Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between January 29, 2024, and March 11, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The complaint claims that iRobot made false statements regarding the effectiveness of its restructuring plan following the termination of its acquisition by Amazon [2]. - It is alleged that iRobot is unlikely to operate profitably as a standalone company, raising doubts about its ability to continue as a going concern [2]. - The lawsuit asserts that the public statements made by the defendants were materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until September 5, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require any out-of-pocket costs or fees for class members [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing substantial compensation for shareholders and has been recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States for seven consecutive years [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased iRobot Corporation securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The Class Period for the iRobot securities is from January 29, 2024, to March 11, 2025 [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by September 5, 2025, to serve as lead plaintiff [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - In 2019, Rosen Law Firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that iRobot made false and misleading statements regarding its Restructuring Plan and its ability to operate profitably as a standalone company [4]. - It is claimed that there was substantial doubt about iRobot's ability to continue as a going concern, which was not disclosed to investors [4]. - The lawsuit asserts that when the true details became public, investors suffered damages due to the misleading information [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action securities lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation, alleging securities fraud that affected investors between January 29, 2024, and March 11, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that iRobot overstated the effectiveness of its restructuring plan following the termination of its acquisition by Amazon [2]. - It is alleged that iRobot is unlikely to operate profitably as a standalone company, raising doubts about its ability to continue as a going concern [2]. - The defendants' public statements are claimed to have been materially false and misleading throughout the relevant period [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors who suffered losses during the specified timeframe have until September 5, 2025, to request appointment as lead plaintiff [3]. - Participation in the lawsuit does not require serving as a lead plaintiff, and there are no out-of-pocket costs for class members [3]. Group 3: Firm Background - Levi & Korsinsky has a history of securing hundreds of millions of dollars for shareholders and is recognized as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and prospects during the class period from January 29, 2024, to March 11, 2025 [1][3]. Financial Performance - iRobot reported a loss of $2.06 per share on revenue of $172 million for Q4 2024, marking a 44% year-over-year decline [4]. - The company expressed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern for at least 12 months from the issuance of its 2024 financial statements [4]. Market Reaction - Following the announcement of poor financial results, iRobot's stock price fell by $3.255 per share, or 51.58%, closing at $3.055 per share on March 13, 2025 [5]. - Analysts have downgraded iRobot's stock rating due to a bleak outlook, citing deteriorating business prospects and significant layoffs [5]. Legal Context - Investors who acquired iRobot securities during the specified class period are encouraged to contact the law firm Bragar Eagel & Squire to discuss their legal rights [1][6].

LOS ANGELES, Sept. 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The DJS Law Group  reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against iRobot Corporation ("iRobot" or "the Company") (NASDAQ: IRBT ) for violations of §§10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.Shareholders who purchased shares of IRBT during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointments. Appointment as lead ...

NEW YORK, Sept. 4, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of iRobot Corporation (NASDAQ: IRBT).Shareholders who purchased shares of IRBT during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.CONTACT US HERE:https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/irobot-corporation-loss-submission-form-2/?id=164983&from=4CLASS PERIOD: January 29, 2 ...

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation for allegedly making materially false and misleading statements regarding its business operations and prospects during the Class Period from January 29, 2024, to March 11, 2025 [1][3]. Financial Performance - iRobot reported a loss of $2.06 per share on revenue of $172 million for Q4 2024, marking a 44% year-over-year decline [4]. - The company expressed substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern for at least 12 months from the issuance of its 2024 financial statements [4]. Market Reaction - Following the announcement of poor financial results, iRobot's stock price fell by $3.255 per share, or 51.58%, closing at $3.055 per share on March 13, 2025 [5]. - Analysts have downgraded iRobot's stock rating due to a bleak outlook, citing deteriorating business prospects and significant layoffs [5]. Legal Context - Investors who acquired iRobot securities during the Class Period are encouraged to contact Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. to discuss their legal rights and options [1][6].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased iRobot Corporation securities during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on September 5, 2025, and the potential for compensation without out-of-pocket costs [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation, alleging that the company made false and misleading statements regarding its Restructuring Plan and its ability to operate profitably as a standalone entity after the termination of the Amazon Acquisition [4]. - The lawsuit claims that iRobot overstated the effectiveness of its Restructuring Plan, leading to substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern, which resulted in investor damages when the truth was revealed [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may not have the necessary experience or resources [3]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements in securities class actions, including recovering over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone, and has been recognized as a leader in this field [3].

ATLANTA, Sept. 02, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- A shareholder class action lawsuit has been filed against iRobot Corporation (“iRobot” or the “Company”) (NASDAQ: IRBT). The lawsuit alleges that Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose material adverse information about iRobot’s business, operations, and prospects, including allegations that: (i) iRobot overstated the extent to which the Restructuring Plan would help the Company maintain stability after the terminat ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased iRobot Corporation securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on September 5, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought iRobot securities between January 29, 2024, and March 11, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by the September 5, 2025 deadline [2]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own success in this area [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including over $438 million for investors in 2019, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that iRobot made false and misleading statements regarding its Restructuring Plan and its ability to operate profitably as a standalone company after the termination of the Amazon Acquisition [4]. - It is claimed that there was substantial doubt about iRobot's ability to continue as a going concern, and that the defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period [4].