Core Viewpoint - Venezuela is experiencing ongoing protests and governmental turmoil following a military attack by the U.S., which the Venezuelan government condemns as illegal aggression [1][2]. Group 1: Government Response - The Venezuelan government has issued a statement condemning the U.S. military actions, claiming that over a hundred civilians and military personnel have died, which violates international law [1]. - The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry has highlighted that President Maduro and his wife were forcibly taken during the military actions, infringing upon the personal immunity of the head of state and undermining fundamental principles of international law [1]. - The Minister of News and Communication, Nianes, stated that Vice President Delcy Rodriguez has no plans to visit the U.S., countering reports that she sought political meetings in Washington [1]. Group 2: Public Protests - Protests continue in Caracas and across the country, marking the sixth consecutive day of demonstrations demanding the immediate and unconditional release of President Maduro and his wife [2]. - The protesters emphasize that unity is essential for maintaining peace and stability in the nation [2].

本文转自【央视新闻客户端】； 巴基斯坦常驻联合国代表团临时代办 奥斯曼·贾敦：这类行为开创了危险的先例，对全球法律框架的根 基构成威胁。 本周，联合国就委内瑞拉局势举行了紧急会议，多方代表就1月3日美国军事行动表示谴责。同时，针对 美国意图控制委内瑞拉石油销售和收益分配，联合国表态称，委内瑞拉的石油属于委内瑞拉人民。 央视记者 徐德智：本周一，联合国安理会就委内瑞拉局势举行了紧急会议，会上负责政治与和平建设 事务的副秘书长迪卡洛代表古特雷斯重申各国需要尊重国际法。 联合国副秘书长 罗斯玛丽·迪卡洛：我一直强调，各方都必须充分尊重国际法，包括作为维护国际和平 与安全基石的《联合国宪章》。我仍然对1月3日的军事行动未能遵守国际法规则表示深切关切。 多个安理会成员谴责美国通过军事行动强制控制马杜罗及其夫人并移送出境的行为，这是对委内瑞拉的 侵略。 俄罗斯常驻联合国代表 涅边贾：美国在加拉加斯实施的这一犯罪行为，毫无也不可能有任何借口，我 们坚决谴责美国对委内瑞拉实施的武装侵略，违反了一切国际法规范。 此外，哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表还回应了美国总统特朗普对哥伦比亚总统佩特罗的威胁。 哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表 萨拉巴塔·托 ...

Group 1 - The Japanese ruling party, the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), is maintaining silence regarding the U.S. military actions against Venezuelan President Maduro, despite some internal calls for a clear stance [1][3] - The LDP's discussions on Venezuela are the first since President Trump ordered actions against Maduro, highlighting the party's reluctance to criticize a key ally [1][3] - Concerns have been raised within the LDP about potential backlash on social media for criticizing the U.S., reflecting a cautious approach in the party's foreign policy [3][5] Group 2 - The Japanese opposition parties are criticizing the LDP for its silence, arguing that it is a mistake to remain passive during critical international events [5] - The Japan- Venezuela trade relationship is significant, with exports to Venezuela projected to increase by 16.1% in 2024, amounting to $69.41 million, primarily in passenger vehicles [6] - Imports from Venezuela are also rising, with a 13.9% increase to $15.47 million, indicating active trade in cocoa and aluminum [6]

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, condemning the U.S. military action on January 3 and asserting that Venezuela's oil belongs to its people [1][10]. Group 1: UN's Position - The UN Secretary-General's representative emphasized the need for all parties to respect international law, particularly the UN Charter, and expressed deep concern over the military action that did not comply with these rules [3]. - Multiple members of the Security Council condemned the U.S. military action as an act of aggression against Venezuela [3][4]. - The UN reiterated that Venezuela's oil resources are owned by the Venezuelan people, similar to the stance on Syria's oil [10]. Group 2: Reactions from Member States - The Russian representative at the UN condemned the U.S. actions as a criminal act and a violation of international law [4]. - The Pakistani representative warned that such actions set a dangerous precedent and threaten the global legal framework [6]. - The Colombian representative stated that any form of aggression lacks legitimacy and should not be used to resolve unresolved situations [6][8].

本周，联合国就委内瑞拉局势举行了紧急会议，多方代表就1月3日美国军事行动表示谴责。同时，针对美国意图控制委内瑞拉石油销售和收益分配，联合国 表态称，委内瑞拉的石油属于委内瑞拉人民。 央视记者 徐德智：本周一，联合国安理会就委内瑞拉局势举行了紧急会议，会上负责政治与和平建设事务的副秘书长迪卡洛代表古特雷斯重申各国需要尊 重国际法。 联合国副秘书长 罗斯玛丽·迪卡洛：我一直强调，各方都必须充分尊重国际法，包括作为维护国际和平与安全基石的《联合国宪章》。我仍然对1月3日的军 事行动未能遵守国际法规则表示深切关切。 多个安理会成员谴责美国通过军事行动强制控制马杜罗及其夫人并移送出境的行为，这是对委内瑞拉的侵略。 俄罗斯常驻联合国代表 涅边贾：美国在加拉加斯实施的这一犯罪行为，毫无也不可能有任何借口，我们坚决谴责美国对委内瑞拉实施的武装侵略，违反了 一切国际法规范。 巴基斯坦常驻联合国代表团临时代办 奥斯曼·贾敦：这类行为开创了危险的先例，对全球法律框架的根基构成威胁。 此外，哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表还回应了美国总统特朗普对哥伦比亚总统佩特罗的威胁。 哥伦比亚常驻联合国代表 萨拉巴塔·托雷斯：任何形式的侵略都毫无正当性， ...

联合国秘书长发言人迪雅里克：委内瑞拉的石油属于委内瑞拉人民，正如叙利亚的石油属于叙利亚 人民一样，任何国家的自然资源都属于该国人民。 美国南方司令部9日确认，在加勒比海控制并扣押"奥利娜"号油轮。美国总统特朗普表示，将立即 开始提炼和销售多达5000万桶委内瑞拉石油。 多个安理会成员谴责美国对委发动军事打击，强行控制马杜罗夫妇并移送出境。 美国国务院一个工作小组9日抵达委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯。 央广网北京1月10日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，委内瑞拉外交部 9日发布公告，再次向国际社会申诉，该国领土及其人民遭受了非法的犯罪侵略，美国发动军事打击导 致100多名平民和军人丧生，公然违反国际法。 俄罗斯常驻联合国代表涅边贾：美国在加拉加斯实施的这一犯罪行为，毫无也不可能有任何借口， 我们坚决谴责美国对委内瑞拉实施的武装侵略，违反了一切国际法规范。 公告说，委内瑞拉政府决定与美国政府启动"探索性外交"进程，推动恢复各自外交使团工作。委内 瑞拉政府9日否认代总统罗德里格斯打算访问美国。 巴基斯坦常驻联合国代表团临时代办奥斯曼·贾敦：这类行为开创了危险的先例，对全球法律框架 的根基构成威胁。 ...

#意总理不信美会对格陵兰岛动武#【#意总理说很多问题不赞同特朗普# 】意大利总理梅洛尼9日表示， 她与美国总统特朗普在格陵兰岛问题上持不同意见。梅洛尼在当天举行的记者会上表示，在很多问题 上，她并不同意特朗普的做法，包括格陵兰岛问题。她认为，国际法应当得到捍卫，一旦规则被打破， 所有人都将面临更大的风险。梅洛尼表示，如果美国对格陵兰岛采取军事行动，此举"不符合任何一方 的利益"。自己不相信美国会对丹麦自治领地格陵兰岛采取军事行动这一假设。美国总统特朗普上任以 来多次扬言要得到格陵兰岛。对此，丹麦等欧洲国家强烈反对。（新华社） ...

Group 1 - French President Macron condemned the spread of "new imperialism" and "new colonialism" in international relations, specifically targeting U.S. foreign policy [1][2][4] - Macron emphasized the need for France and Europe to enhance their strength and influence in a world increasingly dominated by great powers, warning against becoming subservient to power logic [4][5] - The upcoming G7 presidency in 2026 is seen as an opportunity for France to promote global multilateralism reforms, rejecting the notion of G7 as an anti-China or anti-BRICs club [5][6] Group 2 - Trump's remarks indicated a belief that his personal moral standards are the only constraints on U.S. global power, suggesting a shift away from adherence to international law [6][7] - The perception of the U.S. as an unreliable partner has increased in Germany, with 76% of respondents believing the U.S. is no longer a trustworthy ally, marking a 3% rise since June 2025 [8] - The shift in U.S. foreign policy under Trump could lead to a breakdown of the rules-based international order, prompting other nations to adopt similar aggressive postures, thereby increasing the risk of military conflicts globally [9]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights President Trump's assertion that his personal "moral standards and will" are the only constraints on his military actions globally, dismissing the need for international law [3][4]. Group 1: Military Actions and Global Influence - Trump claims that he can freely use military, economic, or political means to reinforce U.S. hegemony, suggesting that national power should dictate international relations rather than laws or treaties [3]. - Under Trump's administration, the U.S. has conducted military strikes in seven countries, matching the total number of strikes during Obama's eight-year term, with over 620 airstrikes ordered since his second term began [5]. - The U.S. has a historical pattern of military interventions, with 392 recorded since its founding, indicating a trend of increasing military engagement post-1950 [6]. Group 2: Political and Social Implications - Experts warn that the U.S.'s misuse of military force and disregard for international law could lead to regional instability, exacerbating issues like illegal immigration and drug trafficking [6][7]. - The perception of low costs and difficulties associated with military interventions may encourage the Trump administration to pursue more aggressive actions in the future [6]. - Historical analysis suggests that rapid military actions often lead to disastrous outcomes, raising concerns about the long-term political consequences of such interventions [7].

Core Viewpoint - President Trump proposed to increase the U.S. defense budget to $1.5 trillion by 2027, which may lead to more aggressive U.S. actions in Venezuela and other regions [1][3]. Group 1: Defense Budget and Military Strategy - The proposed increase in military spending is aimed at creating a "dream army" and ensuring U.S. security against any adversaries, although specific allocations for weapons and military branches were not detailed [3]. - Trump's vision includes a new world order where the U.S. can freely overthrow foreign governments and seize territories and resources deemed in its national interest [3]. Group 2: International Law and Military Intervention - Trump's administration has shown a willingness to use military force to protect U.S. interests in the Western Hemisphere, as indicated by statements from key advisors [6]. - Concerns have been raised about the implications of disregarding international law, with warnings that it could lead to increased aggression and a regression to imperialistic behaviors [6][10]. Group 3: Historical Context and Risks - Historical examples of U.S. military interventions in Latin America have resulted in instability, repression, and human rights violations, with past interventions often leading to regret [10]. - Experts emphasize the need to adhere to current international law to avoid escalating tensions and entering a more dangerous phase in global relations [10].