Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes has reignited, with Luo emphasizing the need for consumer awareness and transparency in the food industry [2][26]. Group 1: Luo Yonghao's Position - Luo Yonghao has reiterated his stance on pre-prepared dishes, suggesting that the industry already has basic definitions that can be refined to enhance consumer knowledge [2]. - He expressed acceptance of various levels of pre-prepared dishes in different dining contexts, indicating a nuanced view rather than outright opposition [2][3]. - Luo's comments have sparked mixed reactions from the public, with some supporting his transparency push while others criticize him for prolonging the controversy [4][5]. Group 2: Xibei's Response - Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, has publicly denied the use of pre-prepared dishes in their restaurants and threatened legal action against Luo for damaging their reputation [7][9]. - Following the backlash, Xibei issued an official apology and committed to significant operational changes by October 1, 2025, including the use of non-GMO soybean oil and on-site cooking for certain menu items [17][18]. - The company acknowledged a gap between their production practices and customer expectations, promising to improve transparency and food safety [18][19]. Group 3: Industry Impact - The controversy has led to a broader trust crisis in the restaurant industry, with many establishments reevaluating their marketing claims regarding "freshly made" dishes [27][29]. - Several restaurants have removed or altered their "no pre-prepared dishes" claims in response to consumer skepticism, indicating a shift towards prioritizing transparency over marketing slogans [29][30]. - The incident highlights a changing consumer preference, where transparency about ingredient sourcing and preparation methods is becoming more important than simply claiming dishes are made fresh [30][31].

Group 1 - In August, China's retail sales growth slowed to 3.4% year-on-year, with total retail sales reaching 39,668 billion yuan [2] - Excluding automobiles, retail sales increased by 3.7% year-on-year, indicating a gradual recovery in consumer spending, although the pace is slowing [2] - The service sector showed slight improvement, with the Ministry of Commerce planning to introduce policies to boost service consumption in September [2][3] Group 2 - The China Automotive Industry Association released guidelines for supplier payment practices, aiming to standardize payment terms and reduce financial pressure on suppliers [4] - Major automakers, including SAIC and BYD, have committed to shortening payment terms to 60 days, which may impact their cash flow management [4][5] - The domestic passenger car sales growth is slowing, and the cessation of price competition may challenge the competitiveness of many unprofitable new energy vehicle companies [5] Group 3 - In August, housing prices in major cities continued to decline, but the rate of decline is narrowing, indicating a potential stabilization in the real estate market [6][7] - Real estate investment remains weak, and the industry faces significant challenges, necessitating timely policy support to stabilize the market [7] Group 4 - The "2025 China Top 500 Enterprises" list was released, showing total revenue of 110.15 trillion yuan, with a net profit of 4.71 trillion yuan, reflecting growth in both metrics [8][9] - The list indicates a stable structure in large enterprises, with state-owned enterprises dominating the top positions, while private enterprises like JD.com are gaining ground in the digital economy [8][9] Group 5 - Recent trends show a rise in the issuance of large-denomination certificates of deposit (CDs) by banks, with interest rates approaching 2%, indicating a strategy to attract deposits amid low net interest margins [14][15] - The issuance of these CDs is not necessarily a signal of an interest rate hike but rather a response to the need for banks to bolster their deposit base [14][15] Group 6 - The stock market showed mixed performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index declining by 0.26% while the ChiNext Index rose by 1.52%, reflecting a volatile market environment [16][17] - Market sentiment is affected by uncertainties in U.S.-China trade negotiations, suggesting a need for new narratives to boost investor confidence [17]

全文如下： 9月15日，罗永浩发文称，决定放弃进一步追究西贝。 五十岁后，我亲眼看到无数的中年人，尤其是取得了一些事业成就的，可以为了所谓的"面子"做出多愚 蠢、多糟糕、多不顾后果的事。 -- 贾国龙为揭露西贝内幕的作出的贡献,这是对 一个欺骗公众的企业家进行讽刺和侮辱的行 为,涉嫌"意气用事",现在决定放弃(除非他 再次做出荒谬的言行); 3. 西贝常年用预制菜或半预制菜欺骗消费者, 导致这一次有很多人打算对西贝发起集体诉 讼,我公开答应过要帮助他们,这个没法失 信。有这个需求的朋友们可以写信到 wujialu@gg.com 我来负责安排律师和法律援 助。愿意主动提供法律帮助的律师朋友们,也 可以用这个信箱跟我们联系,多谢。 另外,西贝官方微博承诺 10月1号前会进行整 改,我会继续监督,如果有必要,我还是会继 续发声,这个你们放心。 就像这一次的贾国龙，在是非对错完全站不住脚...的情况下，还能嘴硬说出"生意宁可不做"的蠢话，不 惜让自己投入数十年心血的企业，和近两万名员工的岗位面临巨大的风险...... 的"面子"做出多愚蠢、多糟糕、多不顾后果的 事。就像这一次的贾国龙,在是非对错完全站 不住脚,在客观 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei has escalated, with Luo deciding to abandon legal action against Xibei's CEO, Jia Guolong, despite previous intentions to pursue a defamation lawsuit. This decision is influenced by a desire to avoid unnecessary conflict and focus on addressing actual issues within the company [6][7]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - Xibei's parent company, Inner Mongolia Xibei Catering Group Co., Ltd., has been under scrutiny from the Beijing Market Supervision Administration regarding the situation [1]. - Xibei issued an apology letter on September 15, which was later modified to include quotation marks around the word "abuse," indicating a lack of sincerity in the apology [11]. - Luo Yonghao has publicly committed to monitoring Xibei's promised reforms, which are expected to be completed by October 1 [8]. Group 2: Legal and Consumer Rights - Luo Yonghao has decided to forgo legal action against Jia Guolong unless further defamatory statements are made, indicating a shift in focus from personal grievances to broader consumer rights issues [7]. - Luo has offered to assist consumers who wish to pursue collective legal action against Xibei for allegedly misleading practices regarding pre-prepared dishes, providing a contact for legal support [8]. Group 3: Industry Standards and Consumer Awareness - Luo Yonghao advocates for transparency in the use of pre-prepared dishes in the restaurant industry, emphasizing the need for consumer awareness regarding the nature of the food being served [8]. - The National Health Commission has reportedly passed a draft national standard for the safety of pre-prepared foods, which Luo is eager to see implemented [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments between Luo Yonghao and Xibei, highlighting Luo's decision to abandon legal action against Xibei despite previous intentions to pursue a defamation lawsuit [2][6][7]. Summary by Sections Luo Yonghao's Statements - Luo Yonghao expressed disappointment that Xibei's official apology did not include a personal apology to him, and he criticized the company's owner, Jia Guolong, for not addressing the allegations of defamation [6][7]. - He reflected on the foolishness of prioritizing personal pride over business integrity, especially in light of Jia's stubbornness that could jeopardize the company and its employees [7]. Decisions Made by Luo Yonghao - Luo decided to abandon the planned legal action against Jia Guolong unless further defamatory statements are made [7]. - He also chose not to reward Jia Guolong with a cash prize for exposing Xibei's practices, recognizing it as an act of spite rather than constructive criticism [7]. - Luo committed to providing legal assistance to consumers who wish to pursue collective action against Xibei for misleading practices regarding pre-prepared dishes [7][8]. Xibei's Response - Xibei issued an apology acknowledging the gap between their production practices and customer expectations, promising to rectify the situation by October 1 [12][13]. - The initial apology was quickly retracted and revised, indicating a sensitive public relations situation [13]. Industry Context - Luo emphasized the importance of consumer rights, particularly the right to know about the use of pre-prepared ingredients in restaurant dishes, and expressed support for upcoming national standards on food safety for pre-prepared dishes [8][10].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing controversy surrounding the pre-prepared dishes of the chain restaurant group Xibei has attracted the attention of the Beijing Municipal Market Supervision Administration, which is further investigating the situation [1] Group 1: Company Actions and Reactions - Xibei's parent company, Inner Mongolia Xibei Catering Group Co., Ltd., is facing scrutiny due to allegations of misleading consumers regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes [1] - Luo Yonghao announced on Weibo that he would no longer pursue legal action against Xibei, citing concerns for the company's nearly 20,000 employees and the potential risks posed by the founder's stubbornness [2][3] - Luo has decided to abandon plans to reward the founder for revealing Xibei's internal issues, as he believes it would be an act of emotional retaliation [3] Group 2: Legal and Consumer Rights - There is a growing movement among consumers to initiate a collective lawsuit against Xibei for allegedly deceiving them with pre-prepared dishes, and Luo has committed to assisting those interested in legal action [4] - Luo emphasizes the importance of consumer rights, stating that while he does not oppose pre-prepared dishes, restaurants should not misrepresent them as freshly made meals [5] Group 3: Industry Standards and Regulations - The National Health Commission has reportedly passed a draft national standard for the food safety of pre-prepared dishes, which is expected to provide clearer guidelines for the industry [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of a public dispute involving a prominent entrepreneur and the potential risks to a well-known restaurant chain, highlighting the importance of accountability and transparency in the food industry [4][5]. Group 1: Company Actions and Decisions - The entrepreneur has decided to abandon legal action against the restaurant chain's owner, which was initially motivated by personal pride and the desire for vindication [6]. - A previously planned monetary reward to the restaurant owner for exposing alleged misconduct has also been canceled, reflecting a shift towards addressing the actual issues rather than personal grievances [6]. - The entrepreneur has committed to providing legal assistance to consumers planning to file a collective lawsuit against the restaurant chain for misleading practices related to pre-prepared food [6][7]. Group 2: Industry Standards and Consumer Rights - There is a growing concern regarding the use of pre-prepared foods in the restaurant industry, with calls for transparency to ensure consumers are informed about the nature of the food they are purchasing [7]. - The National Health Commission is working on a national standard for food safety concerning pre-prepared foods, which has passed expert review and is anticipated to be implemented soon [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the decision of Luo Yonghao to abandon legal action against Xibei, highlighting the impact of personal pride and stubbornness on business decisions, particularly in the context of Xibei's management and practices [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Decisions - Luo Yonghao has decided to drop the planned defamation lawsuit against Xibei's founder, Jia Guolong, citing that pursuing this would be driven by personal pride and rivalry [2]. - The intention to reward Jia Guolong with 100,000 yuan for exposing Xibei's practices has also been abandoned, as it was deemed an act of emotional response [2]. - Luo has committed to assist individuals planning to file a collective lawsuit against Xibei for allegedly misleading consumers with pre-prepared dishes, indicating a focus on consumer rights [2][3]. Group 2: Consumer Rights and Industry Standards - Luo emphasizes the importance of consumer awareness regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes in restaurants, advocating for transparency rather than deception [4]. - The article mentions that a draft national standard for the safety of pre-prepared foods has passed expert review, which is expected to be implemented soon, reflecting a move towards better regulation in the industry [4]. Group 3: Impact on Media and Communication - The incident has caused a delay in the release of the podcast "Luo Yonghao's Crossroads," which will now be aired the following week, indicating the broader impact of this controversy on Luo's media engagements [5]. - Luo humorously notes that if he goes missing, it may be due to external pressures, suggesting a tense atmosphere surrounding the situation [5].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing controversy between Luo Yonghao and Xibei Youmencun highlights the risks associated with business reputations and the impact of public perception on company operations, particularly in the context of pre-prepared food products [1][2][11]. Company Response - Xibei issued an apology letter but did not personally apologize to Luo Yonghao, which has led to further disputes [5]. - Xibei's official Weibo account promised to implement changes by October 1, and Luo Yonghao stated he would continue to monitor the situation [3][7]. Financial Impact - Following the controversy, Xibei's daily revenue reportedly dropped by 1 million yuan on September 10 and 11, and by 2 to 3 million yuan on September 12, indicating a significant financial impact due to public backlash [11]. Legal and Consumer Rights - Luo Yonghao decided to abandon his legal action against Xibei for defamation, citing a desire to avoid personal conflicts and focus on resolving actual issues [6]. - He also expressed commitment to assist consumers who wish to pursue collective legal action against Xibei for misleading practices regarding pre-prepared food [6]. Industry Standards - Luo Yonghao emphasized the need for transparency in the use of pre-prepared foods in restaurants, advocating for consumer rights to know what they are purchasing [8]. - A draft national standard for pre-prepared food safety, led by the National Health Commission, has passed expert review, which is expected to enhance industry regulations [8].

Group 1 - The company has decided to abandon legal action against an individual for defamation unless further similar statements are made [1] - The company will not proceed with a cash reward to the individual for exposing alleged misconduct, as it was deemed an act of emotional response [1] - There is a growing consumer sentiment to initiate a collective lawsuit against the company for misleading practices regarding pre-prepared dishes, and the company has offered legal assistance to affected consumers [1][2] Group 2 - The company emphasizes the importance of consumer awareness regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes, advocating for transparency rather than misrepresentation as fresh dishes [3] - A draft national standard for food safety concerning pre-prepared dishes has passed expert review, which the company looks forward to being implemented [4] - The company's podcast content schedule has been affected by recent events, leading to a delay in updates [4]