（参考：微博、央视新闻，本文经由 AI 优化） 各位，你们是不是也被涨价打乱了换机、攒机计划呢？你觉得这场涨价潮会持续多久？国产存储能不能扛起替 代大旗？快来评论区聊聊你的看法。 有任何疑问，还可以直接 @元宝 来问哦！ 1 月 18 日，"内存条价格暴涨"的词条又又又又冲上微博热搜榜，这场从 2025 年下半年开始的涨价潮愈演愈 烈。 成本压力已全面传导至终端。联想、戴尔等 PC 厂商多款机型涨价 500~1500 元，小米、vivo 等国产手机新 品涨价 300~600 元，魅族甚至因成本过高取消了新款机型上市计划。存储成本占手机 BOM 比超 35%，商家 直言"下午报价晚上就作废"，不少消费者的攒机、换机计划被迫搁浅。 业内人士表示，这不是短期周期反弹，而是 AI 时代的产业重构，新产能释放至少需要两年，2026 年一季度 存储价格可能再涨 40%-50%。目前国产存储企业正加速扩产，但高端领域仍需时间突破，这场涨价潮或将倒 逼行业加速国产替代。 DDR5 内存半年涨幅超 300%，256G 服务器级内存条单价逼近 6 万元，一盒 100 根的价格堪比上海小户型住 宅，网友直呼"内存比黄金还疯狂"。 ...

2006 年诞生的 jQuery，在 2026 年迎来了它的 20 岁生日，同时也等来了近 10 年的首个大版本更新 —— jQuery 4.0.0 正式上线。 作为曾经统治前端界的"神器"，jQuery 4.0.0 这次彻底甩掉历史包袱，不仅精简了大量遗留代码，移除了 jQuery.isArray 、 jQuery.trim 等一批已弃用的 API，还砍掉了对 IE10 及更旧浏览器的支持。 旧的不去，新的不来，轻装上阵的 jQuery 才配得上现代前端的节奏 。 我去！我去！前端上古神器 jQuery 居然更新了！ 20 年沉淀，一朝焕新，jQuery 从未退场，只是换了种方式陪开发者前行 。 https://blog.jquery.com/2026/01/17/jquery-4-0-0/ 你上一次用 jq 还是啥时候呢？欢迎在评论区留言。有任何问题都可以@元宝 来问咯~ 源码全面迁移到 ES 模块，适配现代构建工具； 新增可信类型与 CSP 支持，让网页更安全； 焦点事件顺序遵循 W3C 规范，结束浏览器兼容乱象； 精简版体积再瘦身，压缩后仅 19.5k 字节，轻便度拉满。 本次更新还有几个核心亮点： ...

2、所谓的"擅离岗位"，不过是培训期没活的时候去茶水间、接个电话，每次都不到 30 分钟，根本不算违规。 上海有个程序员，就因为上班时吃了个外卖、累了趴在桌上眯了会儿，居然被公司以"严重违纪"开除了！ 在微博看到这个新闻时把小蒜都给整无语了，好在最后法院判公司违法，赔了 11 万多。 事情是这样的： 程序员小陈在上海一家外包公司干了 4 年，本来好好的，结果项目一撤，他就被公司发配到了一个宝山区办 公点。 说是培训，其实就是没活干，人事专门盯着监控抓小辫子 。 三个月后，公司突然发难：先是给了他一份书面警告，说他"5 次上班睡觉超过半小时"，紧接着一天内又追加 了"擅离岗位"、"吃外卖"、"用个人电脑"三连口头警告，然后直接把这三个口头警告合并成第二份书面警告， 以"一个月内两次书面警告"为由，把他开除了。 二 小陈不服，先仲裁败诉，又起诉到法院。法院一查监控，直接戳穿了公司的把戏： 1、 监控是用来保安全的，不是用来秋后算账的！ 小陈睡觉的同时，其他同事也在摸鱼小憩，公司之前不 管，现在却只罚他，典型的"选择性执法"。 3、公司倒查几个月的监控，把零散的小事硬凑成"严重违纪"，甚至把同一天的口头警告合并成书 ...

1 月 18 日，小程程在网上多次刷到，腾讯向 GitHub 发函要求下架一批与微信相关的开源工具。 说白了，这就是是一场大厂维权和开发者、用户需求之间的冲突。 到底是怎么回事呢？ 简单说，就是一批程序员在 GitHub 上公开的免费工具，核心功能大多是帮用户导出、查看自己手机里的微信 聊天记录，有的还能清理微信缓存、整理聊天数据。 早在 2025 年 7 月，腾讯就发现了这些工具，当时就给 GitHub 发过通知，说这些项目有问题，但 GitHub 那 会回复说"没看出违反我们的规定"，没把工具下架。 2、" 被投诉的开源项目，违反并诱导他人违反微信服务条款，非法干涉腾讯的合同" 这事就拖到了最近，在 1 月 8 日左右，腾讯直接走了更正式的法律流程：发 DMCA 投诉函 ，要求平台下 架。 腾讯的投诉理由 在发给 GitHub 平台的函件中，腾讯提出了 2 项指控： 1、" 被投诉的开源项目，违反 DMCA 法案第 1201 条 。" 这些非法代码仓库提供的软件代码和文档，允许未经授权提取和解密微信用户的完整聊天记录。这些记录存储在 微信的本地数据库中，腾讯通过使用专有加密算法、独特加密密钥和专有数据库协 ...

Core Viewpoint - Windows 11 has been criticized for high resource usage, strict hardware requirements, and poor performance compared to older versions, with a recent test showing it ranked last in multiple performance metrics [1][35]. Performance Comparison - A YouTuber conducted a comparison test using six generations of Windows on outdated hardware, revealing that Windows 11 consistently performed poorly, even compared to Windows XP and 8.1 [1][35]. - The test utilized a Lenovo ThinkPad X220 from 2012, featuring an Intel Core i5-2520M processor, 8GB of RAM, and a 256GB mechanical hard drive, which inherently favored older systems [3][5]. Boot Speed - Windows 8.1 had the fastest boot time, while Windows 11 was significantly slower, suffering from prolonged loading times even after booting [6][8]. Storage Usage - Windows XP had the lowest storage usage at 18.9GB, while Windows 11 consumed 37.3GB, indicating its bulkiness. Interestingly, Windows 7 and Vista had even higher storage requirements [9]. Memory Management - Windows XP excelled in memory management, using only 0.8GB of RAM when idle, whereas Windows 11 averaged 3.3GB, attributed to numerous background services [11][13]. Browser Performance - In a test of how many browser tabs could be opened, Windows 11 managed only 49 tabs, while Windows 8.1 opened 252 tabs, showcasing a significant performance gap [14][16]. Battery Life and Media Processing - Windows 11 was the first to shut down in battery life tests, while Windows XP had the longest battery life. The differences were minimal, around two minutes [17]. - In audio export tests, Windows 11 ranked fifth, and in video rendering, it again placed last, with Windows 10 taking the top spot [19]. Application Launch Speed - Windows 11 performed poorly in application launch speed tests, ranking last in all five tested applications [21]. Web Browsing and File Transfer - Windows 11 ranked third in web image loading tests but fell to last place in switching to Google images and Microsoft account login pages [24]. - It achieved second place in file transfer tests, only behind Windows 10 [26]. Benchmark Performance - In CPU-Z tests, Windows XP had the best single-core performance, while Windows 7 excelled in multi-core performance. Windows 11 had slightly better single-core results but was underwhelming in multi-core tests [27]. - Windows 11 ranked third in CrystalDiskMark tests, while Windows XP was the top performer [29]. - In Cinebench R10 tests, Windows 8.1 secured second place in single-core performance, while Windows 11 ranked fourth [31]. Overall Summary - Windows 11 did not win any tests and was described as having a "disastrous performance." Windows 8.1 was declared the overall winner, praised for its speed and stability despite previous criticisms [35]. - The testing hardware was outdated, which may not accurately reflect Windows 11's performance on modern systems, particularly with the absence of SSDs, which significantly enhance system performance [35].

1 月 15 日晚间，一张追觅科技内部飞书工作群的截图在网上疯传。一位即将离职业务负责人杨柳，对 CEO 俞浩和同事陈龙冬发出了一连串灵魂拷问，直接把公司内部矛盾摆上了台面。 " 药磕多了？一年超过英伟达，一年超过中国所有车企 30 年未达成的成果？ " 这些辛辣的金句瞬间点燃了全 网。 CEO 的回应：赶超是长期目标 面对这场突如其来的"内部爆破"，俞浩在 1 月 17 日通过微博回应。他解释"百万亿美金市值"是 20 年的长期目 标，并非短期口号。 他不仅嘲讽公司"一年超英伟达"的目标是天方夜谭，还痛骂同事只会"无条件舔老板"、"无条件翘单"，甚至直接 放话："老板到时被美国政府罚得倾家荡产的时候，是不是原因就是你强行搞了几台车去美国卖？" 为什么会被吐槽？ 据悉， 俞浩此前发朋友圈表示， "目前全球市值最高的公司是英伟达，约 4.5 万亿美元，预计黄仁勋、马斯克 这代企业家有望将最高市值推至 8-10 万亿美元，但他们已老了，作为更年轻一代，他的目标是把追觅生态做 到一百万亿美金量级。" 同时透露该员工早已提交离职申请，是赶在当天权限失效前故意截屏扩散。还表示"根本不会在意这些，这点 肚量还是有的"。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Bilibili experienced significant server issues during a live event due to high traffic, highlighting the platform's ongoing challenges with scalability and infrastructure [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On January 18, around 3 PM, Bilibili's live stream for the "Top 100 UP Master Awards" faced severe lag and loading failures [1]. - Users reported needing to refresh multiple times to watch the stream, leading to the topic "Bilibili crashed" trending on Weibo [3]. - The peak number of bullet comments during the live stream reached 9.019 million, which overwhelmed the servers [4]. Group 2: Historical Context - This incident marks the second time in the year that Bilibili has faced such issues due to high traffic; the previous occurrence was during the New Year's Eve gala, which had 346 million concurrent users [5]. - The recurring nature of these server crashes suggests a pattern in Bilibili's operational challenges [6].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the public dispute between Luo Yonghao and Jia Guolong regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes in the restaurant industry, specifically targeting Jia's company, Xibei [1][3]. - Jia Guolong reported that since Luo Yonghao's accusations in September 2022, Xibei faced a significant public relations crisis, resulting in the closure of 102 stores and over 4,000 employees losing their jobs [3][5]. - Jia emphasized that Xibei, as a chain restaurant with a central kitchen, does not fall under the category of pre-prepared dishes according to regulations from six national ministries [3][5]. Group 2 - Jia accused Luo of profiting from attacking competitors while his sales surged, suggesting that Luo's actions were self-serving and detrimental to Xibei [4][7]. - He expressed a desire for reconciliation, indicating that he would have colleagues gently present the true situation of Xibei to help calm the controversy and ensure the company's survival [4][6]. - Jia highlighted that Xibei has been the top revenue-generating Chinese cuisine restaurant for 11 consecutive years, maintaining high standards for food quality and employee treatment [5][6].

Core Insights - The article discusses the impressive experience of using Claude Cowork, a tool developed by Anthropic, highlighting its innovative features and potential impact on user productivity [1][3]. Group 1: Core Mechanisms of Claude Cowork - The core mechanisms of Cowork include a sandbox mechanism that ensures operations are conducted in an isolated environment, enhancing security and preventing accidental changes to real system files [3]. - Cowork has a multi-step autonomous execution capability, allowing it to perform approximately 20 consecutive steps in a single task, which is a twofold improvement compared to earlier versions [3]. - The integration of a tool ecosystem enhances Cowork's versatility, supporting features like document and presentation generation, as well as functionalities like Claude in Chrome [3]. Group 2: User Experience and Evaluation - Simon Willison, the author, emphasizes that Cowork is essentially a user-friendly interface for Claude Code, designed to cater to non-developers while maintaining powerful capabilities [6][21]. - The author conducted tests using Cowork, which successfully identified and recommended drafts for publication from his recent writings, demonstrating its effective search and analysis capabilities [10][14]. - Willison expressed surprise at Cowork's ability to execute complex tasks quickly, noting that it could complete work that typically takes 24 to 48 hours in just 20 minutes [25]. Group 3: Security Concerns and Market Implications - Despite the impressive features, there are concerns regarding the potential for malicious command attacks that could compromise user data or system integrity [26][28]. - The article highlights that while Anthropic aims to filter out potential threats, there is no guarantee against future vulnerabilities [28]. - Willison predicts that if competitors like Gemini and OpenAI do not release similar products soon, they may miss out on significant market opportunities, indicating the competitive landscape in AI tools [32].

Core Viewpoint - MySQL, described as "the world's most popular open-source database," is facing an unprecedented development crisis, with a significant decline in code submissions and potential shifts in Oracle's focus towards proprietary products [1][3]. Group 1: Development Status - As of September 2025, the GitHub repository for MySQL Server has not seen any code submissions for over three months, coinciding with reports of layoffs within the MySQL team at Oracle [1]. - Since 2019, the volume of code submissions for MySQL has been declining annually, reaching its lowest point since the project's inception in 2000 in 2025 [1]. Group 2: Industry Insights - Percona's CEO stated that Oracle is "slowly killing the MySQL community edition," indicating a strategic shift towards proprietary versions like MySQL Enterprise Edition, Cluster Edition, and cloud-hosted Heatwave, which offer more direct revenue [3]. - Otto Kekäläinen, former CEO of the MariaDB Foundation, noted that MySQL is now only open-source in terms of licensing, suggesting developers should consider alternatives like MariaDB or PostgreSQL [3]. Group 3: Market Position - Despite its challenges, MySQL remains highly ranked in database popularity, holding the second position in DB Engines rankings and closely following PostgreSQL in the Stack Overflow developer survey [3]. - However, there is a consensus in the industry that if the stagnation of the open-source project continues, MySQL's market share will eventually be eroded by competitors [3].