L3级有条件自动驾驶系统

Search documents
辅助驾驶≠自动驾驶,为何反复强调?
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-08-15 00:49
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the release of a draft notification by the State Administration for Market Regulation and the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aimed at strengthening the recall and supervision of intelligent connected new energy vehicles, particularly focusing on the promotion and use of Level 2 (L2) driver assistance systems [1] - The draft includes requirements for software upgrades to address current issues and aims to prevent safety hazards associated with over-the-air (OTA) updates, which may conceal defects rather than resolve them [1] - The new regulations are intended to standardize OTA practices among companies, reducing chaotic competition and ensuring that software upgrades are adequately verified before implementation [1] Group 2 - Strengthening driver training is deemed necessary as traditional driving schools focus on conventional driving skills, while future systems require drivers to develop a safety awareness regarding the use of driver assistance and automated systems [2] - The interaction between drivers and Level 3 (L3) conditional automated driving systems necessitates specific skills that drivers must learn, as these systems may prompt drivers to take control of the vehicle [4] - China possesses significant advantages in advancing towards higher levels of automation (L3, L4, L5), including a comprehensive supply chain for intelligent connected new energy vehicles and a rich talent pool of engineers in the field [5][6] Group 3 - The competitive nature of the Chinese automotive market fosters rapid technological iteration, positioning the country to potentially lead in future technological developments [6] - The stability of policies regarding new energy and intelligent connected vehicles in China contrasts with other countries, allowing for sustained progress in the automotive industry [6]