Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau has imposed significant penalties on Yongtuo Accounting Firm for multiple violations, including a total confiscation of approximately 8.11 million yuan in business income and a fine of about 57.17 million yuan, totaling around 65.28 million yuan, along with a ban on engaging in securities services [1][4]. Group 1: Violations and Penalties - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was found to have committed violations while auditing financial statements for Hongda Xingye Co., Ltd., Suzhou Hengjiu Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., and Kelin Environmental Equipment Co., Ltd. from 2019 to 2022 [4][5]. - The firm failed to exercise due diligence, resulting in false records in the audit reports for Hongda Xingye from 2020 to 2022 and other related reports [4][5]. - The total penalties included the confiscation of approximately 8.11 million yuan in business income and fines totaling about 57.17 million yuan, leading to a total penalty of around 65.28 million yuan [6][7]. Group 2: Specific Cases - For Hongda Xingye, the firm was fined approximately 40.75 million yuan and had 5.09 million yuan in business income confiscated due to false records in the audit reports [6][7]. - In the case of Hengjiu Technology, Yongtuo was fined about 792.45 thousand yuan and had 1.32 million yuan in business income confiscated for similar violations [6][7]. - For Kelin Environmental, the firm faced a fine of approximately 849.06 thousand yuan and had 1.70 million yuan in business income confiscated due to false records in the audit report [6][7]. Group 3: Accountability of Individuals - The signing registered accountant Chen Xiaohong received a warning and a fine of 4 million yuan, while the chief partner Lü Jiang was warned and fined 2 million yuan [7]. - Seven other responsible individuals were fined between 200,000 yuan and 1.2 million yuan [7]. - Chen Xiaohong faces a lifetime ban from the securities market, while Lü Jiang is banned for 10 years due to the severity of their violations [7].

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Commission has imposed penalties on Yongtuo Accounting Firm for failing to perform due diligence, resulting in false records in annual audit reports and fundraising verification reports, leading to a total fine of 57.17 million yuan and the prohibition of securities service business [1][5][7]. Group 1: Violations and Penalties - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was found to have serious deficiencies in its auditing practices for Hongda Xingye, Hengjiu Technology, and Kelin Environmental Protection, leading to the issuance of false audit reports [1][5][6]. - The total penalties include the confiscation of business income amounting to 8.11 million yuan and fines totaling 57.17 million yuan, with specific penalties for each company: 5.09 million yuan confiscated and 40.75 million yuan fine for Hongda Xingye; 1.32 million yuan confiscated and 7.92 million yuan fine for Hengjiu Technology; 1.70 million yuan confiscated and 8.49 million yuan fine for Kelin Environmental Protection [3][7]. Group 2: Specific Findings - In the audit of Hongda Xingye, Yongtuo failed to exercise due diligence, knowingly issuing unqualified audit reports despite significant issues and deficiencies in audit independence [1][6]. - For Hengjiu Technology, the audit work from 2019 to 2021 was marked by major flaws, including a lack of professional skepticism and failure to assess financial fraud risks appropriately [2][6]. - During the audit of Kelin Environmental Protection, Yongtuo did not adequately understand internal controls related to revenue and failed to execute proper control tests, leading to significant deficiencies in substantive audit procedures [3][7].

Core Viewpoint - Yongtuo Accounting Firm (special general partnership) failed to exercise due diligence in its auditing practices, resulting in false records in annual audit reports and fundraising verification reports, leading to significant penalties and a ban on providing securities services [1][4]. Group 1: Yongtuo's Violations - Yongtuo was responsible for auditing the financial statements of Hongda Xingye from 2020 to 2022, Hengjiu Technology from 2019 to 2021, and Kelin Environmental Protection for the year 2021, and was found to have issued reports with false records [1]. - The firm knowingly cooperated with Hongda Xingye's fraudulent activities, issuing unqualified audit reports despite being aware of significant issues and deficiencies in the audit process [1][2]. - Yongtuo's audit procedures exhibited major defects, including a lack of professional skepticism and failure to assess fraud risks adequately [2][3]. Group 2: Specific Findings - In the audit of Hengjiu Technology's annual reports from 2019 to 2021, Yongtuo failed to maintain professional skepticism and did not appropriately evaluate or respond to financial fraud risks [2]. - The audit of Kelin Environmental Protection's 2021 financial statements revealed that Yongtuo did not adequately understand internal controls related to revenue and failed to execute proper control tests, leading to significant deficiencies in substantive audit procedures [3]. Group 3: Penalties Imposed - The total penalties imposed on Yongtuo included the confiscation of business income amounting to 811 million yuan and fines totaling 57.17 million yuan, along with a prohibition on engaging in securities services [4].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 转自：证券日报网 本报记者 曹卫新 在为恒久科技2019年至2021年年度财务报表提供审计服务时，永拓所同样未履行审计监督核心职 责，相关审计工作存在重大缺陷。经监管核查，永拓所在审计过程中并未勤勉尽责，出具的恒久科技 2019年至2021年年度审计报告存在虚假记载。 此外，经监管核查，永拓所在审计科林环保2021年年度财务报表时，严重未勤勉尽责，未恰当了解 与收入相关的内部控制及业务流程、未执行控制测试，实质性审计程序中关于营业收入风险应对措施存 在重大缺陷，违反多项中国注册会计师审计准则，明知其出具的审计报告意见类型将影响科林环保的上 市地位，在监管部门和深交所多次提示风险的情况下，仍然出具存在虚假记载的审计报告。 "永拓所通过策划舞弊、篡改数据等行为深度参与上市公司造假，该案例极具代表性，暴露出中介 机构与上市公司之间'深度合作'甚至'共谋造假'的系统性风险，这不仅是一次个案处罚，更是资本市 场'看门人'制度重塑的导火索。"众和昆仑（北京）资产管理有限公司董事长柏文喜在接受《证券日 报》记者采访时表示。 监管部门全链条追责重塑行业生态 12月13日，中国 ...

中经记者 孙汝祥 夏欣 北京报道 12月13日，江苏证监局公布对永拓会计师事务所（以下简称"永拓所"）行政处罚决定：责令改正，罚没 6528万元，禁止从事证券服务业务的行政处罚。 另有9名相关责任人共计被罚款1020万元，其中2人分别被采取终身、10年证券市场禁入措施。 江苏证监局查明，永拓所未勤勉尽责，出具的鸿达兴业（已退市）2020年至2022年年度审计报告、2020 年度和2021年度募集资金年度存放与使用情况鉴证报告，恒久科技（*ST恒久，002808.SZ）2019年至 2021年年度审计报告，科林环保（已退市）2021年年度审计报告，存在虚假记载。 江苏证监局12月13日公布的《行政处罚决定书》显示，永拓所鸿达兴业项目组成员配合鸿达兴业造假， 永拓所明知鸿达兴业存在重大问题、审计执业存在重大缺陷，仍出具无保留意见的审计报告、无保留结 论的其他鉴证报告，未客观、公正执业，审计独立性严重缺失。 "2020年至2022年年度财务报告审计期间，项目组成员陈晓鸿、赵睿在无审计调整依据支撑的情况下， 配合鸿达兴业在财务报表合并过程中虚构审计调整分录，导致鸿达兴业2020年至2022年年度报告存在虚 假记载。" ...

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau has imposed penalties on Yongtuo Accounting Firm for failing to perform due diligence in their auditing processes, resulting in false records in annual audit reports and other certification reports [2][4]. Group 1: Penalties and Violations - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was ordered to rectify its practices, had its business income of 8.11 million yuan confiscated, and was fined 57.17 million yuan, with a prohibition on engaging in securities services [2][5]. - The firm was found to have serious deficiencies in its auditing processes for multiple clients, including Hongda Xingye, Hengjiu Technology, and Kelin Environmental Protection, leading to the issuance of unqualified audit reports despite known issues [2][3][4]. Group 2: Specific Cases of Misconduct - In the case of Hongda Xingye, Yongtuo's audit reports for 2020 to 2022 contained false records, and the firm failed to maintain independence and objectivity in its auditing practices [2][3]. - For Hengjiu Technology, significant deficiencies were noted in the 2019 to 2021 audit reports, including a lack of professional skepticism and inadequate assessment of fraud risks [3][4]. - During the audit of Kelin Environmental Protection's 2021 financial statements, Yongtuo did not properly understand internal controls related to revenue and failed to execute appropriate control tests, leading to serious violations of auditing standards [4][5].

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a rental agreement between Hai Xi Communications and *ST Hengjiu, which has led to a dispute over unpaid rent for a battery module assembly line [2][4] - Hai Xi Communications' subsidiary, Hai Xi Zhejiang, has terminated the rental contract due to *ST Hengjiu's failure to pay the monthly rent of 1 million yuan [4][5] - *ST Hengjiu claims that the reason for not paying rent is that the production line did not meet the required conditions for use, and they assert that Hai Xi Zhejiang is in breach of contract [4][5] Group 2 - The rental agreement was initially seen as a win-win situation, allowing Hai Xi Communications to utilize its assets while providing *ST Hengjiu with a means to enter the energy storage market [3] - Financially, *ST Hengjiu has been struggling, with continuous revenue decline and net losses since 2019, raising concerns about its future viability [7] - As of the first three quarters of this year, *ST Hengjiu reported total revenue of only 182 million yuan and a net loss of 24.65 million yuan, with a risk of delisting if financial metrics do not improve [7]

Core Viewpoint - *ST Hengjiu (002808.SZ) announced the receipt of a termination letter from Haixi Zhejiang regarding the lease agreement for production lines due to non-payment of rent by Hengjiu Fengde [1] Group 1: Lease Agreement Details - Hengjiu Fengde failed to pay rent as per the lease agreement because some equipment required technical modifications to meet production needs [2] - Haixi Zhejiang did not deliver the leased production line to Hengjiu Fengde for use, which contributed to the non-payment of rent [2] - According to the contract, if the leased item does not meet the agreement due to Haixi Zhejiang's reasons, Hengjiu Fengde has the right to terminate the contract and Haixi Zhejiang must pay a penalty equivalent to three months of tax-inclusive rent [2] Group 2: Contractual Obligations and Penalties - If Hengjiu Fengde delays rent payment for more than 30 days, Haixi Zhejiang has the right to terminate the contract, and Hengjiu Fengde must pay a penalty equivalent to three months of tax-inclusive rent [2] - If the penalty is insufficient to cover Haixi Zhejiang's losses, Hengjiu Fengde is still liable for further compensation [2] - The company and Hengjiu Fengde will actively negotiate with Haixi Zhejiang to resolve the matter and will continue to monitor the situation closely [2]

证券代码：002808 证券简称：*ST恒久 公告编号：2025-059 苏州恒久光电科技股份有限公司 关于全资子公司租赁生产线暨关联交易的进展公告 近日，恒久丰德收到海希浙江出具的《解除函（租赁）》，由于恒久丰德未根 据双方签订的《生产线租赁合同》约定支付相应的租金，海希浙江根据租赁合同 约定行使解除权，解除双方签订的《生产线租赁合同》。 三、其他说明 1、根据双方签订的《生产线租赁合同》约定，恒久丰德去验收海希浙江交 付租赁的生产线，由于产线部分设备需要技术改造，才能满足生产需要，所以恒 久丰德未及时支付租金，同时海希浙江也未交付租赁标的给恒久丰德使用。根据 合同约定，因海希浙江的原因，其交付的租赁标的不符合本合同的约定，致使恒 1 久丰德不能实现租赁目的的，恒久丰德有权解除合同，同时海希浙江应支付相当 于 3 个月含税租金的违约金；如前述违约金不足以弥补恒久丰德的损失或者不足 以弥补恒久丰德依据本合同可获得的利益的，则海希浙江仍应向恒久丰德继续赔 偿损失。 根据合同约定，恒久丰德逾期不支付租金超过 30 日的，海希浙江有权解除 合同，恒久丰德应支付相当于 3 个月含税租金的违约金；如前述违约金不足以弥 ...

受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 一、已有案件递交立案 *ST恒久（维权）曾收到江苏证监局的《行政处罚决定书》，因财务造假被处以800万元罚款。 上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师代理的投资者诉*ST恒久证券虚假陈述案已陆续提交至该公司管辖地法院 立案审理。目前维权仍可加入，公告中提到，公司存在财报造假行为。（刘鹏律师专栏） 至此，对于2020年4月22日-2023年11月9日期间买入，并在2023年11月10日之后卖出或仍持有而亏 损的投资者及时参与索赔是挽回损失的途径。（ST恒久维权入口） 法院在收到案件后，将依法进行审理，并保障投资者的合法权益。同时，这也提醒广大投资者，在投资 过程中要密切关注公司的财务状况和经营情况，以避免类似的风险。 （本文由上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师供稿，不代表新浪财经的观点。刘鹏律师，专注证券维权19年， 自2006年执业以来，成功为中青宝、国华网安、劲嘉股份（维权）等 300 余家上市公司的中小投资者成 ...