Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent remarks regarding Taiwan have sparked significant criticism from various sectors in Japan, highlighting concerns over Japan's military expansion and its implications for diplomatic relations with China and other neighboring countries [1][2][3]. Group 1: Political Reactions - Takaichi's statements about Taiwan potentially posing an existential threat to Japan have been met with demands for retraction from political figures and civil groups, emphasizing the need to avoid further damage to Japan-China relations [2][3]. - Prominent politicians, including members of the Japanese Communist Party, have condemned Takaichi's comments as a violation of Japan's constitution and a dangerous departure from established diplomatic positions [2][3][4]. Group 2: Military Expansion Concerns - Takaichi's administration has been criticized for signaling a shift towards military expansion, including plans to increase defense spending to 2% of GDP and deploy missiles on islands near Taiwan, raising alarms among the public and experts [4][5]. - Public protests have emerged against the government's military buildup, with citizens expressing concerns over the prioritization of military spending over social welfare [4][5]. Group 3: Historical Context and International Relations - Analysts and scholars have pointed out that Takaichi's rhetoric reflects a troubling lack of historical reflection in Japan, potentially undermining post-war international order and threatening regional stability [5][6]. - The international community, including figures from Russia and Germany, has criticized Japan's military rhetoric and actions as a revival of militarism, calling for adherence to international law and historical accountability [5][6][7].

央视网消息：澳大利亚和新西兰国防部长即将先后访问日本并与日本防卫大臣小泉进次郎举行会谈。据日本媒体报道，此次 澳新两国与日本的会谈内容除加强双边防务合作外，还将涉及日本护卫舰出口事宜。日本首相高市早苗上台以来，着手进一步放 宽防卫装备出口限制，在扩军备武的道路上越走越远，引发日本各界担忧。 分析人士指出，高市早苗政府再次"松绑"武器出口政策，不仅是企图让日本重新成为军工大国，也是为了支撑日本自卫队转 向国防军。这会构成对日本"和平宪法"的实质性架空，也会对国际和地缘政治产生巨大的负面影响影响。 近年来，日本大幅调整安保政策，逐年增加防卫预算，放宽武器出口限制，谋求发展进攻性武器。高市早苗上台以来，甚至 暗示有可能放弃"无核三原则"，愈加背离日本"和平宪法"立场，在强军扩武的错误道路上越走越远，引发日本各界担忧。 日本《每日新闻》3日发表社论指出，盲目推动武器出口将破坏地区军事平衡，加剧局势紧张。还有日本媒体指出，为防卫装 备出口进一步松绑，"从根本上掏空了日本宪法一直倡导的和平主义""国会必须对政府的态度严加质询"。 二战后，日本出台"武器出口三原则"，一度严禁武器出口。近年来，日本一再突破原有限制。2014 ...

"独联体国家人民关于伟大卫国战争集体记忆国际会议"4日在圣彼得堡举行，俄外交部在该会议框 架内举行了记者会。扎哈罗娃在回答新华社记者提问时说，日本政府执迷不悟，不断发表种种涉台错误 言论。俄罗斯在台湾问题上的原则立场始终如一，俄方承认台湾是中国不可分割的一部分，反对以任何 形式谋求"台独"。台湾问题是中国内政，中方完全有正当理由捍卫主权和领土完整。 扎哈罗娃说，必须捍卫历史真相，抵制篡改历史、挑战战后国际秩序的行为，与纳粹和法西斯主义 抗争是人类的共同责任。 新华社圣彼得堡12月4日电 （记者 陈畅）俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃4日说，日本当局近日不断 发表的涉台错误言论和其涉军动向加剧了地区紧张局势，日方应回归其"和平宪法"立场。 扎哈罗娃强调，俄方多次敦促日方停止重走军事化道路，回归其"和平宪法"立场。日本宪法规定， 日本永远放弃以国权发动的战争。而日本当局的好战言论与行动不仅加剧了地区紧张局势，更与日本宪 法直接相悖。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent provocative statements by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan represent a serious interference in China's internal affairs and pose a significant threat to stability in Northeast Asia and international security [1][2]. Group 1: Provocative Statements - Takaichi's remarks on Taiwan are seen as highly provocative and detrimental to Sino-Japanese relations, with no benefits for Japan [1]. - The reference to the "San Francisco Peace Treaty," which is deemed illegal and invalid, is criticized as inappropriate and misleading regarding Taiwan's status [1]. Group 2: Military Developments - Japan's Defense Minister, Nobuo Kishi, announced plans to deploy missiles on Yonaguni Island, approximately 110 kilometers east of Taiwan, which is viewed as a destabilizing action [2]. - Takaichi's discussions about potentially allowing nuclear weapons on Japanese soil directly contradict Japan's long-standing "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [2]. Group 3: Historical Context and Risks - Experts warn that Japan's recent military rhetoric reflects a dangerous trend of seeking to expand the Self-Defense Forces' capabilities and potentially engage in overseas operations [2]. - The revival of nationalist sentiments and the glorification of the "Bushido spirit" by Japanese leaders could lead the country into perilous situations reminiscent of its aggressive policies during World War II [2].

Group 1 - Japan is investing part of its defense budget into "security resilience" initiatives, including the development of "universal plasma" and legal frameworks for wartime scenarios [1] - Japan's military preparations are becoming more practical and detailed, indicating a serious consideration of potential conflicts, particularly regarding the Taiwan Strait [1] - The post-World War II constitution of Japan, particularly Article 9, emphasizes a commitment to peace and the renunciation of war, which has historically shaped its defense policy [1] Group 2 - Japan's security policy has undergone a fundamental shift, moving away from its "exclusive defense" principle, which has been gradually eroded [2] - The Japanese defense budget has seen a continuous increase for thirteen consecutive years, reflecting a trend towards military expansion [2] - Recent changes in Japan's defense laws have allowed for collective self-defense and relaxed restrictions on arms exports, including lethal weapons [2]

针对日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，日本各地抗议集会活动接连不断。当地时间11月28日晚，一批日本民众在东京的世田谷区举行集会，要求 坚持和平宪法，呼吁高市早苗撤回错误言论。 在集会现场，有抗议者打出写有"维护和平宪法""反对扩张军备""高市早苗立即辞职"等内容的横幅，一些集会参与者还在现场发表演说，批评近期日本政府 增加防卫费支出、试图考虑修改"无核三原则"的企图。 集会参加者：关于集体自卫权的问题，此前我们一直都是反对的，而且作为唯一的核爆受害国，日本在核问题上必须慎重，坚持无核三原则，我认为这是极 其重要的。投入军力上的预算和财政支出，最终会破坏我们的生活。政府却还要不断增加军费，我觉得这是非常危险的方向。 集会参加者：日本曾是发动侵略战争的国家，战后，日本民众曾发誓，绝不能再发动战争。然而不知不觉间，日本却走向了要海外参战的状态，我们绝不能 让这种情况继续下去，我们要弘扬和平宪法的精神。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese citizens held protests demanding Prime Minister Kishi's retraction of controversial remarks regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a violation of Japan's pacifist constitution and a challenge to international norms [1][2] Group 1: Public Response - Thousands of Japanese citizens gathered in front of the Prime Minister's residence in Tokyo, calling for the retraction of Kishi's statements, which they believe undermine regional stability and violate Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution [1] - Protesters expressed concerns over the government's recent military spending increases and attempts to amend security regulations, emphasizing the importance of maintaining Japan's pacifist stance [1][2] Group 2: Academic and International Perspectives - Japanese economist Hironobu Maedomari criticized Kishi's remarks as contrary to Japan's peace constitution, warning that constitutional amendments could lead Japan towards a dangerous path [2] - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov expressed concern over Kishi's statements, supporting China's stance on national interests and urging responsible behavior from U.S. allies regarding Taiwan [2] - Jeffrey Sachs, a professor at Columbia University, noted that Kishi's comments have heightened tensions between China and Japan, advocating for a cautious and peace-oriented approach in Japan's foreign policy [2]

政治上的挑衅与军事上的躁动互为表里。高市之所以对错误言论拒不悔改，甚至借题发挥，其背后的算 计就是通过渲染所谓"外部威胁"为日本彻底松绑军事限制寻找借口。回顾历史不难发现，以所谓"存亡 危机"和"自卫"为名发动对外侵略，是日本军国主义的惯用手段。日本曾多次以夸大外部威胁、捏造"存 亡危机"为借口，为其发动侵略战争、破坏地区和平的行为进行辩护和动员。对此，国际社会特别是地 区国家都有深切而惨痛的共同记忆。高市妄图再次将这一危险概念具象化，复活军国主义的险恶用心昭 然若揭。 日本首相高市早苗近期在国会答辩时公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，粗暴干涉中国内政，且不思悔改，拒 不撤回错误言论。日本政府还频频为其错误言论强行辩解。如此顽固立场，暴露了日本右翼势力的持续 抬头和军国主义的阴魂不散。 25日，日本政府内阁决议通过答辩书，称高市关于"台湾有事"可能构成"存亡危机事态"的国会答辩"不 改变日本政府的一贯立场"。日方所谓"一贯立场"的具体内容到底是什么？日方能不能完整公开地表述 这个"一贯立场"？日方一再重复所谓"立场未变"的概念，却始终没有触及问题实质。答辩书老调重弹， 看似在"找补"高市言论的恶劣影响，实则仍在为错误 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent arms export activities and potential changes to its defense policies, highlighting concerns from China regarding Japan's military expansion and historical context related to World War II [1] Group 1: Japan's Arms Export and Defense Policy Changes - Japan has completed the export of "Patriot" air defense missiles to the United States, marking its first export of lethal weapons since relaxing its arms export restrictions [1] - The Japanese Liberal Democratic Party is reportedly discussing revisions to three security treaty documents, which may include changes to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and an increase in defense spending [1] Group 2: China's Response and Historical Context - The Chinese defense spokesperson emphasized that Japan's identity as a defeated nation in World War II is well-established, with international legal documents prohibiting Japan from rearming [1] - There is a warning from China regarding Japan's attempts to break free from its "peace constitution," significantly increase its defense budget, and revise security policies, which are seen as threats to regional peace and stability [1] - The spokesperson called for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities and cease its constitutional amendments and military expansions, asserting that any attempts to revive militarism will not succeed [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism, which poses a serious threat to peace and stability in Asia and the world [1][3][4] Summary by Sections Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has made several provocative moves, including the first export of lethal weapons since easing restrictions in 2023, discussions within the ruling party to revise security documents, and plans to deploy offensive weapons on islands near Taiwan [1][3] International Legal Obligations - International documents such as the UN Charter, the Potsdam Declaration, and Japan's surrender documents clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including disarmament and restrictions on military capabilities [2][3] Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing concern from both domestic and international communities regarding Japan's shift away from its post-war pacifism, with criticism from scholars, media, and public protests against the government's militaristic rhetoric [3][4] Historical Context and Responsibilities - The historical context emphasizes the importance of acknowledging past mistakes to prevent future conflicts, urging Japan to adhere to international law and its own pacifist constitution to build trust with neighboring countries and the international community [4]