Core Viewpoint - The joint military exercise between the United States and Panama aimed at enhancing the defense capabilities of the Panama Canal amidst concerns over China's increasing presence in the region [1][3]. Group 1: Joint Military Exercise - The joint exercise took place from July 13 to July 18, focusing on preparing for security threats to the Panama Canal and other strategic infrastructures [1]. - The U.S. Southern Command deployed three helicopters, including two UH-60 Black Hawks and one CH-47 Chinook, to participate in the exercise at three Panamanian air force bases [1]. Group 2: U.S.-China Relations - The exercise has been framed by U.S. media as a response to perceived threats from China, with claims that China is expanding its military and economic influence in the Western Hemisphere [3]. - U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper and former President Trump have previously expressed concerns about China's control over the Panama Canal, which is vital for global trade [3][4]. Group 3: Responses from China and Panama - Chinese officials have repeatedly denied allegations of attempting to control the Panama Canal, asserting that such claims are unfounded and serve as a pretext for U.S. expansionism [3]. - Panamanian President Laurentino Cortizo has also rejected the notion of Chinese interference, emphasizing Panama's sovereignty over the canal [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the Japanese government's 2025 Defense White Paper, which labels China as an unprecedented strategic challenge and accuses it of unilaterally changing the status quo, particularly regarding Taiwan. The Chinese government strongly opposes these claims and has expressed its dissatisfaction through formal diplomatic channels [2][3]. Group 1 - The Japanese government is accused of fabricating narratives to justify military expansion and portraying a "China threat," which is seen as a gross interference in China's internal affairs [2][3]. - Japan's military actions, including significant increases in defense budgets and loosening weapon export restrictions, are viewed as a dangerous trend that undermines Japan's post-war pacifist constitution and the principle of self-defense [2]. - The article emphasizes the historical context, marking the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and the return of Taiwan to China, urging Japan to reflect on its historical actions and adhere to commitments made in political agreements with China [2][3]. Group 2 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry reiterated that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that the resolution of the Taiwan issue is a matter for the Chinese people alone [3]. - The Chinese government maintains that its military activities are legitimate and defensive, aligning with international laws and norms, and calls for Japan to stop using regional tensions as a pretext for military buildup [3].

Group 1 - The Japanese government has officially released the 2025 version of the Defense White Paper, labeling China as an "unprecedented major strategic challenge" and accusing it of unilaterally changing the status quo with military strength [2][4] - The Chinese Ministry of Defense has expressed strong dissatisfaction and firm opposition to Japan's claims, stating that Japan is fabricating false narratives to justify its military expansion and is grossly interfering in China's internal affairs [2][4] - The article highlights Japan's historical militarism, which has caused significant suffering to China and neighboring Asian countries, and criticizes Japan for not reflecting on its past while increasing its defense budget and relaxing weapon export restrictions [2][5] Group 2 - The Chinese government emphasizes that Taiwan is an inseparable part of its territory and that the Taiwan issue is purely an internal matter for China, asserting that how to resolve it is a decision for the Chinese people alone [4][5] - The article calls for Japan to deeply reflect on its historical responsibilities and to stop using the narrative of "surrounding tensions" as an excuse for military expansion, warning that this could lead to further loss of trust from Asian neighbors and the international community [5]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Defense expresses strong dissatisfaction and opposition to Japan's 2025 Defense White Paper, accusing Japan of fabricating narratives to justify military expansion and portraying a "China threat" [1] Group 1: Japan's Military Actions - Japan is significantly increasing its defense budget and loosening restrictions on arms exports, which raises concerns about militarization and regional stability [1] - The Japanese government is forming military alliances and engaging in confrontational tactics, which are seen as a revival of militarism that could threaten peace in the Asia-Pacific region [1] Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - The year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, emphasizing the historical significance of Taiwan's return to China in 1945 as part of post-war international order [1] - The Chinese government urges Japan to learn from historical lessons and adhere to commitments made in the four political documents between China and Japan, particularly regarding Taiwan [1]

长崎电视台称，关于"儿童版防卫白皮书"，多个市民团体7月15日向长崎县教委提出请愿，要求回收防卫 省分发的"儿童版防卫白皮书"。请愿书称，"不考虑儿童的成长阶段单方面将日本政府的立场施加给儿童， 这种做法是不可接受的，威胁到教育的中立性。"团体负责人称，"我认为先教给孩子的是不管是哪个国家 都要和平共处。" 据日本《读卖新闻》15日报道，日本政府当天上午在内阁会议上通过了2025年版《防卫白皮书》。这版 《防卫白皮书》宣称，中国积极的军事活动可能对日本安全造成严重影响，中国、俄罗斯加强军事关 系"存在严重的安保隐患"。 据报道，日本防卫省今年中旬通过各地教委向全国约2400所小学分发了约6100本"儿童版防卫白皮书"。防 卫省从2021年开始制作"儿童版防卫白皮书"，今年首次直接向学校分发。所谓"儿童版防卫白皮书"是将防 卫省《防卫白皮书》的内容用简单易懂的语句和排版重新编辑后的产物，旨在让儿童也能轻松理解。今年 分发的"儿童版防卫白皮书"的内容基于防卫省2024年发布的《防卫白皮书》。 报道称，今年分发的"儿童版防卫白皮书"将中国、俄罗斯、朝鲜列为"军事层面的威胁"，声称"日本所在的 区域并不安全"。此外， ...

Group 1 - The 2025 version of Japan's Defense White Paper claims that China's military activities pose a serious threat to Japan's security, highlighting concerns over the strengthening military relations between China and Russia [1] - The White Paper emphasizes that China's naval and aerial forces are expanding and becoming more active in the Sea of Japan, describing this as an unprecedented strategic challenge [1] - Japan's Defense White Paper calls for collaboration with allies and like-minded countries to address the perceived threat from China [1] Group 2 - The White Paper expresses concerns about North Korea's military movements and the military cooperation between Russia and North Korea [2] - It mentions plans to enhance the capabilities of Japan's land-based anti-ship missiles and to equip maritime self-defense vessels with U.S.-made Tomahawk cruise missiles [2] - The Chinese government has criticized Japan's Defense White Paper for its portrayal of China and has urged Japan to reflect on its historical responsibilities [2]

Group 1 - The Chinese Embassy in Mexico strongly refuted U.S. Ambassador Ron Johnson's claims that China is attempting to exert economic coercion to dominate Latin American business, labeling his statements as lies and ideological bias [1] - The embassy criticized the U.S. for its hegemonic practices in Latin America, including imposing tariffs and suppressing immigration, while accusing the U.S. of being the true destabilizing factor in the region [1] - The embassy emphasized that the U.S. attempts to discredit China are destined to fail and advised the U.S. ambassador to focus on promoting U.S.-Mexico relations instead of fabricating accusations [1] Group 2 - A recent poll conducted by Bloomberg and AtlasIntel indicated a growing sentiment in Latin America, particularly in Mexico, for closer economic ties with China, with nearly two-thirds of Mexicans supporting increased trade with China [2] - The report noted that while many Latin American leaders are cautious about angering the U.S., ordinary citizens view Beijing as a better economic partner compared to Washington [2] - In Brazil, just over half of respondents favored strengthening economic relations with China, while a majority in Argentina, Chile, and Peru also supported increased trade with China [2]

来源：央视新闻 林剑指出，今年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年。我们 敦促日方深刻反 省历史罪责，认真汲取历史教训 ，停止靠渲染"周边紧张局势"和涉华议题为自身强军扩武寻 找借口，以免进一步失信于亚洲邻国和国际社会。 7月15日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。有记者问：日本方面表示，中国在本地区的军 事活动可能会严重影响日本的国家安全。中方对此有何回应？ 林剑说，我想你指的是日本刚刚发布的新版《防卫白皮书》。 日本新版《防卫白皮书》抱持 错误对华认知，无理干涉中国内政，炒作所谓"中国威胁"。 中方对此表示强烈不满和坚决反 对，已向日方提出严正交涉。 林剑表示，台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，台湾问题纯属中国内政，如何解决台湾问题 是中国人自己的事。中国坚持走和平发展道路，奉行防御性国防政策，有关国防建设和军事 活动正当合理，同其他国家开展的军事合作符合国际法和国际惯例。 ...

Group 1 - The United States has the largest consumer market in the world, supported by a robust dollar system, allowing it to initiate trade wars globally [1][5] - Despite China's large population of 1.4 billion and being the second-largest economy, its per capita income remains low, indicating a significant gap compared to developed countries [3] - The American consumer culture emphasizes immediate gratification, leading to high spending on leisure and entertainment, while essential goods are relatively inexpensive [1][3] Group 2 - The dollar system functions as a global financial network, facilitating international trade and foreign exchange transactions, which reinforces the U.S.'s dominant position in the world economy [5] - The issuance of U.S. Treasury bonds is widely purchased by countries around the world, further solidifying the dollar's status and the U.S.'s economic influence [5] - The current dollar system is unlikely to change in the near future, maintaining the U.S.'s unshakeable global standing [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the strategic dialogue between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and EU's High Representative Josep Borrell, signaling important developments in China-EU relations [1][3] - Merkel's call for EU unity against US tariff threats emphasizes the need for Europe to adopt an independent policy towards China, reflecting a shift in the EU's approach to its relationship with China [3][5] - The economic ties between China and the EU are strong, with daily trade exceeding $2.7 billion, positioning China as the EU's second-largest trading partner [3][5] Group 2 - The EU's internal policy divisions regarding China are becoming more pronounced, with the European Commission under Ursula von der Leyen favoring a tougher stance, while Germany's position is crucial in shaping the overall EU approach [3][5] - Merkel's statements indicate a potential correction in the EU's China policy, advocating for a strategy based on European interests rather than blind alignment with US pressures [3][5] - The article discusses the growing awareness in Europe regarding strategic autonomy, with calls for reduced reliance on US military protection and a more independent stance in international affairs [5][7] Group 3 - The article outlines the broad cooperation potential between China and the EU in global governance areas such as climate change and biodiversity, emphasizing the need for collaborative efforts [5][7] - The complexities of the EU's decision-making process, influenced by the diverse interests of its 27 member states, pose challenges for a unified China strategy [7] - The dialogue between Wang Yi and Merkel's remarks suggest a pivotal moment for China-EU relations, with an emphasis on pragmatic cooperation and the necessity for enhanced communication to address global challenges [7]