Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of defending the post-war international order and the outcomes of World War II, particularly in light of recent provocative statements by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Sanae regarding Taiwan, which are seen as a challenge to this order and a potential revival of militarism [1][5][19]. Group 1: Historical Context - The signing of the Japanese surrender in Nanjing on September 9, 1945, marked a significant moment in establishing the post-war international order and confirming the outcomes of World War II, including the return of Taiwan to China [2][3]. - Historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Declaration provide legal foundations for Taiwan's status as part of China, reinforcing the notion that Japan's claims over Taiwan are illegitimate [3][4]. Group 2: Japan's Current Political Climate - Prime Minister Kishi's recent statements linking Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense rights represent a significant shift in Japan's post-war stance and have been met with widespread criticism both domestically and internationally [5][12]. - Kishi's administration is seen as part of a broader trend of right-wing politics in Japan that seeks to revive militaristic ideologies and challenge the established post-war order [6][10]. Group 3: International Reactions - The international community, including various countries and organizations, has expressed concern over Kishi's remarks, viewing them as a threat to regional stability and a potential revival of militarism in Japan [18][19]. - Critics argue that Kishi's approach could lead to Japan's isolation in diplomatic relations and exacerbate tensions in the Asia-Pacific region [18][19].

中方再驳日方拥核表态：不要在错误道路上继续狂奔下去 中新网北京12月22日电 (记者 曾玥)中国外交部发言人林剑22日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：近日，日本首相官邸一位负责安保政策的高官向媒体宣称，日本应该拥有核武器。此后， 日本防卫大臣称推进讨论"无核三原则"时不排除任何选项。上述言论引发日本国内各界人士和俄罗斯等 周边国家强烈批评。请问中方对此有何评论？ 林剑：中方对日本首相官邸高官、首相侧近公然宣称日本应该拥有核武器感到震惊。日本内阁官房长官 拒绝就此作出澄清，日本防卫大臣还就是否修改"无核三原则"宣称，"不排除任何选项"。联系到日本媒 体此前报道高市首相计划修改"无核三原则"，上述言论是对战后国际秩序和核不扩散体系的公然挑衅， 对地区和国际和平稳定的严重威胁，对日本宣称"走和平发展道路"的完全背离，绝非"个人行为"可以搪 塞敷衍，国际社会必须对此高度警惕和坚决反对。 第一， 有关言论严重违背日方应履行的国际法义务。根据《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》和《日本投降 书》等具有国际法效力的文件，日本应"完全解除武装"，不得"维持能使其重新武装的产业"。日本作为 《不扩散核武器条约》无核武器国家，必须完全恪守不 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly refutes accusations from certain U.S. senators regarding China's alleged economic and military pressure on Japan, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its actions and adhere to international commitments established post-World War II [1] Group 1 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Guo Jia Kun, stated that maintaining the outcomes of World War II and defending the post-war international order is a shared responsibility of the international community, including both China and the U.S. [1] - Guo highlighted that the remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida have not only provoked strong indignation among the Chinese people but have also faced criticism from within Japan, the U.S. strategic community, and the international public opinion [1] - The Chinese government urges Japan to sincerely reflect on its mistakes, retract Kishida's erroneous statements, and accurately communicate Japan's political commitments regarding Taiwan as outlined in the four political documents between China and Japan [1]

第一，坚持公平正义，筑牢实现持久和平的基础。军国主义和法西斯主义势力曾给人类造成空前浩 劫，任何试图为侵略历史翻案的错误言行都将冲击人类良知底线、破坏来之不易的和平。要遵守《联合 国宪章》宗旨和原则，践行大小国家一律平等，反对单边主义、霸权主义和强权政治。要推进国际关系 民主化，不断提高发展中国家在国际事务中的代表性和话语权。 第二，坚持政治解决，打造通往和平的有效途径。任何冲突的终点都是谈判桌。面对矛盾争端，要 坚持劝和促谈。要尊重各国主权和领土完整，兼顾各方合理诉求。大国尤其应展现担当，发挥建设性作 用，不能搞双重标准、强加于人，更不能拱火浇油、谋取私利。 第三，坚持发展优先，消除引发战争冲突的根源。要坚持发展促和平理念，帮助冲突当事国提升自 主发展能力，走出一条符合本国国情的发展道路，从根源上铲除暴力滋生的土壤。 第四，坚持多边主义，增强捍卫和平的国际合力。以联合国为核心的国际体系支撑了世界和平与发 展。未来越是充满不确定性，就越要践行真正的多边主义，越要维护联合国作用和权威，确保安理会履 行维护国际和平与安全的首要责任。在中方倡议下，"全球治理之友小组"近日正式成立，旨在坚持多边 主义，合作应对全球性 ...

Group 1 - The core argument emphasizes the need for Japan to retract its erroneous statements regarding Taiwan, as it poses a serious threat to peace and violates international commitments made post-World War II [1][2] - The statement highlights the historical context of Japan's militarism, warning against the resurgence of militaristic ideologies that led to past aggressions [1] - It asserts that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, supported by various international legal documents and agreements, reinforcing China's territorial claims [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan challenge the post-war international order and pose significant risks, highlighting the persistence of militaristic ideologies in Japan [1][2] Group 1: Historical Context and Implications - Experts emphasize that China was one of the most severely affected countries during World War II, and Japan's failure to confront this history will not only impact Sino-Japanese relations but also affect Korea, Russia, and Southeast Asian nations [2] - The so-called "reconciliation" by Japan post-war is primarily aimed at Western countries while avoiding acknowledgment of Asian victims, attempting to reshape historical narratives to escape the stigma of being a defeated nation [2] Group 2: Political Dynamics in Japan - Kishi's remarks are seen as a culmination of Japan's long-term political trends, reflecting the rise of extreme right-wing ideologies within Japanese politics [1] - The motivations behind Kishi's statements include a desire to shed Japan's post-war identity as a defeated nation and to appeal to right-wing voters by adopting a hardline stance on foreign policy [1][2] Group 3: Regional Security Concerns - The ongoing diplomatic crisis between China and Japan could lead to strategic risks for the United States, Japan's treaty ally, especially as the Trump administration shows no intention of endorsing Kishi's controversial remarks [2] - China's firm response to Japan's actions is framed as a necessary measure to delineate red lines and prevent the resurgence of militaristic ideologies, thereby maintaining post-war international order and regional peace [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that Taiwan has historically and legally been a part of China, and any claims or actions suggesting otherwise are seen as violations of China's sovereignty and international agreements [1][2][3]. Group 1: Historical Context - Taiwan has been recognized as Chinese territory since ancient times, with key historical documents such as the Cairo Declaration (1943) and the Potsdam Declaration (1945) affirming this stance [2]. - The Chinese government restored its sovereignty over Taiwan on October 25, 1945, following Japan's defeat in World War II [2]. - The United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 (1971) reaffirmed the representation of the People's Republic of China as the legitimate government of China, which includes Taiwan [2]. Group 2: Legal and Political Assertions - The article outlines that the legal status of Taiwan has been "locked" by multiple international agreements, asserting that any moves towards Taiwanese independence are seen as a threat to China's territorial integrity [3]. - Japan's acknowledgment of the People's Republic of China as the sole legitimate government of China, as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Communiqué, reinforces the position that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China [2][3]. Group 3: Current Implications - The article criticizes current Japanese leadership for making statements that could be interpreted as military threats regarding Taiwan, which is viewed as a serious challenge to peace in Asia and the world [1][3]. - It calls for a collective responsibility among peace-loving nations to uphold the principles of the United Nations Charter and prevent any resurgence of militarism or imperial ambitions from Japan [3].

警钟已经敲响，悲剧不能重演。如果日本执意要开历史倒车，背弃和平发展的承诺，重走军国主义侵略 扩张的邪路，破坏战后国际秩序，最终只能是自取灭亡。 许怡真 来源：中国军网 近日，继日本首相高市早苗公然抛出涉台挑衅言论、暗示武力介入台海局势后，日本政府又接连做出一 系列倒行逆施之举：批准补充预算案，将2025财年防卫开支占国内生产总值的比例提升至2%；企图在 与台湾邻近的西南诸岛部署进攻性武器；推动杀伤性武器出口……凡此种种危险行径，无一不与"和平 宪法"背道而驰。这不仅严重冲击中日关系，破坏战后国际秩序，更对亚洲乃至世界和平稳定构成严重 威胁。这种开历史倒车的挑衅行径，终将反噬自身。 在中日关系上，不容开历史倒车。1972年中日邦交正常化之际，日本即已宣布承认一个中国原则。此 后，中日四个政治文件对台湾问题作出的明确规定，更是日本政府作出的政治承诺。高市早苗本人在10 月底还曾表示："在台湾问题上，日本将坚持1972年日中联合声明中的立场。"然而，言犹在耳，她却出 尔反尔，抛出"台湾有事"可能构成"存亡危机事态"的荒谬论调。这清晰地表明，日本在台湾问题上的立 场出现严重倒退。以高市早苗为代表的日本右翼势力，企图" ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government strongly criticizes Japan's recent letter to the UN Secretary-General, labeling it as filled with erroneous views and hypocritical lies, and urges Japan to reflect on its actions as a defeated nation and fulfill its commitments to China and the international community [1] Group 1: Japan's Position on Taiwan - Japan's Prime Minister, Fumio Kishida, has made statements regarding Taiwan that challenge the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, which China views as a serious violation of the UN Charter [1] - The Chinese government questions Japan's vague stance on Taiwan, demanding a clear and accurate response regarding Japan's "consistent position" as outlined in the four political documents between China and Japan [1] Group 2: Military and Defense Issues - Japan's claims of adhering to a "defensive posture" are contradicted by its Prime Minister's comments linking Japan's survival crisis to Taiwan, implying a potential military threat against China [1] - The Chinese government highlights Japan's increasing military expenditures and its moves to reinterpret its self-defense policies, which it sees as a violation of its post-war commitments and a challenge to the international order established after World War II [1] Group 3: China's Response - In light of Japan's actions, China has reiterated its position through its permanent mission to the UN, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its past and adhere to its obligations as a defeated nation [1] - The year marks the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the War of Resistance against Japan, reinforcing China's stance against Japan's attempts to challenge the post-war international order and revive militarism [1]

Core Viewpoint - China firmly opposes Japan's challenge to the post-war international order and the revival of militarism, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its actions and adhere to its commitments as a defeated nation in World War II [2][3]. Group 1: Japan's Actions and Statements - Japan's Permanent Representative to the UN made unreasonable claims in a letter to the UN Secretary-General, which China views as a blatant challenge to the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order [2]. - The Japanese Prime Minister's comments regarding Taiwan are seen as a violation of the UN Charter and an implicit threat of military action against China, contradicting Japan's stated defense policies [2][3]. - Japan's defense spending has increased for thirteen consecutive years, and it has been loosening restrictions on military exports, which China interprets as a move to undermine international agreements established after World War II [2]. Group 2: China's Response - China has reiterated its position to the UN Secretary-General, urging Japan to reflect on its past and fulfill its obligations as a defeated nation, especially in light of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War [3]. - Any external interference in Taiwan affairs will be met with strong resistance from China, which asserts that Taiwan is an integral part of its territory [4]. - China encourages Japanese organizations to play a positive role domestically and hopes for a retraction of the Prime Minister's erroneous statements to foster better bilateral relations [5].