软件系统中最大的变数，向来是人类。"删库跑路"虽是老梗，但现实中依然时有发生。只是相比段 子里的"技术性脱身"，现实往往更狼狈——操作不够高明，因一时冲动反倒误了终身。 近日，据外媒 The Register 报道，一名 IT 工程师因对公司停职决定心怀不满，在收到通知的短短 几个小时后就对公司发起"报复行动"，最终不仅职位没保住，还落了个被法院判入狱 7 个月零 14 天的结果。 由 DALL·E 3 生成 01、被停职后火速"复仇" 据英国西约克郡警方披露，这名男子名叫 Mohammed Umar Taj，现年 31 岁。他曾在哈德斯菲尔 德一家公司担任 IT 技术人员，并拥有系统高权限账户。 转自：CSDN（ID：CSDNnews） 据报道，Taj 在利兹皇家法院已认罪，承认自己未经授权干扰公司计算机系统的正常运行。而警方在 后续调查中，还找到了他实施攻击的操作记录和通话内容，里面甚至提到他"自豪地谈论"自己的攻 击过程。 而人需要为自己犯的错"买单"， Taj 于 6 月 26 日在利兹刑事法庭被判处七个月零 14 天的监禁。 02、无独有偶 事实上，在 IT 圈，这类"离职报复型"事件并不罕见。 据 ...

以下文章来源于MaxAIBox ，作者Max MaxAIBox . MaxAIBox.com 汇集优秀 AI 工具，探索 AI 无限可能 近日，AI 智能体平台 Manus 被曝进行裁员，其中国区约 120 名员工中，40 多名核心技术人员转岗至新加坡 总部，其余员工面临裁员优化，裁员补偿标准为 N+3 或 2N。 Manus 表示，公司将专注于核心业务发展，继续加大研发和投入力度，以应对市场的挑战并保持竞争优势。 "脱籍"之路 Manus 是由初创公司 Butterfly Effect（蝴蝶效应）于今年 3 月推出的 AI 助手，当时发布的早期预览版被称 作"全球首款通用智能体产品"，用户仅需提供简单指令，Manus 即可自动完成复杂任务。 由于在当时需要内测邀请码才能体验 Manus，一度在社交平台上掀起"求邀请码"的热潮，甚至在闲鱼平台开价 10 万一个。 今年 6 月，Manus 产品负责人张涛曾公开表示公司总部已从中国迁至新加坡。在当月，Manus 的相关广告就 已经出现在新加坡公交站台以及地铁站中，并已在新加坡展开招聘，岗位包括 AI 工程师、数据科学家、软件 开发经理等，薪资每月 8000~16 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights a tragic case of a 34-year-old outsourced worker who suffered a sudden brain hemorrhage and passed away, raising concerns about workplace health and safety [1] - It emphasizes that the "Work Injury Insurance Regulations" classify sudden death from illness during work hours as a work-related injury, suggesting the company should assist the deceased's family in applying for recognition [1] - The article points out that cases of sudden death among technical workers are common, linking factors like overwork and late-night work to health risks such as brain hemorrhages [2] Group 2 - The article advises IT professionals to be cautious about their health, stressing that work is never-ending and that life is irreplaceable [2] - It suggests that companies should promote a healthier work-life balance to prevent such tragic incidents in the future [2]

Core Viewpoint - Huawei's Pangu technology team publicly denied recent plagiarism allegations, asserting their originality and integrity in their work [1]. Group 1 - On July 5, Huawei's Pangu technology team issued a statement refuting recent plagiarism rumors [1]. - On July 6, a document claiming to be written by an internal employee of the Pangu team sparked significant online discussion [2]. - The document was also published on GitHub, gaining considerable attention with over 10,500 stars and 347 issues reported as of July 10, 2025 [4].

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving Huawei's executive Yu Chengdong, who was accused of "sleeping while driving," has sparked significant public interest and discussion regarding the safety of assisted driving technologies and the need for clearer regulations in the industry [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Background - On May 26, a video surfaced showing Yu Chengdong driving a Wanjie M8 with his head down for nearly 20 seconds, leading to accusations of "sleeping while driving" or being distracted [2]. - The Wanjie customer service responded by stating that the M8 is equipped with L2 level assisted driving, which requires the driver to keep their hands on the wheel and eyes on the road [4]. - Shenzhen traffic police emphasized that such behavior is not permitted and that drivers are responsible for any accidents that may occur under these circumstances [4]. Group 2: Yu Chengdong's Response - On July 8, Yu Chengdong clarified that he was looking at his phone, not sleeping, and explained that he mistakenly thought the driver of a new Wanjie M9 was a Huawei employee [4]. - He recounted that he opened the window to respond to the other driver, unaware that he was being filmed, and subsequently went to the police station to self-report, resulting in a fine and points deduction on his license [4]. Group 3: Future Aspirations - Yu Chengdong expressed a desire for the implementation of legal regulations that would allow for the arrival of L3 level intelligent driving, enabling drivers to safely engage in activities like sleeping or using their phones while the vehicle manages driving tasks [5].

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between Linus Torvalds and Bcachefs maintainer Kent Overstreet has escalated to the point where Linus threatens to remove the Bcachefs file system from the Linux kernel due to fundamental disagreements in development philosophy [1][2]. Group 1: Conflict Background - Linus expressed dissatisfaction with Kent's request to merge a new feature patch called "journal-rewind" during the 6.16-rc phase, which traditionally only allows bug fixes [2][3]. - Kent's patch involved over a thousand lines of code and was deemed a new feature, violating the established rules of the merge window [2][3]. Group 2: Escalation of Dispute - The exchange between Linus and Kent became increasingly heated, with Kent responding to Linus's criticism in a confrontational manner, suggesting that Linus was being unreasonable [4][5]. - Kent emphasized the unique risks associated with file systems, arguing that issues could lead to irreversible data loss, unlike other kernel modules [4]. Group 3: Resolution and Future Implications - Despite temporarily accepting the controversial pull request, Linus indicated that he would likely sever ties with Bcachefs during the 6.17 merge window, stating that he no longer found it meaningful to be involved [5].

转自：CSDN（ID：CSDNnews） 如果你是一位初创公司创始人，历经千挑万选终于招来一位面试表现堪称"神级"的工程师，但入职 没几天 ： 这不是 什么 杜撰 剧本，而是 近日 一起 真实发生在硅谷的离谱事件。 这名 软件工程师名叫 Soham Parekh， 来自印度 。 在过去一年间，他先后同时为多家初创公 司"打工"， 最多时一人兼任四份全职工程师工作，薪资总和高达数十万美元 —— 事件 一经 曝 光， 就 在硅谷引发 了 轩然大波 。 一场爆料引爆硅谷 这场风暴的起点，是前 Mixpanel CEO、知名创业者 Suhail Doshi 在 X（原 Twitter）上发布的 一则"公 共安全警示（PSA）"： "有个叫 Soham Parekh 的人（在印度）同时为 3-4 家初创公司工作，他专挑 YC 创业公司下 手。我第一周就开除了他，并明确告诉他不要再撒谎骗人。但一年过去了，他依旧故技重施、毫无 悔意，别再给他找借口了。" 这条信息很快引起 广泛关注，因为 Suhail Doshi 不仅点名道姓，还贴出了 Soham Parekh 的简 历，并指责其履历造假： " 可能 90% 都是假的，而 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing internal anti-corruption efforts within major internet companies, particularly focusing on Bilibili's recent internal report regarding serious misconduct by a senior executive, Zhang Zaimin, and similar actions taken by other companies like ByteDance and Perfect World [1][4][6]. Group 1: Bilibili's Internal Anti-Corruption Measures - Bilibili reported that Zhang Zaimin, former General Manager of the Game Cooperation Department, was arrested for serious job-related crimes during her tenure [1]. - The company emphasized the importance of compliance with national laws and encouraged employees and partners to report any misconduct, assuring confidentiality for whistleblowers [2]. - Zhang Zaimin had a significant role in Bilibili's game business, which saw a notable revenue increase of 76% year-on-year in Q1, reaching 1.73 billion yuan [3]. Group 2: Broader Industry Trends - There is a noticeable trend of heightened anti-corruption measures across the internet industry, with multiple companies taking action against internal misconduct [4]. - ByteDance recently dismissed two employees for failing to declare a conflict of interest and providing false statements during an investigation [5][6]. - Perfect World announced an internal investigation revealing serious violations of company policies, leading to criminal charges against several employees and suppliers [6].

但随后，华为盘古大模型（Pangu Pro MoE 72B）被指与阿里巴巴通义千问 Qwen-2.5 14B 模型参 数结构"惊人一致"，引发了关于技术原创性与开源合规性的讨论。 6 月 30 日，华为公司宣布开源盘古大模型（Pangu Pro MoE 72B）和基于昇腾的模型推理技术，并 对外公布相关研究论文。对此，华为表示，此举是华为践行昇腾生态战略的又一关键举措，推动大 模型技术的研究与创新发展，加速推进人工智能在千行百业的应用与价值创造。 质疑的提出 7 月 4 日，一项发布于 GitHub 的研究指出，华为盘古 Pro MoE 模型采用了 LLM - Fingerprint（模 型指纹技术），与阿里通义千问 Qwen-2.5 14B 模型的注意力参数分布存在高度相似性，平均相关 性达 0.927，显著超出模型间正常差异范围，指向"非独立开发"的可能性。 - EOF - 推荐阅读 点击标题可跳转 1、 DeepSeek 对明星道歉上热搜！网友：首次看到 AI 被摁头道歉，笑不活了 2、 腾讯：鸿蒙架构特殊，微信适配必须从零重写代码 7 月 4 日，盘古大模型团队在 GitHub 中进行了回应，否认抄袭 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and progress of developing the WeChat version for the HarmonyOS, emphasizing the need to rebuild the application from scratch due to the unique architecture of the HarmonyOS [2][3]. Group 1: Development Challenges - The WeChat HarmonyOS version cannot directly migrate existing features due to the special architecture of the HarmonyOS, requiring a complete rewrite from the ground up [3][4]. - The historical codebase of WeChat, which has accumulated over more than a decade, complicates the development process as it lacks sufficient documentation, making it difficult for developers to understand and modify the existing code [5]. - The instability and rapid iteration of the HarmonyOS, including frequent changes to API interfaces, further hinder the development progress, necessitating additional efforts to adapt to these changes [6][7]. Group 2: Development Experience - The podcast features insights from the WeChat HarmonyOS development team, discussing their experiences and the rationale behind creating a new version of WeChat for HarmonyOS [10][12]. - The team highlights the necessity of rebuilding core functionalities, such as chat and Moments, which are perceived as basic but require significant effort to reconstruct [16]. - The collaboration between the WeChat team and Huawei's team is described as high-frequency and efficient, addressing the challenges faced during the migration process [16].