有人形 容，整个政策依旧"处处都是问号"。提高H-1B签证费又将对美国的企业竞争力、创新能力、经济增长造成 怎样的长期影响？美国舆论对于这一问题的答案充满不安。与此同时，这项新规又给近期磕磕绊绊的美印 关系增添新问题：按国籍看，印度人是去年获得H-1B 签证最多的人群，占比超过70%。 据印媒21日报道，在一架从旧金山起飞的国际航班上，关于H-1B签证的消息引发机舱内印度旅客的慌乱。（《印 度时报》网站） 如同"在雾中飞行" 根据相关规定，H-1B签证允许美国雇主在找不到合格美国雇员的情况下，雇用具有专业技能的外国员工。 持有者最长可 ...

Core Points - The Trump administration has made significant changes to the U.S. high-skilled immigration policy, introducing a $100,000 annual fee for new H-1B visa applicants and new visa channels like the "Gold Card" and "Platinum Card" [1][2][3] Group 1: Changes to H-1B Visa - A $100,000 fee will be imposed on new H-1B visa applications, a drastic increase from previous fees in the thousands [2] - This fee applies only to new applicants and not to current H-1B holders or those renewing their visas [2] - The new regulations will take effect on September 21, 2025, causing confusion and concern among companies and employees [2] Group 2: New Visa Channels - The "Gold Card" allows individuals to obtain a green card-like status for a payment of $1 million, with a company sponsorship option at $2 million [3] - The "Platinum Card" costs $5 million and offers greater tax benefits, such as exemptions on non-U.S. sourced income [3] - These new channels may partially replace existing employment-based immigration categories like EB-1 and EB-2 [3] Group 3: Impact on Countries - Indian nationals are the most affected, making up approximately 71% of H-1B approvals this year, while Chinese nationals account for about 11.7% [5] - The Indian government and industry organizations have expressed strong concerns about the humanitarian impact on Indian professionals and their families [5] Group 4: Market Reactions and Uncertainties - The implementation of these policies faces legal challenges and requires congressional approval, leading to market uncertainty [7] - Companies are already adjusting hiring strategies and advising employees to return to the U.S. before the policy takes effect [7] Group 5: Sector-Specific Impacts - Tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta, and Apple, which rely heavily on H-1B workers, may face increased labor costs and pressure to shift to domestic hiring or automation [8] - Small tech companies and startups may struggle with the new costs, potentially leading to downsizing or relocation of R&D efforts [8] - Educational institutions and study abroad agencies may see a decline in international student enrollment due to the increased costs associated with H-1B visas [8] Group 6: Opportunities and Risks - Domestic talent development and training institutions may benefit from increased investment as companies seek to hire local talent [9] - Fields like artificial intelligence, automation, and low-code tools may experience growth as companies look to reduce reliance on expensive foreign labor [9] - Immigration consulting services may see a surge in demand as affected individuals seek legal assistance and adjustments [9] Group 7: Short-term and Mid-term Market Effects - Short-term market reactions may include volatility and selling pressure on tech stocks that depend on foreign talent [10] - In the mid-term, a dual-track system may emerge, favoring top talent while forcing lower-skilled positions to be localized or automated [10] Group 8: Investor Strategies - Investors should reassess their portfolios, particularly focusing on companies' abilities to localize hiring and adapt to the new regulations [11] - Monitoring legal challenges to the policy will be crucial, as any delays could present buying opportunities for quality tech stocks [11] - Exploring emerging sectors like training, AI automation, and immigration consulting could yield potential investment opportunities [11] Group 9: Conclusion - The changes signify a shift in U.S. immigration policy towards a wealth-based system, impacting talent structures and competitive advantages in the tech industry [12] - Companies that adapt to these changes by investing in local talent and automation may benefit, while those unprepared could face significant pressures [12]

美国哥伦比亚广播公司报道说，这一计划可能适得其反，因为它或将促使美国公司将工作岗位转移到海 外，尤其是在研发等专业领域，也可能进一步减少有意来美国留学的国际学生。 此外，特朗普当天还签署一项名为"黄金卡"的行政令，称其将为具有非凡能力并愿意支持美国的外国人 开辟一条新的"签证通道"：个人向美国财政部缴纳100万美元，或者由企业赞助缴纳200万美元，该外国 人就能通过这一"黄金卡"项目获得加速审批的签证待遇。 （文章来源：新华社） 美国总统特朗普19日签署公告，将企业为H-1B签证申请人支付的费用提高至10万美元，并称此举旨在 确保美国引进的是高技能、不能被美国人替代的人才。此前，企业为H-1B签证支付的费用通常在数千 美金。 特朗普当天下午在白宫签署这项公告。特朗普说，企业不希望支付10万美元，那雇美国人就可以实现， 并称最新政策"实际上给了企业雇美国人的动力"。 在场的美国商务部长卢特尼克表示，这一费用"按年计算"，适用于首次申请和续签，公司需要做出决 定：这个人是否值得每年向政府支付10万美元？如果不值得，就让他回国，公司应该去雇美国人。卢特 尼克说，移民政策的核心是雇美国人，同时确保引进的都是顶尖人才。 ...