近日，西部证券作为湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司（以下简称"友阿股份"）发行股份及支付现金购 买资产并募集配套资金的独立财务顾问，对深圳证券交易所下发的审核问询函进行了回复。此次交易标 的为深圳尚阳通科技股份有限公司（以下简称"尚阳通"），其主要从事高性能半导体功率器件的研发、 设计和销售。 销售模式以经销为主，客户合作稳定性受关注 尚阳通采用经销和直销相结合的销售模式，经销收入占比分别为73.84%和75.59%。客户集中度较高， 前五大客户销售占比分别为72.89%和65.23%。 尚阳通客户集中度较高主要受经销渠道特性及直销客户特点影响，经销模式与公司经营模式、发展阶段 等相匹配。2024年前五大客户销售收入占比下降，主要因市场拓展策略见效、下游需求结构变化、产品 单价下行压力以及客户订单波动。 报告期内，尚阳通与主要经销商和直销客户的合作基本稳定，虽部分客户销售收入受市场因素影响有所 波动，但整体合作关系稳固，客户合作具有稳定性和可持续性。同时，尚阳通针对客户集中度较高情 况，采取增强客户信任、持续研发投入、优化产品结构、开拓新客户等措施应对风险。 采购依赖核心供应商，技术研发奠定发展基础 在采购方面 ...

Core Viewpoint - The asset evaluation conducted by Beijing Zhongqi Hua Asset Appraisal Co., Ltd. for Hunan Friendship Apollo Commercial Co., Ltd. revealed a significant discrepancy between the market valuation of 1.757 billion yuan and historical valuations, raising market concerns [1] Evaluation Method Selection and Rationality - The evaluation utilized market and asset-based methods, with the market method yielding a valuation of 1.757 billion yuan, which is considered more reflective of overall enterprise value compared to the asset-based method [2] - The income method was not used due to the high uncertainty in future cash flow predictions, which do not meet the stability requirements of this method [2] - The market method was deemed suitable due to the availability of comparable listed companies and relevant information, providing a more comprehensive reflection of enterprise value [2] - The valuation increase rate of the assessed assets is lower than the industry average, indicating a cautious approach that protects the interests of the listed company [2] Comparability of Selected Companies - The selected comparable companies share similarities in operational models, product types, production capacity, application fields, and business structures, despite some differences in asset and income scales [3] - The adjustments made in the market method evaluation were based on five dimensions: asset management scale, profitability, growth ability, risk management ability, and operational ratios, with reasonable and quantifiable criteria [3] - Objective differences between the comparable companies and the assessed assets were adequately considered, ensuring that financial data reflects these differences [3] Valuation Discrepancy and Pricing Fairness - The significant valuation difference from historical values is attributed to a decline in the target company's operating performance, a downward shift in industry valuation, and liquidity discounts, which are deemed reasonable [4] - The pricing of the transaction is considered fair based on market comparables and aligns with industry pricing rules, with no significant adverse changes in the target company's operating conditions post-evaluation [4] - The independent financial advisor and appraisers confirmed that there were no significant changes affecting the valuation after the evaluation date, supporting the rationality and prudence of the selected evaluation methods [4]

Core Viewpoint - Lixin Accounting Firm provided a detailed response to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange regarding Hunan Friendship Apollo Commercial Co., Ltd.'s acquisition of Shenzhen Shangyang Technology Co., Ltd., revealing key operational information about Shangyang Technology, including its sales model, financial performance, and procurement practices [1]. Sales Model - Shangyang Technology primarily employs a combination of distribution and direct sales, with distribution revenue accounting for 73.84% and 75.59% in 2023 and 2024, respectively [1]. - The customer concentration is high, with the top five customers accounting for 72.89% and 65.23% of sales during the reporting period [1][2]. - The decline in sales revenue from the top five customers in 2024 is attributed to market expansion strategies, changes in downstream demand structure, pricing pressures, and fluctuations in customer orders [2]. Operational Performance - From 2020 to 2024, Shangyang Technology's main business revenue showed a trend of growth followed by a decline, with figures of 127 million, 391 million, 736 million, 673 million, and 605 million yuan, respectively [1][4]. - Net profits during the same period were -13 million, 49 million, 139 million, 83 million, and 46 million yuan, indicating significant performance volatility [1][4]. - The company's performance fluctuations align with industry trends, with recent improvements noted as the industry recovers [4]. Gross Margin - The decline in gross margin is primarily due to significant decreases in sales prices for high-voltage product lines, while some product lines experienced stable or increasing revenues due to policy adjustments and market trends [5][4]. Procurement Practices - Shangyang Technology operates under a Fabless model, outsourcing wafer manufacturing and packaging testing, with procurement practices aligned with industry standards [6][7]. - The company maintains a high supplier concentration but does not rely heavily on any single supplier, implementing measures to mitigate associated risks [7]. Financial Statements - Changes in accounts receivable and inventory management are noted, with an increase in accounts receivable in 2024 despite a decline in revenue, attributed to a rise in fourth-quarter sales [8]. - The aging of accounts receivable shows a lower provision for bad debts compared to industry peers, indicating a reasonable approach to credit risk management [8].

格隆汇9月26日丨友阿股份(002277.SZ)公布，公司参股的长沙银行股份有限公司（简称"长沙银行"）第 八届董事会第二次会议审议通过了《2025年中期利润分配方案》。截至长沙银行2025年半年度权益分派 股权登记日（2025年9月25日），公司持有长沙银行228,636,220股，根据长沙银行《2025年中期利润分 配方案》，公司可分得现金股利45,727,244.00元人民币。公司已于近日收到该笔分红款。由于公司对长 沙银行的长期股权投资采用权益法核算，因此，收到该笔现金分红款对公司2025年度合并报表净利润无 影响。 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Youa Co., Ltd. (002277.SZ) has received a cash dividend from its investment in Changsha Bank, amounting to 45,727,244.00 RMB, as approved in the bank's 2025 interim profit distribution plan [1] - As of the equity registration date for the dividend distribution on September 25, 2025, Youa Co., Ltd. holds 228,636,220 shares of Changsha Bank [1] - The cash dividend received will not impact the net profit of Youa Co., Ltd.'s consolidated financial statements for the year 2025, as the investment in Changsha Bank is accounted for using the equity method [1]

西部证券股份有限公司 关于 深圳证券交易所《关于湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限 公司发行股份购买资产并募集配套资金申请的审核 问询函》相关问题回复之核查意见 独立财务顾问 二〇二五年九月 深圳证券交易所上市审核中心： 申请文件及公开披露资料显示：（1）深圳尚阳通科技股份有限公司（以下 简称尚阳通或标的资产）主要从事高性能半导体功率器件的研发、设计和销售， 报告期内向前五大客户的销售占比分别为72.89%和65.23%；标的资产采用经销 和直销相结合的销售模式，经销收入占比分别为73.84%和75.59%；标的资产所 处行业技术及应用领域客户需求迭代速度相对较快，标的资产的发展很大程度 上依赖于识别并快速响应客户需求的变化。（2）2020年至2024年，标的资产主 营业务收入分别为1.27亿元、3.91亿元、7.36亿元、6.73亿元和6.05亿元，净 利润分别为-0.13亿元、0.49亿元、1.39亿元、0.83亿元和0.46亿元，业绩波动 幅度较大。（3）报告期内，标的资产高压产品线收入分别为5.67亿元和4.78亿 元，中低压产品线收入分别为1.05亿元和1.14亿元，模组产品线收入分别为 104.04万元和 ...

西部证券股份有限公司 关于 湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司 发行股份及支付现金购买资产并募集配套资金 暨关联交易 （一）本独立财务顾问报告所依据的文件和材料由相关各方提供，相关各 方对所提供文件及资料的真实性、准确性和完整性负责，并保证该等信息不存 在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。本独立财务顾问不承担由此引起的任 何风险责任； （二）本独立财务顾问报告是在假设本次交易各方当事人均全面和及时履 行本次交易相关协议和声明或承诺的基础上出具，若上述假设不成立，本独立 财务顾问不承担由此引起的任何风险责任； （三）对于对本独立财务顾问报告至关重要而又无法得到独立证据支持或 需要法律、审计、评估等专业知识来识别的事实，本独立财务顾问主要依据有 关政府部门、律师事务所、会计师事务所、资产评估机构及其他有关单位出具 的意见、说明及其他文件做出判断； （四）如本独立财务顾问报告中结论性意见利用其他证券服务机构专业意 见的，独立财务顾问已进行了必要的审慎核查。除上述核查责任之外，独立财 务顾问并不对其他中介机构的工作过程与工作结果承担任何责任，本独立财务 顾问报告也不对其他中介机构的工作过程与工作结果发表任何意见与评价。本 ...

湖南启元律师事务所 关于湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司 发行股份及支付现金购买资产并募集配套资金暨关联交易的 补充法律意见书（一） 二〇二五年九月 致：湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司 湖南启元律师事务所（以下简称"本所"）接受湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限 公司（以下简称"上市公司"或"友阿股份"）的委托，担任友阿股份发行股份及支 付现金购买深圳尚阳通科技股份有限公司（以下简称"尚阳通""公司"或"标的资 产"）100%股权并募集配套资金暨关联交易（以下简称"本次交易"）的专项法律 顾问。 本所根据《中华人民共和国公司法》《中华人民共和国证券法》《上市公司 重大资产重组管理办法》《上市公司监管指引第9号——上市公司筹划和实施重 大资产重组的监管要求》《公开发行证券的公司信息披露内容与格式准则第26 号——上市公司重大资产重组》等现行法律、行政法规及中国证券监督管理委员 会相关文件的规定，为友阿股份本次交易出具了《湖南启元律师事务所关于湖南 友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司发行股份及支付现金购买资产并募集配套资金暨 关联交易的法律意见书》（以下简称"法律意见书"）。 2025年7月14日，深圳证券交易所出具《关于湖南友谊 ...

中企华评估 北京中企华资产评估有限责任公司 关于深圳证券交易所《关于湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公 司发行股份购买资产并募集配套资金申请的审核 问询函》 审核函〔2025〕130012 号 资产评估相关问题之答复 根据贵所下发《关于湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司发行股份购买资产并 募集配套资金申请的审核问询函》（审核函〔2025〕130012 号；2025 年 7 月 14 日）之要求，北京中企华资产评估有限责任公司（以下简称"评估机构"或 "评估师"）对贵所审核问询函资产评估相关问题进行了认真分析、核查，现就 资产评估相关问题回复如下，请予审核。 除特别说明外，本审核问询函回复（以下简称"本回复"）所述的词语或简 称与重组报告书中"释义"所定义的词语或简称具有相同的含义。在本审核问询 函回复中，若合计数与各分项数值相加之和在尾数上存在差异，均为四舍五入所 致。本审核问询函回复所引用的财务数据和财务指标，如无特殊说明，指合并报 表口径的财务数据和根据该类财务数据计算的财务指标。 问题五：关于评估预测 申请文件显示：（1）本次交易分别采用市场法和资产基础法对标的资产进 行评估，最终选取市场法评估结果作为评估结论。 ...

信会师函字[2025]第 ZG220 号 深圳证券交易所上市审核中心： 贵所《关于湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司发行股份购买资产并募集配套 资金申请的审核问询函》（审核函〔2025〕130012号）（以下简称"问询函"） 已知悉。立信会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）（以下简称"本所"或"会计师"） 作为湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司（以下简称"上市公司"、"公司"或"友 阿股份"）发行股份购买资产并募集配套资金申请的财务报表审计机构，对本次 问询函要求会计师核查的问题进行了审慎核查，现答复如下： 问题1.关于标的资产销售模式及经营业绩 立信会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙） 关于深圳证券交易所《关于湖南友谊 阿波罗商业股份有限公司发行股份购 买资产并募集配套资金申请的审核问 询函》之专项回复意见 信会师函字[2025]第 ZG220 号 立信会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙） 关于深圳证券交易所《关于湖南友谊阿波罗商业股份有限公司发行股 份购买资产并募集配套资金申请的审核问询函》之专项回复意见 （6）报告期内，标的资产经营活动产生的现金流量净额分别为-2.21亿元和 1.84亿元，存在较大波动。 请上市公司补充说明： 申请文 ...