海富通基金旗下这只基金竟然连续40天"瘦身"到5000万以下，距离清盘只剩10个工作日！ 海富通瑞鑫30天持有期债券基金，光听名字就知道是个"短期锁定"的债基产品。一般来说，30天持有期 的设计初衷是好的——既能给基金经理相对稳定的资金做投资，又能让投资者享受相对灵活的流动性。 可谁曾想，这只基金现在却陷入了"生死存亡"的关键时刻。 据海富通基金公告，这只债基已经连续40个工作日资产净值低于5000万元。按照基金合同的"生死线"规 定，如果连续50个工作日出现这种情况，基金就要强制清盘，连基金份额持有人大会都不用开。现在已 经走到第40天，距离"死刑执行"只剩10个工作日了。 看到公告，叨姐心情挺复杂的。一方面，基金清盘本身就是市场化的正常现象，优胜劣汰嘛。但另一方 面，这背后反映的问题值得我们深思。 首先，5000万的规模对于一只公募基金来说确实太小了。要知道，基金的固定成本是相对固定的——管 理费、托管费、运营费用等等，规模太小就意味着这些成本会被严重摊薄，最终受伤的还是持有人。就 像开餐厅一样，房租水电人工都是固定的，客人太少就只能关门大吉。 其次，债基市场的竞争确实很激烈。现在市场上债基产品同质化严重 ...

| 关于创金合信景零录活配置混合型证券投资基金基金资产净值低于5000万元的提示性 | 目 | 其他公告 | 2025-06-14 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 公告 | | | | | 关于创令合信暑要灵活配置混合型证券投资基金基金资产,通值低于5000万元的提示件 | ם | 其他公告 | 2025-06-07 | | 公告 | | | | | 创金合信基金管理有限公司关于公司旗下基金估值调整情况的公告 | LE | 其他公告 | 2025-06-06 | | 创金合信基金管理有限公司关于终止民商基金销售(上海馆限公司办理旗下基金相关 | LE | 基金销售 | 2025-06-03 | | 销售业务的公告 | | | | | 关于创金含信景要灵活配置混合型证券投资基金基金资产,净值低于5000万元的提示件 | E | 其他公告 | 2025-05-23 | | 公告 | | | | 创金合信景雯混合基金已经在生死线上挣扎了45个工作日，距离被强制清盘只剩5个工作日！ 但问题是，为什么会出现这种情况？是市场环境不好，还是基金本身存在问题？从今年的市场表现来看，确实不 太理想， ...

2025.06. 17 本文字数：2075，阅读时长大约3分钟 作者 | 第一财经 齐琦 6月以来，又一批公募基金面临清盘。 第一财经据Wind统计，6月份刚过半，已有9只基金触发合同终止条款。 截至6月16日，年内已有 117只基金退场，其中因规模不达标而触发合同终止条款的基金达97只，较去年同期的69只，同比 增加约40%。 从清盘原因看，多数产品因规模增长难而遗憾谢幕，其中有业绩长期低迷的，也有跑赢基准后资金撤 离止盈的，还有部分基金因单一持有人大额赎回，规模骤降至濒临清盘。 沪上一位公募基金人士告诉记者，长期以来监管严控"迷你基"数量，基于此头部公司加速出清低效产 品，而中小机构投研实力和渠道优势相对较弱，清盘产品对其经营业绩有一定影响。未来行业仅在存 量产品运营上按规定退出远远不够，供给端也明确审慎申报，避免跟风上报新基金却疏于管理运营。 资金止盈离场，多只基金净值增长规模反降 该基金因为资产净值持续低于5000万元，而触发合同终止。但从业绩看，该基金收益相对稳定，近 一年、近三年以及成立以来的涨幅分别为2.14%、6.68%、66.21%。 行业人士分析称，当前市场不确定性大，尽管部分基金业绩相对 ...

年内，不少基金在净值上升的过程中戛然而止官宣清盘，且当前亦有重仓势头正好的医药板块的基金也公 告可能触发基金合同终止情形。 与市场"挥手作别"的主要原因系这些发起式基金在成立三年后在"规模大考"面前闯关失败，即使绩优产品也难 逃清盘。 从此前逆袭成功的相关产品来看，良好的业绩是发起式产品摆脱清盘之困甚至成长为百亿规模基金的必要因 素，此外，还需要渠道、宣发等一系列资源的大力支持，天时地利人和，才有机会在规模上快速提升。 多只发起式基金倒在黎明前 截至6月15日，在震荡走高的背景下，上半年的行情由以泡泡玛特、老铺黄金为代表的"新消费"和创新药板块 为主导，相关主题基金亦取得不俗涨幅。 然而，部分基金在持仓方面，却在净值向上势头良好之际倒在了黎明前。 以华安创新医药锐选量化为例，截至去年末，该基金前十大重仓股中包括了恒瑞医药、泽璟制药、药明生物、 百济神州等年内涨幅可观的个股，因此截至4月1日，年内净值涨幅高达22%，然而上涨势头却在一季度末戛然 而止，作为一只发起式基金，截至3月31日该产品整体规模仅剩1100万元，离"三年大考"的2亿元门槛相距甚 远，因此不得不选择清盘。 类似情况还有金鹰品质消费，该基金截至 ...

Group 1 - A wave of public fund liquidations continues, with 117 funds having exited the market this year as of June 16, 2023, marking a 40% increase from the same period last year [1][4] - The majority of the liquidated funds were due to insufficient scale, with 97 funds triggering termination clauses for this reason [1][4] - The trend is attributed to regulatory pressure on "mini funds," leading larger firms to eliminate inefficient products while smaller firms struggle with research and distribution capabilities [1][3] Group 2 - Despite some funds showing stable performance, many have seen a decline in scale as investors opt to take profits, leading to liquidations [2][3] - For instance, the recently liquidated fund,浦银安盛幸福回报定开债券, had a stable return of 66.21% since inception but still fell below the 50 million yuan threshold [2] - The market uncertainty has made smaller funds less competitive, resulting in a preference for larger, more stable investments [3][7] Group 3 - As of June 16, 2023, there are 1,655 public funds with asset values below 50 million yuan, with mixed funds being the most affected [5] - The largest number of liquidated funds this year comes from博时基金, which has seen six funds exit, followed by淳厚基金,华安基金, and南方基金, each with five [4][5] - The trend of liquidations is not limited to traditional funds; 18 passive index funds have also faced liquidation risks this year [7][8] Group 4 - The phenomenon of "helping funds" has been noted, where funds receive temporary inflows to avoid liquidation but then see those funds withdrawn shortly after [8] - Several ETFs, including博时国证龙头家电ETF, are on the brink of liquidation, with asset values hovering around the 50 million yuan threshold [7][8] - The overall market environment has led to increased scrutiny on fund performance and sustainability, emphasizing the need for long-term alignment between scale and performance [8]

部分ETF因规模持续萎缩陷入流动性枯竭困境，清盘警报频频拉响 二季度以来，A股市场震荡上行，截至6月16日，上证指数自4月7日年内低点反弹9.43%。随着市场的回 暖，ETF基金也吸引了超过3000亿元资金回流，结束一季度的净流出态势。 其中，宽基指数产品仍是吸金主赛道，沪深300ETF吸金近1100亿元；黄金类商品ETF凭借金价上涨的 东风，年内资金流入规模突破637亿元；债券ETF扩容显著提速，二季度获得了近千亿元资金增持。然 而，并非所有赛道都一片繁荣，如港股医药主题赛道则呈现资金态度两极分化。 高速扩张的ETF市场也正在经历残酷洗牌。伴随基金公司扎堆布局同质化产品，部分ETF因规模持续萎 缩而陷入流动性枯竭困境，清盘警报频频拉响。当前，至少有180只ETF单日成交额不足百万元，甚至 还有几百、数千元的。在业内人士看来，"资产不流动则无价值"，被动产品的头部效应与同质化竞争， 正让部分"陪跑"ETF陷入规模萎缩困局，投资者需警惕低流动性不足的产品。 Wind数据显示，截至6月13日，在跟踪指数中带有"医"或"药"的17只跨境ETF中，呈现资金净流出状态 的有9只，与净流入者几乎旗鼓相当。其中，博时恒生医 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the news is that Nord Fund announced that its Nord Anyuan Pure Bond Fund has had its net asset value below 50 million yuan for 40 consecutive working days as of June 10, 2025, indicating a potential liquidity issue [2][4] - The fund's contract stipulates that if the number of fund shareholders falls below 200 or the net asset value remains below 50 million yuan for 50 consecutive working days, the fund will enter liquidation without needing a shareholder meeting [4] - As of the first quarter of 2025, the fund's net asset value was approximately 522 million yuan, suggesting significant redemptions occurred in the second quarter [4] Group 2 - The fund has seen a net value growth of 10.03% since its inception and a 2.36% growth over the past year as of June 11, 2025 [5] - The fund's first-quarter report indicates that a single institution holds 97.55% of the fund's shares, which may have contributed to the liquidity crisis due to large redemptions in the second quarter [4] - The fund remains optimistic about the bond market, citing stable economic conditions and potential adjustments in bond yields, and plans to extend duration and consider leverage in its investment strategy [6]

Core Viewpoint - The significant loss in fund value from 100 yuan to 58 yuan can be attributed to various factors including market volatility, leverage products, and high fees incurred during the holding period [3][8]. Group 1: Reasons for Principal Loss - Market Volatility: A fund purchased at a net value of 1.0 can drop by 40% during the holding period, resulting in a selling price of 0.6, leading to a loss after fees [3]. - Leverage Products: Funds with enhanced features can yield high returns in a rising market but may incur 1.5 to 2 times the losses during market downturns [3]. Group 2: Fee Deductions - Subscription Fee: A-class funds charge a subscription fee of 0.15%, which amounts to 0.15 yuan on a 100 yuan investment [3]. - Redemption Fee: A minimum of 1.5% is charged if the fund is held for less than 7 days, equating to 1.5 yuan on a 100 yuan investment [3]. - Management and Custody Fees: With an annualized fee of 1.5%, approximately 0.37 yuan is deducted for a 90-day holding period [3]. - Sales Service Fee: C-class funds incur an annualized fee of 0.4%, resulting in about 0.1 yuan deducted over 90 days [3]. - Total Fees: The cumulative fees amount to 2.12 yuan, leading to a final value of 58 yuan after accounting for a 38% drop in net value [3]. Group 3: Risk Considerations - Fund Liquidation Risk: Funds with a continuous size below 50 million may face liquidation risks, potentially leading to a sharp decline in net value [5]. - Currency Fluctuation: Investors in overseas QDII funds must manage the risks associated with currency appreciation and the combined losses from overseas stock declines and currency depreciation [5]. Group 4: Fund Management Strategies - Fund Analysis: Investors should log into their purchasing platform to review transaction records, focusing on net value and fee details [5]. - Stock Position Review: By entering the fund code on brokerage platforms, investors can check the underlying stocks and assess any significant losses in major holdings [5]. - Investment Recommendations: For funds held over two years, investors may consider waiting for industry rotation. For problematic funds, transitioning to money market or bond funds is advisable [5][6].

不到半年，4只基金清盘，另有2只已走在清盘的路上，其中绝大多数是成立仅一年左右的"次新"产品。 这一幕，正发生在老牌公募海富通基金的身上。 2025年，当整个公募行业仍在竞争资产规模增长的时代红利时，海富通却在忙着发一纸纸冰冷的清盘公告和赎回公告。 清盘潮仅仅是冰山一角。近年来海富通频繁拉响警报——旗下次新基金接连清盘、赖以生存的债券基金遭遇大规模赎回、整体规模增长停滞、经营业绩持 续下滑。 这种"出道即巅峰，随即陨落"的现象，无疑暴露了海富通在产品设计、发行和持续营销上的深层次问题。 清盘的直接原因，公告中都指向了同一个——"基金资产净值低于5000万元"。 这并非个例，而是一个普遍性的危机。在海富通现存的97只非货币基金中，竟有多达15只产品的规模低于5000万元的清盘"生死线"，占比超过15%。 短命的次新基金们 进入2025年，海富通似乎陷入了一场无法挣脱的"清盘魔咒"。 据统计，仅仅不到半年时间，公司旗下已有四只基金黯然离场，分别是海富通数字经济、海富通ESG领先、海富通欣盈6个月持有期和海富通量化多因子 混合。这一清盘数量，使其在行业中"名列前茅"，高居前五。 | 基金名称 | 基金成立日 基金终 ...

近期面临清盘的基金中，即将离场的原因多种多样，其中不乏绩优产品却缺乏资金追捧从而导致一边提示 清盘风险、另一边却净值持续创新高的状态。 有公募人士指出，这或与基民"落袋为安"的心态有关，近期行情震荡，即使基金经理操作得当，基民止盈心态 依旧明显，多只基金甚至出现"越涨越卖"的情况。 此外，还有个别债基亦在多个季度稳健上涨后，因单一持有人大额赎回沦为迷你基金，使得这些机构定制产品 在"完成任务"后主动离场。 基民或"落袋为安" 6月12日，申万菱信基金公告，截至6月11日，旗下申万菱信红利量化选股已连续40 个工作日基金资产净值低 于5000万元。 作为一只红利主题的量化产品，该基金截至一季度末前十大重仓股中囊括了厦门银行、邮储银行、工商银行等 六只银行股，且股票组合与今年上半年银行股行情特征较为一致，因此该基金虽然屡屡公告提示清盘风险，但 净值却持续走高，并在近期创下了历史新高，该基金成立于去年6月份，虽建仓后有所回撤，但在去 年"9·24"行情中净值得以迅速回升，然而资金却并不买账，合计份额从3.01亿份逐季下滑至今年一季度的2500 万份。 类似情况还有嘉实方舟一年持有，截至6月6日，该基金已连续30个工 ...