欢迎扫描下方二维码关注： 1 妈……我这刚毕业， 工作咱得慢慢找…… 看你表哥，人家开的 那加油站风生水起! l e) 你也别闲着，过去打打 工，跟着人家学学"致 富经"！ Z "致富经"？ 我倒要看看, 这经到底是怎么念的…… TO 新买的加油机怎么就坏了? 老板! 改过这个主板，咱的加 油数据想改多少就改多少! 这加油机才买了几天啊? 就有人 来上门维修? 质量不行啊! 加油款怎么进了个人的口袋 ? 老弟好好学！ 这加油 站的门道可多着呢! e p 说干就干! 学完 咱也当老板! - 都UP 但是几天下来， I 882 W S a 不开发票有 小礼品哦! 那就不要发票了~ 那您扫这个收款 码就可以了! ap 怎么是个私人 收款码？ 公司的收款码还没申请下 来，先拿这个救急的。 用私人收款码结账? 客户加的是油，他加 的是小金库吧? 6.5 运输费怎么这么贵? 还是老同学的运输公司靠 谱，速度快，价格也实惠! 1 老弟，我那个老同学，把上一趟 的运输费发票开过来了，你赶紧 打印出来，咱们好入账! C 运这一趟油，不到一百公 里，就要两万? 表哥这老 同学也不太靠谱啊! 这运 的是油还是航母啊? 有没有人告诉 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around Wuhan Zhongheng's accusation that Vanke has not paid the agreed 2 billion yuan for land costs related to urban renewal, despite Vanke's sales revenue of nearly 8 billion yuan from the B plot project [3][11] - Zhongheng claims that Vanke has evaded taxes amounting to 1.9 billion yuan over a period of 5 years, raising concerns about the company's financial practices and tax compliance [3][11] - The Wuhan government had previously requested a comprehensive tax settlement for the B plot project, but Vanke has allegedly continued construction and sales without proper procedures, leading to accusations of tax evasion [5][13] Group 2 - Vanke's Vice President, Cai Ping, who was responsible for dealings with the local government, has reportedly been in the United States for over a year, raising questions about his management of the alleged tax evasion funds [5][13] - Cai Ping has a history with Vanke, having joined the company in 2003 and rising through the ranks to become the regional partner for Central China, overseeing operations in multiple provinces [7][15] - The situation has prompted calls for a thorough investigation into Vanke's alleged tax evasion and corruption, emphasizing the need for fair competition and adherence to tax regulations [5][13]

Core Viewpoint - The case involves a well-known automotive reviewer, Chen Zhen, who was found guilty of tax evasion amounting to 1.1867 million yuan by underreporting income and misclassifying income types from 2021 to 2023 [1][3][18] Group 1: Tax Evasion Details - Chen Zhen, a prominent figure in the automotive review industry with over 10 million followers, reported an annual income of only around 1 million yuan, which was inconsistent with his online popularity [3][4] - The tax authorities discovered that Chen had only conducted a self-assessment for the year 2023, while his overall income from 2021 to 2023 was not properly reported [5][6] - From 2021 to early 2022, Chen withdrew a total of 1.5725 million yuan in advertising service fees from a third-party payment platform without declaring it for tax purposes [8] Group 2: Use of Shell Company - In 2022, Chen established a personal cultural and creative studio in Tianjin, which was found to be a shell company without actual operations or employees [11][12] - Chen misclassified his income from short video advertisements as business income of the shell company, thereby reducing his tax liabilities [14][15] - The tax authorities confirmed that Chen reported 2.3 million yuan of personal income as revenue for the shell company, which constituted a typical case of "income type conversion" for tax evasion [15][16] Group 3: Legal Consequences - Following the investigation, tax authorities imposed a total penalty of 2.4748 million yuan on Chen, which included back taxes, late fees, and fines, all of which have been collected [18]

Core Viewpoint - The case of Chen Zhen, a well-known automotive reviewer with over 10 million followers, highlights significant tax evasion through underreporting income and misclassifying income types, resulting in a total tax shortfall of 1.1867 million yuan from 2021 to 2023 [1][3][10]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Details - Chen Zhen reported an annual comprehensive income of only around 1 million yuan, which was inconsistent with his popularity and online presence [3][10]. - Tax authorities discovered that Chen Zhen had received a total of 1.5725 million yuan in advertising service fees through a third-party payment platform, which he failed to declare for tax purposes [11]. - In 2022, Chen Zhen established a personal cultural and creative studio but did not have a physical office or employees, indicating that the reported business income was actually derived from his online platform earnings [11]. Group 2: Legal Consequences - Following the investigation, tax authorities imposed a total penalty of 2.4748 million yuan on Chen Zhen, which included the recovery of unpaid taxes, late fees, and fines [11]. - The entire amount of the penalty has been successfully collected by the tax authorities [11]. Group 3: Social Media Impact - As a result of the tax evasion case, Chen Zhen has faced bans on multiple social media platforms, including Weibo, Douyin, and Xiaohongshu, starting from December 4 [13].

拥有千万粉丝的车评头部网红陈震被税务部门披露偷税后，外界一些人士对他被税务查税原因及公开曝 光缘由感兴趣，而随着陈震偷税案细节披露，也似乎有了答案。 税务曝光陈震偷税案细节，他申报收入与其网络热度严重不符 据央视新闻，税务稽查部门就收入问题首次约谈陈震，陈震声称已完成了以前年度的自查补税。但税务 稽查人员发现，所谓的自查补税仅针对的是2023年这一年的收入。 此后税务部门开始摸查2021至2023年陈震取得收入及纳税情况。 国家税务总局北京市税务局第三稽查局工作人员发现，经查从2021年至2022年初，陈震通过第三方支付 平台，提取了某网络视频平台转入的广告劳务报酬，累计157.25万元，且未申报纳税。经过深入调查， 2022年，陈震在天津成立了一家个人文化创意工作室，该工作室实质为空壳企业，将其本应个人劳务收 入转换为工作室生产经营收入，从而少缴税款。 税务部门再次约谈陈震。在完整证据链面前，陈震最终承认违法事实，并积极配合提供完整的银行流水 和交易记录。 由此可见，陈震在面对税务部门自称补完税后，实际仍存在偷税行为，且再次被税务部门查出。而这或 是他被税务部门公开曝光的一个重要原因。 12月5日，国家税务 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of Chen Zhen, a well-known online car reviewer, highlights significant tax evasion through underreporting income and misclassifying income types, resulting in a total tax evasion of 1.1867 million yuan from 2021 to 2023 [1][6]. Group 1: Income Reporting Discrepancies - Chen Zhen reported an annual comprehensive income of only around 100,000 yuan from 2021 to 2023, which is inconsistent with his online popularity and estimated annual income from online advertising exceeding 20 million yuan [2][6]. - Tax authorities discovered that Chen Zhen's self-reported tax adjustments only addressed the year 2023, leaving prior years unexamined [2][3]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation revealed that from 2021 to early 2022, Chen Zhen withdrew a total of 1.5725 million yuan from a third-party payment platform as advertising labor remuneration, which he failed to report for tax purposes [3][8]. - In 2022, Chen Zhen established a personal cultural and creative studio in Tianjin, which was found to be a shell entity without actual operations or employees, used to misreport personal income as business income [4][9]. Group 3: Tax Evasion Techniques - Chen Zhen transferred 2.3 million yuan of personal income to his studio's bank account, falsely declaring it as business income to reduce tax liabilities, a clear case of "income type conversion" [4][9]. - Following the investigation, tax authorities imposed a total penalty of 2.4748 million yuan, including back taxes and fines, which has been fully collected [5][9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a tax evasion case involving Chen Zhen, a well-known online car reviewer, who underreported his income and misclassified it to evade personal income tax totaling 1.1867 million yuan from 2021 to 2023 [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Evasion Details - Chen Zhen, a prominent figure in the car review industry with over 10 million followers, reported an annual income of only around 1 million yuan, which was inconsistent with his online popularity [2]. - Tax authorities discovered that Chen had not withdrawn any funds from his video account for nearly a year, indicating potential use of alternative withdrawal channels [3]. - Investigations revealed that from 2021 to early 2022, Chen withdrew a total of 1.5725 million yuan from a third-party payment platform as advertising service fees without reporting it for tax [4]. Group 2: Misclassification of Income - In 2022, Chen established a personal cultural and creative studio, which was found to be a shell entity without actual operations or employees, used to misreport income [5]. - Chen misclassified 2.3 million yuan of personal income as revenue for this shell studio, thereby reducing his tax liability through fraudulent income classification [5]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - Following a thorough investigation, tax authorities imposed a penalty on Chen, requiring him to pay back taxes, late fees, and fines totaling 2.4748 million yuan, all of which have been collected [7].

Core Insights - The implementation of the gold tax has led to significant adjustments in the domestic gold market, particularly affecting businesses in Shenzhen's Shui Bei market, which is a key hub for gold distribution in China [1][4][6] - Many merchants are experiencing a sharp decline in business, with some planning to sell off existing inventory and return home early due to the increased costs and supply chain disruptions [1][10] - Consumers are adapting by purchasing tax-free gold bars from banks and having them crafted into jewelry, which has become a popular alternative to traditional gold purchases [19][20] Market Impact - The gold tax has increased the cost of purchasing gold, with investment gold priced at 940 yuan per gram and jewelry gold at 1056 yuan per gram in Shui Bei market [4][6] - Business volume has dropped dramatically, with some merchants reporting transaction volumes falling to less than half of previous levels [6][9] - The supply of raw gold materials has been disrupted, leading to some merchants facing inventory shortages and considering temporary closures [9][10] Consumer Behavior - Consumers are increasingly opting for cash transactions to avoid the gold tax, with some merchants offering discounts for cash payments [15][16] - The trend of buying gold bars from banks and then customizing them with local artisans has gained traction, allowing consumers to save significantly on costs [19][20] - This shift in purchasing behavior has also led to increased demand for local gold artisans, who are experiencing a surge in orders [20] Legal Considerations - There are legal risks associated with cash transactions that avoid tax regulations, which could lead to accusations of tax evasion or money laundering [24][26][27] - Consumers who purchase gold bars and then have them processed into jewelry may also face tax obligations if the items are sold or treated as sales [28]

Core Insights - The recent exposure of tax evasion cases among internet celebrities and online stores highlights significant issues within the booming influencer economy, revealing a dark side behind the glamorous facade [1][2] - Tax evasion is not merely a minor issue but a serious legal violation that undermines public services and creates an unfair competitive environment for compliant businesses [2] - The industry has examples of compliant operations, demonstrating that legal business practices lead to long-term success and consumer trust [3] Group 1: Tax Evasion Cases - Six tax evasion cases were recently exposed, with notable amounts of unpaid taxes and penalties, including a case where an influencer owed 1.41 million yuan in taxes, resulting in a total of 2.6889 million yuan in penalties [1] - The scale of tax evasion is alarming, with some influencers using various methods to evade taxes, such as private transactions through WeChat and Alipay, and creating shell companies for fraudulent invoicing [1] Group 2: Regulatory Response - The tax authorities are enhancing their monitoring capabilities using big data to track influencers' income and transactions, making it increasingly difficult to evade taxes [2] - New regulations require platforms to report influencers' income data, effectively closing loopholes for hidden income [2] Group 3: Industry Practices - There are positive examples within the industry, such as top influencer Li Jiaqi's team, which employs tax consultants and consistently declares taxes, and a clothing store owner who issues invoices for every order, gaining a reputation for compliance [3] - The exposure of tax evasion cases serves as a warning to industry participants that legal compliance is essential for sustainable success, and that focusing on quality content and services is more beneficial than exploiting tax loopholes [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent fluctuations in the economy and the ongoing pandemic have led to increased public anxiety regarding personal income stability and employment prospects, resulting in a significant rise in personal savings in China, which now totals 227.21 trillion yuan, making China the leader in global deposit scale [1] Group 1: Regulatory Changes - The People's Bank of China (PBOC) has introduced a new regulation requiring commercial banks to inquire about the source and purpose of personal deposits exceeding 50,000 yuan, with detailed customer information to be recorded [4] - The regulation aims to combat money laundering, telecom fraud, illegal fundraising, and tax evasion, thereby maintaining the overall stability and security of the financial system [6] Group 2: Public Reaction - The new regulation has sparked discussions and dissatisfaction among depositors, who feel that their financial privacy is being infringed upon by the banks' inquiries into the purpose of large withdrawals [3] Group 3: Adjustments to the Regulation - Following the implementation of the regulation, the PBOC has adjusted the threshold for reporting large transactions, with some regions increasing the limit to 100,000 yuan or more, to balance regulatory effectiveness and operational efficiency [8] - The adjustments also reflect a consideration for depositor privacy, acknowledging that large cash withdrawals may involve sensitive personal matters [8] - The initial 50,000 yuan threshold was deemed to potentially overwhelm bank staff with excessive workload, prompting the need for a more manageable standard [8] Group 4: Future Regulatory Strategies - The PBOC is advancing its digital currency strategy as a means to enhance financial regulation, with digital yuan transactions being traceable, thus providing a robust tool for preventing financial crimes [9] - Digital yuan can facilitate transactions even in areas lacking traditional network coverage, expanding its application and offering more flexible regulatory options [9]