Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly state an investment rating for the industry Core Insights - The global virtual asset licensing system has essentially taken shape, with a systematic regional regulatory framework established [3] - Different regions exhibit variations in virtual asset licensing, reflecting distinct regulatory logics and strategic focuses [3] - Three major collaborative trends are emerging: local currency anchoring, asset custody, and anti-money laundering compliance [3] - Licensed operators and service providers are expected to become mainstream, with regulated trading platforms and stablecoin assets presenting lower risks [3] - The licensing will serve as a significant valuation support factor, with leading companies holding core licenses enjoying first-mover advantages and competitive moats [3] Summary by Sections 01 Global Virtual Asset Licensing System - The licensing framework in Hong Kong includes a dual regulatory structure for stablecoin issuers and virtual asset service providers (VASP) [8][9] - Hong Kong's VASP license requires compliance with strict operational and auditing standards, enhancing market transparency and investor safety [10] - Singapore's regulatory approach emphasizes innovation while ensuring market safety through a clear regulatory framework [11][12] - The European MiCA framework provides comprehensive regulations for crypto assets, categorizing them into electronic money tokens, asset-referenced tokens, and utility tokens [13][14] - The U.S. regulatory landscape is characterized by a complex multi-layered system involving federal and state-level oversight [17][18] 02 Differences and Collaborations in Regional Licensing - Hong Kong's licensing system is more inclusive for retail investors compared to Singapore's cautious approach [26] - The regulatory frameworks in Hong Kong and Europe aim to provide clear guidelines to foster innovation while ensuring compliance [26] - The U.S. regulatory environment is fragmented, requiring compliance with both federal and state regulations [26] 03 Investment Recommendations - Beneficial targets include licensed firms such as Zhongyou Capital, Bank of China Hong Kong, and Coinbase Global [4] - The report highlights the importance of holding licenses as a key factor for valuation and competitive advantage in the virtual asset industry [3][4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the report is that despite global economic uncertainties and geopolitical tensions, Hong Kong is strengthening its position as an asset management hub in Asia through targeted tax reforms, a robust IPO market, and progressive virtual asset regulation [1][2] - The total assets under management in Hong Kong's asset and wealth management sector are projected to increase by 13% in 2024, reaching HKD 35.1 trillion [1] - Recent optimizations to the Unified Fund Exemption (UFE) regime in Hong Kong have expanded the exemption scope to include private credit and other alternative assets, enhancing the competitiveness of Hong Kong [1][2] Group 2 - Hong Kong is actively working to establish a clear regulatory framework for virtual assets, with significant progress expected by 2025 as the number of local virtual asset trading platforms increases [1] - The report highlights Hong Kong's potential to act as a "super connector" by optimizing cross-border initiatives, thereby deepening ties with mainland Chinese investors [2] - The ongoing development of cross-border mutual recognition is significant, allowing Hong Kong advisory firms to offer a wider range of products in mainland China, positioning Hong Kong asset management firms favorably to serve emerging markets [2]

Investment Rating - The report does not explicitly provide an investment rating for the industry or specific companies Core Insights - The Hong Kong Stablecoin Ordinance will take effect on August 1, 2024, with initial licenses expected to be limited to a single-digit number, focusing on applicants' reserve management, compliance, and technical security [1][34] - The regulatory framework for virtual assets in Hong Kong includes various license types, such as VATP licenses for trading platforms and specific licenses for stablecoin issuers, with stringent requirements [2][35] - The stablecoin supply chain is categorized into upstream (infrastructure), midstream (issuers and distributors), and downstream (application scenarios), highlighting the ecosystem's complexity and interdependencies [3][12][13] Summary by Sections 1. Hong Kong Virtual Asset Regulatory Framework - Different types of licenses are required for various players in the virtual asset space, including VATP licenses for trading platforms and upgraded licenses for existing SFC licensees [2][11] - The entry threshold for stablecoin issuers includes a paid-up capital of at least HK$25 million and compliance with quarterly audits and reserve asset regulations [10][28] 2. Stablecoin Supply Chain - The stablecoin supply chain is divided into three segments: upstream (infrastructure), midstream (issuers and distributors), and downstream (application scenarios) [3][12] - Key players in the midstream include issuers like Circle and Tether, and distributors such as licensed trading platforms and brokers [12][13] 3. Stablecoin Issuance Process - The stablecoin issuance process involves several steps, including user exchange initiation, fund custody, reserve management, and issuance of stablecoins [4][20] - Issuers maintain a 1:1 reserve mechanism to ensure stablecoin value is pegged to fiat currencies, with reserves diversified into cash and low-risk assets [19][20] 4. Profitability Models - Stablecoin issuers generate revenue primarily from interest on reserve assets, while distributors earn from transaction fees and other services [5][23] - The report highlights the clear profitability paths for stablecoin issuers and distributors, emphasizing their potential for resource integration across the supply chain [5][23] 5. Comparison with Mainland China - The report outlines the stablecoin landscape in Hong Kong and mainland China, identifying key participants and their roles within the ecosystem [14][15] - Notable players include custodians, issuers, and distributors, with a focus on the regulatory sandbox initiatives in Hong Kong [16][30] 6. Impact on Traditional Payment Systems - The emergence of stablecoins is expected to disrupt traditional payment models, offering new opportunities for payment service providers to expand their services [31] - Stablecoins may enable payment processors to access diverse payment scenarios and enhance their offerings through technology integration [31]

Core Viewpoint - The Pakistani government has approved a virtual asset bill to establish an independent regulatory body for licensing and regulating the cryptocurrency industry [1] Group 1 - The new legislation aims to create a framework for the oversight of the cryptocurrency sector in Pakistan [1] - The independent regulatory authority will be responsible for granting licenses to cryptocurrency businesses and ensuring compliance with regulations [1] - This move is expected to enhance investor protection and promote the growth of the digital asset market in the country [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau, along with the Securities and Futures Commission, is initiating a consultation to introduce a regulatory framework for virtual asset trading service providers and custodians [1] Group 1: Regulatory Framework - The proposed system will empower the Securities and Futures Commission to issue licenses and supervise virtual asset trading service providers and custodians [1] - The Commission will establish compliance standards for these service providers based on the principle of "same business, same risks, same rules" [1] Group 2: Investor Protection and Market Integrity - The initiative aims to ensure robust investor protection measures and maintain market integrity [1] - This reflects the Commission's commitment to implementing various plans under the "ASPIRe" roadmap, focusing on sustainable development [1] Group 3: Market Development - The goal is to build a vibrant yet secure and robust digital asset market [1]

Core Viewpoint - Tianfeng International Securities has upgraded its securities trading license to provide virtual asset trading services in Hong Kong, reflecting the growing interest in virtual asset businesses in the region [1] Group 1: Regulatory Environment - The virtual asset business activities in Hong Kong are regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) [1] - The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) oversees areas involving currency payments, such as stablecoins and digital Hong Kong dollars [1] - The SFC adopts a "same business, same risk, same regulation" principle for virtual asset regulation, adding conditions and technical specifications to traditional financial licenses [1]

Core Viewpoint - Hong Kong's inclusion of virtual assets in its investment immigration program is attracting high-net-worth individuals, positioning the city as a favorable destination compared to other regions like Singapore [1] Group 1: Virtual Asset Policy - Hong Kong's virtual asset policy is more inclusive compared to Singapore, which has not clearly recognized virtual assets for investment immigration [5][6] - The unique advantages of virtual assets include ease of asset evaluation and transparency, allowing for quick estimation based on market prices without extensive research [5] Group 2: Investment Immigration Requirements - The investment immigration framework in Hong Kong allows for daily asset valuation, requiring a minimum of HKD 30 million to be maintained over the past six months, accommodating fluctuations in asset value [7] - Hong Kong's investment immigration policy is clearer and more lenient than Singapore's, which has stricter anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism financing regulations [6][9] Group 3: Compliance and Verification - The verification process for converting on-chain assets into compliant exchange certificates is streamlined in Hong Kong, contrasting with Singapore's rigorous initial scrutiny of fund sources [9] - The focus of compliance checks in Hong Kong occurs during the investment phase, rather than at the application stage, simplifying the process for applicants [9]

【导读】香港立法会通过《稳定币条例草案》，预计年内生效，渣打等机构正在积极筹备与港元挂钩的 稳定币发行 5月21日，香港立法会通过了《稳定币条例草案》（以下简称《草案》），以在香港设立法币稳定币发 行人的发牌制度，完善对虚拟资产活动在香港的监管框架，以保持金融稳定，同时推动金融创新。 据中国基金报记者了解，目前香港特区政府相关部门及金融监管机构，正积极协助业界做好过渡期安 排，以及稳定币发行的相关筹备工作。 发行人须向金融管理专员 申领牌照 香港特区政府发布声明对此表示欢迎，并指出《稳定币条例》实施后，任何人如在业务过程中在香港发 行法币稳定币，或在香港或以外发行宣称锚定港元价值的法币稳定币，必须向金融管理专员申领牌照。 相关人士须符合储备资产管理及赎回等方面的规定，包括妥善分隔客户资产、维持健全的稳定机制，以 及须在合理条件下按面额处理稳定币持有人的赎回要求。相关人士亦须符合一系列打击洗钱及恐怖分子 资金筹集、风险管理、披露规定及审计和适当人选等要求。金融管理专员会适时就制度的详细监管要求 作进一步咨询。 香港特区政府表示，发牌制度将为公众及投资者提供更好保障。其中，条例只容许指定的持牌机构在香 港销售法币 ...

｜2025年5月22日星期四｜ NO.1 第二十一届文博会5月22日在深圳开幕 5月22日，第二十一届中国（深圳）国际文化产业博览交易会（以下简称文博会）将盛大开幕。本届文博会首次设立人工智能展区， 汇聚了60余家人工智能领域企业参展，覆盖机器人、无人机、智能眼镜、智能耳机等前沿领域，集中展示AI技术如何重塑文化产业 的形态与边界。 点评：当前深圳正打造"人工智能先锋城市"，在此次展会上展示的人工智能领域产品，也将让观众感受到深圳的科技魅力。 NO.2 2024年深圳民营企业增超10万户 据"深圳发布"微信公众号5月21日消息，2024年，深圳市民营企业数量超260万家，增长10万户以上。其中，7家深圳民企入围世界500 强，27家上榜中国民企500强，40家成为广东省民企100强。 点评：深圳始终把优化营商环境作为"一号改革工程"，近年不断推出改革举措，推动市场化、法治化、国际化营商环境持续优化。 NO.3 广东餐饮连锁化率达31.7% 据金羊网5月21日消息，第16届CRE广州餐博会近日开幕，会上发布的报告显示，中国餐饮连锁化率去年达到22%，预计今年将突破 24%。而广东餐饮连锁化率更是高达31.7%， ...