Core Viewpoint - Tianpu Co., Ltd. will resume trading on September 18 after being suspended for 11 trading days due to a significant increase in stock price and ongoing acquisition activities [2][4]. Group 1: Stock Performance and Trading Suspension - Tianpu Co., Ltd. experienced a 185.29% increase in stock price from August 22 to September 10, leading to a trading suspension for verification starting September 11 [4]. - The stock price was 76 CNY per share, with a market capitalization of 10.2 billion CNY as of September 10 [7]. Group 2: Acquisition Details - The acquisition involves a transfer of control to Zhonghao Xinying through share transfer and capital increase agreements, with the actual controller being Yang Gong Yifan [4]. - There are no plans for asset injection from Zhonghao Xinying into Tianpu Co., Ltd. as confirmed by the company [6]. Group 3: Insider Trading Allegations - There were rumors of insider information leakage and insider trading related to the acquisition, but Tianpu Co., Ltd. stated that the trading activities of four insiders occurred before the formation or knowledge of the insider information [5][6]. - The company emphasized that the trading actions of the involved individuals do not constitute insider trading, and any profits have been returned to Tianpu Co., Ltd. [6].

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：688366 证券简称：昊海生科 公告编号：2025-042 上海昊海生物科技股份有限公司 行政处罚最终结果将以中国证监会对蒋伟先生最终出具的《行政处罚决定书》结论为准。公司将持续关 注上述事项的进展情况，并按照有关法律法规的规定和要求，及时履行信息披露义务，敬请广大投资者 注意投资风险。 特此公告。 上海昊海生物科技股份有限公司董事会 2025年9月17日 收到《行政处罚事先告知书》的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性依法承担法律责任。 上海昊海生物科技股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）控股股东、实际控制人之一蒋伟先生于2025年5月 收到中国证券监督管理委员会（以下简称"中国证监会"）出具的《立案告知书》（编号：证监立案字 0382025016 号）。因其涉嫌内幕交易，根据《中华人民共和国证券法》《中华人民共和国行政处罚 法》等法律法规，中国证监会决定对其立案。具体内容详见公司于2025年5月8日披露的《上海昊海生物 科技股份有限公司关于控股股东、实际控制人之一 ...

Group 1 - On September 15, 2023, Huida Technology had a financing buy-in of 81.8871 million yuan and a financing repayment of 73.618 million yuan, resulting in a net financing buy of 8.2691 million yuan [2] - The company approved the reappointment of KPMG Huazhen as the auditing firm for the fiscal year 2025, with an audit fee of 1.6 million yuan (including tax) [3][4] - KPMG Huazhen has a cumulative professional insurance compensation limit and a provision for professional risk fund exceeding 200 million yuan, complying with relevant laws and regulations [3] Group 2 - On August 25, 2023, Huida Technology announced that its president, Liu Yuping, received a notice of investigation from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for suspected insider trading [5] - Investors who suffered losses due to the alleged insider trading can seek compensation if they purchased Huida Technology's stock between its listing and August 25, 2025, and held it through that date [5] - Huida Technology has participated in 29 bidding projects and has 81 trademark registrations [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a case of insider trading involving an individual named Lou, who engaged in illegal stock trading based on undisclosed information about a significant project contract of a listed company, Guang Technology. The case highlights the regulatory actions taken by the Xiamen Securities Regulatory Bureau, resulting in substantial financial penalties for the offender [2][4][6]. Summary by Sections - **Insider Trading Case**: Lou engaged in multiple communications with insiders during a sensitive period before Guang Technology publicly announced a major project contract. He invested 17.59 million yuan (approximately 2.5 million USD) and made a profit of 4.9064 million yuan (approximately 700,000 USD) from trading 1.7391 million shares [2][4][6]. - **Regulatory Actions**: The Xiamen Securities Regulatory Bureau conducted an investigation and held a hearing. Despite Lou's defense claims that the information was not insider information and that his trading was based on a pre-set investment plan, the bureau found substantial evidence of wrongdoing. Consequently, Lou was fined a total of 19.6257 million yuan (approximately 2.8 million USD), which included the confiscation of his illegal gains and a penalty of three times the amount of his profits [5][6]. - **Legal Proceedings**: The regulatory decision mandates that Lou must pay the fines within 15 days of receiving the penalty notice. He has the right to appeal the decision within 60 days or file a lawsuit within six months, but the penalties will remain in effect during the appeal process [6].

（原标题："听"来内幕消息，大赚超490万元！最终被罚没近2000万） 9月12日，厦门证监局公布了一则行政处罚决定书，揭穿了一桩利用内幕信息违规交易上市公司股票的 案件。 厦门证监局在调查中指出，楼某民的交易行为存在多个明显异常特征：买入时点与内幕信息高度吻合， 资金规模较以往显著放大，单只股票持仓占比也远超平常，种种行为轨迹指向利用未公开信息进行交 易。 罚一没三合计近2000万元 为查清事实，厦门证监局对楼某民内幕交易行为进行了立案调查并举行听证会。 在听证中，楼某民及其代理人提出多项申辩意见，包括声称案涉信息不构成内幕信息、信息形成时间认 定不准确、与知情人的接触属合理往来，甚至表示交易是依据事先设定的投资计划执行，不存在明显异 常。 但经厦门证监局复核，这些说法均未获支持。调查人员通过广某科技发布的公告、相关说明、证券账户 资料、银行流水、询问笔录以及通讯记录、微信聊天等多项证据，认定其行为已违反《证券法》中关于 禁止内幕交易的规定。 当事人楼某民，内幕信息敏感期内与相关内幕信息知情人存在多次见面、通话、微信语音联络情况，投 入金额高达1759.8万元，获利490.64万元，最终因内幕交易，被没收违 ...

9月12日，厦门证监局公布了一则行政处罚决定书，揭穿了一桩利用内幕信息违规交易上市公司股票的案件。 当事人楼某民，内幕信息敏感期内与相关内幕信息知情人存在多次见面、通话、微信语音联络情况，投入金额高达1759.8万元，获利490.64万元，最终因内 幕交易，被没收违法所得490.64万元，并处以约1471.93万元罚款，合计罚没金额1962.57万元。 见面、通话和微信语音联络知情人 事情要从2023年底说起。 2023年12月21日前，上市公司广某科技正在筹划签订一项重要项目合同——这一事项属于《证券法》明确规定的内幕信息，直到2024年3月4日才正式对外 公告。 而就在这段信息高度敏感的时期，楼某民与相关内幕信息知情人频繁通过见面、通话、微信语音等多种方式保持联系。 但经厦门证监局复核，这些说法均未获支持。调查人员通过广某科技发布的公告、相关说明、证券账户资料、银行流水、询问笔录以及通讯记录、微信聊天 等多项证据，认定其行为已违反《证券法》中关于禁止内幕交易的规定。 最终，根据当事人违法行为的事实、性质、情节与社会危害程度，依据《证券法》相关规定，厦门证监局作出行政处罚决定：没收楼某民违法所得490.64 ...

事情要从2023年底说起。 2023年12月21日前，上市公司广某科技正在筹划签订一项重要项目合同——这一事项属于《证券法》明确规定的内幕信 息，直到2024年3月4日才正式对外公告。 9月12日，厦门证监局公布了一则行政处罚决定书，揭穿了一桩利用内幕信息违规交易上市公司股票的案件。 当事人楼某民，内幕信息敏感期内与相关内幕信息知情人存在多次见面、通话、微信语音联络情况，投入金额高达1759.8 万元，获利490.64万元，最终因内幕交易，被没收违法所得490.64万元，并处以约1471.93万元罚款，合计罚没金额 1962.57万元。 见面、通话和微信语音联络知情人 责编： 战术恒 上版：王璐璐 校 对： 杨舒欣 百万用户都在看 而就在这段信息高度敏感的时期，楼某民与相关内幕信息知情人频繁通过见面、通话、微信语音等多种方式保持联系。 联络之后，楼某民迅速出手。经查，在内幕信息尚未公开期间，他累计买入"广某科技"股票173.91万股，投入资金高达 1759.8万元。待2024年3月4日广某科技公司发布公告、股价出现相应变化后，他将所有持股全部卖出， 一举获利490.64万 元。 厦门证监局在调查中指出，楼某民 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share merger and acquisition (M&A) market is experiencing heightened activity, with several listed companies disclosing M&A progress. However, foreign institutions have been strategically positioning themselves as major shareholders in these companies before the public announcement of M&A plans [1][2]. Group 1: Foreign Institutions' Strategy - Several foreign institutions, including Morgan Stanley, Barclays, UBS, and Goldman Sachs, have entered the top ten shareholders of listed companies prior to their M&A announcements this year [1][3]. - These foreign accounts exhibit distinct characteristics, such as targeting small and mid-cap stocks, entering just before trading suspensions, and quickly exiting after favorable news is released [1][3][4]. - The trend of foreign institutions entering small-cap M&A stocks has been frequently observed in the A-share market this year, with over ten such cases reported [3][4]. Group 2: Case Studies - For instance, Dongzhu Ecological disclosed a plan to issue shares and pay cash for asset purchases, with Morgan Stanley and UBS appearing as new major shareholders, holding 0.35% and 0.33% of the company, respectively [3]. - In another example, Jinpu Titanium announced a major asset swap, with multiple foreign institutions becoming significant shareholders just before the announcement [4]. - The commonality among these cases is that foreign institutions often enter the market before the stock is suspended for M&A planning, leading to significant price movements prior to the official announcements [7]. Group 3: Market Reactions and Implications - Stocks of companies like Dongzhu Ecological saw significant price increases prior to the announcement of M&A plans, with a 7.85% rise on the day before the suspension and over 20% increase in the 20 trading days leading up to the announcement [7]. - After the resumption of trading, Dongzhu Ecological's stock hit the daily limit, indicating substantial profits for early investors [7]. - Some foreign institutions are adept at exiting their positions after significant price increases, as seen with companies like Zhongke Tongda and Xiamen Port, where they were no longer listed among the top shareholders shortly after the stock price surged [8].

上市公司欲并购，岂知消息暗走漏。 亲戚账户作掩护，低买高卖猛揩油。 赚一罚三受惩处，偷鸡不成米也丢。 太阳底下无新事，加强监管除毒瘤。 朱慧卿/漫画孙勇/诗 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dynamics of wealth and power among business leaders, highlighting instances of insider trading and the consequences that follow, ultimately leading to legal troubles for some individuals involved [4][64]. Group 1: Business Leaders and Their Strategies - Business leaders often have different approaches to wealth accumulation, with some choosing to involve family, friends, or employees in their financial ventures [5][6]. - An example is the plan by the chairman of Tonghuashun, who intended to reduce his holdings to allow others to benefit from market opportunities, but ultimately only reduced his stake by 0.13% [8][9][12]. Group 2: Insider Trading Case - A notable case involves a celebrity girlfriend of a chairman who received insider information about a planned acquisition, leading to significant financial losses when the deal was halted by authorities [21][24]. - The chairman, identified as Zheng Yuewen, had a net worth of 27 billion yuan and was involved with Shanghai Laishi, a blood products company that saw its market value increase dramatically over the years [29][30][36]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Valuation - The market value of Shanghai Laishi surged from 6.7 billion yuan in December 2012 to 120 billion yuan by May 2015, attributed to strategic market management [36]. - The article mentions the involvement of a key figure, Wu Xu, who played a significant role in the company's market valuation strategies [37]. Group 4: Consequences of Insider Trading - The celebrity girlfriend faced a fine of 400,000 yuan and legal repercussions, while the chairman's actions raised concerns among investors about the ethical implications of using insider information for personal gain [25][26]. - The article suggests that the intertwining of personal relationships and business dealings can lead to significant risks and legal issues for those involved [64].