Core Viewpoint - The company emphasizes the importance of public opinion management and is committed to enhancing brand reputation and competitiveness [1] Group 1 - The company responded to investor inquiries on October 31, indicating a proactive approach to managing public sentiment [1] - The company is focused on improving its business operations and management practices [1]

Core Viewpoint - Tongyu New Materials (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. has strengthened its internal governance by establishing new management systems aimed at enhancing compliance and market risk response capabilities [1][3]. Group 1: Financial Reporting - The board of directors approved the "2025 Q3 Report," confirming that the report accurately reflects the company's actual situation and complies with relevant laws and regulations [2]. - The voting results for the report were unanimous, with 7 votes in favor and no abstentions or oppositions [2]. Group 2: Internal Governance - The company has introduced the "Public Opinion Management System" and "Market Value Management System" to improve its ability to monitor and respond to public sentiment and to regulate market value management practices [3]. - These systems are designed to promote the reasonable return of company value and long-term stable growth, marking a significant step in the systematic construction of investor relations management and market risk prevention [3]. Group 3: Meeting Compliance - The board meeting held on October 27, 2025, was conducted in accordance with legal requirements, with all 7 directors present, including 4 participating via remote voting [4]. - The meeting was chaired by the chairman, Zhang Chi, and the decision-making process was transparent and compliant with the Company Law and Articles of Association [4].

Core Points - The meeting focused on the theme of "Learning and Implementing Xi Jinping's Cultural Thought and Effectively Managing Public Opinion in State-Owned Enterprises" [1] - The importance of cultural construction in governance has been emphasized since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] - The meeting aimed to enhance understanding of the new challenges in the field of news and public opinion management [1] Group 1 - The meeting highlighted the extreme importance of managing news and public opinion in the new era, urging leaders to maintain political sensitivity and ensure public opinion safety [2] - It emphasized the need to improve public opinion management capabilities through various methods such as training, regular assessments, and establishing a comprehensive management system [2] - The meeting called for integrating public opinion management with core business operations to enhance overall efficiency and governance [2] Group 2 - An expert from the China Public Relations Association provided specialized guidance during the meeting [3] - Participants included members of the Capital Airport Group's leadership, department heads, and personnel related to public relations and cultural promotion [3]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the controversy of pre-made dishes at Xibei, highlighting the urgent need for transparency and standardization in the restaurant industry [2][3] - The incident began when a public figure criticized Xibei for allegedly serving pre-made dishes, leading to a public dispute and escalating tensions between the brand and consumers [2][3] - Xibei's response included a strong denial of the allegations, an offer for kitchen tours, and a commitment to rectify production processes, although their communication strategy faced criticism [3][5] Group 2 - The incident has resulted in a significant decline in Xibei's sales and brand value due to prolonged public backlash and ineffective communication [5] - The regulatory scrutiny faced by Xiaohongshu for its content management practices underscores the challenges of maintaining content quality and social responsibility as platforms grow [6][8] - Xiaohongshu's commitment to improve its content governance and adhere to regulatory standards reflects the increasing pressure on digital platforms to balance user engagement with responsible content management [7][8]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the controversy of pre-made dishes at Xibei, highlighting the urgent need for transparency and standardization in the restaurant industry [2][6] - The incident began when a public figure criticized Xibei for allegedly serving pre-made dishes, leading to a public dispute and escalating tensions between the brand and consumers [2][6] - Xibei's response included a strong denial of the allegations, an offer for kitchen tours, and a commitment to rectify production processes, although their communication strategy faced criticism [6][7] Group 2 - The incident has resulted in a significant decline in Xibei's sales and brand value due to prolonged public backlash and ineffective communication [7] - The regulatory scrutiny faced by Xiaohongshu for its content management practices emphasizes the need for platforms to balance user engagement with social responsibility [8][10] - Xiaohongshu's commitment to improve its content governance and adhere to regulatory standards reflects the growing pressure on digital platforms to maintain ethical content distribution [10][11]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of the AI Shield system by Jiu San Lu Digital Media, which uses AI technology to help companies manage and mitigate negative online sentiment, particularly in the restaurant and retail sectors. Group 1: Crisis in Corporate Reputation - Companies face not only market competition but also potential risks from online sentiment, where a single negative comment can trigger a crisis [2] - The restaurant and retail industry is particularly vulnerable to rapid and widespread negative sentiment, often leading to significant impacts on brand reputation and sales [2] Group 2: AI Shield System - The AI Shield system represents a technological breakthrough in sentiment management, designed specifically for modern enterprises [3] - It features advanced monitoring capabilities, continuously scanning popular social media platforms and news sites for potential threats to a company's reputation [3] Group 3: Deep Analysis and Problem Identification - The system not only monitors but also conducts deep analysis to identify the root causes, dissemination paths, and impact of negative sentiment [3][4] - For example, a well-known beauty brand faced negative comments due to product quality issues, which were found to be exacerbated by competitor sabotage [4] Group 4: Techniques for Mitigating Negative Information - One of the core functions of the AI Shield system is to suppress negative information in search results, effectively lowering its visibility [4] - This is achieved through scientific SEO strategies, including content optimization and the publication of positive information on authoritative platforms [4] Group 5: Industry Leadership and Technological Strength - Jiu San Lu Digital Media is recognized as a leader in the industry, having developed a unique "consumption scenario-based sentiment response system" tailored for the restaurant and retail sectors [8] - Their proprietary "Tianyan Consumption Version" AI sentiment system can accurately identify negative emotions in user comments and provide early warnings [8] Group 6: Comprehensive Sentiment Management - Effective sentiment management requires a full-process protective system, from monitoring and early warning to response and recovery [13] - Companies should prioritize industry compatibility, response speed, and cost-effectiveness when selecting sentiment management partners [13]

Core Insights - The training session aimed to enhance the legal compliance awareness and reputation risk management effectiveness of private equity institutions in Shenzhen [1][2] - The current market sentiment towards public opinion management is characterized by high attention, low tolerance, and high demands for handling public sentiment [1] - The training is part of a broader initiative to improve the public opinion response capabilities of private equity institutions, addressing existing deficiencies in this area [2] Group 1: Training Objectives and Participation - The training attracted over 150 representatives from private equity institutions, indicating strong interest in improving public opinion management [1] - The session focused on enhancing the compliance and reputation management skills of private equity firms in the Shenzhen area [1] Group 2: Key Recommendations and Strategies - Recommendations included increasing awareness, strengthening public opinion monitoring and management, and enhancing media cooperation [1][2] - Institutions were advised to develop a multi-tiered response mechanism for public opinion risks based on the nature, impact, and severity of the sentiment [2] Group 3: Regulatory Context and Support - The training aligns with the ongoing "Clear and Bright" campaign by the Central Internet Information Office to combat online chaos and improve market ecology [2] - The China Securities Regulatory Commission emphasizes the importance of managing public sentiment and addressing false information in the capital market [2]

Core Viewpoint - The company has established a public opinion management system to enhance its ability to respond to various public opinions, protect investor rights, and mitigate impacts on its stock and business reputation [2][3]. Group 1: General Principles - The public opinion management system aims to address negative or false media reports, rumors, and information that could affect investor decisions and stock price fluctuations [2]. - Public opinion is categorized into major public opinion, which significantly impacts the company's public image and operations, and general public opinion, which encompasses all other types [2][3]. Group 2: Organizational Structure and Responsibilities - The company has formed a public opinion management working group led by the chairman, with responsibilities including decision-making on public opinion handling and coordinating external communications [3][4]. - The board office is tasked with collecting and managing public opinion information, analyzing its impact, and reporting to the working group [4][5]. Group 3: Response and Handling of Public Opinion - The company emphasizes rapid response, coordinated communication, and proactive engagement in managing public opinion crises [5][6]. - A structured reporting process is in place for departments to report public opinion information, ensuring timely and accurate communication [6][7]. Group 4: Accountability and Confidentiality - The company holds personnel accountable for failing to follow public opinion management procedures, with potential disciplinary actions for causing losses [7][8]. - Confidentiality obligations are imposed on employees and consultants regarding undisclosed significant information, with penalties for breaches that harm the company [7][8].

Core Viewpoint - The company has established a public opinion management system to enhance its ability to respond to public sentiment and mitigate the impact of negative information on its stock and business operations [1][2]. Group 1: General Principles - The public opinion management system aims to quickly address various types of public sentiment that may affect the company's stock price and reputation [1]. - Public sentiment includes negative or false media reports, rumors, and any information that could influence investor behavior [1][2]. Group 2: Organizational Structure and Responsibilities - The company has formed a public opinion response team, which includes members from the securities, legal, and public relations departments [2]. - The public opinion response team is responsible for assessing the impact of public sentiment and coordinating external communications [2][3]. - A monitoring team has been established to conduct 24-hour surveillance of online information related to the company [2][3]. Group 3: Handling Principles and Measures - Public sentiment is categorized into major and general sentiment, with major sentiment having a broader impact on the company's image and operations [3][4]. - The company emphasizes timely, coordinated, targeted, and prudent responses to public sentiment [4]. - The reporting process for public sentiment includes immediate notification to the securities department and management for further action [4][5]. Group 4: Accountability - Employees and insiders are obligated to maintain confidentiality regarding undisclosed significant information, with penalties for breaches that cause company losses [5]. - The company reserves the right to pursue legal action against media that disseminate false or misleading information [5]. Group 5: Implementation and Interpretation - The public opinion management system will be executed in accordance with national laws and the company's articles of association [5]. - The board of directors is responsible for interpreting the system, which becomes effective upon approval [5].

Core Viewpoint - The company has established a public opinion management system to enhance its ability to respond to various public opinions and protect investor rights, in compliance with relevant laws and regulations [1][2]. Group 1: General Principles - The public opinion management system aims to address negative media coverage, rumors, and information that may affect the company's reputation and stock price [1]. - Public opinion is categorized into major public opinion, which significantly impacts the company's image and operations, and general public opinion, which is less severe [1][2]. Group 2: Organizational Structure and Responsibilities - The company has formed a public opinion management working group led by the chairman, with members from senior management and relevant departments [2][3]. - The working group is responsible for decision-making, investigation of public opinion incidents, and communication with regulatory bodies [2][3]. Group 3: Information Collection and Reporting - The board office leads the collection and analysis of public opinion information, tracking stock price fluctuations and assessing risks [3][4]. - All departments and subsidiaries must cooperate in reporting public opinion information promptly and accurately [4][5]. Group 4: Principles and Measures for Handling Public Opinion - The company emphasizes quick response, sincere communication, proactive engagement, and fair treatment in handling public opinion [5][6]. - Major public opinion incidents require immediate investigation, communication with media, and timely updates to investors [6][7]. Group 5: Confidentiality and Accountability - Internal departments and personnel are obligated to maintain confidentiality regarding public opinion incidents and their handling [6][7]. - The company reserves the right to pursue legal action against individuals or entities that disseminate false information affecting its reputation [6][7].