演员刘晓庆称 无税务相关问题。 8月8日，上海市税务局第四稽查局发布情况通报："近期，我局对王某举报刘某庆及相关企业涉税违法事项依法进行了核查。经查，未发现举报所反映的涉税问 题。" 同日，刘晓庆在微博发表声明称，前期，有针对本人及相关企业的涉税违法事项举报。经税务部门核查，未发现举报所反映的涉税问题。 早在5月15日，刘晓庆就在个人社交账号发布公开声明，正式回应冲上热搜的"刘晓庆被举报偷税"风波。她谴责"王某"恶意举报她偷税漏税，强调依法纳税是每个公 民应尽的义务。 据媒体此前报道，"王某"的举报内容显示，刘晓庆通过名下小微企业上海弈熙文化传媒中心，以"形象代言费"名义将330万元借款转为个人收入，并开具6%税点的 增值税发票规避27%以上的个人所得税。该企业被指无实际经营场地、员工和社保缴纳记录，涉嫌虚开发票逃税。 综合自：国家税务总局上海市税务局网站、刘晓庆微博等 责编：李丹 校对： 彭其华 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 点击关键 ...

每经编辑｜段炼 国家税务总局上海市税务局第四稽查局8月8日通报，近期，该局对王某举报刘某庆及相关企业涉税违法事项依法进行了核查。经查，未发现举报所反映的 涉税问题。 税务部门将依法加强税收监管，持续优化服务，促进合规经营、诚信纳税。感谢社会各界对税收工作的关心支持！ 同日，刘晓庆发文称，"前期，有针对本人及相关企业的涉税违法事项举报。经税务部门核查，未发现举报所反映的涉税问题。依法纳税是每个公民的法 定义务。本人将继续遵守国家法律法规，依法诚信纳税。" 5月15日晚，国家税务总局上海市税务局第四稽查局发布情况通报称：近日，我局收到王某对刘某某及相关企业存在涉税问题的举报，目前正在依法依规 办理。 此前，知名演员刘晓庆被深圳市民王先生实名举报涉嫌偷税漏税。 王先生的举报内容显示，刘晓庆通过名下小微企业上海弈熙文化传媒中心，以"形象代言费"名义将330万元借款转为个人收入，并开具6%税点的增值税发 票规避27%以上的个人所得税。该企业被指无实际经营场地、员工和社保缴纳记录，涉嫌虚开发票逃税。 彼时，刘晓庆在社交平台发声：本人与举报人王某并不认识，也从无交集。王某举报内容与客观事实不符，纯属恶意举报。依法纳税是每个 ...

Core Points - A case of identity theft involving Mr. Wang from Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, who discovered that his personal information was used by a labor service company in Hainan to falsely report wages and evade taxes [1][3] - The labor service company was identified as a non-compliant entity by the Haikou National High-tech Industrial Development Zone Tax Bureau, which confirmed the validity of Mr. Wang's claims and removed his income and tax declaration records from the system [1][9] - Mr. Wang's identity was allegedly misused to create fictitious salary records amounting to over 100,000 yuan (approximately 15 million USD) over a two-year period [1][3] Company and Industry Summary - The labor service company in question has been recognized as a non-normal entity as of March 1, 2024, indicating potential issues with compliance and legitimacy in its operations [1][9] - The case highlights the risks associated with identity theft in the labor sector, where personal information can be exploited for fraudulent financial activities [3][4] - The involvement of tax authorities and the judiciary underscores the regulatory framework in place to address such fraudulent activities, with the case being transferred to the appropriate jurisdiction for further legal proceedings [7][9]

Core Viewpoint - The recent tax evasion allegations against Liu Xiaoqing have sparked significant public interest, with Liu denying the accusations and asserting that the claims are malicious and unfounded [1][3][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Liu Xiaoqing publicly denied the tax evasion allegations, stating that the court has confirmed she is not related to the loan mentioned by the accuser, Wang [1][7]. - Wang claims that he was informed by Liu's business partner about financial troubles within Liu's jewelry company, which led to a loan agreement [1][9]. - Liu emphasized her commitment to lawful tax payment and expressed willingness to cooperate with tax authorities for verification [5][7]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - Wang has initiated legal action against Liu's jewelry company for loan repayment, with a court ruling in his favor regarding the loan of 3 million yuan [9][12]. - The court has also ordered Liu's jewelry company to cease using her name and likeness in its branding and marketing, along with compensating her for damages [14]. - Recent reports indicate ongoing investigations by the Shanghai tax authority into the allegations made by Wang against Liu and her associated enterprises [16][18].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent allegations against actress Liu Xiaoqing regarding tax evasion, highlighting her denial of the accusations and the legal context surrounding the case [1][3][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Response - Liu Xiaoqing issued a statement denying any connection with the accuser, Wang, and labeled the allegations as malicious [1][3]. - The court has ruled that Liu Xiaoqing is not related to the loan mentioned by Wang, who lost the case and subsequently made the allegations [3][5]. - Liu Xiaoqing expressed her willingness to cooperate with tax authorities for an investigation into her income and tax payments [3][5]. Group 2: Historical Context - The allegations have reignited public interest in Liu Xiaoqing's past tax issues, including a significant tax evasion case in 2002 where she was detained for 422 days [6]. - Liu Xiaoqing's previous company was found guilty of tax evasion exceeding ten million yuan, leading to her sister-in-law's imprisonment [6]. - The current allegations suggest that Liu Xiaoqing has a history of tax-related penalties, indicating a pattern of legal issues regarding taxation [6].

Core Viewpoint - Liu Xiaoqing is embroiled in a tax evasion scandal, with allegations of tax fraud involving her jewelry company and a loan of 3.3 million yuan [1][2][5]. Group 1: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - A citizen named Wang reported Liu Xiaoqing for suspected tax evasion, leading to an investigation by the Shanghai Taxation Bureau [2][5]. - The allegations involve a loan of 3.3 million yuan from Liu Xiaoqing's jewelry company, which was allegedly transferred to her personal account under the guise of an endorsement fee [5][6]. - Liu Xiaoqing's jewelry company has faced multiple lawsuits related to borrowing issues, with a recent court ruling ordering the company to repay 3.6599 million yuan [10][13]. Group 2: Company Background and Financial Issues - Liu Xiaoqing's jewelry company was established in November 2018, with a registered capital of 10 million yuan, and has been facing financial difficulties, including employee salary issues [7][8]. - The company was listed as a tax abnormal entity by the tax authorities, which can lead to penalties and restrictions on tax filings [8][9]. - Liu Xiaoqing has previously been involved in a tax evasion case in 2002, which resulted in her being detained for 422 days [17]. Group 3: Current Developments and Public Response - As of the latest updates, Liu Xiaoqing has not publicly responded to the allegations, and her jewelry company has been reported to be in a state of operational irregularity [4][18]. - The ongoing investigation and negative publicity may impact Liu Xiaoqing's current television projects, raising concerns about potential cancellations or withdrawals [20].

Group 1 - The new tax regulations are causing concern for individuals with bank deposits exceeding 500,000, as these accounts may be closely monitored by tax authorities [1][4] - The rationale behind monitoring accounts with deposits over 500,000 is that significant increases in account balances may indicate potential tax evasion or illegal activities [4][6] - Tax authorities are focusing on accounts that may have suspicious transactions, such as funds transferred from business income to personal accounts without proper tax declarations [4][6] Group 2 - If an account is flagged for monitoring, tax authorities will investigate the source and use of funds, requiring documentation to prove legitimacy [6][8] - Individuals with legitimate income sources and who comply with tax regulations are less likely to face issues, even with deposits exceeding 500,000 [6][8] - To mitigate risks, individuals are advised to enhance their tax awareness, maintain accurate financial records, and seek professional tax advice when uncertain [8]

Core Viewpoint - Actor Tong Zhuo publicly accused 33 affiliated companies of tax evasion, emphasizing the importance of tax fairness for social development and public welfare [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Actions - Tong Zhuo submitted materials to relevant authorities regarding the tax evasion of 33 affiliated companies, calling for an investigation and urging others to join in protecting social justice [1]. - In a follow-up statement, Tong Zhuo clarified that his actions were not driven by a narrow mindset but were a legitimate effort to defend his legal rights and uphold the law [3]. - The tax authority in Shenyang has acknowledged receipt of the complaint but has not provided further details on whether an investigation will be initiated [3]. Group 2: Company Affiliations and Legal Issues - Tong Zhuo is associated with three companies, all of which are currently in a state of cancellation, including the recent cancellation of Liaoning Tong Xuehui Cultural Communication Co., Ltd. in August 2024 [7]. - A contract dispute involving Liaoning Liao Guang Media Co., Ltd., an affiliate of Tong Zhuo's former studio, is set to be heard in court on May 6, 2024 [7]. - The company Liaoning Liao Guang Media Co., Ltd. is co-owned by Hainan Ying'an Technology Co., Ltd. and Tong Zhuo's former agent, Guo Han, holding 90% and 10% of the shares respectively [7].

Group 1 - The article highlights the case of Sima Nan, a popular internet celebrity, who was penalized for tax evasion, with a total fine and penalties amounting to 926.94 thousand yuan, which has been fully collected by the tax authorities [1] - Sima Nan's tax evasion involved concealing income and false declarations, resulting in unpaid taxes totaling 462.43 thousand yuan from 2019 to 2023, reflecting a broader trend of tax evasion among internet celebrities [1][2] - The article discusses the complex income structure of internet celebrities, which includes tips, commission from sales, and advertising fees, making it difficult for tax authorities to track funds due to the lack of transparency in platform settlement systems [1][2] Group 2 - The article critiques the current business model in the internet celebrity industry, where "traffic equals revenue" has become a common understanding, leading to a moral decline and even illegal activities among creators [2] - It emphasizes the blurred lines between reality and falsehood in the content produced, resulting in a data-driven game that prioritizes metrics over ethical considerations [2] - The article warns that the relationship between platforms and creators has become a distorted symbiosis, leading to a vicious cycle where rational voices are marginalized and extreme opinions gain viral traction [2] Group 3 - Tax industry insiders indicate that penalties for tax evasion can range from 0.5 to 5 times the owed amount, with Sima Nan's case serving as a significant warning for the industry [3] - The article outlines three scenarios for tax penalties: reduced penalties for voluntary tax payments, heavy penalties for hidden income without voluntary payment, and standard penalties for misclassified income [3] - It concludes that the Sima Nan incident should serve as a starting point for promoting lawful business practices and compliance among internet celebrities and public figures [3]