（文章来源：每日经济新闻） 每经AI快讯，有投资者在投资者互动平台提问：请问贵公司中标华中科技大学的110KW低空飞行器电 机控制器产品，是否有对外和eVTOL飞行器制造企业如小鹏等开展合作洽淡？谢谢！ 英威腾（002334.SZ）1月12日在投资者互动平台表示，尊敬的投资者，您好！目前中标的华中科技大学 的110kW低空飞行器电机控制器为定制产品，暂无对外和其他企业开展合作。感谢您的关注！ ...

英威腾（002334.SZ）1月12日在投资者互动平台表示，中山基地一期目前已投入使用；苏州产业园三期 预计2026年下半年可实现投产。 每经AI快讯，有投资者在投资者互动平台提问：苏州产业园三期进度和中山新能源基地一期进度，公 司计划25年底完成，按照现在看什么时候可以正常投入生产？ ...

英威腾（002334.SZ）1月12日在投资者互动平台表示，公司目前主要以伺服通用电机产品为主，未来或 视市场与战略规划，拓展其他电机类型。 每经AI快讯，有投资者在投资者互动平台提问：请问贵子公司苏州英威腾3期的高端电机生产线除了已 有的永磁电机、伺服电机等高精度定位，高响应、高效的电机品类，是否有生产新的用途领域的高端电 机产品类别，能否介绍下相关情况？ （文章来源：每日经济新闻） ...

每经AI快讯，有投资者在投资者互动平台提问：请问贵公司在脑机接口方面有研发技术储备或业务 吗？贵公司的人机界面产品是否有应用脑机接口技术？ （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 英威腾（002334.SZ）1月12日在投资者互动平台表示，公司的人机界面目前广泛应用于纺织行业、包装 行业、水处理行业、木工行业、医疗行业、食品行业、农事行业等行业。公司目前暂无脑机接口相关应 用。 ...

格隆汇1月12日丨英威腾(002334.SZ)在投资者互动平台表示，公司目前暂无集成电路生产线。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the company, Invt, has stated that its industrial automation products currently do not have applications in the field of embodied intelligence [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the company, Invt, currently does not have any applications in the field of embodied intelligence related to its industrial automation products [1]

Core Viewpoint - The long-standing merger and acquisition dispute involving Invt and Hanruide has concluded with a court ruling in favor of Invt, but the company faces challenges in collecting the awarded compensation due to Hanruide's prior dissolution [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Outcomes - The Guangdong High Court ruled that Hanruide must pay Invt 64.9988 million yuan plus interest by December 31, 2025, but Hanruide was dissolved in 2019, complicating the collection process [1]. - Invt initially planned to acquire 100% of Prineywei for 250 million yuan, with performance guarantees set for net profits from 2017 to 2019, which were later adjusted due to market changes [1]. - The court's decision came after a lengthy legal process, with Invt filing a lawsuit in 2019 but lacking complete performance data until 2021, which delayed the determination of any breach of contract [2]. Group 2: Challenges in Enforcement - The absence of prior similar cases may have influenced the Shenzhen Intermediate Court's unfavorable ruling for Invt, highlighting the complexities of M&A litigation [2]. - The prolonged litigation process and lack of effective measures to manage the debtor's obligations increased the difficulty for Invt in asserting its rights [2]. - Without pre-agreed terms in the acquisition agreement, creditors face challenges in recovering assets from dissolved companies, as shareholders may have transferred assets or claimed "legal dissolution" to evade responsibilities [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Future Transactions - To prevent issues related to the dissolution of responsible parties, it is recommended to include clauses that impose joint liability on original shareholders for performance commitments even after company dissolution [2][3]. - Companies should monitor the performance capabilities of original shareholders, ensuring they have sufficient assets and creditworthiness, and may require collateral or guarantee accounts to secure compensation [3]. - Payment structures should be carefully considered, favoring a combination of equity and installment payments tied to performance milestones to mitigate recovery risks [3].

Core Viewpoint - The long-standing merger dispute involving Invt (002334) has reached a final ruling, but the company faces challenges in collecting the awarded compensation due to the bankruptcy of the counterparty, Hanruide, which was dissolved in 2019 [1] Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Outcomes - The Guangdong High Court ruled that Hanruide must pay Invt 64.9988 million yuan plus interest by December 31, 2025, but the company is unlikely to collect this amount due to Hanruide's prior dissolution [1] - Invt initially planned to acquire 100% of the shares of Prineywei for 250 million yuan, with performance guarantees from Hanruide for net profits of at least 15 million, 30 million, and 55 million yuan for the years 2017 to 2019 [1] - The acquisition price was later reduced to 150 million yuan, with a revised performance commitment of a total net profit of at least 55 million yuan from 2017 to 2020 [1] Group 2: Challenges in Enforcement - The complexity of the case is highlighted by the fact that Invt filed a lawsuit in 2019 without complete performance data, making it difficult to determine Hanruide's breach of contract until the 2022 judgment [2] - The lack of precedents in similar cases may have contributed to the unfavorable ruling for Invt in the Shenzhen Intermediate Court, which dismissed a claim for over 300 million yuan in performance compensation [2] - The absence of effective debt management measures during the litigation process further complicated Invt's ability to enforce its rights [2] Group 3: Recommendations for Future Transactions - To prevent similar issues in future mergers, it is recommended to implement measures such as anti-dissolution clauses and joint liability for original shareholders even after company dissolution [2][3] - Companies should monitor the performance capabilities of the responsible parties and may require asset pledges or guarantee accounts to ensure the enforceability of compensation [3] - A mixed payment approach combining equity and installment payments, along with performance milestones, is suggested to mitigate recovery risks [3]

Core Viewpoint - The long-standing merger dispute involving Yingweitong has concluded with a court ruling in favor of the company, but challenges remain in collecting the awarded compensation due to the dissolution of the counterparty, Hanruide [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Outcomes - The Guangdong High Court ruled that Hanruide must pay Yingweitong 64.9988 million yuan plus interest by December 31, 2025, but the company has been dissolved since 2019, complicating the collection of the awarded amount [1]. - The acquisition process began in 2017 when Yingweitong planned to acquire 100% of the electric vehicle motor company, Pulinyiwei, for 250 million yuan, with performance guarantees set for 2017-2019 [1]. - The acquisition price was later reduced to 150 million yuan in 2018, with revised performance commitments for 2017-2020, but Pulinyiwei failed to meet these commitments, leading to a 128 million yuan goodwill impairment recorded by Yingweitong [1][2]. Group 2: Challenges in Enforcement - The complexity of the case was exacerbated by the lack of complete financial data until 2021, making it difficult to determine if Hanruide had breached its obligations [2]. - The absence of precedents in similar cases may have influenced the unfavorable ruling by the Shenzhen Intermediate Court in 2022, which only supported penalties and not the full compensation claim [2]. - The dissolution of Hanruide has led to significant challenges in enforcing the court's ruling, as creditors face difficulties in proving claims against a dissolved entity [2][3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Future Transactions - To prevent similar issues in future mergers, companies should include clauses to prevent the dissolution of the counterparty and ensure that original shareholders remain liable for performance commitments even after dissolution [2][3]. - Companies should conduct thorough due diligence on the financial health and creditworthiness of original shareholders, potentially requiring collateral or guarantees to secure performance obligations [3]. - Payment structures should be carefully designed, favoring equity or convertible bonds over cash payments, and incorporating performance milestones to mitigate risks associated with compensation claims [3].