8月27日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。 俄新社记者提问，美国总统特朗普此前表示，美国和俄罗斯正在讨论削减核武库的问题，并希望让中国参 与这一进程。请问中国是否愿意参加三边削减核武库的谈判？ "我们注意到有关报道"，郭嘉昆表示，拥有最大核武库的国家，应该切实履行核裁军特殊优先责任，进一 步大幅实质削减核武库，为最终实现全面彻底核裁军创造条件。 郭嘉昆指出，中美核力量根本不在一个量级，两国核政策战略、安全环境也完全不同，要求中方加入中美 俄三边核裁军谈判，既不合理也不现实。 "中国奉行不首先使用核武器政策，坚持自卫防御核战略，始终将自身核力量维持在国家安全需要的最低 水平，不与任何国家搞军备竞赛，中国核力量及核政策是对世界和平的重要贡献。"他说。 责编：叶舒筠 校对： 高源 版权声明 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes END 来源：环球网 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 投资小红书 丨 e公司调查 丨 时报会客厅 丨 十大明星私募 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that the largest nuclear arsenal holders should take primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament and significantly reduce their nuclear stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive disarmament [1]. Group 1: Nuclear Disarmament Responsibility - The spokesperson highlights that the country with the largest nuclear arsenal should fulfill its special priority responsibility for nuclear disarmament [1]. - There is a call for substantial reductions in nuclear arsenals to facilitate the ultimate goal of complete nuclear disarmament [1]. Group 2: Comparison of Nuclear Forces - The spokesperson notes that the nuclear capabilities of China and the U.S. are not comparable in scale [1]. - The strategic security environments and nuclear policies of China and the U.S. are fundamentally different, making the request for China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament talks unreasonable and unrealistic [1]. Group 3: China's Nuclear Policy - China adheres to a no-first-use policy regarding nuclear weapons and maintains a self-defense nuclear strategy [1]. - The country keeps its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security and does not engage in an arms race with any nation [1]. - China's nuclear capabilities and policies are presented as significant contributions to global peace [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes that the largest nuclear powers should take primary responsibility for nuclear disarmament and that the request for China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament talks with the US and Russia is unreasonable and unrealistic [1] Group 1: Nuclear Disarmament Responsibility - The spokesperson highlights that the countries with the largest nuclear arsenals must significantly reduce their nuclear stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive nuclear disarmament [1] - It is noted that the nuclear capabilities of China and the US are not comparable, and their nuclear policies and strategic security environments are entirely different [1] Group 2: China's Nuclear Policy - China adheres to a no-first-use policy regarding nuclear weapons and maintains a self-defense nuclear strategy, keeping its nuclear forces at the minimum level necessary for national security [1] - The Chinese nuclear capabilities and policies are presented as a significant contribution to global peace, indicating a stance against an arms race with any country [1]

Group 1 - The Chinese government acknowledges discussions between the U.S. and Russia regarding nuclear arsenal reduction and the potential inclusion of China in these talks [1] - China emphasizes that countries with the largest nuclear arsenals have a special responsibility to significantly reduce their nuclear stockpiles to create conditions for comprehensive nuclear disarmament [1] - The Chinese spokesperson states that the nuclear capabilities of China and the U.S. are not comparable, and their nuclear policies and security environments are entirely different, making it unreasonable and unrealistic to expect China to join trilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations [1] Group 2 - China adheres to a no-first-use nuclear policy and maintains its nuclear forces at the minimum level required for national security, avoiding an arms race with any country [1] - The Chinese nuclear capabilities and policies are presented as a significant contribution to global peace [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving public opinion on nuclear weapons, particularly in the United States, highlighting a significant shift towards opposition against their use, as well as the efforts of the Japan Atomic Bomb Survivors Association to advocate for nuclear disarmament and recognition of the suffering caused by nuclear warfare [2][8]. Group 1: Public Opinion on Nuclear Weapons - In 1945, 53% of Americans supported the use of atomic bombs on multiple cities, a sentiment strongly defended by then-President Truman [7]. - Recent surveys indicate a dramatic change, with only 19% of Americans supporting the use of atomic bombs in 2024, and 36% believing that no atomic bomb should ever be used, marking a 32 percentage point increase from 1945 [8]. - The shift in opinion is particularly pronounced among younger generations, who are increasingly vocal against the use of nuclear weapons [8]. Group 2: Advocacy for Nuclear Disarmament - The Japan Atomic Bomb Survivors Association is intensifying its efforts to gain international recognition and support for nuclear disarmament, aiming for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2024 [4]. - During a recent event, representatives from the association emphasized the inhumanity of nuclear weapons and called for global discussions on their elimination [4][5]. - The association's advocacy is supported by a growing international sentiment against nuclear weapons, with surveys showing that 40-50% of respondents in several countries believe nuclear weapons should be abolished [9]. Group 3: Media and Historical Context - The reporting on nuclear bombings has evolved over the years, with increasing depth and quality in coverage, reflecting a persistent global concern about nuclear warfare [10]. - Research indicates that the number of survivors and their testimonies is dwindling, raising concerns about the future of nuclear disarmament advocacy and the transmission of historical memory [10].

声明称，随着美俄《新削减战略武器条约》即将于2026年2月到期，欧盟呼吁重启战略对话，并采取切 实措施，进一步削减核武库。声明说，不负责任的核言论、不透明的核武库扩张以及新势力谋求核能力 等，已经危及国际和平与安全。 当地时间6日，欧盟安全和外交政策高级代表卡拉斯发表书面声明，呼吁美俄重启核战略对话。 声明指出，面对这些挑战，《不扩散核武器条约》仍然是全球核不扩散机制的基石，也是实现核裁军的 重要基础。欧盟坚定不移地支持《全面禁止核试验条约》生效，并维护和重申现有的核武器试爆禁令。 （文章来源：央视新闻） ...

Core Viewpoint - The 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing in Hiroshima emphasizes the importance of understanding the truth about nuclear weapons and the need for global disarmament efforts [2][6]. Group 1: Commemoration and Participation - The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park held a memorial ceremony for the victims, attended by survivors and their families, marking the 80th anniversary of the atomic bombing [2]. - The participation scale reached a historical high, with approximately 55,000 attendees from 120 countries and regions, as the city invited all nations with diplomatic relations instead of just those who expressed interest [6]. Group 2: Calls for Nuclear Disarmament - Hiroshima Mayor Matsui Kazumi called for a transformation of the desire to abolish nuclear weapons into a consensus within civil society, highlighting the urgency of dialogue-based security systems amid global military buildup trends [4]. - Prime Minister Kishida Fumio reiterated the need for accurate understanding of the nuclear bombing's truth as a foundation for achieving a world without nuclear weapons, referencing the Hiroshima Action Plan for nuclear disarmament [6]. Group 3: Recognition of Victims - The names of 4,940 individuals who died or were confirmed dead in the past year were added to the memorial list, bringing the total recorded victims to 349,246 [9].

Group 1: Impact on U.S. Ports and Shipping Industry - The Trump administration's proposal to impose a 100% tariff on Chinese-manufactured port cranes and high port fees on Chinese vessels has faced significant opposition from the U.S. port and shipping industry, with critics labeling it as "suicidal" [4][12] - The American Association of Port Authorities (AAPA) highlighted that there have been no domestic crane manufacturers in the U.S. since the 1980s, and the limited production capacity of existing global manufacturers cannot meet demand [6] - The Houston Port has a contract with China for eight cranes worth approximately $300 million, and the proposed tariffs could increase costs by up to 270%, jeopardizing port expansion plans [8] Group 2: Trade Negotiations and Economic Consequences - Shipping associations warned that such tariffs contradict the goals of ongoing U.S.-China trade negotiations and would ultimately raise logistics costs in the U.S., leading to higher prices for consumers [12] - Industry predictions suggest that these measures could result in a 15% decline in U.S. port throughput, further diminishing its status as a global trade hub [14] Group 3: Nuclear Weapons Development and International Concerns - The U.S. Department of Energy announced the early completion of the B61-13 nuclear bomb, which has a yield of 320,000 tons of TNT, significantly raising concerns about the potential lowering of the nuclear weapon usage threshold [18][22] - The B61-13's production plan contradicts global nuclear disarmament trends and could trigger a new arms race, as the U.S. has spent over $30 billion on nuclear modernization in recent years, surpassing the total of other nuclear-armed states [24] Group 4: Space Defense Initiatives and Political Implications - Trump's announcement of the "Iron Dome" space-based missile defense system, with a proposed budget of $175 billion, has been criticized for its technical feasibility and potential to escalate the militarization of space [28][37] - The project faces significant funding challenges, as the budget has not been approved by Congress, and there are concerns about the long-term maintenance costs of such a system [37]

Core Viewpoint - China emphasizes the importance of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) in maintaining global peace and development, while highlighting the unprecedented challenges it currently faces [1][2]. Group 1: China's Position on Nuclear Weapons - China advocates for the inseparability of its own security and collective security, calling for the two countries with the largest nuclear arsenals to resume compliance with the New START treaty and further reduce their nuclear stockpiles [2]. - The country urges nuclear-armed states to negotiate a "No First Use" treaty and to abandon nuclear sharing and extended deterrence arrangements, as well as to withdraw nuclear weapons deployed abroad [2]. - China maintains that security rights and obligations are inseparable, promoting a fair and just nuclear non-proliferation system and opposing unilateral sanctions and military force in resolving regional nuclear issues [2]. Group 2: China's Defense Policy and Commitment - China asserts its commitment to a defensive national defense policy, having pledged not to use nuclear weapons first under any circumstances since it acquired them, and not to threaten non-nuclear weapon states [3]. - The country positions itself as a responsible nation, with its nuclear policy being a significant contribution to global peace, remaining consistent for over 60 years [3].

其他情况： 1. 乌克兰空军：俄罗斯在夜间袭击中发射了46架无人机和一枚弹道导弹。 2. 俄罗斯的防空系统在贝尔哥罗德和库尔斯克地区的夜间行动中摧毁了23架乌克兰无人机。 3. 俄国防部：过去24小时内，乌克兰对俄罗斯能源基础设施进行了两次攻击。 4. 俄国防部表示，俄军收复库尔斯克地区的Guyevo。 金十数据整理：俄乌冲突最新24小时局势跟踪（4月9日） 冲突情况： 和谈情况： 1. 乌克兰最大钢铁制造商从美国收到第一批煤炭。 2. 乌克兰与欧洲自由贸易联盟签署协议，取消了对工业品的所有关税。 3. 美国防部证实美国驻北约军事代表已被解雇。 4. 瑞士政府：在农业产品方面，乌克兰正在向瑞士提供一系列出口相关产品的让步。 5. 特朗普政府考虑从东欧撤出1万名士兵，占前总统拜登派遣的一半。 6. 俄罗斯原油发货量降至一个月来最低水平。据路透计算，由于布油价格疲软，俄罗斯ESPO混合原油 价格首次跌破每桶60美元的价格上限。 7. 俄罗斯联邦安全委员会副主席梅德韦杰夫：当前形势意味着未来几十年内不会实现核裁军。 8. 波兰总理图斯克：希望美国能够履行承诺，保持在波兰的驻军规模。 跟踪俄乌冲突局势 +订阅 1. ...