【文/观察者网 阮佳琪】 掳走马杜罗夫妇后，无法无天的特朗普开始"明抢"委内瑞拉石油。在美军强行扣押第五艘涉委原油运输 油轮后，本周五，一场旨在吃干抹净、彻底瓜分委内瑞拉石油资源的会议随即于白宫召开。 据美国《纽约时报》、英国《卫报》等报道，当地时间9日，特朗普在会上急于向美国石油巨头高管施 压，要求其迅速开发委内瑞拉的石油储备。他极力承诺委内瑞拉当前"绝对安全"，试图说服企业赴委投 资，同时称美军对委内瑞拉的行动为美国石油公司提供了"前所未有的开采机会"。 不过，美媒指出，参会的石油企业整体态度谨慎，对重返委内瑞拉石油市场兴趣寥寥。"不少公司连在 美国本土钻探都兴致缺缺，更遑论冒着风险进入委内瑞拉。" 报道称，雪佛龙、埃克森美孚、康菲石油等十余家美国石油巨头高管均出席了此次会议，但没有一家企 业明确承诺将在委开展大规模新投资，多以推诿之词回应。 特朗普显然对企业的消极态度颇为不满。《卫报》提及，他在会上警告道，要是他们对在委内瑞拉的开 采投资不感兴趣，"我有25个今天不在场的人愿意接替你们的位置。" 委内瑞拉政府尚未确认会允许美国公司进入该国，代总统罗德里格斯本周早些时候曾表示，加拉加斯对 与包括美国在内的 ...

特朗普9日下午在白宫与大型石油企业高管会面。白宫披露，受邀参会的高管来自17家石油企业，包括 雪佛龙、埃克森美孚、康菲、哈利伯顿、瓦莱罗、马拉松、壳牌、托克、埃尼、莱普索尔等公司。 美国总统特朗普9日下午在白宫与大型石油企业高管举行会议，承诺石油企业投资委内瑞拉将获"全面安 全保障"。特朗普还告诉与会高管，不希望这些公司与委方"产生任何往来"，而是直接与美国政府打交 道。 催促美国油企重返委内瑞拉 美国总统特朗普9日下午在白宫与大型石油企业高管举行会议。新华社/美联社 据美联社报道，特朗普在会上催促各大石油企业尽快投资委内瑞拉，劝说他们无需对相关投资前景持有 担忧或怀疑，并承诺称"你们将获得全面的安全保障"。 特朗普表示，安全保障将通过与委内瑞拉领导层及其民众合作实现，而非派遣美军。他同时表示，石油 企业也可"自行配备部分安保力量"。 他稍早时候在社交媒体发文说，这些石油企业将在委内瑞拉投资至少1000亿美元，"这些资金来自企业 自有资金，而非（美国）政府资金。这些企业根本不需要政府注资，但它们需要政府的保护"。按照他 的说法，美国与委内瑞拉正开展"良好合作，尤其在以更大、更好、更现代化的形式重建（委内瑞拉） ...

美国总统特朗普1月9日下午在白宫与大型 石油企业高管举行会议，承诺石油企业投资委内瑞拉将获"全 面安全保障"。受邀参会的高管来自17家石油企业，包括雪佛龙、埃克森美孚等公司。特朗普在会上催 促各大石油企业尽快投资委内瑞拉，劝说他们无需对相关投资前景持有担忧或怀疑，并承诺称"你们将 获得全面的安全保障"。特朗普同时向石油企业施压，要求它们未来利用自有资金在委内瑞拉投资至少 1000亿美元，并威胁称"如果不想加入就说一声"，还有很多家企业"愿意取代你们的位置"。尽管特朗普 对安全做出了承诺，并催促油企高管们投资委内瑞拉石油业，但却遭到质疑和态度谨慎的回应。埃克森 美孚首席执行官达伦·伍兹直言："如果审视委内瑞拉当前的法律与商业架构及框架——就目前而言，这 里并不具备投资价值。"（智通财经） ...

钛媒体App 1月10日消息，美国总统特朗普9日下午在白宫与大型石油企业高管举行会议，承诺石油企业 投资委内瑞拉将获"全面安全保障"。受邀参会的高管来自17家石油企业，包括雪佛龙、埃克森美孚等公 司。特朗普在会上催促各大石油企业尽快投资委内瑞拉，劝说他们无需对相关投资前景持有担忧或怀 疑，并承诺称"你们将获得全面的安全保障"。特朗普同时向石油企业施压，要求它们未来利用自有资金 在委内瑞拉投资至少1000亿美元，并威胁称"如果不想加入就说一声"，还有很多家企业"愿意取代你们 的位置"。尽管特朗普对安全做出了承诺，并催促油企高管们投资委内瑞拉石油业，但却遭到质疑和态 度谨慎的回应。埃克森美孚首席执行官达伦·伍兹直言："如果审视委内瑞拉当前的法律与商业架构及框 架——就目前而言，这里并不具备投资价值。"他说："我们在当地的资产曾两次被征用，可想而知，要 第三次重返委内瑞拉市场，需要该国做出相当重大的变革。"（广角观察） ...

但石油公司高管们普遍认为，任何新的投资都需要数年时间才能实现财务上的回报，并且很大程度上取决于未来几个月政局的稳定与否。 多位高管都提到了安全保障的必要性，他们担心委内瑞拉的政治走向，以及员工和设备的安全，投资前提应是明确的法治保障、人员与设备安 全、政治稳定等。多数人准备在短期内组建技术团队，对行业和资产现状进行评估。 埃克森美孚（美孚）自2007年时任总统将委内瑞拉石油国有化后撤出该国。该公司CEO伍兹在白宫指出，在委内瑞拉开展业务之前，需要先了解 投资回报、建立一系列法律和商业框架。 面对高管们的犹豫不决，特朗普直接回应，"如果你不想进去，就直接告诉我好了，后面还有25个人今天没来，他们可以代替你去。" 美东时间1月9日，美国总统特朗普在白宫与大型石油企业高管举行会议，以推动美国能源企业投资委内瑞拉石油产业，但许多美国石油公司对重 新进入委内瑞拉的石油行业兴趣不大。 据央视新闻报道，按照特朗普的说法，大型石油公司将至少花费1000亿美元来重建委内瑞拉石油产业必要的产能和基础设施，他同时还承诺，美 国石油公司将获得安全保障。 作为石油资源大国，委内瑞拉已探明储量约3030亿桶，占全球总量的17%，居世界首 ...

Defense Sector - The defense sector experienced significant volatility following President Trump's announcement of a proposed military budget increase to $1.5 trillion for fiscal 2027, a 50% increase from the $962 billion requested for 2026, leading to a surge in defense stocks [3][4] - Lockheed Martin's shares rose 4.3% on January 8, followed by a 4.2% increase on January 9, closing at $542.78, while Northrop Grumman and RTX also saw gains [3] - Smaller companies like Kratos Defense experienced a remarkable 13.8% increase, and defense-focused ETFs outperformed the broader market [3] Housing Market - President Trump's proposal to ban large institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes caused a decline in major stock indices, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 0.9% and the S&P 500 slipping 0.3% [5] - Shortly after, Trump announced a directive for federal agencies to purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds to lower mortgage rates, which led to a rally in housing stocks, with Rocket Companies surging 9.65% and homebuilders like Lennar and D.R. Horton also experiencing significant gains [6][8] - Analysts expressed concerns that while bond purchases might lower mortgage yields, they could also increase housing demand, complicating the affordability issue [7] Energy Sector - The capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and Trump's announcement of a $100 billion oil investment plan for Venezuela positively impacted major stock indexes, with energy stocks like Chevron and Exxon Mobil seeing gains [10] - However, by January 7, oil prices fell due to concerns over the long-term implications of Trump's plan to refine and sell Venezuelan crude, indicating a mixed market reaction [11] Tariffs and Legal Uncertainty - The market showed anxiety ahead of a Supreme Court ruling on Trump's tariffs, with Wall Street futures dipping as uncertainty persisted regarding the legality of these policies [13] - Kevin Hassett's expectation that the Supreme Court would side with the Trump administration on tariffs adds another layer of speculation to the ongoing legal battle, highlighting the tension between executive power and trade norms [14] Market Dynamics - The overall market remains highly reactive to Trump's pronouncements, with significant fluctuations observed across various sectors, including defense, housing, and energy, reflecting the interplay between presidential policy and economic fundamentals [15][16] - On January 9, major indices were on track for weekly gains, with the S&P 500 reaching a new all-time high of 6,966, indicating a volatile yet upward trend in the market [16]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between President Trump and executives from major U.S. oil companies aimed to discuss potential investments in Venezuela's oil industry, but executives expressed caution regarding future investments due to the current legal and business environment in the country [1]. Group 1: Company Perspectives - ExxonMobil's CEO Darren W. Woods stated that Venezuela is currently "not investable" unless there are significant changes in the country's legal and business framework [1]. - ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance emphasized the need to discuss a "restructuring" of Venezuela's entire energy system, noting that the company has previously incurred losses of $12 billion in Venezuela [1]. - Chevron is the only major U.S. oil company still operating in Venezuela, with Vice Chairman Mark Nelson indicating a potential for short-term increases in oil production but not committing to further investments [1]. Group 2: Investment Plans and Challenges - President Trump announced plans for U.S. oil companies to invest at least $100 billion to "rebuild" Venezuela's oil infrastructure and production capacity, promising "full" security guarantees for the companies involved [1]. - Despite Trump's call for U.S. oil companies to enter Venezuela to "make money for America," there are significant risks related to funding capabilities, security assurances, and political stability, with the most enthusiastic companies being the least prepared and experienced [1].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump urged major oil companies to return to Venezuela to exploit its vast oil reserves, proposing a plan that could require at least $100 billion in investments to rebuild the country's oil industry [1] Group 1: Company Responses - Executives from major oil companies expressed skepticism about investing in Venezuela without significant legal and commercial reforms, with ExxonMobil's CEO stating the country is currently in an "uninvestable" state [1][5] - Chevron's executives showed a more positive stance, indicating potential for increasing production from existing joint ventures in Venezuela [6] - Other companies like Shell and Repsol expressed readiness to invest if U.S. sanctions are lifted, highlighting a willingness to explore opportunities in Venezuela [6] Group 2: Market Reactions - The announcement did not lead to significant market volatility, with oil prices remaining stable, reflecting investor skepticism about the feasibility of the proposed plan [2] - Chevron's stock price fell by 1% following the news, indicating market concerns over geopolitical risks associated with increased exposure to Venezuela [2] Group 3: Investment Challenges - Analysts noted that restoring Venezuela's oil production could require hundreds of billions of dollars due to years of neglect and mismanagement, posing a significant barrier to investment [7] - Trump's proposal to lower oil prices to $50 per barrel raised concerns that such low prices could hinder profitability for oil companies investing in Venezuela [7] Group 4: Security and Legal Uncertainties - Trump's assurances of "complete security" for companies were seen as vague, with concerns that safety would depend on the Venezuelan regime rather than U.S. military support [8] - Legal experts highlighted the gap between interest in potential investments and the actual commitment to spending, emphasizing the need for clearer regulations and easier access to licenses from U.S. authorities [8]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between President Trump and executives from major oil companies aimed to discuss potential investments in Venezuela's oil industry, but executives expressed caution regarding future investments due to the current legal and business environment in the country [1] Group 1: Company Perspectives - ExxonMobil's CEO Darren W. Woods stated that Venezuela is currently "not investable" unless there are significant changes in the country's legal and business framework [1] - ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance emphasized the need to discuss a "restructuring" of Venezuela's entire energy system, noting that the company has previously incurred losses of $12 billion in the country [1] - Chevron is the only major U.S. oil company still operating in Venezuela's oil fields, with Vice Chairman Mark Nelson indicating that while there is potential to increase production in the short term, there are no commitments for further investment [1]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between President Trump and executives from major U.S. oil companies aimed to encourage investment in Venezuela's oil industry, with Trump claiming that U.S. companies could control over 55% of global oil if they re-entered the Venezuelan market [1][5]. Group 1: Investment Opportunities - Trump expressed a strong desire for U.S. companies to invest at least $100 billion in Venezuela's oil production, highlighting the potential for rebuilding the country's energy infrastructure [5]. - The executives from ExxonMobil, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips were present, but none committed to immediate large-scale investments, citing the need for regulatory reforms and restructuring of the energy sector in Venezuela [5]. Group 2: Oil Reserves and Production - Venezuela is reported to have approximately 303 billion barrels of proven oil reserves, accounting for about 19% of global reserves, while the U.S. has around 45 billion barrels, representing about 3% [4][6]. - Combined, the reserves of both countries account for approximately 22% of the world's total proven oil reserves, contradicting Trump's claim of 55% [4]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Challenges - Analysts suggest that U.S. intervention in Venezuela's oil sector aims for both short-term access to heavy crude oil and long-term energy dominance, but face significant challenges due to aging infrastructure and changing global energy market dynamics [6]. - Venezuelan officials have condemned Trump's plans as an attempt to exploit the country's resources, asserting that such actions violate national sovereignty [6].