"最近新接手了老项目升级维护，刚刚收到反馈说有个页面用户说选不了 2027 年以后的时间。然后我看到了下 面的东西……" 网友回复 - EOF - 推荐阅读 点击标题可跳转 1、 宇宙厂海外员工晒 7 点下班，国内同事表示才开始晚班，对方回怼"我们效率高"，这边瞬间气炸了… 2、 "同事被裁了，私人物品全带走，只留下一堆荣誉奖杯"。网友：随便丢，都是骗打工人卖命的 3、 "不想搞 IT 了！微软工程师凌晨猝死，警醒 33 岁手握 300 万美元的程序员：我能自由退休吗？" 网友爆料 l 4、 "辛辛苦苦卖命，替公司裁员约 200 人，给公司省了 150 多万，最后我也被裁了" ...

【导读】：一位拥有 17 年经验的高级全栈开发者，刚为初创公司做出盈利项目，就因暂助其他团队埋下"祸 根"。他发现团队存在 git force push、任务管理混乱等问题，还找出会泄露密钥的安全漏洞。 即便他给出修复方案，却遭后端开发指责，更被 CTO 以"给同事压力大"为由开除。明明句句属实，却被贴 上"外行"标签，这样遭遇，引发无数人共鸣。 他在 Reddit 的网名是 WorstDeveloperEver（"最烂开发没有之一"，下面就他"烂哥"吧），可见对其遭遇非常 生气的。他的奇特遭遇引发热议。 误入某创业公司 我在一家小型初创公司工作了两个多月。作为一名拥有 17 年工作经验的高级全栈开发，我负责的项目与团队 其他项目相互独立。 公司要求我从零开始搭建这个项目，且尽量减少依赖，最终整个项目的体积控制在了 300KB 以内。其中包含 200KB 经过优化的 webp 格式图片和 100KB 的打包文件，这是一款 SaaS 产品。 CTO 对这个项目非常满意，上线后很快就开始盈利，还让我接手下一个新项目的开发。我对项目进行了全面 优化，最终所有性能指标都达到了 100 分。 在此期间，由于新项目的设计 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the Xiaomi SU7 vehicle, which reportedly drove away on its own, has sparked significant public discussion and scrutiny regarding the vehicle's safety and technology [1][2]. Incident Summary - On September 30, a Xiaomi SU7 owner in Weihai, Shandong, shared a video showing their car driving away unattended after being locked for six minutes [3]. - The owner contacted Xiaomi's customer service, which suggested that a possible accidental touch on the phone could have triggered the vehicle's movement. However, the owner disputed this explanation, asserting that they did not touch the phone and questioned how the car could have turned left without complex input [4]. Company Response - On October 3, Xiaomi issued a statement confirming that a special task force was established to investigate the incident. They collaborated with the user to verify data through authorized access to the vehicle's backend and mobile app logs [6]. - The investigation concluded that the vehicle's backend data matched the operation logs from the user's iPhone 15 Pro Max, indicating that a parking assist command was issued, which activated the vehicle's movement [6]. - Xiaomi acknowledged a mix-up in communication regarding the device model during customer service interactions, which led to misunderstandings. They apologized for the confusion and committed to improving their service processes [7]. User Feedback - The involved car owner publicly confirmed the accuracy of the information provided by Xiaomi and expressed gratitude for the company's professional handling of the situation [8]. - Online comments reflected mixed sentiments, with some users criticizing Xiaomi for potential oversight in understanding device logs and others defending the company's response [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses incidents of discrimination against disabled individuals in the hiring process, highlighting a case where a candidate was dismissed on her first day despite passing multiple interviews, leading to public outcry and corporate apologies from the involved companies [1][3][5]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A female candidate shared her experience of being advised to resign on her first day at Didi after successfully passing four rounds of interviews, which sparked significant public attention [1]. - Another candidate, known as "Xiao Zhi Qian," recounted a similar experience with Deli, where she was also dismissed after passing three interviews, prompting her to speak out [1][3]. Group 2: Corporate Response - Deli's president, Chen Xueqiang, expressed shock upon learning about the incident and issued a formal apology, stating that the actions were inconsistent with the company's values [3]. - Following the public backlash, Deli released an official apology statement on September 30, 2023 [5]. Group 3: Legal and Social Implications - "Xiao Zhi Qian" indicated that her dismissal constituted an illegal termination of the labor contract, which could warrant compensation under labor laws, although she stated she had not received any compensation [8]. - The Ninghai County Disabled Persons' Federation announced plans to contact Deli Group to follow up on the incident and protect the rights of disabled individuals [10]. Group 4: Public Reaction - Online comments reflected a mix of support for the candidates and criticism of the companies involved, with some users expressing a commitment to boycott Deli products [11]. - The incidents have encouraged discussions about the rights of disabled individuals in the workplace, with calls for greater courage in advocating for their rights [12].

Core Viewpoint - A clothing store owner in Guangdong is being sued by Xiaomi for trademark infringement due to the use of the letter "M" in her brand logo, which is claimed to be similar to Xiaomi's branding [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Dispute - The clothing brand, named "MiHou," has a logo that is a play on the pinyin abbreviation of its name, which has drawn Xiaomi's legal attention [5]. - The store owner received a court notice consisting of approximately 300 pages, indicating the severity of the lawsuit and the potential consequences of losing [3]. - There is public sentiment that the lawsuit may be perceived as an example of a larger company bullying a smaller one, although some observers believe the logo's similarities warrant Xiaomi's actions [5][7]. Group 2: Brand Identity and Market Perception - The store's branding primarily features red, which the owner argues differentiates it from Xiaomi's branding [1]. - Some online commentators have noted that the phonetic similarity of "MiHou" to "米猴" (Mi Hou) could be seen as an intentional play on words, further complicating the legal situation [8]. - Xiaomi's logo underwent a significant redesign that reportedly cost around 2 million, which highlights the company's investment in its brand identity [8][10].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding Xiaomi's promotional posters highlights a common industry practice of using small print disclaimers, which has drawn criticism from consumers and commentators alike [5][7][12]. Group 1: Xiaomi's Promotional Strategy - Xiaomi's recent launch of the 17 series featured promotional slogans such as "King of Backlight" and "King of Small Size Battery Life," but included small print stating these were design goals rather than definitive claims [2][5]. - The use of small print has been perceived as a "word game," leading to public backlash and accusations of misleading advertising [5][8]. Group 2: Industry Practices - Industry figure Luo Yonghao commented that the use of small print disclaimers is a widespread practice across various sectors, not unique to Xiaomi [7][12]. - Other industries have similar practices, such as instant noodles showcasing appealing images while including disclaimers about the actual product [13]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - Legal experts have raised concerns that such advertising practices could mislead consumers who do not notice the small print, potentially violating advertising regulations [14][15]. - It is emphasized that advertisements should be truthful and not misleading, ensuring that product performance claims are accurately represented [15].

Core Viewpoint - Huawei has announced that Meng Wanzhou will serve as the rotating chairperson from October 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026, overseeing the board of directors and its executive committee [1]. Summary by Sections Leadership and Background - Meng Wanzhou graduated from Huazhong University of Science and Technology with a master's degree and joined Huawei in 1993. She has held various positions including International Accounting Director, CFO of Huawei Hong Kong, and President of the Accounting Management Department. Currently, she serves as Vice Chairperson, rotating chairperson, and CFO [3]. - Since 2003, Meng has led the establishment of a unified financial organization structure, processes, systems, and IT platforms globally at Huawei. From 2007 to 2014, she implemented the Integrated Financial Services (IFS) reform, embedding refined management into Huawei's growth DNA [3]. Financial Transformation and Digitalization - In 2014, Meng spearheaded Huawei's data transformation, creating a comprehensive data management system that turned data into a strategic asset. She also initiated projects for financial reporting internal control, consistency in accounts, fund management, and tax management, enabling the finance organization to become a partner and value integrator for business [3]. - From 2019 onwards, aligning with the company's strategic foresight and long-term development plans, Meng constructed an overall blueprint for financial digitalization. This includes the development of risk probes and risk control models for contactless risk management, an agile management system based on data and AI algorithms for intelligent decision-making, and an integrated command platform for collaborative operations in key financial tasks [3][4]. Achievements - Under her leadership, Huawei's finance organization has become a world leader in digitalization and intelligence, providing a solid operational foundation that supports the company's strategic goals in the new era [4].

Core Viewpoint - Australia is implementing new regulations starting December 10, 2025, prohibiting children under 16 from using social platforms deemed harmful, which may include GitHub among others [6][15]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Australian eSafety agency is assessing various platforms, including GitHub, to determine if they fit the legal definition of a "social network" [9]. - Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and X are already on the list of those considered potentially harmful to children [6][15]. - eSafety has initiated a self-assessment tool for around 100 platforms to evaluate their compliance with the new regulations [15]. Group 2: Public Reaction - The decision has sparked ridicule online, with users questioning the classification of GitHub as a dangerous platform for children [11][12]. - Some users speculate that the ban may be a method to control access to open-source tools that could be used to bypass censorship [14]. Group 3: GitHub's Functionality - GitHub is primarily a platform for programmers to store, share code, and collaborate on projects, but it also has social features like commenting and image sharing [10]. - There are concerns about the presence of malicious software and phishing tools on GitHub, which could pose risks to children [10].

Core Viewpoint - DeepSeek has released its experimental version DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp, which significantly improves long text training and inference efficiency while maintaining output quality compared to its predecessor V3.1-Terminus [5][6]. Group 1: Model Performance - DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp introduces DeepSeek Sparse Attention (DSA), achieving a 2-3 times increase in long text inference speed and a 30%-40% reduction in memory usage, along with a 50% improvement in training efficiency [5]. - In benchmark tests, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp performs comparably to V3.1-Terminus, with scores of 85.0 in MMLU-Pro and a slight improvement in AIME 2025, scoring 89.3 compared to 88.4 [5][6]. Group 2: Pricing Adjustments - Due to the reduced service costs associated with the new model, DeepSeek has lowered its API pricing by over 50%, with input prices dropping from 0.5 yuan to 0.2 yuan per million tokens for cache hits, and from 4 yuan to 2 yuan for cache misses. Output prices have decreased from 12 yuan to 3 yuan per million tokens [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the disconnect between research and development (R&D) teams and the recognition they receive within companies, highlighting a trend where R&D contributions are overlooked in favor of marketing and financing achievements [4]. Group 1: R&D Recognition - Successful R&D projects often lead to celebrations that exclude the engineers and technicians who contributed to the success, indicating a lack of appreciation for their work [1]. - The analogy of a farmer celebrating a harvest without acknowledging the labor of the farm animals illustrates the sentiment that R&D efforts are undervalued [3]. Group 2: Company Culture - Many companies prioritize marketing and financing over R&D, treating R&D personnel as expendable resources rather than integral team members [4]. - The statement "R&D is just a tool for output, while financing is the focus" reflects a broader industry trend where R&D is not seen as a core function [4]. - The culture within these companies suggests a lack of respect for R&D, with the implication that anyone can provide technical guidance, undermining the expertise of R&D professionals [4].