Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the construction and engineering sector [9] Core Views - The construction sector exhibits characteristics such as low valuation, low institutional holdings, large market capitalization, and stable outlook for quality targets. The report identifies four key investment directions within the construction industry: 1) Companies with strong Q3 performance and short-term earnings certainty 2) High dividend yield stocks providing a safety cushion 3) Strong long-term growth potential 4) Large-cap stocks with low absolute valuations [5][6][7] Summary by Sections Valuation Metrics - As of the latest closing, the Jiangsu Construction Index has a PE ratio of 12.83, ranking 28th across all industries, with a 10-year percentile of 68.5%. The PB ratio stands at 0.84, ranking 31st, with a 10-year percentile of 16.22%. Notably, the construction sector and the banking sector are the only indices within the Jiangsu framework that are trading below book value [5][6] Institutional Holdings - The construction sector has historically low institutional holdings, which may reflect a weak outlook for the industry and a lack of attention from investors. This could lead to undervaluation of high-quality construction stocks [6] Market Capitalization - The construction sector has a limited number of listed companies, with eight major state-owned enterprises collectively valued at 941.19 billion, accounting for 47% of the Jiangsu Construction Index's market capitalization. These enterprises play a crucial role in stabilizing economic growth and are likely to be favored in a market shift towards undervalued sectors [6][7] Investment Directions - **Direction One**: Focus on companies with strong Q3 earnings, such as Sichuan Road and Bridge, China Chemical, and others, which show robust growth and sufficient order backlogs [7] - **Direction Two**: Invest in high dividend yield stocks like Jianghe Group (6.2%), Sichuan Road and Bridge (5.6%), and others, which provide a strong holding safety net [7] - **Direction Three**: Target companies with strong long-term growth potential, such as Honglu Steel Structure and others benefiting from semiconductor capital expenditure [7] - **Direction Four**: Invest in large-cap stocks with low absolute valuations, including eight major state-owned enterprises that are all trading below book value [7]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Zhonggong International, has signed a business contract for the construction of a 100-bed hospital in Diwaniyah Province, Iraq, with a total contract value of approximately 5.71 million RMB [1] Group 1: Project Details - The contract amount for the hospital construction project is 105.389 billion Iraqi Dinars, equivalent to about 5.71 million RMB [1] - The project is located in the Al-Badireh area of Diwaniyah Province and involves the construction of a hospital with a building area of approximately 30,000 square meters [1] - The project includes the construction of medical buildings and supporting facilities, as well as the supply, installation, and commissioning of medical equipment [1] - The contract duration is set for no more than 1,095 days [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company has signed a business contract for the construction of a 100-bed hospital in Diwaniyah Province, Iraq, with a total contract value of approximately 105.39 billion Iraqi Dinars, equivalent to about 571.19 million RMB [1] Group 1 - The project involves the construction of a hospital with a total area of approximately 30,000 square meters, including medical buildings and supporting facilities [1] - The contract includes the supply, installation, and commissioning of medical equipment [1] - The construction period for the project is set to not exceed 1,095 days [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company has signed a business contract for the construction of a 100-bed hospital in Diwaniyah Province, Iraq, with a contract value of approximately 571 million RMB, which represents 4.68% of the company's projected total revenue for 2024 [1] Group 1 - The contract is expected to have a positive impact on the company's operating performance over the next three years [1] - The signing of this contract enables the company to achieve rolling development in the healthcare sector in the Middle East [1] - This project is beneficial for consolidating and deepening the company's differentiated competitive advantage in the healthcare field [1]

证券代码：002051 证券简称：中工国际 公告编号：2025-067 中工国际工程股份有限公司经营合同公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整， 没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 特别提示： 本项目存在因法律法规、原材料价格、政治社会环境、汇率等因 素发生变化而影响合同执行和项目收益的风险。 一、合同签署概况 近日，中工国际工程股份有限公司（以下简称公司）与伊拉克卫 生部下属迪瓦尼耶省卫生局（以下简称迪瓦尼耶省卫生局）签署伊拉 克迪瓦尼耶省 100 床位医院建设项目商务合同。 伊拉克迪瓦尼耶省 100 床位医院建设项目商务合同金额为 105,389,300,500 伊拉克第纳尔，折合人民币约 57,119.39 万元。该项 目位于伊拉克迪瓦尼耶省阿尔巴迪尔区，项目建设内容为新建一所建 筑面积约 3 万平米，配置 100 张床位的医院，包括医疗建筑和配套设 施的建设以及医用设备的供货、安装、调试等。合同工期不超过 1,095 天。 二、交易对方情况介绍 —1— of Health, Diwaniyah Health Directorate) 2、授权代表：Dr. Muhannad N ...

Core Viewpoint - Zhonggong International (002051) has demonstrated its capabilities in international power transmission engineering, actively participating in projects across various regions as part of the Belt and Road Initiative [2] Group 1: Company Capabilities - The company has established a strong presence in the international power transmission sector, particularly in Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Latin America [2] - Notable completed projects include the Uganda Industrial Park power transmission project, Kenya's grid upgrade project, and the 115kV transmission line in San Jose, Philippines [2] - These projects have significantly improved local public service levels in the respective regions [2]

Market Overview - The professional engineering sector increased by 0.56% on November 10, with Huadian Technology leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4018.6, up 0.53%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13427.61, up 0.18% [1] Top Gainers - Huadian Technology (601226) closed at 8.49, up 9.97% with a trading volume of 393,200 shares and a turnover of 333 million yuan [1] - Chalco International (601068) closed at 5.66, up 3.66% with a trading volume of 390,800 shares and a turnover of 220 million yuan [1] - Honglu Steel Structure (002541) closed at 18.14, up 3.66% with a trading volume of 96,100 shares and a turnover of 172 million yuan [1] Top Losers - Shikong Technology (605178) closed at 74.20, down 7.24% with a trading volume of 243,700 shares and a turnover of 1.867 billion yuan [2] - Shenghui Integration (603163) closed at 44.24, down 6.39% with a trading volume of 37,500 shares and a turnover of 16.8 million yuan [2] - Tianwo Technology (002564) closed at 8.86, down 3.06% with a trading volume of 262,600 shares and a turnover of 23.3 million yuan [2] Fund Flow Analysis - The professional engineering sector experienced a net outflow of 112 million yuan from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 48.3 million yuan [2] - Huadian Technology had a net outflow of 56.939 million yuan from institutional investors, while it saw a net inflow of 6.366 million yuan from retail investors [3] - Deep Sanda A (000032) had a net inflow of 53.667 million yuan from institutional investors, but a net outflow of 56.397 million yuan from retail investors [3]

Investment Rating - The report maintains a "Positive" investment rating for the construction and engineering industry [11]. Core Insights - In September, central enterprise orders improved, and the decline in investment narrowed. The manufacturing PMI fell significantly in October, indicating a marginal weakening in industry prosperity, while the construction PMI slightly decreased, aligning with seasonal trends [6][20]. - Fixed asset investment in September was 4.5 trillion yuan, down 7.1% year-on-year, with a cumulative fixed asset investment of 37.2 trillion yuan for the year, a decrease of 0.5% year-on-year. Narrowly defined infrastructure investment showed a smaller decline compared to previous months [7][25]. - The physical workload showed improvement in October, with cement output declining at a slower rate, and cement dispatch volumes increased marginally [8][50]. - Project funding is being prioritized, with a funding rate of 59.7% for construction sites as of October 28, showing a slight week-on-week increase [9][57]. Summary by Sections Investment & Orders - Central enterprise orders improved in September, with most central enterprises showing positive growth in domestic orders. Notably, China Chemical and China Railway Construction saw significant growth rates of 18.11% and 9.38%, respectively [7][42][44]. - The overall order growth for major construction central enterprises in Q3 was 5.02% year-on-year, indicating a positive trend in both domestic and overseas markets [42][44]. Physical Workload - Cement production saw a year-on-year decline of 5.2% from January to September, with a more pronounced drop of 8.6% in September alone. However, cement dispatch volumes showed a week-on-week increase of 8.0% in late October [8][50]. Project Funding - The funding rate for construction projects was reported at 59.7%, with non-residential projects at 61.15% and residential projects at 52.81% as of late October. The issuance of special bonds reached 39.646 billion yuan year-to-date, with a 90% completion rate [9][59].

Investment Rating - The report indicates a positive investment outlook for the construction state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the ESG context, highlighting strong performance in green development and social responsibility [5][11]. Core Insights - The overall ESG scores for the 19 construction SOEs are good, with 8 companies scoring above 80 and 10 between 60-79, while only 1 company scored below 60. Climate governance and governance improvements are identified as key weaknesses [11][21]. - The importance assessment is well-disclosed among the companies, with 19 companies reporting their assessments, and 17 completing dual importance assessments. However, third-party verification is lacking, with only 3 companies engaging external validation [13][18]. - Environmental disclosures are mature, but climate disclosures need improvement. The total score for "environment + climate change response" ranges from 0 to 32 out of a maximum of 34, indicating a need for better climate-related disclosures [21][22]. - Social responsibility is a strong focus, with all 19 companies disclosing relevant information, particularly in rural revitalization and social welfare, showcasing their commitment to social responsibility [50][53]. - Governance structures are generally robust, with most companies having established boards and supervisory committees, although transparency in performance evaluation and ESG integration remains an area for improvement [60][65]. Summary by Sections Overall Performance - The ESG performance of the 19 construction SOEs is generally good, with strengths in green development and social responsibility, while climate governance remains a critical shortcoming [11][21]. Importance Assessment - All 19 companies have disclosed their importance assessments, with a high level of completeness. However, third-party verification is limited, indicating a need for greater transparency [13][18]. Environmental & Climate - Environmental disclosures are well-developed, but climate-related disclosures are lagging. The overall score for environmental and climate issues indicates a need for enhanced climate strategy integration [21][22]. Social Responsibility - Social issues are prominently featured in disclosures, with a focus on rural revitalization and community welfare, reflecting a strong commitment to social responsibility among the companies [50][53]. Governance - Governance frameworks are well-established, with most companies having comprehensive governance structures. However, the integration of ESG metrics into performance evaluations is not uniformly transparent [60][65].

Investment Rating - The report rates the industry as "Positive" for A-share central enterprises in the construction sector, indicating an expectation of outperforming the overall market [3]. Core Insights - The ESG performance of 19 central enterprises in the construction industry is generally good, with strengths in green development and social responsibility, while climate governance and governance enhancement remain key weaknesses [5][13]. - The overall ESG scores show that 8 companies scored above 80, 10 companies scored between 60-79, and 1 company scored below 60, with a maximum score of 100 [13]. - Importance assessments are disclosed by all 19 companies, with 17 completing dual importance assessments, although third-party verification is lacking, with only 3 companies engaging third-party validation [16][18]. Summary by Sections 1. Overall Scores and Areas for Improvement - The ESG scores of the 19 central enterprises are generally good, with green development and social responsibility as strong areas, while climate governance and governance improvements are identified as critical weaknesses [5][13]. 2. Importance Assessment - All 19 companies disclosed importance assessments, with 17 completing dual assessments. However, third-party verification is limited, with only 3 companies providing such validation [16][18]. 3. Environmental & Climate - The total score for "Environment + Climate Change" among the 19 companies ranges from 0 to 32 points (out of 34). Two companies scored between 30-34, indicating strong performance in both environmental and climate disclosures. Twelve companies scored between 20-29, primarily focusing on environmental disclosures, while five companies scored between 10-19, showing limited engagement with climate issues [24][25]. 4. Social Responsibility - All 19 companies disclosed social responsibility initiatives, with a focus on rural revitalization and social welfare, reflecting a strong commitment to social responsibility. However, some disclosures lack quantitative performance indicators [57][60]. 5. Governance - The governance scores are primarily in the mid to high range, with most companies having established governance structures. However, the integration of ESG performance indicators into governance mechanisms remains unclear for many companies [68][73].