9月28日，吉林长春、河南鹤壁、山西长治、江苏泰州、江西九江、湖南株洲等地税务部门公布了依法 查处的6起加油站偷税案件。 江西财经大学副校长李春根表示："依法如实申报纳税是每个纳税人应尽的义务。涉案加油站利用多种 方式偷逃税，破坏了市场的公平竞争环境，更侵蚀了国家税基。" 从这6起案件来看，既有使用第三方收款软件、POS机收款后将部分款项转入个人银行账户，也有绑定 对公银行账户的POS机和绑定个人银行账户的收款二维码同时对外收款，还有将收款二维码绑定员工个 人银行卡收取加油款后转至企业法定代表人个人银行账户，同时为应对税务部门检查，销毁或隐藏了前 期销售日志等关键信息。 比如，国家税务总局长治市税务局稽查局依法查处潞城市雨田实业有限责任公司第一加油站偷税案件。 经查，2021年至2023年，该加油站通过个人银行账户收款、在账簿凭证上少列收入等手段隐匿销售收入 进行虚假纳税申报，少缴增值税等税费款308.12万元。2025年3月，国家税务总局长治市税务局稽查局 依据《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》等相关法律法规规定，对该加 油站追缴税费款、加收滞纳金并处罚款，共计662.45万元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article clarifies the types of transportation tickets that cannot be classified as travel expenses for reimbursement purposes, emphasizing the distinction between travel expenses and other categories such as employee education expenses and welfare expenses [2][3][8]. Summary by Sections Definition of Travel Expenses - Travel expenses refer to costs incurred by employees when traveling for business purposes outside their regular work location, including intercity transportation, accommodation, meal allowances, and local transportation [3]. Tax Deduction for Transportation Costs - As of April 1, 2019, taxpayers can deduct the input tax from the output tax for domestic passenger transport services purchased [4]. Conditions Where Transportation Tickets Cannot Be Classified as Travel Expenses - **Condition 1**: Tickets for employees attending external training cannot be classified as travel expenses but rather as employee education expenses, as per the relevant regulations [7][8]. - **Condition 2**: Tickets for employees returning home during holidays cannot be classified as travel expenses but are considered welfare expenses, according to the guidelines on employee welfare funds [9][12]. - **Condition 3**: Tickets reimbursed for clients' business trips cannot be classified as travel expenses but fall under business entertainment expenses, as defined in tax enforcement practices [13][14]. Relevant Regulations - The article references several regulations that govern the classification of expenses, including the Ministry of Finance and State Taxation Administration guidelines on employee education and welfare expenses [15].

Core Viewpoint - Liu Xiaoqing has been cleared of tax-related allegations following an investigation by the Shanghai Municipal Taxation Bureau, which found no evidence supporting the claims made against her [3][8]. Group 1: Investigation Findings - The Shanghai Municipal Taxation Bureau's Fourth Inspection Bureau conducted an investigation based on a report from an individual named Wang, which alleged tax violations by Liu Xiaoqing and her associated enterprises. The investigation concluded that no tax issues were found [3]. - Liu Xiaoqing publicly stated that she has always complied with tax laws and emphasized the importance of lawful tax payment as a civic duty [6]. Group 2: Allegations Details - Prior reports indicated that the allegations involved Liu Xiaoqing allegedly converting a loan of 3.3 million yuan into personal income through her small enterprise, Shanghai Yixi Cultural Media Center, by issuing invoices with a 6% VAT rate to evade over 27% personal income tax [8]. - The enterprise was accused of lacking a physical operating location, employees, and social security payment records, suggesting potential invoice fraud to avoid taxes [8].

Group 1 - The Shanghai Municipal Taxation Bureau confirmed that an investigation into tax-related allegations against Liu Xiaoqing and related enterprises found no evidence of wrongdoing [1][4] - Liu Xiaoqing publicly stated her commitment to lawful tax practices and expressed gratitude for the support from the community regarding tax matters [1][5] - The allegations included claims that Liu Xiaoqing's company improperly converted a loan of 3.3 million yuan into personal income while evading higher personal income tax rates [5] Group 2 - The tax authority emphasized its ongoing efforts to enhance tax regulation and promote compliance among taxpayers [1] - Liu Xiaoqing denied any acquaintance with the accuser and labeled the allegations as malicious [5] - The tax authority's investigation was initiated following a report from an individual named Wang, who alleged tax evasion practices by Liu Xiaoqing's enterprise [4][5]

Core Points - A case of identity theft involving Mr. Wang from Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, who discovered that his personal information was used by a labor service company in Hainan to falsely report wages and evade taxes [1][3] - The labor service company was identified as a non-compliant entity by the Haikou National High-tech Industrial Development Zone Tax Bureau, which confirmed the validity of Mr. Wang's claims and removed his income and tax declaration records from the system [1][9] - Mr. Wang's identity was allegedly misused to create fictitious salary records amounting to over 100,000 yuan (approximately 15 million USD) over a two-year period [1][3] Company and Industry Summary - The labor service company in question has been recognized as a non-normal entity as of March 1, 2024, indicating potential issues with compliance and legitimacy in its operations [1][9] - The case highlights the risks associated with identity theft in the labor sector, where personal information can be exploited for fraudulent financial activities [3][4] - The involvement of tax authorities and the judiciary underscores the regulatory framework in place to address such fraudulent activities, with the case being transferred to the appropriate jurisdiction for further legal proceedings [7][9]

Core Viewpoint - The recent tax evasion allegations against Liu Xiaoqing have sparked significant public interest, with Liu denying the accusations and asserting that the claims are malicious and unfounded [1][3][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Liu Xiaoqing publicly denied the tax evasion allegations, stating that the court has confirmed she is not related to the loan mentioned by the accuser, Wang [1][7]. - Wang claims that he was informed by Liu's business partner about financial troubles within Liu's jewelry company, which led to a loan agreement [1][9]. - Liu emphasized her commitment to lawful tax payment and expressed willingness to cooperate with tax authorities for verification [5][7]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Wang has initiated legal action against Liu's jewelry company for loan repayment, with a court ruling in his favor regarding the loan of 3 million yuan [9][12]. - The court has also ordered Liu's jewelry company to cease using her name and likeness in its branding and marketing, along with compensating her for damages [14]. - Recent reports indicate ongoing investigations by the Shanghai tax authority into the allegations made by Wang against Liu and her associated enterprises [16][18].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent allegations against actress Liu Xiaoqing regarding tax evasion, highlighting her denial of the accusations and the legal context surrounding the case [1][3][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Response - Liu Xiaoqing issued a statement denying any connection with the accuser, Wang, and labeled the allegations as malicious [1][3]. - The court has ruled that Liu Xiaoqing is not related to the loan mentioned by Wang, who lost the case and subsequently made the allegations [3][5]. - Liu Xiaoqing expressed her willingness to cooperate with tax authorities for an investigation into her income and tax payments [3][5]. Group 2: Historical Context - The allegations have reignited public interest in Liu Xiaoqing's past tax issues, including a significant tax evasion case in 2002 where she was detained for 422 days [6]. - Liu Xiaoqing's previous company was found guilty of tax evasion exceeding ten million yuan, leading to her sister-in-law's imprisonment [6]. - The current allegations suggest that Liu Xiaoqing has a history of tax-related penalties, indicating a pattern of legal issues regarding taxation [6].

Core Viewpoint - Liu Xiaoqing is embroiled in a tax evasion scandal, with allegations of tax fraud involving her jewelry company and a loan of 3.3 million yuan [1][2][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - A citizen named Wang reported Liu Xiaoqing for suspected tax evasion, leading to an investigation by the Shanghai Taxation Bureau [2][5]. - The allegations involve a loan of 3.3 million yuan from Liu Xiaoqing's jewelry company, which was allegedly transferred to her personal account under the guise of an endorsement fee [5][6]. - Liu Xiaoqing's jewelry company has faced multiple lawsuits related to borrowing issues, with a recent court ruling ordering the company to repay 3.6599 million yuan [10][13]. Group 2: Company Background and Financial Issues - Liu Xiaoqing's jewelry company was established in November 2018, with a registered capital of 10 million yuan, and has been facing financial difficulties, including employee salary issues [7][8]. - The company was listed as a tax abnormal entity by the tax authorities, which can lead to penalties and restrictions on tax filings [8][9]. - Liu Xiaoqing has previously been involved in a tax evasion case in 2002, which resulted in her being detained for 422 days [17]. Group 3: Current Developments and Public Response - As of the latest updates, Liu Xiaoqing has not publicly responded to the allegations, and her jewelry company has been reported to be in a state of operational irregularity [4][18]. - The ongoing investigation and negative publicity may impact Liu Xiaoqing's current television projects, raising concerns about potential cancellations or withdrawals [20].

Group 1 - The new tax regulations are causing concern for individuals with bank deposits exceeding 500,000, as these accounts may be closely monitored by tax authorities [1][4] - The rationale behind monitoring accounts with deposits over 500,000 is that significant increases in account balances may indicate potential tax evasion or illegal activities [4][6] - Tax authorities are focusing on accounts that may have suspicious transactions, such as funds transferred from business income to personal accounts without proper tax declarations [4][6] Group 2 - If an account is flagged for monitoring, tax authorities will investigate the source and use of funds, requiring documentation to prove legitimacy [6][8] - Individuals with legitimate income sources and who comply with tax regulations are less likely to face issues, even with deposits exceeding 500,000 [6][8] - To mitigate risks, individuals are advised to enhance their tax awareness, maintain accurate financial records, and seek professional tax advice when uncertain [8]

Core Viewpoint - Actor Tong Zhuo publicly accused 33 affiliated companies of tax evasion, emphasizing the importance of tax fairness for social development and public welfare [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Actions - Tong Zhuo submitted materials to relevant authorities regarding the tax evasion of 33 affiliated companies, calling for an investigation and urging others to join in protecting social justice [1]. - In a follow-up statement, Tong Zhuo clarified that his actions were not driven by a narrow mindset but were a legitimate effort to defend his legal rights and uphold the law [3]. - The tax authority in Shenyang has acknowledged receipt of the complaint but has not provided further details on whether an investigation will be initiated [3]. Group 2: Company Affiliations and Legal Issues - Tong Zhuo is associated with three companies, all of which are currently in a state of cancellation, including the recent cancellation of Liaoning Tong Xuehui Cultural Communication Co., Ltd. in August 2024 [7]. - A contract dispute involving Liaoning Liao Guang Media Co., Ltd., an affiliate of Tong Zhuo's former studio, is set to be heard in court on May 6, 2024 [7]. - The company Liaoning Liao Guang Media Co., Ltd. is co-owned by Hainan Ying'an Technology Co., Ltd. and Tong Zhuo's former agent, Guo Han, holding 90% and 10% of the shares respectively [7].