报道称，嫌疑人为79岁的首尔居民金某。他11日早上8时左右在石墙上先写下了"致人民和世界的信 息"，随后在书写"特朗普总统"时被当场制止。警方随即将其抓获，并以涉嫌违反《文化遗产保护及利 用相关法律》立案调查。因其供词内容含糊不清且年事已高，警方随后将其紧急送医。 【环球时报驻韩国特约记者 黎枳银】据韩联社24日报道，首尔景福宫正门光化门的外墙日前遭人用黑 色马克笔涂写了"特朗普总统"等字样。韩国国家遗产厅表示，清除这批涂鸦共耗时约7小时，费用接近 1000万韩元（1000韩元约合5.2元人民币）。 韩国国立古宫博物馆文物科学科的5至6名工作人员11日上午开始在现场作业，最终借助专业设备与细微 石粉喷涂技术，将长约1.7米、宽约0.3米的字迹彻底清除。据景福宫管理所透露，清理工作的初步费用 统计至少为850万韩元。根据韩国现行法律，破坏文化遗产者不仅需承担全部修复费用，还可能被追究 法律责任。 这并非景福宫首次遭遇涂鸦破坏。2023年底，一名青少年在他人教唆下，以300万韩元为报酬对景福宫 进行喷漆涂鸦，清理费用高达约1.3亿韩元，事件引发韩国社会广泛谴责。 景福宫是朝鲜王朝的正宫，由太祖李成桂于1395年下 ...

Core Insights - The "2025 Forever Lost Heritage" Global Maker Competition aims to integrate cultural heritage with modern life, focusing on the theme "One City, One Tower, One River" [1][3] - The "Silk Road Echo" team won the competition with their creative installation "Garden of Sound Bells," inspired by the historical sound bells of the Dabaoen Temple [1][2] - The event saw participation from nearly 700 young creative talents from 19 countries, showcasing innovative proposals for cultural heritage revitalization [1][2] Event Highlights - The competition was organized by the Dabaoen Temple Ruins Museum, with support from UNESCO and various international institutions, enhancing its global perspective [1][2] - 31 young creators presented their digital art installation models, emphasizing interactivity and engagement with cultural heritage [2] - The winning team's design aims to awaken the historical memories of Nanjing, reflecting the city's rich cultural heritage [2] Future Implications - The creative installations developed during the competition will be integrated into public life, forming a growth chain of "creativity—product—industry—economy" [2] - The Dabaoen Temple Ruins Museum plans to officially unveil the "Garden of Sound Bells" installation on its rooftop, inviting global youth to participate in the narrative of Nanjing [2][3] - The competition serves as a model for sustainable development in museums, demonstrating how cultural roots can be preserved amid transformation [3]

Group 1 - The article highlights the comprehensive preservation efforts for the World Cultural Heritage site of Suoyang City, which includes advanced technologies like remote sensing and new materials to enhance the site's durability [1][2] - Over the past five years, the government has invested more than 10 million RMB in various preservation projects, including the restoration of city walls and archaeological excavations [2] - The archaeological findings at the site, including artifacts from the Tang and Sui dynasties, underscore the historical significance of Suoyang City as a vital hub for Silk Road trade and cultural exchange [3] Group 2 - The site has implemented a monitoring and early warning system to track environmental conditions affecting the heritage site, ensuring ongoing protection and maintenance [2] - Recent enhancements to visitor facilities, such as wooden walkways and viewing platforms, aim to provide an immersive experience of the site's historical and cultural significance [3] - Future plans include the establishment of a digital preservation experience center that will utilize holographic projections and AR technology to engage visitors with the history of Suoyang City [3]

Core Points - The incident of vandalism at Gyeongbokgung Palace highlights ongoing issues with cultural heritage preservation in South Korea [1][3] - The perpetrator, a 79-year-old man, was arrested after defacing the palace with graffiti, which included references to former President Trump [3] - The South Korean government has committed to responding firmly to any acts of vandalism against national heritage sites [3] Summary by Sections - **Incident Details** - A 79-year-old man named Kim was arrested for vandalizing Gyeongbokgung Palace with a black marker [3] - The graffiti included a message "to the people and the world" and a reference to "President Trump" [3] - The motive behind the act remains unclear [3] - **Government Response** - The Cultural Heritage Administration of South Korea plans to remove the graffiti on the same day and has vowed to take strong action against any damage to national heritage [3] - According to South Korean law, individuals who damage cultural heritage are required to restore the site and cover all repair costs [3] - **Historical Context** - Gyeongbokgung Palace, built in 1395 by King Taejo of the Joseon Dynasty, has faced multiple instances of damage and reconstruction throughout its history [4] - This is not the first instance of vandalism at the palace; a previous incident involved a teenager who was incentivized to graffiti the site, resulting in significant public outrage and repair costs of approximately 130 million KRW [3]

Core Viewpoint - The revitalization of Beijing's central axis, recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage site, enhances the cultural and tourism landscape, attracting more visitors and enriching local life [4][5][7]. Group 1: Historical Significance - The Beijing central axis, established in the 13th century and completed in the 16th century, spans 7.8 kilometers and is the most complete traditional city axis in China, symbolizing the historical backbone of the ancient capital [4]. - The successful application for World Heritage status on July 27, 2024, has increased interest in lesser-known sites like the Bell and Drum Towers and the Agricultural Ancestors' Altar [4]. Group 2: Tourism Development - Following the World Heritage designation, Beijing has developed new cultural tourism experiences, including themed routes and cultural exploration paths, catering to diverse tourist needs [4][5]. - Visitor numbers have shown a rapid increase, with attractions like the Drum Tower offering interactive experiences that highlight ancient Chinese timekeeping culture [5]. Group 3: Community Engagement - Public participation in the preservation of the central axis is growing, with initiatives like the "Digital Night Watchman" program allowing citizens to contribute to heritage monitoring through mobile applications [5]. - Local residents express pride in the central axis's status as a World Heritage site, noting improvements in cleanliness and the integration of cultural activities into daily life [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the integration of technology and creativity in the protection of cultural heritage in Zhejiang, particularly focusing on the West Lake, Grand Canal, and various intangible cultural heritages, showcasing a model of sustainable cultural preservation and innovation. Group 1: Cultural Heritage Protection - Zhejiang has achieved a breakthrough in world cultural heritage, with sites like West Lake and the Grand Canal being recognized, alongside 13 projects included in the intangible cultural heritage list [2] - The province boasts 20 historical cultural cities, 94 towns, 218 villages, and over 70,000 immovable cultural relics, indicating a rich cultural heritage landscape [2] Group 2: Technological Empowerment - Digital technology is being utilized in cultural heritage protection, such as AR guides in museums and smart management systems for the Grand Canal, enhancing visitor experience and management efficiency [3][4] - The "Liangzhu Cultural Comprehensive Enhancement Project" has implemented smart applications to monitor environmental conditions at heritage sites, improving management precision [3] Group 3: Major Cultural Projects - The "Chinese Historical Painting Series" project has been ongoing for 20 years, resulting in a comprehensive archive of ancient Chinese paintings, addressing the dual challenge of preservation and accessibility [6][7] - The project has produced 64 volumes and 244 books, creating the most extensive documentation of ancient Chinese art [6] Group 4: Intangible Cultural Heritage - Zhejiang leads the nation with 241 national intangible cultural heritage projects and 271 representative inheritors, reflecting a strong commitment to preserving traditional crafts [8] - Local initiatives encourage young artisans to engage in heritage protection, fostering a new generation of craftsmen [8] Group 5: Creative Cultural Development - Young creators in Zhejiang are innovating within the cultural sector, developing new products and experiences that blend traditional crafts with modern consumer interests [10] - The integration of local culture with creative industries is being promoted through various initiatives, enhancing cultural tourism and community engagement [10]

Core Viewpoint - The resilience protection system is essential for the rapid response and adaptive management of cultural heritage in the face of climate change and external shocks [1][2] Group 1: Climate Change Impact - Climate change poses a significant threat to cultural heritage, affecting temperature and precipitation averages over time, as well as their variability [1] - Different regions and materials (such as soil, wood, brick, stone) require tailored responses to climate change, with a particular focus on the over 80% of earthen sites in China [1] Group 2: Restoration and Preservation Techniques - Restoration is crucial for recovering the original appearance of cultural artifacts, while also enhancing their resilience against external shocks and erosion [1] - Modern restoration emphasizes detailed scientific exploration, testing, research, and evaluation before applying various restoration measures, moving beyond mere restoration to strengthening the artifacts [1] Group 3: Environmental Considerations - The protection of cultural heritage must include the safeguarding of surrounding environments, as many ancient buildings are integrated with their surroundings [2] - There is a consensus on the need to study the safety of the environments where cultural artifacts are located [2] Group 4: Technological Integration - Current technology is no longer a limiting factor for protection, but the disconnect between technology application and cultural heritage preservation remains an issue [2] - A comprehensive understanding of the value, characteristics, and properties of cultural artifacts is necessary to effectively utilize technology for early diagnosis of deterioration and enhance monitoring capabilities [2] Group 5: Goals of the Resilience Protection System - The resilience protection system aims to maximize the self-healing and sustainable development capabilities of cultural artifacts in response to external shocks [2] - It requires a shift from reactive "emergency restoration" to proactive "adaptive maintenance," necessitating improved knowledge and understanding of cultural heritage [2] - There is a need to integrate existing cultural heritage protection data and systems, establishing cross-disciplinary collaboration platforms for data sharing and resource coordination [2]

Core Viewpoint - The legend of "Gao Liang Chasing Water" reflects the historical significance of water resources in Beijing and the cultural memory associated with the Gao Liang Bridge and Gao Liang River, highlighting the challenges of water scarcity faced by the city's residents throughout history [6][12][13]. Summary by Relevant Sections Legend and Historical Context - The legend narrates how General Gao Liang chased away dragons to save Beijing's water supply, ultimately leading to the establishment of Gao Liang Bridge to commemorate his efforts [6][8]. - The story, while fictional, encapsulates the historical struggles of Beijing's residents with water scarcity, emphasizing the importance of water resources in their daily lives [7][9]. Water Scarcity in Beijing - Historical records indicate that Beijing has long faced water shortages, with a significant portion of its wells providing poor-quality water [7][10]. - The reliance on wells for daily water needs and the high cost of purchasing drinkable water reflect the ongoing challenges faced by the city's inhabitants [7][8]. Cultural Significance of Gao Liang Bridge and River - Gao Liang Bridge and River have been integral to Beijing's history, serving as vital components of the city's water system since the Jin Dynasty [9][10]. - The bridge and river have also been popular recreational spots for residents, contributing to their cultural significance [11][12]. Heritage Protection and Modern Relevance - Recent efforts have been made to preserve Gao Liang Bridge as a cultural heritage site, highlighting its historical value amidst urban development [12][13]. - The legend of "Gao Liang Chasing Water" serves as a means to raise awareness about the importance of protecting cultural heritage and understanding the historical context of Beijing's water resources [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangxi Province has issued a plan for the construction and protection of the Yangtze National Cultural Park, emphasizing high-quality development and cultural heritage preservation [1] Group 1: Planning and Scope - The plan covers 46 counties (cities, districts) across 11 prefecture-level cities in Jiangxi Province, focusing on significant cultural heritage along the Yangtze River and its tributaries [1] - The primary task is to ensure the holistic and systematic protection of cultural heritage [1] Group 2: Development Philosophy - The plan adheres to the principles of "coordinated major protection, no major development" and "ecological priority, green development" [1] - It aims to integrate the protection of cultural heritage, ecological environment, and urban-rural landscape [1] Group 3: Cultural and Tourism Integration - The plan seeks to enhance thematic displays and create a distinctive Yangtze cultural exhibition system with local characteristics [1] - It promotes the innovative integration of culture and tourism, aiming to develop a shining pearl on the international golden tourism belt of the Yangtze River [1] Group 4: Future Goals - By 2027, the plan aims to establish a cultural heritage protection supervision system and a mechanism for the protection of cultural heritage [1] - By 2035, it envisions a clear responsibility and efficient management model for comprehensive and systematic protection of cultural heritage, positioning Jiangxi as a core area for inheriting and promoting Yangtze culture [1]

Core Viewpoint - The successful application of Beijing's Central Axis for World Heritage status marks a significant milestone in cultural heritage protection and urban development in China, showcasing the country's commitment to preserving its historical and cultural identity [1][17][18]. Group 1: Historical Context and Significance - The concept of Beijing's Central Axis was formally recognized in the 20th century, with significant contributions from scholars like Liang Sicheng, who detailed its historical and architectural importance [2][4]. - The Central Axis, spanning 7.8 kilometers, is the longest urban axis in the world, representing a unique blend of material and intangible cultural heritage [4][14]. Group 2: Application Journey - The journey to apply for World Heritage status began post-2008 Beijing Olympics, with a series of initiatives and plans laid out by local and national authorities to protect and promote the Central Axis [6][7]. - Key milestones included its inclusion in the national cultural heritage preparatory list in 2012 and the establishment of a dedicated working group for its protection and promotion [6][8]. Group 3: Core Work for Heritage Protection - A comprehensive protection system was developed, focusing on cultural heritage preservation, environmental improvement, public engagement, and technological integration [10][12]. - Significant restoration efforts were made on key historical sites along the Central Axis, adhering to international heritage protection standards [10][11]. Group 4: Unique Value of the Central Axis - The Central Axis serves as a model for balancing heritage protection with urban development, providing valuable insights for other historical cities worldwide [14][15]. - Its successful application for World Heritage status highlights China's cultural confidence and the continuity of its civilization [18]. Group 5: Future Implications - The recognition of the Central Axis as a World Heritage site is expected to enhance Beijing's role as a national cultural center, guiding future urban planning and development [17][18]. - Ongoing efforts will focus on maintaining the heritage's value, ensuring public participation, and integrating modern urban life with historical preservation [18].