Core Viewpoint - The conference on "Chinese-style modernization and human rights protection" highlighted the innovative theories and practical experiences in human rights within the context of China's modernization process [1]. Group 1: Key Insights from Experts - The director of the Human Rights Research Center at Nankai University emphasized that China's whole-process people's democracy combines people's will with party leadership, integrating direct and indirect democracy across various stages such as elections, consultation, decision-making, management, and supervision [1]. - A professor from East China University of Political Science and Law noted that China is advancing "human-centered" digital human rights protection and actively participating in global digital governance, proposing a Chinese narrative and solution for digital human rights [1]. - The vice president of the China Human Rights Research Association stated that Chinese-style modernization has created a new realm and form of human rights civilization, enriching the diversity of human rights civilization globally [1]. - A professor from Peking University highlighted that Chinese-style modernization focuses on people-centered development, advocating concepts like "promoting human rights through development," "win-win cooperation," and "building a community with a shared future for mankind," contributing Chinese wisdom and solutions to global human rights governance [1]. - A professor from Southwest University of Political Science and Law mentioned that China has transitioned from being an international dialogue participant and narrative deconstructor to a provider of global governance solutions [1]. Group 2: Research Directions - Participants emphasized the need to deepen foundational research in traditional human rights areas, strengthen leading topic research, and actively explore cutting-edge interdisciplinary research, leveraging regional and country-specific advantages to contribute more significantly to the comprehensive development of China's human rights cause [2]. Group 3: Conference Organization - The conference was organized by the China Human Rights Research Association and hosted by the Human Rights Research Center and the Law School of Shandong University [3].

Group 1 - The core concept of the articles revolves around the significance and development vision of the Global South, which includes emerging market countries and developing nations [2][3][6] - The Global South represents a collective rise of developing countries on the international stage, striving for independent development and reforming international order [2] - Countries in the Global South account for approximately 85% of the world's population and over 40% of the global economy, contributing 80% to world economic growth [3] Group 2 - The Global South is characterized by shared aspirations for development and cooperation, with China being a key player advocating for South-South cooperation [5] - The vision of the Global South emphasizes a harmonious and mutually beneficial future, aiming to enhance the representation and voice of developing countries in international affairs [6] - The collective rise of the Global South is seen as a historic achievement in the progress of human civilization, promoting a more just and equitable international order [3][6]

新质生产力勃发奔涌，科技创新突飞猛进，城乡面貌日新月异，快速发展变化的中国为世界注入稳定 性，正说明预期稳定不等于一成不变、停滞不前。洞察大势、遵循规律，在历史前进的逻辑中前进，在 时代发展的潮流中发展，便不惧一时一地的波动、眼前暂时的风雨——这何尝不是一种更深层次的预 期。 历史有其规律和逻辑，文明有其方向和轨迹，和平、发展、合作、共赢的潮流不可阻挡。坚定站在历史 正确一边、站在公平正义一边，以人民之心为心、以天下之利为利的中国，将以推动构建人类命运共同 体的务实行动形塑世界关于自身的预期，也为世界大同、天下一家的愿景预期蓄势夯基。 说回"路线"，小说《长安的荔枝》中，主人公李善德为了将鲜荔枝从岭南运到长安，耗费大量人力物力 财力反复试验，才最终找到一条"最优路线"。如今指尖轻点，路径规划、预估时间一目了然，能轻松实 现预期清晰、心中有数。 影响选择的关键因素，在于"预期"。日常生活中，人们往往会倾向于预期更稳定、意外更少的选项，因 为越稳定的预期，意味着节奏愈可掌控、收益愈可预料。由日常生活到经济生活，同理。稳定的预期， 是人们下决心、作决策时的重要锚点，是信心与行动的基石。由此，便不难理解为何许多地方优 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of enhancing China-Africa cooperation through four key initiatives proposed by Wang Yi, focusing on development, people-centered approaches, mutual learning, and openness [1][2] Group 2 - The first initiative stresses prioritizing development and modernizing together, with China committed to expanding its unilateral openness to Africa, which is expected to boost African exports and industrial development [1] - The second initiative highlights the importance of serving the people and fostering long-term cultural exchange mechanisms to strengthen emotional ties between the 2.8 billion people of China and Africa [1] - The third initiative advocates for mutual learning in governance and political exchanges, aiming to deepen cooperation between political parties and organizations in China and Africa [2] - The fourth initiative calls for openness and inclusivity, aiming to build a community with a shared future and enhance Africa's role in international governance [2]

转自：北京日报客户端 无论形势如何变化，中国将始终坚持多边主义，支持联合国在国际事务中发挥核心作用，同国际社会一 道推动构建更加公正合理的全球治理体系。 毛宁。图源：外 中新社记者：今天上午，中国军控与裁军协会等学术机构发布了《日本右翼的核野心：对世界和平的严 重威胁》报告，指出日本右翼不断膨胀的核野心对世界和平构成严重威胁，呼吁日本首相高市早苗立即 澄清日方在核武器问题上的立场。中方对此有何评论？ 毛宁：日本新政府执政以来，急不可耐地暴露出日本右翼的核野心。日本首相高市早苗等高官推动修 改"无核三原则"，暗示引入核潜艇，鼓动强化所谓对日"延伸威慑"，公开声称"日本应该拥有核武器"。 日方行径是对以《不扩散核武器条约》为基石的国际核不扩散体系、战后国际秩序的严重挑战，引发国 际社会以及日本国内各界人士的强烈反对。 你提到的报告揭露了日本右翼拥核图谋，列举日本秘密研发核武器、长期囤积大量敏感核材料、具备发 展核武器潜力的危险事实，深入分析日本右翼涉核言行对国际和平与安全的消极影响，并提出一系列消 除日方言行恶劣影响的措施建议，发出了反对日本拥核、维护世界和平的呼吁。 日本右翼日益膨胀的核野心，是日本军国主义死灰 ...

纳迪娅密切关注中国进一步全面深化改革、推进中国式现代化的举措。她认为，制度建设为中国式现代 化提供保障。作为全球第二大经济体、负责任大国，中国始终坚持和平发展，对全球政治经济格局，尤 其对全球南方国家推进现代化产生重要影响。 近年来，中埃高质量共建"一带一路"合作卓有成效；中国稳居埃及第一大贸易伙伴国地位，也是近年来 对埃及投资最活跃、增速最快的国家之一。纳迪娅表示，共建"一带一路"倡议帮助发展中国家走向现代 化，为促进当地经济发展、改善民生福祉发挥了重要作用。纳迪娅认为，中国是全球能源转型的推动者 和贡献者，"中国遵循绿色发展理念，强调人与自然和谐共生，为保护地球生态作出贡献，也为中国式 现代化在国际舞台上赢得更多支持。"她认为，中国秉持公平正义，积极劝和促谈，为解决巴勒斯坦问 题贡献力量，"中国坚定不移地维护世界和平、促进共同发展，彰显了维护世界和平的大国担当。" "中国走出了一条和平、发展、合作、共赢的现代化道路。"近日，埃及贝尼苏韦夫大学政治学教授纳迪 娅·希勒米接受本报记者采访时表示，中国式现代化促进世界的合作共赢，推动构建人类命运共同体， 为人类和平与发展作出贡献。 纳迪娅一直高度关注中国的现代化 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of Asian values rooted in historical traditions, advocating for peace, cooperation, openness, and inclusiveness as guiding principles for relationships among Asian countries [1][2][3] - Asian values are seen as a crystallization of centuries of interactions among various Asian civilizations, with Chinese civilization being a significant source [1][2] - The historical context includes the impact of colonialism and the post-World War II independence movements, which fostered a collective demand for equality and opposition to hegemony [2] Group 2 - The concept of "Asian values" has evolved through historical experiences, emphasizing responsibility, order, and harmony, which are reflected in various cultural traditions across Asia [3][4] - The rise of the "Asian Tigers" in the late 20th century showcased a development-first, collective cooperation value system distinct from Western models [2][4] - The current era sees China promoting Asian values through initiatives like the "Belt and Road" and regional cooperation frameworks, aiming to build a community with a shared future [2][8] Group 3 - The "Asian Miracle" of rapid economic growth is attributed to the support and guidance of Asian values, which encourage openness and collaboration rather than ideological divisions [5][6] - Asian values are positioned as a means to navigate both traditional and emerging challenges, providing a framework for cooperation that respects diversity [5][6] - The emphasis on mutual benefit and cooperation is seen as essential for addressing global issues and enhancing the voice of Southern countries in shaping future international orders [5][6] Group 4 - China is identified as a key advocate and practitioner of Asian values, demonstrating their effectiveness through significant economic achievements and regional cooperation initiatives [8][9] - The promotion of multilateralism and free trade by China is highlighted as a stabilizing force in Asia, fostering a conducive environment for development [8][9] - Collaborative projects, such as infrastructure development, are seen as vital for enhancing regional connectivity and economic integration, benefiting all participating countries [9][10]

Core Viewpoint - The year 2025 is seen as a significant year for the construction of an independent knowledge system in Chinese political science, aligning with Xi Jinping's directive on building a Chinese autonomous knowledge system [1] Group 1: Project Initiation - In September 2025, the Ministry of Education's major project "Research on the Construction of China's Autonomous Political Science Knowledge System" was successfully launched at Peking University, marking the official start of this initiative [1] - Seven major special topics under this project have been initiated, indicating a shift towards the "accelerated promotion" phase of constructing an autonomous knowledge system in Chinese political science [1] Group 2: Strategic Missions - Chinese political scientists are tasked with a strategic mission to construct an autonomous knowledge system that focuses on Xi Jinping's thoughts, traditional Chinese culture, and the practical experiences of China's development [1] - The construction must summarize regular insights and extract distinctive concepts, academic discourse, and classic propositions that reflect Chinese characteristics [1] Group 3: Balancing Perspectives - The autonomous knowledge system must balance universality and specificity, addressing specific issues in the context of Chinese modernization while also providing alternative knowledge perspectives for the world [2] - It is essential to objectively present the limitations of Western theories and showcase the competitiveness and adaptability of the Chinese knowledge framework [2] Group 4: Autonomy and Openness - The construction of the knowledge system should emphasize both autonomy and openness, recognizing that knowledge generation requires dialogue and interaction with other knowledge systems [2] - The unique theoretical foundation of the Chinese knowledge system should be highlighted, especially in the context of knowledge interaction and competition [2] Group 5: Theory and Practice - The most important source for constructing the autonomous knowledge system is Chinese practice, which must inform theoretical innovations [2] - Theoretical developments should respond accurately to major national strategic needs, promoting a two-way interaction between theory and practice to enhance predictive and guiding capabilities [2]

刘大使传达了党的二十届四中全会和中央经济工作会议精神，介绍了中汤关系发展和地区形势，充 分肯定了各中资企业（机构）工作成效，强调要加强理论学习，强化自身廉洁合规建设，主动防范化解 各类风险，积极履行社会责任，树立良好形象，自觉将自身发展融入国家改革发展稳定和对外工作大 局，为"十五五"时期高质量共建"一带一路"、服务中国式现代化、构建人类命运共同体贡献力量。 6名中资企业（机构）代表汇报了一年来在汤工作，纷纷表示将认真学习国内方针政策，做好本职 工作，为中汤务实合作添砖加瓦。 5.jpg （原标题：驻汤加使馆召开2025年中资企业（机构）年终座谈会） 2.jpg 2025年12月31日，刘为民大使主持召开2025年汤加中资企业（机构）年终座谈会。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent military intervention by the United States in Venezuela marks a significant shift in international order, reflecting a move towards "jungle law" and undermining established international norms [2][6]. Group 1: U.S. Military Action - The U.S. military action against Venezuela is seen as the first step in implementing the new National Security Strategy, emphasizing U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere [2][3]. - Venezuela's selection as the target is attributed to its strong anti-American sentiment and its vast oil reserves, making it a strategic priority for the U.S. [3][4]. Group 2: Implications for Latin America - The intervention is expected to create a "chilling effect" on leftist governments in Latin America, as it serves as a warning to other nations [4]. - The U.S. openly acknowledges that its actions in Venezuela are intended as a show of force against leftist regimes across the region [4][6]. Group 3: International Law and Order - The military intervention raises concerns about the erosion of international law and the potential normalization of such actions, which could lead to a complete breakdown of the current international order [6]. - The situation highlights the need for a renewed commitment to building a community with a shared future for humanity, as existing frameworks fail to ensure basic sovereignty and security [6].