| | 2025《银行家》中资银行综合表现排名 | | --- | --- | | 序号 | 综合表现 | | 1 | 招商银行 | | 2 | 兴业银行 | | 3 | 工商银行 | | 4 | 中信银行 | | 5 | 建设银行 | | 6 | 中国银行 | | 7 | 农业银行 | | 8 | 交通银行 | | 9 | 邮储银行 | | 10 | 浦发银行 | | 来源: | 英国《银行家》轻金融 | 可以发现，国有行综合表现前三分别为：工商银行、建设银行、中国银行；股份行综合表现排名前三分 别为：招商银行、兴业银行、中信银行。 来源：轻金融 四大行一级资本排名继续霸榜，股份行在综合表现上抢眼：招行蝉联第一，兴业银行跻身第二（上升6 位），中信银行上升两位 近日，英国《银行家》（The Banker）杂志公布2025年度全球银行1000强排名，按照一级资本排名，工 商银行、建设银行、农业银行和中国银行连续8年包揽榜单前四。 同期，《银行家》还公布了中资银行综合表现排名，轻金融对相关内容进行了编译、制表，如下是排名 详情。 一、综合表现排名：股份行表现亮眼 1、增长规模排名前五的银行分别为：招商银行、邮储 ...

Group 1 - The fund name is Bosera SSE AAA Technology Innovation Corporate Bond ETF, which has been approved for fundraising by the China Securities Regulatory Commission [14][15] - The fund is a bond-type open-ended index fund, with an initial share value of 1.00 RMB [15][22] - The maximum fundraising scale for the fund is set at 3 billion RMB, excluding interest and subscription fees [30][31] Group 2 - The fund will be publicly offered on July 7, 2025, with three subscription methods: online cash subscription, offline cash subscription, and offline bond subscription [6][18] - Investors must have a Shanghai Stock Exchange A-share account or a fund account to subscribe to the fund [32][34] - The fund management company is Bosera Fund Management Co., Ltd., and the custodian is CITIC Bank [1][3] Group 3 - The fund will accept offline bond subscriptions only for bonds that are components of the SSE AAA Technology Innovation Corporate Bond Index [4][28] - The minimum subscription amount for offline cash subscription through the fund management company is 50,000 shares, while for other agents, it is 1,000 shares [3][26] - The fund will allow multiple subscriptions, and there is no upper limit on the cumulative subscription amount [3][26] Group 4 - The fund's subscription fees will be calculated based on the subscription amount and the applicable fee rate [23][24] - Investors can cancel their online cash subscription requests within the same trading day [39] - The fund will undergo a verification process to confirm the total subscription amount and ensure it meets the regulatory requirements [67][68]

? 證券的面值相同，須繳或繳足的股款亦相同； ? 證券有權領取同一期間內按同一息率計算的股息/利息，下次派息時每單位應獲派發的股息/利息額亦完全相同（總額及淨額）；及 股份發行人及根據《上市規則》第十九B章上市的香港預託證券發行人的證券變動月報表 截至月份: 2025年6月30日 狀態: 新提交 致：香港交易及結算所有限公司 公司名稱: 中信銀行股份有限公司(「本行」) 呈交日期: 2025年7月2日 I. 法定/註冊股本變動 證券代號 (如上市) 00998 說明 H股 法定/註冊股份數目 面值 法定/註冊股本 上月底結存 14,882,162,977 RMB 1 RMB 14,882,162,977 增加 / 減少 (-) 0 RMB 0 本月底結存 14,882,162,977 RMB 1 RMB 14,882,162,977 證券代號 (如上市) 601998 說明 A股 法定/註冊股份數目 面值 法定/註冊股本 上月底結存 40,762,999,287 RMB 1 RMB 40,762,999,287 增加 / 減少 (-) 0 RMB 0 本月底結存 40,762,999,287 RMB 1 RM ...

Core Viewpoint - The evaluation of seven banks in Zhuhai revealed significant disparities in their card issuance processes, with some banks excelling in service quality while others faced criticism for excessive restrictions and inefficiencies [1][3][6]. Group 1: Evaluation Results - The evaluation showed a clear tiered scoring among the banks, with China Merchants Bank and Xiamen International Bank both achieving the highest score of 95, demonstrating effective risk management and customer service [6][16]. - The lowest score was 55, attributed to banks like China Everbright Bank and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, which exhibited lengthy processes and excessive restrictions on transaction limits [7][12][16]. Group 2: Efficiency and Process - The time taken to open a bank account varied significantly, with the fastest being 10 minutes at Xiamen International Bank, while some banks took up to 64 minutes due to inefficient processes [11][12][13]. - The average waiting time and processing time for account opening were inconsistent across different banks, highlighting a lack of standardization in service efficiency [11][26]. Group 3: Compliance and Service Quality - Overall compliance performance was strong, with four banks receiving full marks for not engaging in bundling sales or requiring unnecessary app downloads [16][17]. - However, some banks, such as China Everbright Bank and China CITIC Bank, faced criticism for requiring customers to follow social media accounts or download apps, negatively impacting user experience [17][21][22]. Group 4: Transaction Limits - The initial transaction limits varied widely, with Xiamen International Bank allowing a limit of 50,000, while others like China CITIC Bank set limits as low as 1,000 [22][24]. - The inconsistency in transaction limits reflects the banks' varying interpretations of regulatory guidelines aimed at preventing fraud and money laundering [22][23][24]. Group 5: Documentation Requirements - The documentation required for account opening was not standardized, leading to confusion and delays as different banks requested varying levels of information [26][27][30]. - This lack of uniformity in documentation requirements contributed to a frustrating experience for customers, as they faced different expectations at each bank [26][30].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the challenges faced by banks in Zhuhai regarding the stringent account opening processes aimed at preventing fraud and money laundering, leading to varied customer experiences and service quality across different bank branches [1]. Group 1: Bank Evaluation - A survey was conducted at seven banks in Zhuhai to assess the compliance and efficiency of their account opening processes, focusing on four dimensions: service efficiency, compliance, fraud prevention execution, and service quality [1]. - The evaluation revealed a significant disparity in performance among the banks, with scores ranging from a high of 95 to a low of 55, indicating that some banks excelled in service quality while others struggled with lengthy processes and excessive restrictions [1]. Group 2: Specific Case Study - Citic Bank - The evaluation of Citic Bank's Zhuhai Gongbei branch showed a total processing time of approximately 20 minutes for opening a type one savings account [3]. - During the process, the bank staff initially attempted to persuade the reporter to open a type two card instead, citing a low transfer limit of 1,000 yuan, which did not meet the reporter's needs [5]. - The staff required the reporter to provide social security information to verify eligibility for the account, emphasizing the need for continuous and stable social security contributions [5]. - The bank's system was reported to have outdated information regarding transfer limits, with the staff stating that the current limit was 1,000 yuan, despite the application showing a minimum option of 5,000 yuan [6]. - The process included mandatory downloads of the bank's app and registration for a mini-program, raising concerns about potential forced registration practices [7].

FF301 股份發行人及根據《上市規則》第十九B章上市的香港預託證券發行人的證券變動月報表 截至月份: 2025年6月30日 狀態: 新提交 致：香港交易及結算所有限公司 公司名稱: 中信銀行股份有限公司(「本行」) 呈交日期: 2025年7月2日 I. 法定/註冊股本變動 | 1. 股份分類 | 普通股 | 股份類別 H | | | 於香港聯交所上市 (註1) | | 是 | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 證券代號 (如上市) | 00998 | 說明 | H股 | | | | | | | | | 法定/註冊股份數目 | | | 面值 | | 法定/註冊股本 | | | 上月底結存 | | | 14,882,162,977 | RMB | | 1 RMB | | 14,882,162,977 | | 增加 / 減少 (-) | | | 0 | | | RMB | | 0 | | 本月底結存 | | | 14,882,162,977 | RMB | | 1 RMB | | 14,882,162,977 | | 2. 股份 ...

证券代码：601998 证券简称：中信银行 公告编号：2025-052 中信银行股份有限公司 2024年年度A 股普通股分红派息实施公告 本行董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或 者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： 每股分配比例 A 股每股现金红利0.1722元人民币（含税）。 相关日期 | 股份类别 | 股权登记日 | 最后交易日 | 除权（息）日 | 现金红利发放日 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Ａ股 | 2025/7/9 | － | 2025/7/10 | 2025/7/10 | 差异化分红送转： 否 一、 通过分配方案的股东大会届次和日期 本次利润分配方案经中信银行股份有限公司（以下简称"本行"）2025 年 6 月 20 日的2024年年度股东大会、2025 年第二次 A 股类别股东大会及 2025 年第二次 H 股类别股东大会审议通过。 二、 分配方案 1. 发放年度 2024年年度 有关 H 股股东的分红派息事宜，请参见本行于 2025 年 6 月 20 日在香港联合 交易所网站（www ...

Core Insights - Shenzhen's banking sector has seen a continuous increase in "green" financing, with 29 banks disclosing their environmental information reports for 2024, including state-owned, joint-stock, and city commercial banks [1][3] - As of the first quarter of 2025, the balance of green loans in Shenzhen reached 1.27 trillion yuan, ranking among the top in the country [2] - The four major state-owned banks in Shenzhen have all surpassed 100 billion yuan in green loan balances, primarily directed towards clean energy, energy conservation, and green infrastructure upgrades [1][5] Green Loan Performance - The balance of green loans for the four major state-owned banks in Shenzhen is as follows: - Bank of China: 156.68 billion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 14.78% [8] - Industrial and Commercial Bank: 146.6 billion yuan, with a growth of 28.6% [8] - China Construction Bank: 116.3 billion yuan, with a growth of 38% [8] - Agricultural Bank: 107.75 billion yuan, with a growth of 14.74% [8] - Joint-stock banks like Shanghai Pudong Development Bank and China Everbright Bank also reported significant growth in green loans, with year-on-year increases of 82.83% and 64.64%, respectively [5][8] Governance and Structure - Many banks have established green finance committees at the branch level, with governance structures often led by senior management from relevant departments [9] - The governance model typically follows a "top-down" approach, with specific departments managing green finance initiatives [9] Green Branches and Recognition - Over 20 "green branches" have been recognized in Shenzhen, with several branches achieving notable green loan balances [10] - The establishment of specialized green financial institutions has been a focus, with various banks creating dedicated branches to serve green financing needs [10] Innovations in Green Finance - Shenzhen has pioneered digital carbon accounts and "carbon reduction loans," along with the issuance of the first green financial bonds for rural revitalization in the country [11] - A comprehensive action plan for green finance was released, outlining 19 specific measures to support Shenzhen's goal of achieving carbon peak in a mega-city context [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the diversification of currency structures in offshore bond issuance by Chinese enterprises, with a notable increase in non-US dollar bonds such as offshore RMB, Euro, and Hong Kong Dollar bonds. The total issuance in the first half of 2025 reached 399.04 billion USD, marking a 12.74% increase year-on-year, despite significant refinancing pressures in the market [1]. Group 1: Offshore Bond Market Overview - The offshore bond market for Chinese enterprises saw a total of 837 new bonds issued in the first half of 2025, amounting to 3990.44 billion USD, reflecting a 12.74% growth compared to the same period last year [1]. - The market continues to experience a significant net financing gap, indicating ongoing refinancing pressures from existing debt [1]. Group 2: Underwriting Rankings - In the underwriting rankings for offshore bonds, Bank of China led with 56.3 billion USD from 115 bonds, followed by HSBC with 51.8 billion USD from 83 bonds, and Guotai Junan International with 43.1 billion USD from 155 bonds [3][4]. - The total underwriting amount for the top three institutions reflects the competitive landscape in the offshore bond market [3][4]. Group 3: Project Count Rankings - CITIC Securities topped the project count rankings with 227 bonds underwritten, followed by Haitong International with 180 bonds, and CITIC Jianan with 165 bonds [8][9]. - This indicates a strong performance in terms of the number of projects handled by these institutions in the offshore bond market [8][9]. Group 4: Bank Underwriting Rankings - The bank underwriting rankings show Bank of China at the top with 56.3 billion USD from 115 bonds, followed by HSBC with 51.8 billion USD from 83 bonds, and CITIC Bank with 35.5 billion USD from 151 bonds [17][18]. - This highlights the dominance of these banks in the offshore bond underwriting space [17][18]. Group 5: Securities Firm Underwriting Rankings - Guotai Junan International led the securities firm rankings with 43.1 billion USD from 155 bonds, followed by CICC with 27.1 billion USD from 127 bonds, and CITIC Lyon with 26.7 billion USD from 170 bonds [20][21]. - This showcases the competitive positioning of securities firms in the offshore bond market [20][21]. Group 6: Specific Bond Type Rankings - For offshore municipal bonds, Guotai Junan International ranked first with 14.9 billion USD from 57 bonds, followed by Dongfang Securities with 9.8 billion USD from 39 bonds, and CITIC Bank with 9.5 billion USD from 55 bonds [30]. - In the offshore financial bond category, Bank of China led with 34.4 billion USD from 62 bonds, followed by HSBC with 20.6 billion USD from 41 bonds [34]. - For green bonds, Bank of China also ranked first with 6.2 billion USD from 17 bonds, closely followed by Industrial and Commercial Bank of China with 6.1 billion USD from 17 bonds [38].

Group 1 - The Cathay Securities CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend Investment Index Fund (QDII) C has experienced a decline of 0.07% on July 1, with a latest net value of 1.13 yuan, marking a continuous drop for five trading days and a cumulative decline of 1.8% over the period [1] - The fund was established on January 1, 2025, with an initial scale of 0.06 billion yuan and has achieved a cumulative return of 13.34% since its inception [1] Group 2 - Current fund manager Zhang Jing holds a bachelor's degree in finance from the University of International Business and Economics and an MBA from Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, with extensive international experience in asset management [2] - The other fund manager, Deng Yakun, has a master's degree in computational finance from Carnegie Mellon University and has been with Cathay Securities since March 2021, focusing on quantitative investment [2] Group 3 - As of March 31, 2025, the top ten holdings of the Cathay Securities CSI Hong Kong Stock Connect High Dividend Investment Index Fund (QDII) C account for a total of 44.28%, with significant positions in COSCO Shipping Holdings (9.76%), Yancoal Australia (5.88%), and Orient Overseas International (3.94%) among others [3]