L3级有条件自动驾驶系统
Search documents
自动驾驶挺进L3,改变之下车企要闯几道关?
Xin Jing Bao· 2026-01-30 08:26
随着L3级车型的获批准入,中国汽车产业驶入"智驱"新阶段。"智驱新程 芯动未来"新京报第二十届超 级汽车论坛1月30日下午举办,邀请嘉宾参与《车圈圆桌派》,探讨"自动驾驶挺进L3,带来怎样的改 变?"这一热门话题。 余龙 深蓝汽车软件开发总监 张洋 北汽研究总院智能驾驶资深工程师 李至柔 对外经济贸易大学保险法与社会保障法研究中心研究员 责任之变:主体转移下的风险控制 新京报贝壳财经:从辅助驾驶到L3级有条件自动驾驶,有哪些技术难点? 余龙:一是系统可靠性,二是功能安全和预期功能安全的提升,三是人机接管的边界,四是运行设计域 精细化管理。 L2跨越到L3的本质是辅助驾驶到有条件自动驾驶的突破,意味着责任主体的转移。L2阶段驾驶员是责 任主体,L3阶段责任主体可能是主机厂、系统供应商等。技术难点在于责任主体转移过后,如何把风 险控制到最低。此外,AI决策模型的确立性和可解释性需进一步突破。 张洋:责任归属上,在L2级,责任主体始终是人。而到了L3的限定场景下是系统担责,需要驾驶员介 入时,驾驶员要及时接管车辆,这种责任主体的切换是一个动态、场景化的复杂过程。长尾场景泛化, 在极端天气、道路施工、突发障碍物等低概 ...
辅助驾驶≠自动驾驶,为何反复强调?
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-08-15 00:49
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the release of a draft notification by the State Administration for Market Regulation and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aimed at strengthening the recall and supervision of intelligent connected new energy vehicles, particularly focusing on the promotion and use of Level 2 (L2) driver assistance systems [1] - The draft includes requirements for software upgrades to address current issues and aims to prevent safety hazards associated with over-the-air (OTA) updates, which may conceal defects rather than resolve them [1] - The new regulations are intended to standardize OTA practices among companies, reducing chaotic competition and ensuring that software upgrades are adequately verified before implementation [1] Group 2 - Strengthening driver training is deemed necessary as traditional driving schools focus on conventional driving skills, while future systems require drivers to develop a safety awareness regarding the use of driver assistance and automated systems [2] - The interaction between drivers and Level 3 (L3) conditional automated driving systems necessitates specific skills that drivers must learn, as these systems may prompt drivers to take control of the vehicle [4] - China possesses significant advantages in advancing towards higher levels of automation (L3, L4, L5), including a comprehensive supply chain for intelligent connected new energy vehicles and a rich talent pool of engineers in the field [5][6] Group 3 - The competitive nature of the Chinese automotive market fosters rapid technological iteration, positioning the country to potentially lead in future technological developments [6] - The stability of policies regarding new energy and intelligent connected vehicles in China contrasts with other countries, allowing for sustained progress in the automotive industry [6]
新闻1+1丨辅助驾驶≠自动驾驶,为何反复强调?
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-08-14 22:24
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the release of a draft notification by the State Administration for Market Regulation and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aimed at strengthening the recall, production consistency supervision, and standardized promotion of intelligent connected new energy vehicles [1] - The draft notification specifically addresses the need to regulate the promotion and use of Level 2 (L2) driver assistance systems by car manufacturers, which is expected to play a significant role in ensuring safety [1] - The document includes requirements for software upgrades, targeting current issues related to the potential concealment of defects through Over-The-Air (OTA) updates by companies [1][3] Group 2 - There is a necessity to enhance driver training, as traditional driving schools focus on conventional driving skills, while future systems require drivers to develop a safety awareness regarding the use of driver assistance and autonomous driving systems [4] - The interaction between the driver and the system in Level 3 (L3) conditional autonomous driving systems will require drivers to master new skills, such as responding to takeover prompts during assisted driving [6] - China possesses significant advantages in the development of L3, L4, and L5 autonomous driving technologies, including a complete industrial chain for intelligent connected new energy vehicles and a rich talent pool of engineers [7][9]