日前，日本首相高市早苗在国会公然宣称，"台湾有事"可能构成日本可行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，暗示可能武力介入台海问题。这是日本战败以 来，日本在任领导人首次在台湾问题上表达试图武装介入的野心。 所谓"存亡危机事态"指的是什么？这一挑衅行为背后有何图谋？高市的言论又在日本国内引发了怎样的反对声浪？ 所谓"存亡危机事态"是什么？ "存亡危机事态"下 日本可行使集体自卫权 所谓"存亡危机事态"，是日本前首相安倍晋三在十年前，强行通过新安保法案时炮制的一个法律概念。法案规定，在"存亡危机事态"之际，日本可行使集体 自卫权。而所谓"存亡危机事态"的定义是："与我国有密切关系的他国遭到武力攻击，因此威胁到我国的生存，从根本上颠覆了我国国民的生命、自由和追 求幸福的权利的明确的危险事态。" 议院预算委员会会议上回答提问。 10年后，以安倍路线继承人自诩的高市早苗悍然将台湾问题与"存亡危机事态"联系起来，在接受国会质询中公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，暗示日本可能武力 介入台海问题。 台湾是"与日本有密切关系的他国"？台湾问题"威胁到日本的生存"？"从根本上颠覆了日本国民的生命、自由和追求幸福的权利"？高市这一言论简直荒谬至 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's recent statements in the Diet suggest a potential military intervention in the Taiwan issue, marking a significant shift in Japan's defense posture since World War II [1][5][10] Summary by Sections Concept of "Existential Crisis Situation" - The term "Existential Crisis Situation" was created by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe a decade ago, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under specific conditions [3] - This situation is defined as a clear and imminent danger that threatens Japan's survival due to military attacks on closely related foreign nations [3][5] Takaichi's Statements and Domestic Reactions - Takaichi linked the Taiwan issue to Japan's "Existential Crisis Situation," suggesting that Taiwan's situation threatens Japan's survival [5][10] - Her comments have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with former Prime Ministers and political leaders criticizing her statements as illogical and provocative [11][12] Defense Policy Shift - The ruling Liberal Democratic Party plans to discuss amendments to Japan's National Security Strategy and related documents, aiming to increase defense spending and potentially revise the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [7][9] - Takaichi's administration is pushing for aggressive military policies, including a substantial increase in defense spending and the possibility of acquiring nuclear capabilities [7][9] Public Protests and Political Pressure - Following Takaichi's remarks, public protests erupted in Tokyo, with citizens demanding her resignation and a retraction of her statements [12][13] - Various political figures and civil groups have expressed concerns over the implications of her comments for Japan's national security and international relations, particularly with China [10][12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements made by Japan's new Prime Minister, Sanae Takaichi, regarding Taiwan have sparked significant controversy in the international community, indicating a potential shift in Japan's political stance towards China and Taiwan [1][15][42]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's comments suggest that a situation in Taiwan could be considered a "survival crisis" for Japan, implying possible military intervention [1][5]. - This marks a departure from previous Japanese leaders who refrained from linking Taiwan's situation directly to Japan's national security [7][17]. - The term "survival crisis" was originally introduced by former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense under certain conditions [5][27]. Group 2: Domestic Reactions - Takaichi's remarks have faced backlash from various political figures in Japan, including former Prime Ministers who emphasize that Taiwan is a domestic issue for China and Japan should not interfere [17][19]. - Despite the criticism, Takaichi has refused to retract her statements, indicating a firm stance aligned with the current government's views [19][25]. - The political climate in Japan appears to be shifting towards a more right-leaning approach, with Takaichi's comments reflecting a broader trend among the ruling coalition [27][38]. Group 3: International Implications - The Chinese government has expressed strong discontent with Takaichi's statements, viewing them as a violation of China's sovereignty and a potential threat to regional stability [13][41]. - Experts warn that Japan's rightward political shift could lead to increased tensions in East Asia, reminiscent of historical militaristic tendencies [27][38]. - The situation raises concerns about Japan's adherence to its pacifist constitution and its implications for international law and relations [38][41].

最近一段时间，新任日本首相高市早苗关于台湾问题的言论在国际社会掀起了轩然大波。台湾问题是中国内政早就是国际共识，也是日本政府对华的基本政 治承诺，为何高市一上任就突破了底线？背后折射出日本政坛怎样的危险转向？又将把中日关系带向何方？ 11月7日，日本新任首相高市早苗口出狂言，在日本众议院预算委员会会议这样一个正式场合下，作为一国首相，在回答议员提问时竟公然表示："台湾有 事"可能是日本行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"。言外之意是，日本可能会以武力介入台海。高市早苗上台还不到一个月，这番言论瞬间让她成为东亚地 缘政治的焦点。 中国社会科学院日本研究所所长 杨伯江：在野党和执政党双方都可以借用这个平台向对方发起政治上的进攻，这次日本领导人的发言，应该说开了一个非 常恶劣的先例，第一次把这个"存亡危机事态"应用于中国的内政问题，也就是台湾问题上，这一点是中方所完全无法接受的。 "存亡危机事态"，是日本前首相安倍晋三在十年前，强行通过"新安保法"时炮制的一个法律概念。该法规定，即使日本没有遭到直接攻击，但若美国等密切 相关国家遭武力攻击进而威胁日本国家存亡时，自卫队便可行使集体自卫权。但具体标准是什么，一直语焉不详。 ...

在7日举行的众议院预算委员会会议上，当被问及"台湾有事"是否属于安全保障相关法规定中可行使集 体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，高市早苗表示，"如果涉及武力行使，我认为这可能属于'存亡危机事态'的 情形。"社民党在文章中称，运用自卫队或许是高市早苗的一贯主张，但作为现任首相（此番发言）如 此轻易地脱口而出，难免被指责轻率。 日本《产经新闻》14日报道称，日本前首相石破茂13日晚在一档节目中针对高市早苗在国会上发表"存 亡危机事态"的言论提出批评。石破茂称，"这近乎于在说'台湾有事就是日本有事'"，"设想个别案例并 判定'这种情况属于存亡危机事态'、下令（采取）防卫行动，而历届政府从未限定'这种情况就是日本有 事'。" 日本前首相鸠山由纪夫11日在社交平台X上发文表示，日本应该尊重台湾是中国一部分的这一事实，日 本不应干涉中国内政。鸠山由纪夫8日就在X上发帖表示，高市早苗发表"存亡危机事态"言论的"目的恐 怕是煽动危机，进而为增强军事力量找借口"，"归根结底，台湾问题是中国的内政，日本绝不应插 手。" "外界对事态认定扩大化的解释心存担忧。"日本《每日新闻》称，高市早苗"存亡危机事态"的言论可被 解读为暗示"台湾有事 ...

新华社东京11月14日电 题：高市的"存亡危机事态" 新华社记者冯武勇 2015年7月，在民众的强烈抗议声浪中，日本国会强行通过了安倍晋三政府提交的旨在解禁集体自卫权 的新安保法案。 行使集体自卫权，实际上超越了日本宪法第9条划定的红线，这是1972年日本政府就"集体自卫权和宪法 关系"发表的正式立场。安倍内阁解禁集体自卫权的做法有违反宪法之嫌，也是迄今日本绝大多数宪法 学者的共识。 高市这是图穷匕见了！ 台湾是"与日本有密切关系的他国"？台湾问题"威胁到日本的生存"？"从根本上颠覆了日本国民的生 命、自由和追求幸福的权利"？简直荒谬至极。 正如中方指出的，高市早苗的错误言论粗暴干涉中国内政，严重违背一个中国原则、中日四个政治文件 精神和国际关系基本准则，同日本政府迄今所作政治承诺严重不符，性质和影响极其恶劣。 高市这番"暴论"在日本国内也掀起轩然大波。有声音指出，高市早苗煽动"台湾有事"，蓄意刺激中国， 对日本国家利益和安全保障有百害而无一利。也有声音认为，连日本倚重的美国政府也在避免无谓挑衅 刺激中国，日本是主动下场绑架美国对抗中国。甚至对华持对抗思维的一些保守人士也哀叹，高市的言 论大大压缩了日本的未来 ...

据日本TBS电视台10日报道，立宪民主党众议院议员大串博志在国会称，"认定'存亡危机事态'绝非易 事。一旦认定，就意味着防卫出动，也就是日本作为国家将卷入战争。你难道不打算撤回、取消相关发 言吗？" 对这番言论，日本政坛出现质疑声音。立宪民主党党首野田佳彦8日已对媒体表示，他对高市早苗的发 言感到"非常惊讶，感受到了（她）独自贸然前行的危险性"，并表示打算在国会就此展开追问。野田佳 彦还称，"历任首相都对这类话题保持着一定克制，（首相的此番发言）会对国内外产生影响。"他强 调，该发言"分量极重"，"难道不应该格外谨慎吗？" 日本前首相鸠山由纪夫8日在社交平台X上发帖表示，过去也有人提出"台湾有事即日本有事"，而高市 首相则称，（台湾有事）可能构成可行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，目的恐怕是煽动危机，进而为 增强军事力量找借口，但日本本应尊重台湾是中国的一部分这一事实。"归根结底，台湾问题是中国的 内政，日本绝不应插手。"他写道。 【环球时报报道 记者 邢晓婧】日本首相高市早苗日前在回应国会质询时，宣称"台湾有事"恐构成可行 使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"，引发争议。10日，日本在野党方面要求其撤回相关答辩内 ...

日本首相高市早苗 高市早苗11月10日就此前的言论表示，当时"设想了最坏的情况，并做出了略微有些具体的回答"，同时 解释称"今后将避免这种做法"，但强调："这样的言论符合日本政府的一贯立场，并不打算收回和取 消"…… 日本历届政府始终仅在私下进行相关讨论，在国会等公开场合对具体情景的提及则持谨慎态度。即便被 问及"台湾有事"是否属于"存亡危机事态"，政府也始终以模糊表述回应。 关于是否收回台湾发生紧急情况可能触发"存亡危机事态"的回答，高市早苗对此予以否定。她强 调："这样的言论符合日本政府的一贯立场，并不打算收回和取消"。同时表示："不打算将这种说法视 为日本政府的统一立场来发表"。 针对增至国内生产总值（GDP）比重2％的防卫费的资金来源问题，高市早苗表示："希望在大力进行支 出改革的同时，妥善确保相关资金"。同时称："希望采取无需提高税率就能增加税收的应对措施"。 版权声明：日本经济新闻社版权所有，未经授权不得转载或部分复制，违者必究。 在11月10日的众议院预算委员会会议上，日本首相高市早苗提及台湾发生紧急情况可能会触发日本能够 行使集体自卫权的"存亡危机事态"一事。她表示，针对事态的界定具体列举特定 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida stated that the possibility of a "survival crisis situation" being triggered if Taiwan suffers a military attack is high, aiming to clarify Japan's response measures in emergencies and enhance deterrence against China [2][4]. Group 1: Japan's Response to Taiwan's Situation - Kishida emphasized the need for comprehensive judgment based on various scenarios if an emergency occurs in Taiwan, indicating that not all situations would constitute a "survival crisis" [4][5]. - The concept of "survival crisis situation" was introduced in Japan's 2015 security legislation, allowing Japan to exercise collective self-defense even if it has not been directly attacked, provided that its national survival is threatened [5][6]. - Japan's Self-Defense Forces (SDF) could engage in joint operations with U.S. forces if the government perceives a threat to Japan's survival, addressing previous concerns from the U.S. regarding SDF's involvement without direct attacks [5][6]. Group 2: Political Reactions and Concerns - There are concerns that discussing specific scenarios in public could escalate tensions, as historically, Japanese governments have been cautious in addressing such topics openly [6][7]. - Defense Minister Nobuo Kishi opposed the idea of discussing specific cases related to Taiwan, arguing that it could expose Japan's strategies and make it more vulnerable to attacks [7]. - Criticism arose from opposition members regarding the potential implications of openly discussing military responses, suggesting it could be seen as an escalation of tensions with China [6][7].