本文首发于公众号"私募排排网"。 （点击↑↑ 上图查看详情 ） 2025年12月，公募基金行业近年来最具深远意义的改革新规落地——投资范围、薪酬激励与业务限制的调整，被视为重塑行业生态的关键一 步。从3月初的意见征集到新规落地，一股暗流已悄然涌动。 Choice数据显示，截至2025年12月19日，年内已经有304位公募基金经理离职，包括鲍无可、张翼飞、周海栋、曹名长、翟相栋等多名绩优基金 经理或从业多年的老将卸任，其中多位基金经理传出"奔私"的消息。 回望过去三次"公奔私"大潮，它不仅是基金经理个人职业路径的再选择，更是基金行业生态重构与市场行情变迁的缩影： 2006年-2007年 上证指数从1000点涨至6124点，公募基金规模井喷，但激励机制相对匮乏。在此期间，初代明星基金经理离职"试水"私募，如嘉实基金的"王牌"赵 军创立淡水泉、工银瑞信的老将江晖创办星石投资； 2012年-2015年 随着创业板牛市和2014年的蓝筹"暴动"，明星基金经理再被推上风口浪尖。"公募一哥"王亚伟离职成立千合资本，南方基金的邱国鹭创办高毅资 产，后聚拢邓晓峰等基金经理形成"高毅系"； 2020—2022年 在新能源等赛道股 ...

Core Insights - The private equity fund industry is characterized by diverse investment philosophies and strategies influenced by the backgrounds of fund managers, which directly impacts product performance and risk profiles [1][4] - As of September 19, 2025, the average return for private equity fund managers this year is 25.57%, with 2,669 managers and 5,270 products reported [2][4] - Fund managers from public offerings and futures backgrounds lead in performance, with public fund managers achieving an average return of 31.26% and futures managers at 31.21% [2][4] Summary by Category Public Fund Managers - There are 859 public fund managers, with 328 products meeting ranking criteria, achieving an average return of 31.26% this year [4][2] - The top three products from public fund managers are managed by Lu Wentao, Nian Shouhua, and Wang Zheng, with Lu's product leading significantly [3][4] Futures Fund Managers - There are 251 futures fund managers, with 72 products achieving an average return of 31.21% this year, slightly below public fund managers [9][4] - The top three products from futures fund managers are managed by Liu Kejiao, Yin Zhiping, and Liang Tao, with Liu's product leading the group [10][12] Private Fund Managers - There are 298 private fund managers, with 119 products achieving an average return of 30.07%, ranking third among all backgrounds [14][4] - The top three products from private fund managers are managed by Tang Yunjie, Li Jiabin, and Han Guangbin, with Tang's product leading in performance [15][17]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance of private equity fund managers from different backgrounds, highlighting the differences in investment strategies and their impact on fund performance. It emphasizes that the "public fund" managers have outperformed others in terms of returns this year, driven by their rigorous investment research and risk control practices [1][4]. Summary by Category Performance Overview - As of September 19, 2025, there are 2,669 fund managers with performance data, managing a total of 5,270 products, with an average return of 25.57% this year [1]. - Fund managers from public funds achieved an average return of 31.26%, slightly ahead of those from the futures background at 31.21% [1][2]. Fund Manager Backgrounds - The performance of fund managers varies significantly based on their professional backgrounds: - Public Fund Managers: 328 products, total scale of approximately 4.16 billion, average return of 31.26% [3]. - Futures Managers: 72 products, total scale of approximately 609 million, average return of 31.21% [3]. - Private Managers: 119 products, total scale of approximately 1.21 billion, average return of 30.07% [3]. - Securities Managers: 936 products, total scale of approximately 7.65 billion, average return of 27.66% [2][3]. Top Performing Products - The article lists the top-performing products from public fund managers, with "路远睿泽稳增" managed by 路文韬 leading with significant returns [5][6]. - For futures managers, "富延盛世1号" managed by 刘腾蛟 is highlighted as the top product, showcasing strong performance [10][11]. - The "民间派" managers also have notable products, with "泽源多策略2号A类份额" managed by 唐韵捷 leading in returns [12][14]. Trends and Insights - There is a notable trend of public fund managers transitioning to private equity, with 307 departures recorded this year, the highest in five years [4]. - The article indicates a growing interest in sectors like gold and military industries among fund managers, reflecting broader market trends [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing trend of public fund managers transitioning to private equity, driven by changes in incentive mechanisms, a trend towards "de-starring," and a bullish market environment since 2025 [1]. Group 1: Public to Private Transition - As of September 19, 2023, a total of 307 public fund managers have left their positions this year, marking a five-year high, with several star managers rumored to join private equity firms [1]. - Notable departures include managers from Huashang Fund, Invesco Great Wall Fund, and China Merchants Shekou, with many expected to join Hillhouse Capital's Lingren Investment [1]. Group 2: Performance of Former Public Fund Managers - Among the 859 former public fund managers, those who transitioned to private equity have shown strong performance, with average returns of 28.26%, 57.63%, and 58.89% over the past year, three years, and since the beginning of the year, respectively [1]. Group 3: Top Performers in 2023 - Wang Penghui from Wangzheng Asset tops the list of private fund managers for this year, with an average return of ***% across three products [4]. - The only quantitative fund manager on the list is Nie Shouhua from Hanrong Investment, who ranks fourth with an average return of ***% [5]. Group 4: Performance Over One Year - In the past year, Zeng Weijiang from Beijing Zhenke Private Equity leads with a significant advantage, achieving an average return of ***% [6][7]. - The top ten list includes eight subjective private fund managers, with many managing less than 50 billion [6]. Group 5: Performance Over Three Years - In the last three years, Zhang Wenlong from Jinyu Investment and Yuan Wei from Huazhong Hexin rank among the top five, with average returns of ***% [9][10]. - Wang Penghui and Lu Hang have consistently appeared in the top rankings across different time frames [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing trend of public fund managers transitioning to private equity, driven by changes in incentive mechanisms, a shift away from star managers, and a bullish market environment since 2025 [1]. Group 1: Public to Private Transition - As of September 19, 2023, a total of 307 public fund managers have left their positions this year, marking a five-year high, with several star managers rumored to join private equity firms [1]. - Notable managers who have transitioned include Zhou Haidong from Huashang Fund and Bao Wuke from Invesco Great Wall, both reportedly joining Hillhouse Capital's Lingren Investment [1]. Group 2: Performance of Transitioned Managers - Among the 859 former public fund managers, those who have moved to private equity have shown strong performance, with average returns of 28.26%, 57.63%, and 58.89% over the past year, three years, and since the beginning of the year, respectively [1]. - The top-performing managers in the current year include Wang Penghui from Wangzheng Asset, who leads with an average return of ***% [2][4]. Group 3: Top Managers by Performance - In the current year, the top 10 "public to private" fund managers have a performance threshold of ***%, with 9 being from subjective private equity and only 1 from quantitative private equity [2]. - Wang Penghui from Wangzheng Asset ranks first, with an average return of ***% across three products [4]. - The only quantitative manager in the top ranks is Nie Shouhua from Hanrong Investment, with an average return of ***% [5]. Group 4: Yearly and Three-Year Performance - In the past year, Zeng Weijiang from Beijing Zhenke Private Equity achieved the highest average return of ***%, with 8 out of the top 10 managers being from subjective private equity [6][7]. - Over the past three years, Zeng Weijiang also leads with an average return of ***%, with Wang Penghui and Lu Hang appearing in the top ranks multiple times [9][10].

Group 1 - DeepSeek's parent company director is under investigation for allegedly siphoning off over 100 million in commissions from a brokerage [11] - The case involves a "rebate" scandal linked to top quantitative private fund Huanfang Quantitative and China Merchants Securities [11] - The investigation has led to the transfer of involved personnel to judicial authorities, with no current response from China Merchants Securities [11] Group 2 - The Chinese economy is experiencing anxiety and pessimism due to a shift from easy earnings to economic volatility, as noted by Fan Gang, Vice President of the China Economic System Reform Research Association [3] - Economic fluctuations are common in market economies, and despite a 5% growth rate, consumer behavior is being affected by this anxiety [3] Group 3 - The supply-side adjustment in China is facing greater challenges than in 2016, with severe overcapacity issues arising from production in recent years, according to economist Hong Hao [5][12] - The current market conditions are compared to previous years, highlighting the unsustainable pricing of products like electric vehicles and milk tea [5][12] Group 4 - Lenovo reported a record high revenue of 136.2 billion RMB for the first quarter of the 2025 fiscal year, marking a 22% year-on-year increase [13] - The company’s net profit also saw significant growth, with a 108% increase under Hong Kong Financial Reporting Standards [13] - Lenovo's CEO emphasized that China remains a competitive manufacturing base, with lower costs compared to other regions [13] Group 5 - The recent trend of high-profile fund managers leaving public funds has raised concerns about the "public to private" phenomenon, with 242 fund managers departing in 2025 alone [16] - This trend reflects broader industry changes, including salary reforms and regulatory adjustments, as well as private firms actively recruiting top talent [16] Group 6 - The "Dong Mingzhu Health Home" brand has been renamed to "Gree Good Goods Guide" in preparation for the launch of an online store, according to Gree Electric's marketing director [17] - This change is part of a strategic adjustment to meet platform naming rules [17] Group 7 - Future Health, the parent company of SKG, has halted its plans for an IPO on the Beijing Stock Exchange after signing a termination agreement with CITIC Securities [20] - The company reported earnings of 500 million over four years, with SKG being a popular brand endorsed by Elon Musk's mother [20]

Core Viewpoint - The recent trend of fund manager departures at China Asset Management Company reflects a broader talent migration within the public fund industry, driven by compensation reforms, regulatory adjustments, and the shift from a "star" model to a "platform" model [3][6][12]. Group 1: Fund Manager Departures - Zhai Xiangdong, a prominent fund manager at China Asset Management, has officially resigned due to personal reasons, marking another high-profile departure in 2025 [2][4]. - This year, China Asset Management has lost four key fund managers, including Ma Long, Su Yanqing, and Wang Yan, with Ma Long managing assets worth 876 billion yuan before his departure [4][10]. - The public fund industry has seen a total of 242 fund manager departures in 2025, a record high, indicating a significant trend of talent movement [3][6]. Group 2: Industry Trends - The public fund industry is undergoing a transformation from reliance on individual star fund managers to a more team-oriented and institutionalized approach [8][12]. - The shift is characterized by enhanced collaboration within research teams and a focus on long-term performance and risk management, reducing dependency on individual managers [8][9]. - Compensation structures are evolving, with a greater emphasis on equity incentives and differentiated assessments, reflecting a competitive landscape for talent [7][12]. Group 3: Company Response - China Asset Management has stated that the recent personnel changes are part of a long-term strategy for optimizing resources and product management [5][9]. - The company emphasizes its commitment to developing a robust talent pipeline and maintaining a culture of focus and openness within its investment team [5][9]. - The firm has extended its performance evaluation period from three to five years to enhance investor experience and align interests with long-term returns [9].

Group 1 - The departure of fund manager Zhai Xiangdong from China Merchants Fund is part of a broader trend of talent migration within the public fund industry, with 242 fund managers leaving since 2025, marking a new high [2][6][8] - Zhai Xiangdong achieved a return of 117.90% and an annualized return of 27.24% since taking over the China Merchants Advantage Enterprise Mixed Fund, which grew from less than 40 million to over 10 billion in size [3][4] - The fund's size has decreased to 81.32 billion following Zhai's departure, with over 300 million shares redeemed, raising concerns about the future performance under the new manager [3][4] Group 2 - The trend of talent loss at China Merchants Fund is not isolated, as four prominent fund managers have left the company this year, including Ma Long and Su Yanqing, due to personal reasons [4][5] - The public fund industry is experiencing a shift from a "star manager" model to a "platform" model, emphasizing team collaboration and reducing reliance on individual managers [9][10] - The industry is seeing an increase in competition for talent, with factors such as salary reforms and regulatory changes driving the migration of fund managers to private equity firms [9][10] Group 3 - The average tenure of fund managers in the industry is around 4.15 years, with a significant number of managers leaving their positions, indicating a high turnover rate [7][8] - The trend of high-level personnel changes is also evident, with frequent adjustments in executive roles across various fund companies, reflecting the competitive landscape and the need for strategic realignment [11][12][14] - The ongoing transformation in the public fund industry is pushing firms to focus on long-term performance, risk management, and effective communication with investors, which raises the bar for fund managers' professional skills [10][14]

Core Viewpoint - The resignation of prominent fund manager Zhai Xiangdong from China Merchants Fund has been confirmed, with speculation about his potential move to a private equity fund, possibly Hillhouse Capital. This trend of high-profile fund manager departures has been increasing in the industry this year, with a total of 242 public fund managers leaving as of August 12, 2025, compared to 212 in the same period last year, marking a 14.15% increase [1][19][21]. Group 1: Resignation Details - Zhai Xiangdong has officially resigned as the manager of the China Merchants Advantage Enterprise Fund due to personal reasons and will not take on any other roles within the company [2][3]. - His departure follows a series of high-profile exits from various funds, including notable managers from firms like China Europe Fund and Industrial Bank of China Fund [1][19]. - The number of fund managers leaving this year has significantly increased, with 242 departures compared to previous years, indicating a trend in the industry [19][21]. Group 2: Performance and Management - Zhai Xiangdong's management of the China Merchants Advantage Enterprise Fund has been marked by impressive performance, achieving a 124.59% increase during his tenure, with an annualized return of 27.96% [5][6]. - The fund's performance has been notable, especially in 2023 and 2024, where it outperformed benchmarks significantly, although it faced challenges in the second quarter of 2025, resulting in a net value decline of 3.63% [6][11]. - His investment strategy focused on high-risk, high-reward opportunities, particularly in TMT (Technology, Media, and Telecommunications) sectors, which contributed to the fund's strong performance during market upswings [12][9]. Group 3: Industry Trends - The trend of fund managers transitioning from public to private equity is becoming more pronounced, driven by the allure of higher compensation and greater investment freedom in private equity [22]. - The public fund industry has seen a shift in dynamics, with an oversupply of fund managers following a period of rapid expansion, leading to increased departures as performance evaluations come into play [21][22]. - The active equity funds have recently begun to outperform the market after three years of underperformance, yet this has not prevented the exodus of top-performing fund managers [18][21].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent resignation of prominent fund manager Zhai Xiangdong from the China Merchants Fund, highlighting a trend of increasing departures among star fund managers in the industry, with a total of 242 fund managers leaving in 2025, compared to 212 in the previous year, marking a 14.15% increase [1][14][15]. Summary by Sections Resignation of Zhai Xiangdong - Zhai Xiangdong has officially resigned as the manager of the China Merchants Advantage Enterprise Fund due to "personal reasons" and is rumored to join a private equity fund, possibly Hillhouse [3][5]. - His tenure saw the fund achieve a 124.59% increase over 3 years, significantly outperforming the CSI 300 index [5][9]. Performance and Strategy - Under Zhai's management, the fund's annualized return was 27.96%, with a maximum quarterly drawdown of less than 25%, making it a popular choice among investors [5][9]. - Despite strong past performance, the fund experienced a net value decline of 3.63% in Q2 2025, attributed to a lack of exposure to high-performing sectors during that period [6][9]. Market Trends and Departures - The article notes a significant increase in fund manager departures this year, with 242 resignations reported by August 12, 2025, compared to previous years [14][15]. - The trend is linked to a market shift where many fund managers are facing performance evaluations after three years of underperformance, leading to a surplus of fund managers in the industry [15]. Transition to Private Equity - The article highlights the trend of fund managers moving to private equity, driven by better compensation structures and greater investment freedom, allowing them to implement personal investment strategies [15][16]. - Zhai's successor, Lu Wenkai, is noted to have a more balanced investment approach compared to Zhai's high-risk strategy, indicating a potential shift in the fund's management style [11][12].