Group 1 - The company *ST Hengjiu announced the resignation of its General Manager Chen Zhi and Deputy General Manager Zhang Dongyun due to personal reasons, with both no longer holding any positions in the company or its subsidiaries after their resignations [1] - The board of directors appointed Lan Shanying as the new General Manager, while also appointing Li Yong, Wang Xiaohua, and Wang Shanbin as new Deputy General Managers [1] - For the first half of 2025, the revenue composition of *ST Hengjiu is as follows: 78.28% from laser OPC drum manufacturing, 17.09% from photovoltaic project construction, 3.06% from information security, and 1.56% from toner and other printing consumables [1] Group 2 - As of the latest report, the market capitalization of *ST Hengjiu is 1.2 billion yuan [2]

关于公司高级管理人员辞职及聘任的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 一、公司总经理、董事会秘书辞职的情况 证券代码：002808 证券简称：*ST恒久 公告编号：2025-061 苏州恒久光电科技股份有限公司 1、总经理聘任情况 公司于 2025 年 12 月 15 日召开了第六届董事会第十四次会议，审议通过了 《关于聘任公司总经理的议案》，经公司董事长提名及董事会提名委员会审议通 过，董事会同意改聘兰山英女士（简历见附件）担任公司总经理，不再担任公司 副总经理职务，任期从本次董事会审议通过之日起至第六届董事会届满为止。 2、副总经理、指定董事会秘书代行人情况 公司于 2025 年 12 月 15 日召开了第六届董事会第十四次会议，审议通过了 《关于聘任公司高级管理人员的议案》，具体如下： （1）经公司总经理提名并经董事会提名委员会审议通过，董事会同意聘任 李勇先生（简历见附件）担任公司副总经理，任期自本次董事会审议通过之日起 至第六届董事会任期届满日止。公司在未正式聘任新的董事会秘书期间，公司董 1 苏州恒久光电科技股份有限公司（以下简称 ...

证券代码：002808 证券简称：*ST恒久 公告编号：2025-060 苏州恒久光电科技股份有限公司 第六届董事会第十四次会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完整，没有虚假 记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 一、董事会会议召开情况 苏州恒久光电科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）第六届董事会第十四 次会议于2025年12月15日在公司会议室以现场结合通讯方式召开，会议通知已于 2025年12月12日以电话、邮件或书面方式送达。本次会议应出席的董事7人，实 际出席的董事7人。本次会议由董事长刘荣先生召集和主持，公司高级管理人员 列席了会议。会议的召开符合《公司法》和《公司章程》的规定。 二、董事会会议审议情况 1、审议通过了《关于聘任公司总经理的议案》； 经公司董事长提名及董事会提名委员会审议通过，董事会同意改聘兰山英女 士担任公司总经理，不再担任公司副总经理职务，任期从本次董事会审议通过之 日起至第六届董事会届满为止。（具体内容详见公司同日刊登在中国证监会指定 信息披露网站的相关公告） 表决结果：赞成票 7 票，反对票 0 票，弃权票 0 票。 2、审议通过了《关于聘任公司高级管 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company announced the resignation of its general manager, Chen Zhi, due to personal reasons, effective immediately upon delivery of the resignation report to the board of directors [1] Group 1 - Chen Zhi will no longer hold any position within the company or its subsidiaries after his resignation [1] - As of the announcement date, Chen Zhi did not hold any shares in the company [1]

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Commission issued a significant penalty against Yongtuo Accounting Firm for failing to perform due diligence, resulting in false records in audit reports and other documents, leading to a total fine of approximately 65.28 million yuan [1][17]. Group 1: Penalty Details - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was ordered to correct its practices, had its business income of 8.11 million yuan confiscated, and faced a total fine of 57.17 million yuan, marking a penalty that is seven times its illegal gains [1][24]. - This penalty is the first instance since the 2019 revision of the Securities Law where an auditing firm has been banned from providing securities services [1][17]. Group 2: Background of Yongtuo Accounting Firm - Established in 1993, Yongtuo is a well-known auditing firm that was the first in the national auditing system to join an international accounting organization [4][20]. - The firm ranked 42nd in the 2024 comprehensive evaluation of accounting firms [5][21]. Group 3: Audit Failures - Yongtuo was found to have committed multiple audit failures for companies such as Hongda Xingye, Hengjiu Technology, and Kelin Environmental Protection, where it issued audit reports with false records [6][22]. - Specific failures included a lack of diligence in audits and significant defects in audit procedures and quality control [6][22][23]. Group 4: Accountability of Individuals - Nine individuals associated with Yongtuo were penalized, with project partner Chen Xiaohong receiving a fine of 4 million yuan and a lifetime ban from the securities market [8][24]. - Other key individuals, including the firm's chief partner, were also fined and faced varying lengths of market bans [8][25]. Group 5: Previous Penalties - This is not the first penalty for Yongtuo in 2025, as it had previously received fines from the Fujian Securities Regulatory Bureau for similar issues [10][26]. - In September 2025, Yongtuo was fined 11.32 million yuan for its involvement in the fraudulent activities of Yan'an Bikon, highlighting a pattern of regulatory scrutiny [13][29].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau imposed a significant penalty on Yongtuo Accounting Firm for failing to perform due diligence in auditing the annual reports of Hongda Xingye, Hengjiu Technology, and Kelin Environmental Protection, resulting in a total fine of 57.17 million yuan and the confiscation of 8.11 million yuan in business income [1][31]. Group 1: Yongtuo Accounting Firm's Violations - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was found to have violated professional standards and ethical codes, losing independence and failing to take appropriate audit measures to address fraud risks, leading to substantial defects in substantive procedures [1][31]. - The firm issued audit reports containing false records for Hongda Xingye, Hengjiu Technology, and Kelin Environmental Protection, violating Article 163 of the Securities Law [1][31]. - Specific failures included not objectively assessing significant misstatement risks due to fraud and not maintaining professional skepticism regarding abnormal audit evidence related to revenue [1][31]. Group 2: Audit Process Deficiencies - Yongtuo failed to obtain reliable financial data from subsidiaries, relying instead on potentially manipulated data from the parent company [15][16]. - There were significant discrepancies in revenue figures across different audit documents, indicating a lack of professional skepticism and appropriate audit responses [17][18]. - The firm did not adequately address low response rates to accounts receivable confirmations, which were linked to fraudulent activities [22][23]. Group 3: Quality Control Issues - The project team did not follow internal review procedures, and the quality control reviewer failed to identify significant issues during the audit process [29][30]. - The project partner did not supervise or guide team members effectively, leading to a lack of adequate audit evidence to support the issued reports [29][30]. - The quality control reviewer did not address or follow up on critical issues raised during the review process, resulting in unaddressed audit deficiencies [29][30]. Group 4: Impact on Related Companies - Hongda Xingye was found to have engaged in fraudulent activities, including altering the use of raised funds and reporting false income and profit figures [10][11]. - Hengjiu Technology was implicated in inflating revenue and profits through unfulfilled contracts, which were not adequately scrutinized by Yongtuo [33][34]. - Kelin Environmental Protection's financial statements were also affected by Yongtuo's inadequate audit practices, leading to significant misstatements [1][31].

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau has imposed significant penalties on Yongtuo Accounting Firm for multiple violations, including a total confiscation of approximately 8.11 million yuan in business income and a fine of about 57.17 million yuan, totaling around 65.28 million yuan, along with a ban on engaging in securities services [1][4]. Group 1: Violations and Penalties - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was found to have committed violations while auditing financial statements for Hongda Xingye Co., Ltd., Suzhou Hengjiu Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd., and Kelin Environmental Equipment Co., Ltd. from 2019 to 2022 [4][5]. - The firm failed to exercise due diligence, resulting in false records in the audit reports for Hongda Xingye from 2020 to 2022 and other related reports [4][5]. - The total penalties included the confiscation of approximately 8.11 million yuan in business income and fines totaling about 57.17 million yuan, leading to a total penalty of around 65.28 million yuan [6][7]. Group 2: Specific Cases - For Hongda Xingye, the firm was fined approximately 40.75 million yuan and had 5.09 million yuan in business income confiscated due to false records in the audit reports [6][7]. - In the case of Hengjiu Technology, Yongtuo was fined about 792.45 thousand yuan and had 1.32 million yuan in business income confiscated for similar violations [6][7]. - For Kelin Environmental, the firm faced a fine of approximately 849.06 thousand yuan and had 1.70 million yuan in business income confiscated due to false records in the audit report [6][7]. Group 3: Accountability of Individuals - The signing registered accountant Chen Xiaohong received a warning and a fine of 4 million yuan, while the chief partner Lü Jiang was warned and fined 2 million yuan [7]. - Seven other responsible individuals were fined between 200,000 yuan and 1.2 million yuan [7]. - Chen Xiaohong faces a lifetime ban from the securities market, while Lü Jiang is banned for 10 years due to the severity of their violations [7].

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Commission has imposed penalties on Yongtuo Accounting Firm for failing to perform due diligence, resulting in false records in annual audit reports and fundraising verification reports, leading to a total fine of 57.17 million yuan and the prohibition of securities service business [1][5][7]. Group 1: Violations and Penalties - Yongtuo Accounting Firm was found to have serious deficiencies in its auditing practices for Hongda Xingye, Hengjiu Technology, and Kelin Environmental Protection, leading to the issuance of false audit reports [1][5][6]. - The total penalties include the confiscation of business income amounting to 8.11 million yuan and fines totaling 57.17 million yuan, with specific penalties for each company: 5.09 million yuan confiscated and 40.75 million yuan fine for Hongda Xingye; 1.32 million yuan confiscated and 7.92 million yuan fine for Hengjiu Technology; 1.70 million yuan confiscated and 8.49 million yuan fine for Kelin Environmental Protection [3][7]. Group 2: Specific Findings - In the audit of Hongda Xingye, Yongtuo failed to exercise due diligence, knowingly issuing unqualified audit reports despite significant issues and deficiencies in audit independence [1][6]. - For Hengjiu Technology, the audit work from 2019 to 2021 was marked by major flaws, including a lack of professional skepticism and failure to assess financial fraud risks appropriately [2][6]. - During the audit of Kelin Environmental Protection, Yongtuo did not adequately understand internal controls related to revenue and failed to execute proper control tests, leading to significant deficiencies in substantive audit procedures [3][7].

Core Viewpoint - Yongtuo Accounting Firm (special general partnership) failed to exercise due diligence in its auditing practices, resulting in false records in annual audit reports and fundraising verification reports, leading to significant penalties and a ban on providing securities services [1][4]. Group 1: Yongtuo's Violations - Yongtuo was responsible for auditing the financial statements of Hongda Xingye from 2020 to 2022, Hengjiu Technology from 2019 to 2021, and Kelin Environmental Protection for the year 2021, and was found to have issued reports with false records [1]. - The firm knowingly cooperated with Hongda Xingye's fraudulent activities, issuing unqualified audit reports despite being aware of significant issues and deficiencies in the audit process [1][2]. - Yongtuo's audit procedures exhibited major defects, including a lack of professional skepticism and failure to assess fraud risks adequately [2][3]. Group 2: Specific Findings - In the audit of Hengjiu Technology's annual reports from 2019 to 2021, Yongtuo failed to maintain professional skepticism and did not appropriately evaluate or respond to financial fraud risks [2]. - The audit of Kelin Environmental Protection's 2021 financial statements revealed that Yongtuo did not adequately understand internal controls related to revenue and failed to execute proper control tests, leading to significant deficiencies in substantive audit procedures [3]. Group 3: Penalties Imposed - The total penalties imposed on Yongtuo included the confiscation of business income amounting to 811 million yuan and fines totaling 57.17 million yuan, along with a prohibition on engaging in securities services [4].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 转自：证券日报网 本报记者 曹卫新 在为恒久科技2019年至2021年年度财务报表提供审计服务时，永拓所同样未履行审计监督核心职 责，相关审计工作存在重大缺陷。经监管核查，永拓所在审计过程中并未勤勉尽责，出具的恒久科技 2019年至2021年年度审计报告存在虚假记载。 此外，经监管核查，永拓所在审计科林环保2021年年度财务报表时，严重未勤勉尽责，未恰当了解 与收入相关的内部控制及业务流程、未执行控制测试，实质性审计程序中关于营业收入风险应对措施存 在重大缺陷，违反多项中国注册会计师审计准则，明知其出具的审计报告意见类型将影响科林环保的上 市地位，在监管部门和深交所多次提示风险的情况下，仍然出具存在虚假记载的审计报告。 "永拓所通过策划舞弊、篡改数据等行为深度参与上市公司造假，该案例极具代表性，暴露出中介 机构与上市公司之间'深度合作'甚至'共谋造假'的系统性风险，这不仅是一次个案处罚，更是资本市 场'看门人'制度重塑的导火索。"众和昆仑（北京）资产管理有限公司董事长柏文喜在接受《证券日 报》记者采访时表示。 监管部门全链条追责重塑行业生态 12月13日，中国 ...