近日，IPO辅导已逾4年半的马上消费金融股份有限公司（简称"马上消费"）公告显示，曾被曝光"催收 乱象"的企业依旧出现在合作催收机构名单上，而且该企业还是马上消费第二大股东的全资子公司，这 种关联交易引发外界质疑，被戏称为"左手放贷，右手催收"的"产业闭环"。 二问：催收乱象为何屡禁不绝？ 公开数据显示，目前马上消费服务用户超2亿，用户群体数量庞大，贷后催收的合规问题备受社会瞩 目。 "催收乱象"已成消费金融行业痼疾，有关部门大力整治，但屡禁不绝。马上消费2024年度实现营收 151.49亿元，是国内持牌头部消费金融企业。业内人士认为，马上消费催收环节存在关联交易隐患，不 仅让人质疑其催收业务的独立性，也使其催收费用的定价公允性存疑。 一问：合作白名单为何难禁"问题机构"？ 9月8日，马上消费在其官网发布公告称，目前正与135家催收机构进行合作，在其公布的合作名单上， 重庆信盟科技发展有限公司（简称"重庆信盟"）等曾被曝光存在"催收乱象"的企业赫然在列。 据媒体报道，包括重庆信盟合肥分公司在内的4家催收公司，在催收实操中存在不少乱象，甚至触及法 律底线，包括经常对欠款人恐吓、侮辱，曝通讯录，骚扰家属、单位，获 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 ST长园（维权）（600525.SH）昨晚公告，公司最新一次董事会审议通过了聘任公司总裁的议案，但作 为第一大股东代表的两名董事投下了反对票。前后不到两个月时间的五次董事会会议中，这两名董事已 在三次会议投出反对票，系此前所罕见，且其反对意见皆指向董事、高管的人事变动。曾是李嘉诚家族 A股"旗舰"的ST长园，在经历长达十余年的无实控人状态后，其主要股东间的博弈强度又有上升之势。 回看李嘉诚退出后的这些年，ST长园曾历经多路资本竞逐、并购交易密集的"繁华"，可换来的却是股 价低迷不振。特别是自去年"924"以来，在大盘涨幅超40%的牛市背景板前，ST长园逆势下跌逾21%的K 线图，更显刺眼。这背后，有此前积弊的拖累、有内控问题的曝光、有经营上的举步维艰……情况纷 繁、疑云重重。而如今，通过数月前一场鲜为人知的董事会会议作为"观察窗"，投资者或可一窥ST长 园的现状以及未来。 相关人士向智通财经记者透露，在7月4日的董事会会议上，至少有两位非独立董事对该议案表示反对， 理由包括：出售长园共创股权存在核心优质资产流失风险，以及本次关联交易定价存在不公允的风险。 ST ...

Group 1 - The company has approved a proposal to invest in a private equity fund and has signed an agreement to acquire a limited partnership interest in the Henan Hongkai Equity Investment Fund with a total commitment of RMB 202 million, representing 25.0935% of the fund's total committed capital [2] - The fund has completed the necessary business registration changes and private investment fund filing procedures [3] - The announcement includes details about the partners of the Hongkai Fund and their respective contributions, although specific data is not provided in the text [4]

Group 1 - The transaction involves a significant asset sale, issuance of shares, and cash payment for asset acquisition, along with fundraising, all of which are interdependent and form an integral part of a major asset restructuring [2][3][4] - The company plans to sell 100% equity of Sichuan Development Maglev Technology Co., Ltd. and related assets to Sichuan Shudao Rail Transit Group Co., Ltd., and 100% equity of Chengdu Xinzhu Transportation Technology Co., Ltd. to Sichuan Road and Bridge Construction Group Co., Ltd. [3] - The company intends to issue shares and pay cash to acquire 60% equity of Sichuan Shudao Clean Energy Group Co., Ltd., which will become a controlling subsidiary post-transaction [4] Group 2 - The company aims to raise matching funds by issuing shares to no more than 35 qualified investors, with the total amount not exceeding 100% of the transaction price for the asset acquisition [5] - This transaction is expected to constitute a major asset restructuring and related party transaction but does not qualify as a restructuring listing [6] - The company has disclosed the history of this transaction, including stock suspension and resumption dates, and relevant announcements made on various dates [7][8] Group 3 - As of the announcement date, the audit and evaluation work related to the transaction is still ongoing, and the company will convene a board meeting to review the transaction once these tasks are completed [9]

Core Viewpoint - ST Longyuan is experiencing intensified internal conflicts among major shareholders, particularly regarding executive appointments and board decisions, which reflects the company's ongoing struggles since the exit of Li Ka-shing's family and has led to a significant decline in stock performance despite broader market gains [1][12]. Group 1: Board Meetings and Decisions - The recent board meetings have seen unusual opposition from two non-independent directors representing the largest shareholder, indicating a shift in governance dynamics [1][6]. - A controversial board meeting held on July 4 was not disclosed until July 21, raising questions about the transparency and governance practices of ST Longyuan [2][4]. - The board's decision-making process has been criticized for not adhering to regulatory guidelines, particularly regarding the handling of related party transactions and the need for independent director approval [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Risks - ST Longyuan's stock price has significantly underperformed, dropping over 21% since September 2024, contrasting sharply with a 40% rise in the broader market [1][12]. - The company reported a net loss of 343.9 million yuan in the first half of the year, exacerbated by a 282 million yuan investment loss from the sale of a subsidiary [13][14]. - Concerns about the potential sale of its subsidiary, Changyuan Gongchuang, which is a key profit-generating asset, have been raised due to fears of losing core quality assets [15][14]. Group 3: Shareholder Dynamics - The ownership structure shows that the largest shareholder, Gree Financial Investment, holds 14.38% of shares, while the second and third largest shareholders collectively hold 15.86%, indicating a competitive shareholder landscape [15][16]. - The recent changes in board composition, including the resignation of key figures, may influence future decisions regarding asset sales and governance [8][9]. - The shift in control from Gree Group to Zhuhai Technology Group could further complicate the shareholder dynamics and impact the company's strategic direction [16][17].

公司控股股东、实际控制人、董事长、总经理林长青担任尧景基因董事长，董事会秘书、副总经理石永 沾担任尧景基因财务负责人。尧景基因拟设立的员工持股平台拟由林长青担任普通合伙人。根据《上海 证券交易所科创板股票上市规则》的规定，尧景基因、拟设立的员工持股平台为公司的关联方。公司作 为尧景基因的股东，放弃对尧景基因本次增资的优先认购权，构成关联交易，但不构成《上市公司重大 资产重组管理办法》规定的重大资产重组。 格隆汇9月30日丨热景生物(688068.SH)公布，为进一步优化股权架构，完善长效激励机制，吸引和留住 优秀人才，充分调动管理层、核心骨干人员的积极性，共同推进业务的长期稳定发展，公司参股公司尧 景基因拟通过新设立有限合伙企业（员工持股平台）对尧景基因进行增资并实施股权激励，增资价格为 1.6元/注册资本，增资总金额为1,600万元。公司拟放弃本次增资的优先认购权。 ...

鸿利智汇（300219）(300219.SZ)发布公告，公司分别于2021年8月25日、2021年9月13日召开第四届董 事会第二十二次会议、2021年第三次临时股东大会，审议通过了《关于与关联方签署产权交易合同暨关 联交易的议案》。同意公司转让全资子公司广东省金材科技有限公司(原名："东莞市金材五金有限公 司"，以下简称"金材科技")80%股权及债权。金材科技作为公司全资子公司期间，公司陆续向其提供资 金作为日常生产经营使用，截至2021年8月金材科技向公司借款余额为19,691.39万元。2021年9月，公司 与金材科技签署了《还款协议》，约定上述欠款由金材科技在六年内分期偿还，即于2027年9月30日还 清。具体还款方式为：每年按约定比例偿还部分本金，同时按同期银行贷款利率结算并支付当年利息。 2024年12月，基于公司战略规划，进一步优化资源配置，公司通过公开挂牌方式转让金材科技20%股 权，本次转让完成后，鸿利智汇不再持有金材科技的任何股权。基于金材科技的控股股东、实际控制人 游国娥女士为公司董事、常务副总裁廖梓成母亲，根据《深圳证券交易所创业板股票上市规则》的规 定，金材科技向公司偿还欠款事项构成 ...

张晓平、池淑萍、张佳睿为公司的共同实际控制人。本次发行前，张晓平、池淑萍通过瑞立集团控制公司64.1613%的股份；张佳睿直 接持有公司7.4001%的股份。张晓平、池淑萍、张佳睿合计控制公司71.5614%的股份。张晓平和池淑萍系夫妻关系，张佳睿系张晓平、 池淑萍之女，张晓平担任公司董事长，张佳睿担任公司董事。 瑞立科密于2025年4月18日首发过会，深交所上市审核委员会2025年第8次审议会议现场问询的主要问题： 瑞立科密是专业从事机动车主动安全系统相关核心部件研发、生产和销售的国家高新技术企业，主营业务为机动车主动安全系统和铝合 金精密压铸件的研发、生产和销售以及技术服务。 公司控股股东为瑞立集团有限公司。本次发行前，瑞立集团直接持有公司8,670.3438万股股份，占本次发行前公司总股本的64.1613%。 1.经营业绩问题。根据发行人申报材料，发行人是国内商用车主动安全系统龙头企业，已逐步实现对新能源车领域的产品布局。报告期 内，发行人主营业务收入分别为129824.96万元、172685.71万元、193956.50万元。新能源车领域的收入分别为19257.47万元、24994.84 万元、317 ...

来源：新浪港股-好仓工作室 珠海精实测控技术股份有限公司冲刺港股IPO，其招股书披露了公司在业务、财务等多方面的详细信 息。从数据来看，公司呈现出营收增长但净利润波动大，上半年净利率骤降的态势。这背后隐藏着怎样 的经营状况与潜在风险？以下将为您深入解读。 业务模式：双领域布局，ODM模式为主 工业与消费双领域协同发展 珠海精实测控融合测量、控制与AI技术，在工业领域凭借十余年测控技术积累，为消费电子、汽车及 家电等行业提供非标定制化设备与服务，覆盖产品全流程。同时，基于工业装备研发经验，积极开拓消 费领域应用，构建全球化研发、生产、销售体系。这种双领域布局旨在打造新的增长曲线，分散市场风 险。 ODM模式绑定头部客户 公司主要采用ODM业务模式，服务于消费电子、汽车及家用电器领域的头部制造企业。根据客户需求 设计、生产及销售定制智能TMC设备，包括在线测试装备、制造工艺装备等。该模式虽能借助头部客 户的市场影响力稳定业务，但也可能导致对大客户的依赖。 财务数据：营收增长，利润指标波动大 营收复合增长23.3%，产品结构变化显著 在线测试装备收入在2022 - 2023年下降，2023 - 2024年回升；制造 ...

Group 1 - The core issue raised by the Shanghai Stock Exchange is the competition and related party transactions between the company and its controlling shareholder, BAIC Group [1] - The company is required to explain the fulfillment of its commitment to avoid competition, the reasons for any delays, and whether there are significant obstacles to future compliance [1] - The exchange also inquired about the necessity and fairness of the significant related party transactions during the reporting period, including pricing mechanisms and whether these transactions affect the company's operational independence [1] Group 2 - In response to regulatory inquiries, the company stated that BAIC Group committed to resolving competition issues within six years from 2018, with a five-year extension to 2029 due to certain subsidiaries not meeting the conditions for injection into the listed company [2] - The company explained that its cooperation with Beijing Automotive is based on historical model platform technology and cost-effectiveness, with pricing following a 50-50 profit-sharing principle, indicating commercial logic and fairness [2] - The revenue from related party transactions has been decreasing, with projections indicating it will fall below 5% by the first half of 2025 [2]