Core Points - The Shenzhen Kingsda Applied Materials Co., Ltd. was found guilty of tax evasion by falsely declaring R&D expenses, resulting in a tax underpayment of 16.21 million yuan [1][4] - The tax authorities imposed a total penalty of 36.18 million yuan, which includes the recovery of unpaid taxes and additional fines [1][4] Group 1 - The case originated from the Shenzhen tax authority's data analysis, which revealed that the company's R&D expenditures were significantly higher than industry norms [3] - The company falsely reported over 80 million yuan in gold material costs in its R&D expenses without corresponding production or waste recovery records [3] - Investigations showed that the company's claims of substantial gold loss during purification were inconsistent with evidence from third-party refining institutions [3] Group 2 - A total of 17 R&D projects were identified with suspicious gold material expenditures, leading to the conclusion that the company improperly benefited from R&D tax deductions [3] - The tax authority emphasized that the act of falsely inflating operational costs and making fraudulent tax declarations constitutes tax evasion under the Tax Collection and Administration Law [4] - The tax department aims to create a fair and orderly tax environment by regularly combating various tax-related illegal activities [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Shenzhen Kingsda Applied Materials Co., Ltd. has been found guilty of tax evasion through fraudulent reporting of research and development expenses, specifically by falsely listing expenditures on gold materials, leading to significant tax benefits that were not justified [4][5]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Case - The Shenzhen Taxation Bureau discovered that Shenzhen Kingsda reported over 80 million yuan in gold expenditures as part of its R&D costs, which lacked corresponding production outputs or waste recovery records [4]. - The company claimed that the gold was lost during the purification process, but investigations revealed that the actual loss was minimal and the company could not provide credible evidence to support its claims [4]. - A total of 17 R&D projects were identified where the company falsely reported gold material expenditures, resulting in an underpayment of corporate income tax amounting to 16.21 million yuan [4]. Group 2: Penalties and Company Background - The tax authorities classified Shenzhen Kingsda's actions as tax evasion, leading to a total penalty of 36.18 million yuan, which includes tax recovery, late fees, and fines [5]. - Shenzhen Kingsda was established in 2016 with a registered capital of 50 million yuan, focusing on the production of materials for integrated circuits and semiconductor devices [6]. - The company has a history of tax issues, with previous announcements indicating tax arrears exceeding 23 million yuan [6].

Core Viewpoint - The tax authorities in Shenzhen, Jiangsu, and Zhejiang have cracked down on three cases of tax fraud involving companies illegally enjoying tax benefits related to research and development expenses and small business tax incentives [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Fraud Cases - Shenzhen Jinda Application Materials Co., Ltd. was found to have claimed excessive R&D expense deductions, including over 80 million yuan in gold costs without corresponding outputs or waste recovery records [2][3]. - Suzhou Lisoft Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Jiaxing Jingsheng Concrete Products Co., Ltd. were also implicated in similar fraudulent activities regarding tax benefits [1]. - The tax authorities determined that Jinda's claims of significant gold loss during purification were inconsistent with industry standards, leading to the discovery of 17 R&D projects with inflated gold material expenses, resulting in a tax underpayment of 16.21 million yuan [4]. Group 2: Tax Policy and Enforcement - Recent tax policies have aimed to support R&D and small businesses, with a 100% tax deduction for R&D expenses and additional benefits for small and micro enterprises [6]. - In the first quarter of 2025, tax reductions and refunds related to these policies reached 424.1 billion yuan [6]. - The tax authorities are committed to using big data to prevent fraudulent claims and ensure that tax benefits reach legitimate businesses, thereby promoting high-quality development in manufacturing [6].

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Jinsda Applied Materials Co., Ltd. was found to have engaged in tax evasion by falsely claiming research and development (R&D) expenses, specifically through the misrepresentation of gold material costs, resulting in a tax underpayment of 16.21 million yuan [1][8]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Details - The company reported over 80 million yuan in gold as R&D expenses without corresponding product output or waste recovery records [2]. - The company's claim of significant gold loss during the refining process was disproven by evidence from two refining institutions, which indicated minimal loss and that the gold returned was approximately equal in weight to what was processed [5][7]. - A thorough analysis of over 30 R&D projects revealed that 17 projects had inflated gold material expenses, leading to the tax underpayment [8]. Group 2: Legal Consequences - The tax authority has mandated the company to repay the underpaid taxes, along with penalties and late fees totaling 36.18 million yuan [1]. - The legal framework under which the company was penalized includes provisions for tax evasion, which can lead to severe fines and potential criminal charges [10].

Group 1 - The article highlights common traps related to fraudulent invoicing, emphasizing the need for vigilance in business practices [2][3][5] - It discusses the illegal purchase of invoices, where Company A pays a "billing fee" to Company B for invoices, constituting both fraudulent invoicing and tax evasion [2] - The article outlines scenarios involving false relationships, where Company A collaborates with individual C to obtain invoices from Company B, indicating potential tax evasion [3] Group 2 - It addresses the issue of false product names, where Company A purchases employee welfare products but receives invoices for office supplies, which is considered fraudulent [5] - The article stresses the importance of compliance in business operations, suggesting that lawful practices are essential for sustainable development [6]