Workflow
Zhong Yang Ji Wei Guo Jia Jian Wei Wang Zhan
icon
Search documents
青海省教育厅原一级巡视员孙立明被开除党籍和公职
经查,孙立明身为党员领导干部,丧失理想信念,背弃初心使命,履行全面从严治党主体责任不力;无 视中央八项规定精神,违规收受礼品、礼金,接受可能影响公正执行公务的宴请,借用管理服务对象车 辆;违背组织原则,在干部职务晋升工作中为他人谋取利益,不如实报告个人有关事项;干预和插手工 程项目承发包,在推动项目实施工作中失职失责,造成不良影响;将公权力作为谋取私利的工具,大搞 权钱交易,利用职务便利为他人在工程项目承揽等方面谋利,非法收受巨额财物。 中央纪委国家监委网站讯 据青海省纪委监委消息:经中共青海省委批准,青海省纪委监委对青海省教 育厅原一级巡视员孙立明严重违纪违法问题进行了立案审查调查。 (青海省纪委监委) 孙立明严重违反党的政治纪律、组织纪律、廉洁纪律和工作纪律,构成严重职务违法并涉嫌受贿犯罪, 且在党的十八大后不收敛、不收手,性质严重,影响恶劣,应予严肃处理。依据《中国共产党纪律处分 条例》《中华人民共和国监察法》《中华人民共和国公职人员政务处分法》等有关规定,经中共青海省 纪委常委会会议研究并报中共青海省委批准,决定给予孙立明开除党籍处分;由青海省监委给予其开除 公职处分;收缴其违纪违法所得;将其涉嫌犯罪 ...
河南省驻马店市人大常委会原党组副书记、副主任、一级巡视员贾迎战接受纪律审查和监察调查
中央纪委国家监委网站讯 据河南省纪委监委消息:驻马店市人大常委会原党组副书记、副主任、一级 巡视员贾迎战涉嫌严重违纪违法,目前正接受河南省纪委监委纪律审查和监察调查。 (河南省纪委监委) ...
天津:发挥纪检监察工作联络站作用 助力提升基层监督质效
Core Viewpoint - The establishment of grassroots disciplinary inspection and supervision work liaison stations is aimed at enhancing supervision effectiveness and addressing urgent issues faced by the public, thereby increasing their sense of gain and happiness [1] Group 1: Establishment and Functionality of Liaison Stations - The disciplinary inspection work liaison stations are set up by township (street) disciplinary inspection organizations in villages (communities) to serve as effective platforms for public supervision [1] - Over 5,000 villages (communities) in the city have established these liaison stations, which are led by village (community) disciplinary committee secretaries [1] - The stations play a crucial role in promoting party policies, collecting information on integrity, and supervising problem reporting [1] Group 2: Community Engagement and Problem Resolution - In the Beichen District, the liaison station collected over 30 resident suggestions regarding community issues such as damaged parking spaces and potholes, leading to the creation of a problem list [2] - The station facilitated the initiation of multiple improvement projects, including parking space renovations and road repairs, while ensuring thorough supervision of funding and construction quality [2] - After project completion, the liaison station organized satisfaction surveys with resident representatives to ensure that community needs were met [2] Group 3: Focus on Key Areas and Integrity Issues - The liaison station in the Hedong District focused on critical areas such as low-income support and disability subsidies, identifying issues of non-compliance and corruption [3] - The station uncovered two cases of fraudulent low-income support applications and reported them to the relevant authorities, resulting in disciplinary actions against four staff members [3] - The station also emphasized the importance of policy education and integrity culture, organizing activities to promote these values within the community [3]
慎微守底线 小节见初心
Group 1 - The core message emphasizes the importance of maintaining integrity and discipline among party members, highlighting that small actions reflect larger principles and character [1][2]. - It stresses the need for vigilance and adherence to regulations, suggesting that understanding the real situation requires more than just listening to reports [2]. - The article advocates for a proactive approach in addressing issues, encouraging officials to engage directly with communities rather than relying solely on formalities [2]. Group 2 - The content underscores the significance of building immunity against corruption and the necessity of strict self-discipline among officials [2]. - It illustrates the importance of transparency and accountability in governance, suggesting that superficial engagement is insufficient for genuine understanding [2]. - The narrative promotes a culture of responsibility and ethical behavior, urging officials to prioritize integrity over personal gain [1][2].
三堂会审丨违反廉洁纪律和挪用公款相关问题分析
Core Points - The article discusses the case of Huang, a former official, who is accused of multiple violations of discipline and law, including bribery and embezzlement, while serving in various government positions [4][5][6] - The case highlights the misuse of power by officials to benefit relatives and associates, raising concerns about corruption and the integrity of public service [8][10] Summary by Sections Case Background - Huang served as the Party Secretary and Director of the Land and Resources Bureau in A City, and as Vice Chairman of the B District Political Consultative Conference, retiring in May 2022 [4] - From 1991 to 2022, Huang allegedly used his position to benefit relatives in project contracting and material sales [5] Violations and Charges - Huang is accused of accepting bribes totaling over 22.89 million RMB from 2002 to 2022, leveraging his official capacity to assist his brother and associates in business dealings [5] - In 2015, Huang and another official conspired to misappropriate 20 million RMB of public funds, which were not returned, indicating a serious breach of trust [5][6] Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The investigation began in May 2023, leading to Huang's detention and subsequent legal actions, including expulsion from the Party and loss of retirement benefits [6] - By March 2025, Huang was sentenced to 13 years and 6 months in prison for bribery and embezzlement, with a fine imposed [6] Analysis of Misconduct - Huang's actions are characterized as a clear violation of integrity, as he used his authority to secure contracts for his son and brother, undermining fair competition [10] - The article emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between legitimate assistance to relatives and corrupt practices, with Huang's case illustrating the latter [17] Implications for Governance - The case serves as a reminder of the need for stringent oversight and accountability in public service to prevent the misuse of power for personal gain [8][10] - It highlights the ongoing challenges in combating corruption within government ranks, particularly regarding nepotism and favoritism [8][10]
村干部能否构成滥用职权罪?
Core Viewpoint - The case discusses the legal implications of a village official's abuse of power in the context of public property and compensation, highlighting differing opinions on whether the actions constitute a crime under the law [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Classification of Actions - There are three opinions regarding the classification of Chen's actions: 1. Chen and Pan are co-conspirators in embezzlement due to Chen's facilitation of Pan's fraudulent claims [2]. 2. Pan committed fraud independently, while Chen's actions, though improper, do not constitute complicity in fraud due to lack of intent to illegally possess public property [2]. 3. Chen, while assisting the government, can be considered a public official and his actions amount to abuse of power, leading to significant losses for the state [2][3]. Group 2: Definition of Public Officials - Village officials can be recognized as public officials when assisting government functions, as per legal interpretations that include those acting on behalf of state agencies [3][4]. - The case illustrates that Chen, as a village party secretary and committee director, was acting under government delegation, thus qualifying as a public official [4]. Group 3: Subjective Intent and Actions - Chen lacked the intent to illegally possess public property, as his actions were driven by personal relationships rather than a desire for personal gain [5][6]. - The absence of a conspiracy to embezzle public funds between Chen and Pan indicates that Chen's actions were not criminally conspiratorial [5][6]. Group 4: Objective Consequences of Actions - Chen's failure to properly audit compensation claims led to significant financial losses for the state, amounting to over 4 million yuan in fraudulent compensation [1][6]. - The abuse of power manifested through Chen's negligence in fulfilling his duties, resulting in substantial harm to public interests [6].
把法规制度建设贯穿纪检监察工作全过程各环节
加强党内法规制度建设是全面从严治党的长远之策、根本之策。黑龙江省齐齐哈尔市纪委监委坚持把法 规制度建设贯穿纪检监察工作全过程、各环节,持续构建内容科学、程序严密、配套完备、运行有效的 纪检监察法规制度体系,为推进监督执纪执法工作高质量发展提供坚强保障。 以"严"为标尺,着力提升监督执纪执法权威。一是严格督导抓执行。围绕党章党规、宪法法律赋予的职 责任务,坚持市县乡三级监督执纪执法工作一体推进、一体落实,督促指导全市纪检监察系统严格执行 《中国共产党纪律检查机关监督执纪工作规则》等有关制度规定,强化程序标准和工作规范。严格措施 使用和证据收集,扎实推进案件查办、案件审理和移送审查起诉等工作,有力推动执纪执法有序对接、 相互衔接。二是调研评估找不足。深入基层调研,了解掌握制度机制层面的短板弱项,组织开展调研评 估和自查自评47次。结合工作实际,对监察法及《纪检监察机关派驻机构工作规则》实施情况等开展执 行评估检查,形成问题清单和意见建议,为精准施策提供依据。三是加强检查促提升。充分发挥纪检监 察建议纠偏和治理作用,从优化制发、督办、检查到整改全链条管理机制出发,形成《关于推进纪检监 察建议工作的意见》,建立常态化 ...
明纪释法丨准确认定处理漠视、损害群众利益行为
重庆市秀山土家族苗族自治县纪委监委紧盯联系服务群众中不担当不作为等违反中央八项规定精神突出问题,深 入田间地头、生产车间、服务窗口等基层一线开展监督,压紧压实职能部门、乡镇(街道)相关责任,推动党员 干部改进工作作风,主动对接群众诉求、积极回应群众期盼,以作风建设实际成效守护群众切身利益。图为该县 纪检监察干部在峨溶镇峨溶居委会大坪茶园走访了解有关情况。 胡程 摄 民生无小事,枝叶总关情。习近平总书记强调,"我们要坚持把人民群众的小事当作自己的大事,从人民群众关心 的事情做起,从让人民群众满意的事情做起,带领人民不断创造美好生活",指出"要始终把人民放在心中最高位 置,站稳人民立场,厚植为民情怀,把握新形势下群众工作的特点和规律,带头走好群众路线,把心系群众、情 系百姓体现到履职尽责全过程各方面,着力保障和改善民生,及时回应人民群众合理诉求,切实把好事办好、实 事办实、难事办妥"。2023年修订的《中国共产党纪律处分条例》(以下简称《条例》)第一百二十六条对不作 为、乱作为、慢作为、假作为等漠视、损害群众利益行为及其适用的处分种类和幅度作出了规定。 ●《中国共产党纪律处分条例》 第一百二十六条 有下列行为之一 ...
充分发挥思想政治工作引领作用
强化系统性。思想政治工作是事理与情理交融的综合性、系统性、复杂性工作。审查调查过程中,要求 办案人员既要综合施策、多措并举,将政策运用与心理把握、方法与情感融于一体,又要懂得排兵布 阵、摆布得当,准确把握审查调查普遍规律和个案特点,统筹运用党性教育、政策感召、证据支撑、亲 情感化、纪法教育等方法,根据谈话进程把握节奏,适时变换策略,做到"多把钥匙开一把锁",敦促审 查调查对象真诚悔过。 思想政治工作是党的优良传统、鲜明特色和突出政治优势。中共中央印发的《中国共产党思想政治工作 条例》指出,全党必须深刻认识思想政治工作的极端重要性,将思想政治工作贯穿于党的全部工作之 中,充分发挥思想政治工作的引领作用。山东省青岛市李沧区纪委监委坚决用好思想政治工作传家宝, 坚持"惩前毖后、治病救人"方针,将思想政治工作贯穿审查调查始终,努力实现政治效果、纪法效果、 社会效果有机统一。 突出政治性。始终坚持政治引领,建立区纪委监委主要负责人靠前指挥机制,加强对审查调查工作尤其 是查办重大案件的组织领导。严格落实领导首谈、心理疏导等工作要求,向审查调查对象阐释政策、指 明出路,确保思想政治工作政治性、政策性和权威性。注重统筹谋划, ...
我说变化丨公务接待清清爽爽
我干了6年接待工作,以前每逢上级单位来人,光是准备纸质公函就需要大半天,要提前跟对方确认人 数、行程,再拿着申请单逐级签字,最后到党政办盖章。有时遇上临时加人的情况,只能先安排接待, 回头再补办公函。还有些单位拿着"空白公函"来,具体接待内容全靠口头说。这类不规范的情况让我们 基层干部负担更重,有时一天要应付三四拨人,办公室和食堂两头跑。 晏淑芬,江西省宜丰县棠浦镇党政办干部。 这两年,县里开始推行电子公函,规范公务接待管理。现在公务人员出差,在"赣政通"上填好出差事 由、人数,审批通过就能生成带二维码的电子公函。我们接待时扫扫二维码,是谁来、来干啥、待几 天,一目了然,还能自动生成回执单,位置信息都清清楚楚。同事们都打趣说,这电子公函就是"铁规 矩"的化身,把住了接待关。前不久,县纪委监委联合县财政局开展"三公"经费及"电子公函"管理制度 执行情况检查,通报在全县范围内发现的超标准公务接待、电子公函审批手续不完备、一函多餐等15个 问题,还专门提及县民政局有3名工作人员前往澄塘镇开展复核工作时,未按规定执行电子公函流程。 这不仅是给涉事单位提了醒,也让我们更清楚制度执行不能有半点马虎,为后续进一步规范制度执 ...