固收+产品

Search documents
上半年公募基金发行升温,权益类占比超七成
Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao· 2025-07-03 15:52
Core Insights - The public fund issuance market showed significant recovery in the first half of 2025, with a total of 680 new funds launched, representing a year-on-year increase of 7.94% and a quarter-on-quarter increase of 32.55% [1][2] Fund Type Analysis - Equity funds were the main contributors to the fundraising, with 390 equity funds launched, accounting for 57.35% of the total. Both year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth exceeded 60%, indicating a notable increase in equity fund issuance [1][2] - FOF (Fund of Funds) funds experienced a peak in issuance, with 31 funds launched, representing 4.56% of the total. The year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter growth rates were 82.35% and 93.75%, respectively [1][2] - Bond funds and mixed funds showed a recovery trend quarter-on-quarter, with 131 bond funds launched, making up 19.26% of the total, while mixed funds also exceeded 100 launches, accounting for 16.18% [1][2] Market Dynamics - The recovery in public fund issuance is attributed to two main factors: the restoration of market profitability, with over 80% of actively managed equity funds turning positive since April, and the release of policy benefits, such as the new "National Nine Articles" promoting long-term capital inflow into the market [3] - Looking ahead, the public fund issuance market is expected to continue a pattern of differentiation and innovation, with equity funds remaining dominant, comprising over 70% of upcoming funds. Index funds are becoming increasingly popular, with a focus on expanding ETF product lines into niche areas and accelerating coverage of emerging markets and US tech leaders [3] - "Fixed income plus" products and bond funds are anticipated to recover, with institutional interest in "fixed income plus" products due to their balanced return advantages. The potential of bond ETFs is expected to be released, supported by policies and funding [3]
买基金100元为啥卖出只有58
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-15 14:00
Core Viewpoint - The significant loss in fund value from 100 yuan to 58 yuan can be attributed to various factors including market volatility, leverage products, and high fees incurred during the holding period [3][8]. Group 1: Reasons for Principal Loss - Market Volatility: A fund purchased at a net value of 1.0 can drop by 40% during the holding period, resulting in a selling price of 0.6, leading to a loss after fees [3]. - Leverage Products: Funds with enhanced features can yield high returns in a rising market but may incur 1.5 to 2 times the losses during market downturns [3]. Group 2: Fee Deductions - Subscription Fee: A-class funds charge a subscription fee of 0.15%, which amounts to 0.15 yuan on a 100 yuan investment [3]. - Redemption Fee: A minimum of 1.5% is charged if the fund is held for less than 7 days, equating to 1.5 yuan on a 100 yuan investment [3]. - Management and Custody Fees: With an annualized fee of 1.5%, approximately 0.37 yuan is deducted for a 90-day holding period [3]. - Sales Service Fee: C-class funds incur an annualized fee of 0.4%, resulting in about 0.1 yuan deducted over 90 days [3]. - Total Fees: The cumulative fees amount to 2.12 yuan, leading to a final value of 58 yuan after accounting for a 38% drop in net value [3]. Group 3: Risk Considerations - Fund Liquidation Risk: Funds with a continuous size below 50 million may face liquidation risks, potentially leading to a sharp decline in net value [5]. - Currency Fluctuation: Investors in overseas QDII funds must manage the risks associated with currency appreciation and the combined losses from overseas stock declines and currency depreciation [5]. Group 4: Fund Management Strategies - Fund Analysis: Investors should log into their purchasing platform to review transaction records, focusing on net value and fee details [5]. - Stock Position Review: By entering the fund code on brokerage platforms, investors can check the underlying stocks and assess any significant losses in major holdings [5]. - Investment Recommendations: For funds held over two years, investors may consider waiting for industry rotation. For problematic funds, transitioning to money market or bond funds is advisable [5][6].