格隆汇8月4日｜根据链上数据平台Lookonchain，截至7月30日，贝莱德透过其现货以太坊ETF(ETHA)， 已持有超过300万枚ETH，总价值约113.6亿美元，占全球流通量约2.46%，正式晋升为以太坊"巨鲸"。 仅在上周，贝莱德就斥资超12亿美元大举买进ETH，买入金额更是同期比特币的四倍。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Li Ka-shing, the 96-year-old Hong Kong business tycoon, has decided to soften his stance amid the US-China rivalry by extending the sale negotiation period and inviting mainland Chinese capital to join a deal primarily dominated by US and European interests [1][3] Group 1: Transaction Background - In March, Li Ka-shing's CK Hutchison Holdings announced plans to sell 43 overseas ports, including two critical ports at either end of the Panama Canal, which are considered strategic assets [3][12] - The initial buyers were led by US asset management giant BlackRock and Swiss-Italian shipping giant MSC, raising concerns in financial and political circles due to the strategic importance of these ports [3][12] Group 2: Regulatory and Political Dynamics - The transaction initially bypassed Chinese regulatory scrutiny, with Li Ka-shing seemingly attempting to maintain neutrality by selling to US capital [7][12] - The Chinese government expressed strong discontent, particularly opposing the transfer of Panama Canal ports to US-led control, leading to negotiations with BlackRock and MSC regarding compliance with Chinese antitrust reviews [7][12] Group 3: Recent Developments - CK Hutchison confirmed that while the exclusive negotiation window with BlackRock has expired, discussions are ongoing, and a major mainland strategic investor, likely China COSCO Shipping Group, will be invited to join the consortium [9][12] - This shift indicates that Li Ka-shing acknowledges the necessity of Chinese participation for the deal to proceed, moving away from a solely Western-oriented transaction [9][12] Group 4: Strategic Implications - Li Ka-shing faces the reality that BlackRock cannot dominate the Panama ports without Chinese regulatory approval, especially given the current tense US-China relations [12][14] - The port operations are heavily reliant on Chinese exports, and any perceived threat to China's strategic interests could jeopardize the future operations of these ports [12][14] - The arrangement allows BlackRock and MSC to remain significant stakeholders while accommodating Chinese interests, resulting in a compromise where no party fully achieves its initial objectives [14]

Core Viewpoint - A US judge has largely rejected a request by major asset managers, including BlackRock, to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Texas and 12 other Republican-led states, which alleges that these companies violated antitrust laws through climate activism that negatively impacted coal production and increased energy prices [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is one of the most prominent cases targeting efforts to promote environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals [2]. - The states' claims against the asset managers include allegations of joining Climate Action 100+, an initiative aimed at combating climate change, and using shareholder advocacy to further its objectives [3][4]. - The judge dismissed only three of the 21 counts in the lawsuit, allowing the majority of the claims to proceed [1]. Group 2: Implications for Asset Managers - The outcome of the lawsuit could significantly affect how these asset managers, which collectively manage approximately $27 trillion, handle their investments and passive funds [6][7]. - One potential remedy sought by the plaintiffs is for the asset managers to divest from coal companies, which BlackRock argues would harm access to capital and likely lead to higher energy prices [6].

Group 1 - A Texas judge has ruled that cases regarding conspiracy can proceed against BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard [1] - The companies are facing antitrust lawsuits [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. non-farm payroll report indicates that the views of Federal Reserve Governor Waller's faction may be gaining traction, potentially persuading more individuals to support interest rate cuts [1] Group 1 - The missed opportunity for a rate cut in July has significantly increased the likelihood of a cut in September [1] - The substantial decline in the front end of the yield curve is attributed to these developments [1]

Core Insights - The article focuses on the iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (BATS: MTUM), which is managed by BlackRock and aims to replicate the performance of the MSCI [1] Group 1 - The iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF is an investment vehicle that seeks to track the performance of the MSCI [1]

香港交易所信息显示， 贝莱德在 信达生物的持股比例于07月28日从5.19%降至4.69%。 ...

Group 1 - Tencent has reduced its stake in China International Capital Corporation (CICC) by selling 4.96 million H-shares at an average price of HKD 21.16 per share, resulting in a cash inflow of approximately HKD 105 million [1] - In contrast, global asset management giants BlackRock and E Fund have increased their holdings in CICC, with BlackRock raising its stake to 5.01% and E Fund to 5.13% following their purchases on July 22 and July 25, respectively [1]

Simultaneously, BlackRock's larger infrastructure business, Global Infrastructure Partners, oversees approximately $183 billion across 300-plus investments in more than 100 nations. While infrastructure businesses tend to go unnoticed within global indexes, Morrison said that it's precisely this under-allocation that makes BILT so strong. The ETF offers access to an asset class that has historically been less volatile than global equities, but without giving up growth opportunity. BlackRock is going deeper ...

Group 1 - Li Ka-shing's company, CK Hutchison Holdings (长和), has decided to invite mainland Chinese strategic investors to join a consortium to take over its global port assets after a 145-day negotiation period with BlackRock-TiL ended [1][3] - The Chinese government had previously warned that the transaction parties must not evade antitrust reviews and must not implement concentration without approval, indicating a strong stance on maintaining national interests [3][5] - China COSCO Shipping Group (中远集团) is seeking to join the consortium, demanding equal shareholder status and a veto right in decisions related to Chinese shipping operations, which reflects a strategic move to protect national interests while ensuring commercial development [3][5] Group 2 - Li Ka-shing's shift is seen as a calculated risk hedge against geopolitical pressures, particularly concerning the Panama Canal, which handles 6% of global maritime trade and has faced U.S. security-related threats [5][7] - The introduction of Chinese capital is intended to demonstrate neutrality to both the U.S. and China, potentially providing operational flexibility for CK Hutchison while mitigating risks associated with U.S. sanctions [5][7] - The involvement of COSCO is strategically significant as it aims to safeguard shipping routes and counteract U.S. efforts to control port operations, thereby preserving China's energy and food supply chains [5][7] Group 3 - The deal's complexity is heightened by the need for approval across 12 global jurisdictions, with China's stance being a critical variable in the antitrust review process [7] - BlackRock's willingness to allow Chinese participation is a pragmatic approach to avoid the collapse of the transaction, as it still seeks to benefit from long-term operational gains through port management [7] - By integrating Chinese investment, CK Hutchison not only mitigates potential backlash regarding national interests but also retains commercial collaboration opportunities, while simultaneously reallocating funds towards technology and renewable energy sectors [7]