Core Viewpoint - The correct understanding of history is fundamental to safeguarding the post-war international order, emphasizing the need for China and Europe to jointly promote an accurate view of World War II history and contribute to global peace and development [1] Group 1: Historical Context - The EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs, Josep Borrell, acknowledged the significant suffering endured by the Chinese people during World War II, particularly in the context of the 80th anniversary of the end of the war in Asia [1] - China, as the main battlefield in the East during World War II, made an indelible contribution to the victory of the global anti-fascist war through immense national sacrifice [1] Group 2: International Relations - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, highlighted the importance of maintaining the achievements of World War II and the international order centered around the United Nations [1] - There is a call for China and Europe to work together to uphold the correct historical narrative of World War II, which is seen as essential for fostering cooperation and stability in international relations [1]

Group 1 - Japan's Prime Minister Kishi Sanae's controversial remarks regarding Taiwan have led to strong protests from China, resulting in economic and tourism repercussions for Japan [1][2][5] - Approximately 491,000 flight tickets to Japan have been canceled by Chinese airlines, representing 32% of total bookings, with a significant impact on Japan's tourism industry [4][5] - The reduction in Chinese tourists could lead to a 0.2 percentage point decrease in Japan's GDP growth if the number of visitors is halved, exacerbating the already fragile state of Japan's economy [5][6] Group 2 - The Japanese government is facing criticism from within, with calls for Prime Minister Kishi to reconsider her statements and actions that have escalated tensions with China [6][8] - There are concerns that Kishi may visit the Yasukuni Shrine, which could further strain Japan-China relations and provoke international backlash [7][8] - The ongoing diplomatic tensions have narrowed communication channels between Japan and China, complicating efforts to resolve the situation [3][8]

毛宁表示，中方注意到卡拉斯高级代表有关表态。作为二战东方主战场，80年前中国以巨大的民族牺 牲，为世界反法西斯战争胜利作出不可磨灭的重要贡献。这一历史事实已经载入史册，得到国际社会公 认。 "正确对待历史，是捍卫战后国际秩序的基石。"毛宁说，中欧应该共同弘扬正确二战史观，维护二战胜 利成果和以联合国为核心的国际秩序，携手为世界和平与发展作出更大贡献。 当日例行记者会上，有记者问：近日，欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯在书面答复欧洲议会议员相 关质询时表示，中国人民在二战中为保卫家园和结束战争承受了巨大苦难，值此二战亚洲战场战事结束 80周年之际，欧盟向中国人民的勇气致敬。中方对此有何评论？ 新华社北京11月18日电（记者冯歆然、曹嘉玥）外交部发言人毛宁11月18日表示，正确对待历史，是捍 卫战后国际秩序的基石。中欧应该共同弘扬正确二战史观，维护二战胜利成果和以联合国为核心的国际 秩序，携手为世界和平与发展作出更大贡献。 ...

Group 1 - Japan is planning to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, potentially restoring terms from the old Japanese military, which raises concerns among neighboring countries affected by Japan's colonial history [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry emphasizes that Japan's military security movements are closely watched due to its history of colonialism and invasion, highlighting the shift in Japan's security policy and increased defense budget [1] - The spokesperson warns against the revival of Japanese militarism, stating that historical lessons must not be forgotten or distorted, and asserts that Japan's militaristic tendencies should not be allowed to resurface [1] Group 2 - The Chinese Foreign Ministry responds to comments made by the U.S. Ambassador to Japan, criticizing the remarks as politically motivated and contrary to diplomatic responsibilities [2] - The Ministry asserts that the U.S.-Japan alliance, a product of the Cold War, should not target third parties or interfere in the internal affairs of other nations [2]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent plans to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, including the restoration of terms like "Colonel," have raised concerns about a potential revival of militarism, which could be seen as a provocation to nations affected by Japan's colonial history [3]. Group 1: Japan's Military Policy Changes - Japan's military security movements are under scrutiny due to its colonial and invasion history, with significant adjustments to security policies and an increase in defense budgets noted in recent years [3]. - The country is seeking to develop offensive weapons and is moving away from its "no nuclear" principles, which raises alarms among neighboring countries and the international community [3]. - The resurgence of right-wing forces in Japan is pushing for a departure from the constraints of the "Peace Constitution," indicating a shift towards militarization [3]. Group 2: Territorial Disputes - The Diaoyu Islands, claimed by China, are highlighted as an area of contention, with Chinese Coast Guard vessels conducting lawful patrols in the region, which Japan has protested [3]. - China firmly rejects Japan's diplomatic protests regarding its patrols, asserting its territorial sovereignty and calling for Japan to respect the four-point consensus between China and Japan [3]. Group 3: U.S.-Japan Relations - Comments made by the U.S. Ambassador to Japan regarding China are characterized as politically motivated and contrary to the responsibilities of a diplomat, emphasizing that the U.S.-Japan alliance should not target third parties [4].

Group 1 - Japan is planning to modify the Self-Defense Forces' rank names, potentially restoring terms like "Colonel," which may break the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects [1] - The Chinese government expresses strong opposition to Japan's military security movements, citing historical colonial and invasion issues that concern neighboring countries and the international community [1] - Japan has been significantly adjusting its security policies, increasing defense budgets annually, relaxing weapon export restrictions, and seeking to develop offensive weapons, which raises alarms about abandoning its "no nuclear" principles [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government criticizes the U.S. Ambassador to Japan's comments as politically motivated and contrary to diplomatic responsibilities, emphasizing that the U.S.-Japan alliance should not target third parties or interfere in other nations' internal affairs [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government acknowledges the European Union's recognition of China's sacrifices during World War II, emphasizing the importance of historical accuracy in maintaining the post-war international order [1] Group 1: Historical Context - China, as a major battlefield in the East during World War II, made significant sacrifices 80 years ago, contributing to the victory of the global anti-fascist war [1] - This historical fact is recognized and documented in history, gaining acknowledgment from the international community [1] Group 2: International Relations - The Chinese government advocates for a joint effort with Europe to promote a correct understanding of World War II history [1] - There is a call to uphold the achievements of World War II and the international order centered around the United Nations, aiming for greater contributions to global peace and development [1]

Core Points - The EU's High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, acknowledged the significant suffering endured by the Chinese people during World War II, particularly in the context of the 80th anniversary of the end of the war in Asia [1] - The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, emphasized China's crucial contributions to the victory in the anti-fascist war, highlighting the importance of recognizing historical facts to uphold the post-war international order [1] - Both sides are encouraged to promote a correct understanding of World War II history and work together to maintain the achievements of the war and the UN-centered international order for global peace and development [1] Summary by Sections EU's Acknowledgment - The EU expressed respect for the courage of the Chinese people during World War II, marking the 80th anniversary of the end of the war in Asia [1] China's Response - China noted the acknowledgment from the EU and reiterated its significant sacrifices made during the war, which are recognized globally [1] - The importance of correctly addressing historical events was highlighted as a foundation for defending the post-war international order [1] Future Cooperation - There is a call for both China and the EU to jointly promote a correct view of World War II history and to collaborate in contributing to global peace and development [1]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's military security movements are under scrutiny due to its colonial and invasion history, raising concerns among Asian neighbors and the international community [3] Summary by Relevant Sections Security Policy Adjustments - Japan has significantly adjusted its security policies in recent years, increasing its defense budget annually and relaxing restrictions on arms exports [3] - There is a pursuit to develop offensive weapons and a potential abandonment of the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" [3] Historical Context - The resurgence of militarism in Japan is alarming, as it echoes the militaristic aggression that caused severe suffering in Asia and worldwide 80 years ago [3] - The lessons from history emphasize the dangers of forgetting past conflicts and the need to prevent the revival of Japanese militarism [3] International Order - There is a strong stance against any challenges to the post-war international order and a commitment to maintaining global peace and stability [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's recent plans to modify its Self-Defense Forces' military rank terminology, which raises concerns among neighboring countries due to Japan's historical military aggression and colonialism [1]. Summary by Sections - **Japan's Military Rank Changes** - Japan is planning to restore old military rank terms such as "Colonel," which breaks the long-standing practice of downplaying military aspects in the Self-Defense Forces [1]. - **Historical Context and Concerns** - The historical context of Japan's militarism and colonial invasions is highlighted, emphasizing that these changes are alarming to Asian neighbors and the international community [1]. - The Potsdam Declaration explicitly prohibits Japan from rearming, and Japan's pacifist constitution establishes a principle of self-defense [1]. - **Recent Security Policy Adjustments** - Japan has been significantly adjusting its security policies, increasing defense budgets annually, relaxing weapon export restrictions, and seeking to develop offensive weapons [1]. - There is a growing trend among Japanese right-wing forces to challenge the constraints of the pacifist constitution, moving further towards militarization [1]. - **Warnings Against Militarism** - The article warns against the revival of Japanese militarism, stating that the lessons of history must not be forgotten or distorted [1]. - It emphasizes the importance of maintaining international order and preventing any threats to global peace and stability [1].