Group 1 - The article discusses Japan's Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which China strongly opposes and views as a violation of its sovereignty [1][2] - China emphasizes that the Taiwan issue is an internal matter and warns Japan against interfering, stating that any military involvement would be considered an act of aggression [2] - The article reflects on Japan's historical militarism and its past invasions, questioning the motives behind the current government's rhetoric and its implications for regional stability [2]

林剑表示，日本首相高市早苗日前在国会公然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，暗示武力介入台海的可能性。在中方表达严正交涉和强烈抗议后，还执迷不悟、拒不 撤回。上述错误言行严重违背一个中国原则，严重违背中日四个政治文件精神和国际关系基本准则，粗暴干涉中国内政，挑战中方的核心利益，侵犯中国主 权，中方对此坚决反对，绝不容忍。日方必须立即纠正、收回恶劣言论，否则一切后果必须由日方承担。 今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年，也是台湾光复80周年，日本曾对台湾实行殖民统治，犯下罄竹难书的罪行。日本军国主义历史上 曾多次以所谓"存亡危机"为借口，发动对外侵略，包括以"行使自卫权"为由，悍然制造九一八事变，挑起侵华战争，给包括中国在内的亚洲乃至世界人民带 来深重灾难。今天日本首相高市早苗再提所谓"存亡危机事态"，究竟是何居心？是否要重蹈军国主义覆辙？是否要再次同中国人民和亚洲人民为敌？是否企 图颠覆战后国际秩序？ 11月13日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 有记者问：日本首相高市早苗日前发表关于中国大陆对台湾动武可能构成日本"存亡危机事态"的言论。据报道，高市早苗在国会答辩时坚称，有关言论符合 日本政府看法，无意撤 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses Japan's Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan, suggesting potential military intervention, which China strongly opposes [1][2] - China emphasizes that Taiwan is an internal matter and any external interference, particularly from Japan, is a violation of China's sovereignty and core interests [2] - The article highlights historical grievances, recalling Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan and its militaristic past, warning against repeating such actions [1][2] Group 2 - The Chinese government demands Japan to retract its statements and warns of consequences if Japan continues its provocative rhetoric [1][2] - The article asserts that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, prompting a strong response from China [2] - It calls for Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities and cease its interference in China's internal affairs [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly opposes Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, asserting that such statements violate the One China principle and challenge China's core interests [2][3]. Group 1: Japan's Provocative Statements - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida publicly suggested that China's military actions towards Taiwan could constitute a "crisis situation" for Japan, indicating a willingness to consider military intervention [2][3]. - Kishida's remarks are seen as a blatant provocation and a refusal to retract despite China's stern protests, which China views as a serious violation of international relations norms [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - The year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression, highlighting Japan's historical colonial rule over Taiwan and its past military aggressions [3]. - The Chinese government warns that Japan's rhetoric may echo its militaristic past, questioning whether Japan intends to repeat historical mistakes and disrupt the post-war international order [3]. Group 3: China's Stance on Taiwan - China asserts that the resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese people alone, rejecting any external interference, particularly from Japan [3]. - The Chinese government emphasizes that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, and China would respond decisively to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan, which have drawn strong condemnation from China, emphasizing the violation of the One China principle and the potential for escalating tensions in the region [3][4][5]. Group 1: Japan's Provocative Statements - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo suggested that China's potential military action against Taiwan could pose an existential crisis for Japan, aligning with the Japanese government's stance and refusing to retract his comments [3]. - The remarks are seen as a blatant provocation, indicating a possible military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which China has strongly opposed [4]. Group 2: China's Response - China firmly rejects Japan's statements, demanding immediate correction and retraction of the remarks, warning that Japan will bear all consequences if it does not comply [4][5]. - The spokesperson highlighted the historical context, noting that this year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the liberation of Taiwan, reminding Japan of its colonial past and the atrocities committed [4]. Group 3: Implications for Sino-Japanese Relations - The article raises concerns about Japan's intentions, questioning whether it aims to repeat its militaristic history and disrupt the post-war international order [4]. - Any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression, prompting a strong defensive response from China, which would uphold its sovereignty and territorial integrity [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the historical significance of Taiwan's return to China, asserting it as an integral part of China's territory and a key outcome of World War II and the post-war international order [5][6][8]. Summary by Sections Historical Context - The year marks the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery, which is framed as a significant result of World War II and the post-war international order [6]. - Taiwan has been an inseparable part of China since ancient times, with its illegal occupation by Japan through the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895 being highlighted [6][7]. United Nations Resolution - The UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, passed in 1971, recognized the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate representative of China in the UN, effectively resolving Taiwan's representation issue [6][7]. - The article argues that recent claims by Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party and external forces that challenge this resolution are fundamentally erroneous and undermine UN authority [6][7]. One China Principle - The One China principle is presented as a universal consensus in the international community, with Taiwan referred to as "Taiwan, Province of China" in UN documents [7]. - The UK government’s acknowledgment of this principle during the establishment of diplomatic relations with China in 1972 is emphasized as a historical commitment that should not be forgotten [7][8]. Current Threats and Responsibilities - The article identifies "Taiwan independence" movements and external support as the primary threats to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait [8]. - It calls for the UK, as a major WWII victor and permanent member of the UN Security Council, to uphold its commitments and oppose any actions that challenge Resolution 2758, aligning with international interests [8].

Core Viewpoint - The commemoration of the 80th anniversary of Taiwan's recovery emphasizes its significance in the historical context of China's national rejuvenation and the post-war international order [2][4]. Group 1: Historical Significance - Taiwan's recovery in 1945 marked the end of 50 years of Japanese colonial rule and the restoration of Chinese sovereignty over Taiwan and the Penghu Islands [1][2]. - The event is seen as a critical symbol of the Chinese nation's resurgence from historical humiliations, particularly following the Opium Wars and the Treaty of Shimonoseki [2][3]. - The recovery is viewed as a collective effort of the Chinese people, highlighting the unity between Taiwan and mainland China during the anti-Japanese war [2][4]. Group 2: International Context - Taiwan's recovery is recognized as a significant outcome of the global anti-fascist war and an integral part of the post-war international order [3][4]. - International legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation serve as foundational principles affirming China's sovereignty over Taiwan [3][4]. - The recovery challenges the imperialistic notion of "might makes right," establishing a legal precedent for the return of territories acquired through aggression [3]. Group 3: Contemporary Relevance - The 80th anniversary serves to reinforce national unity and counteract separatist narratives, particularly in light of current geopolitical tensions [4]. - It aims to clarify the historical context against attempts to promote the "status of Taiwan" as undetermined, reaffirming China's sovereignty [4]. - The commemoration is positioned as a rebuttal to historical distortions and a call for recognition of the established facts regarding Taiwan's status post-World War II [4].

Core Viewpoint - The historical narrative regarding Taiwan's return to China is emphasized, asserting that it cannot be forgotten or altered, and the results of a recent survey reflect a strong understanding of this history among respondents [1][2]. Group 1: Survey Results - A recent CGTN survey conducted among approximately 12,000 respondents across 40 countries revealed that 66.7% of participants are aware of Taiwan's historical return, with awareness among Asian respondents reaching 73.5% [1]. - The majority of respondents view Taiwan's return to China as a result of World War II victories, rejecting any notions of "Taiwan independence" as a denial of these historical achievements [1]. Group 2: Official Commentary - The spokesperson for the Taiwan Affairs Office, Chen Binhua, highlighted that the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japan was crucial in safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and it erased the historical shame of repeated failures against foreign invasions [2]. - Chen criticized the Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) persistent "Taiwan independence" stance, claiming it challenges the current status of the Taiwan Strait and undermines China's sovereignty over Taiwan, which is considered an integral part of the post-war international order [2].

Core Viewpoint - China's contribution to the global anti-fascist war is significantly underestimated by the West, and there is a lack of recognition of China's role in this historical context [1][2] Group 1: Historical Context - China served as the Eastern main battlefield during the global anti-fascist war, effectively tying down Japanese military forces and preventing further expansion, which allowed Allied forces to concentrate their efforts elsewhere [1] - The Chinese military and civilians endured immense suffering during this period, highlighting the sacrifices made [1] Group 2: Commemoration and Education - The establishment of the "Lisbon Maru" Memorial Association in 2024 aims to commemorate the historical events and educate more people about this history [2] - Recent documentaries and films, such as "The Sinking of the Lisbon Maru" and "Dongji Island," have been released in multiple countries to help Western audiences understand and remember this history [2] Group 3: Current Relevance - Maintaining the post-war international order is crucial, based on the consensus that the world must not fall into destructive situations again [2] - The importance of promoting a multipolar world is emphasized, ensuring that all countries, regardless of size, can voice their opinions and share in development outcomes [2] - China is recognized as a key player in achieving these goals, contributing to global peace, stability, development, and prosperity [2]

Core Viewpoint - Russia demands Japan to fully acknowledge the outcomes of World War II and take responsibility for its role in instigating global conflict [1] Group 1 - Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov emphasizes that the results of World War II in the Pacific, including Japan's unconditional surrender, are an integral part of the post-war international order [1] - Russia plans to collaborate with like-minded partners to conduct various educational and military commemorative activities aimed at uncovering new evidence of Japan's crimes committed in the 1930s and 1940s [1] - Lavrov states that remembering the lessons of the world wars is a sacred duty to prevent such tragedies from occurring again [1]