Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent decision to export lethal weapons marks a significant shift in its defense policy, raising concerns about a potential return to militarism and the violation of post-war commitments [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Defense Policy Changes - Japan has completed its first export of lethal weapons following the relaxation of its arms export restrictions, specifically the sale of "Patriot" missile systems to the United States [1]. - The Japanese government is discussing amendments to three security treaties, which may include changes to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and an increase in defense spending [1]. - Japan's defense budget has seen a continuous increase for thirteen consecutive years, indicating a trend towards military expansion [1]. Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Japan's military expansion, warning that any attempt to revert to militarism will ultimately fail and will not be accepted by the international community [2]. - Historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, which include complete disarmament and restrictions on military capabilities [1].

Group 1 - Japan has recently completed its first export of lethal weapons following the relaxation of its arms export policy, specifically selling "Patriot" air defense missiles to the United States [1][2] - The Japanese government is discussing amendments to three security treaties, which may include changes to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and an increase in defense spending [1] - Japan's defense budget has seen a continuous increase for thirteen consecutive years, indicating a trend towards military expansion and a shift from its post-war pacifist stance [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to Japan's military expansion, warning that any attempt to revert to militarism would be met with resistance from both the Chinese people and the international community [2] - Japan's actions are perceived as a breach of post-war international agreements that mandated its disarmament and restricted its military capabilities [1][2] - The ongoing discussions in Japan regarding nuclear policy and defense strategies suggest a potential shift towards a more aggressive military posture, raising concerns about regional stability [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is increasingly expanding its military capabilities and loosening restrictions on arms exports, raising concerns about its intentions and potential return to militarism after World War II [1] Group 1: Japan's Military Expansion - Japan has completed the return of "Patriot" air defense missiles to the United States, marking its first export of lethal weapons since relaxing arms export restrictions [1] - The Japanese government has been increasing its defense budget for thirteen consecutive years and has enacted new security laws to allow collective self-defense [1] - Japan is modifying its "Three Principles on Weapons Exports" to the "Three Principles on Defense Equipment Transfers," further easing arms export limitations [1] Group 2: Nuclear Policy and International Relations - Japan claims to aim for a world without nuclear weapons while simultaneously strengthening "extended deterrence" cooperation and seeking to amend its "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [1] - The potential modification of these principles could facilitate Japan's pursuit of "nuclear sharing" arrangements, which raises alarms about its commitment to peace [1] - The actions taken by Japan suggest a move away from its post-war pacifism and a shift towards rearmament, prompting questions about its future intentions [1]

Core Viewpoint - Recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked widespread criticism, with international figures suggesting that her statements challenge the current international order and pose risks to peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region [1][3][5][6] Group 1: International Reactions - International experts assert that Takaichi's comments are irresponsible and could exacerbate conflicts, potentially reviving militarism and expansionism in Japan [3][5] - Critics emphasize that Takaichi's statements represent a blatant interference in China's internal affairs, which the international community is unlikely to accept [5] - The Japanese economic sector has expressed opposition to Takaichi's remarks, indicating that such rhetoric could strain economic relations between Japan and China, ultimately harming Japan more than China [6] Group 2: Historical Context - Commentary from international figures highlights that Takaichi's statements seem to challenge the international order established after the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, suggesting a revival of militaristic ideologies in Japan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government, represented by Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning, firmly opposes Japan's potential return to militarism and emphasizes that such actions would violate commitments to peaceful development and disrupt the post-war international order [1] Group 1 - If Japan attempts to revert to militaristic policies, it will face resistance from the Chinese people and the international community [1] - The consequences of Japan's militaristic ambitions are predicted to end in failure [1]

Core Points - The international scientific and practical forum titled "No Statute of Limitations: 80th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Trials" opened in Moscow to commemorate the historical significance and principles of the Nuremberg Trials [1] - Russian President Putin emphasized that the principles established by the Nuremberg Trials remain applicable today and are crucial in resisting attempts to distort historical facts and addressing current global challenges [1] - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov highlighted the significant impact of the Nuremberg Trials on the post-war international legal system and criticized the West for tending to "forget" the conclusions of the Nuremberg Trials and the lessons of World War II [1] - The Nuremberg Trials are recognized for opposing Nazism, extreme nationalism, and militarism, and are considered foundational to the post-war international order alongside other historical events like the Yalta Conference and the Tokyo Trials [1] Historical Context - The Nuremberg Trials were established on November 20, 1945, by the United States, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and France in Nuremberg, Germany, to hold Nazi war criminals accountable for their crimes against humanity [2] - A total of 24 major war criminals were tried, including Hermann Göring, with 10 sentenced to death by hanging [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent remarks by Japanese politician Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan represent a blatant betrayal of Japan's pacifist constitution and a provocative interference in China's internal affairs, raising concerns about the revival of militarism in Japan [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Context and Implications - Takaichi's linking of "Taiwan issues" with Japan's "survival crisis" is reminiscent of Japan's historical militaristic justifications for foreign invasions, suggesting a potential return to militaristic ideologies [1][2]. - The concept of "survival crisis" has historically been used by Japanese militarists to justify aggressive actions, indicating a dangerous precedent in current political rhetoric [2][3]. Group 2: Domestic and International Reactions - Analysts highlight that Takaichi's statements are not isolated but reflect a broader right-wing movement in Japan aiming to revive militarism and escape post-war constraints, which poses risks to regional peace and stability [3][4]. - The remarks have significantly harmed the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations, leading to a deterioration in bilateral exchanges across various fields [4]. Group 3: Future Outlook - The current trajectory of Japan's right-wing policies, particularly regarding defense and historical issues, threatens to push the country towards disaster rather than genuine revival, with increasing strategic uncertainty in the region [3][4]. - China has warned that if Japan does not retract its erroneous statements, it will have to take severe countermeasures, with all consequences falling on Japan [4].

Core Viewpoint - The recent remarks by Japanese politician Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan represent a blatant betrayal of Japan's pacifist constitution and a gross interference in China's internal affairs, provoking concerns about the revival of militarism in Japan [1][3][5]. Group 1: Historical Context - Japanese militarism has historically used the concept of "survival crisis" as a pretext for foreign aggression, linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's own national security [3][5]. - Takaichi's statements raise fears of Japan repeating its militaristic past, as they echo the logic used by Japan during its invasions of China and other Asian countries [5][10]. Group 2: Current Political Climate - Analysts suggest that Takaichi's actions are not isolated but part of a broader right-wing movement in Japan seeking to revive militarism and escape the constraints of the post-war system [8][10]. - There is a growing concern that Japan is on a dangerous path towards rearmament and militaristic expansion, which could destabilize regional peace and increase the risk of conflict [10][11]. Group 3: Impact on Sino-Japanese Relations - The remarks by Takaichi have severely damaged the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations, pushing them to their lowest point in recent years, with the responsibility lying entirely with Japan [11][13]. - The promotion of military intervention in the Taiwan Strait by Takaichi has hurt the sentiments of the Chinese people, who suffered from Japanese militarism, and has negatively affected people-to-people exchanges between the two nations [13][15]. Group 4: Future Implications - The relationship between China and Japan, which has potential for extensive cooperation, is contingent upon historical issues and the Taiwan question, which are fundamental to the bilateral relationship [15]. - China has warned that if Japan does not retract its erroneous statements, it will have to take severe countermeasures, with all consequences borne by Japan [15].

首尔中国侨民协会联合多组织严正声明：强烈谴责高市早苗错误言论 中新网11月20日电 据韩国《新华报》报道，11月18日，韩国首尔中国侨民协会联手韩国华文媒体及部 分韩文媒体暨各商协会，对日本首相高市早苗的错误言论表示最强烈的谴责。 近日，高市早苗在国会答辩时，公然说"若台湾有事"，会构成日本"存亡危机事态"，暗示其日本可能武 力介入台海问题，公然干涉中国内政，明目张胆挑衅一个中国原则。 对此，首尔中国侨民协会联合韩国华文媒体及部分韩文媒体暨各商协会，在各媒体上共同发布声明，表 示最强烈的谴责。 声明指出，台湾自古以来就是中国的一部分，《开罗宣言》和《波茨坦公告》明确规定把日本窃取的台 湾和澎湖列岛归还中国。在二战期间，日本对中国人民犯下罄竹难书的罪行，如果不深刻反省历史，重 蹈军国主义覆辙，必将自取灭亡。高市早苗的错误言论及其危险，妄图介入台海事务，严重破坏战后秩 序，严重破坏一个中国原则和中日四个政治文件精神。 声明称，我们正告日方，立即停止干涉中国内政，全球华人及正义人士必将团结一致，坚决挫败日本企 图复活军国主义的图谋。 此外，首尔中国侨民协会会长曹明权表示，日本军国主义当年悍然发动侵华战争，历史殷鉴不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's recent remarks regarding Taiwan represent a dangerous political gamble that undermines Japan's peace constitution and provokes China, ultimately leading to failure [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Context - Kishi's statements are not isolated but reflect a broader right-wing movement in Japan aiming to revive militarism and escape post-war constraints, using the Taiwan issue as a pretext to amend the peace constitution [2]. - The remarks have sparked significant backlash within Japan, indicating that there remains a rational voice and a commitment to peace among the populace, with calls for Kishi's resignation and opposition to war rhetoric [2]. Group 2: Historical Reflection - The article emphasizes that Japan's post-war recovery and prosperity were built on a commitment to peace and a promise of "never again to wage war," which the current right-wing forces threaten to dismantle [3]. - It warns that any attempts to interfere with China's internal affairs, particularly regarding Taiwan, will be met with strong resistance, highlighting the importance of respecting historical lessons and the current geopolitical landscape [3].