他说，他的关税政策给美国国库带来了超过一万亿美元的横财。 特朗普重回白宫满一周年。 那天下午，他在白宫简报室，说过去365天里，他"取得了365场胜利"，成就多到一个星期都列不完。 他特别得意地提到一个词：关税。 在国内，特朗普这一年的日子过得可谓"风风火火"。 上任第一天，他就一口气签了40多道行政命令和总统备忘录，创了个历史纪录。 到他执政一周年那天，这个数字变成了229。 他喜欢用这种方式绕开国会没 完没了的争吵，直接下令。 法律界的麻烦也随之而来，他的政府被告上了法庭超过500次。 最夸张的一次，因为和国会僵持不下，联邦政府大门关了足足43天，公务员们放了有史以来最长的一个"无薪假"。 就在同一天，大洋彼岸的欧洲，不少国际关系学者和政治编辑们正在挠头。 他们手里的另一份数据清单显示，美国联邦政府的总债务，在特朗普回来的这一年里，悄无声息地爬过了37万亿美元的大关。 而他津津乐道的那笔"关税横财"，实际入库的金额，大概只占这庞大债务利息的一个零头。 更让华尔街分析师们皱眉的是，尽管总统把"关税"称为最美丽 的词汇，美国2025年的货物贸易逆差，还是稳稳地站在1.21万亿美元的高位，比他第一次当选前的20 ...

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the geopolitical struggle between the US and the EU over Greenland, highlighting a shift in transatlantic relations [1][13] - The US is applying pressure through tariffs to gain special rights in Greenland, while the EU's response is characterized by strong rhetoric but weak actions [3][9] - The EU's economic dependency on the US, with a bilateral trade volume exceeding €700 billion annually, limits its ability to respond effectively to US threats [3] Group 2 - Greenland holds significant strategic value for the US due to its rich mineral resources, including world-class rare earth deposits and potential oil and gas reserves [6][8] - The control of Arctic shipping routes is becoming increasingly important, with Greenland positioned at a critical juncture for future Eurasian trade [8] - The US aims to secure resource development rights and influence over shipping regulations rather than territorial annexation, thereby consolidating its strategic advantage [8] Group 3 - The EU's internal divisions, stemming from the differing interests of its 27 member states regarding Arctic affairs, hinder a unified response to US pressure [5] - The most likely outcome is that the EU will make substantive concessions while maintaining a facade of sovereignty, seeking a "face-saving" resolution [9][11] - Potential concessions may include granting resource development rights to US companies, yielding rule-making authority in Arctic negotiations, and tacitly allowing an expanded US military presence in Greenland [11]

智通财经记者 杨文钦 从《纽约时报》的评论到达沃斯现场其他欧洲领导人的演讲，舆论的焦点无不集中于一点：特朗普总统 在第二任期伊始所展现的"有恃无恐"姿态，是否意味着二战后的西方联盟架构正面临根本性的重塑？ 今年也正值美国中期选举之年。复旦大学美国研究中心教授韦宗友向智通财经分析指出，"在这个关键 节点，他（特朗普）更加意图借助达沃斯这一国际舞台，贯彻'美国优先'的政策理念，将达沃斯论坛转 化为宣扬美国政策的工具。与此同时，这也成为向国内选民展示执政成果、强化个人政治形象的重要舞 台。" 中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所研究员肖河告诉智通财经，特朗普进入第二任期后追求政治声望 与政治遗产的塑造，在达沃斯这样一个传统上倡导自由贸易与全球化的平台，特朗普明显带有示强目 的。"不仅希望借此'示威'鼓舞国内支持者，也率领庞大代表团赴会施压欧洲，在格陵兰岛、数字税等 问题中要求欧洲更多退让。" 北约若解散，与特朗普打造的政治遗产相悖 当地时间21日下午，特朗普在达沃斯发表讲话。在主办方原本安排半小时的发言时间里，特朗普又超时 四十分钟，洋洋洒洒地谈了美国国内经济、抨击前任政府、格陵兰岛、乌克兰、"羞辱"欧洲盟友、"和 ...

转自：京报网_北京日报官方网站 【#美国盟友体系加速瓦解#】#美国盟友集体跳船#一场以关税施压强行"购岛"的闹剧，让北大西洋同盟 上演惊人内讧。历经博弈之后，这场危机迎来最新进展。当地时间1月21日，美国总统特朗普在社交媒 体宣布，双方就格陵兰岛及北极地区的未来达成了"框架协议"，并以此为由收回了对欧洲八国的关税威 胁。危机貌似初步化解，但这场跨大西洋交锋让美欧同盟关系裂痕加深，欧洲开始加速"去美国化"。美 国前副总统卡玛拉・哈里斯的国家安全顾问一针见血指出："特朗普首次迫使欧洲人真正开始寻找美国 的替代方案并推进去风险进程，我们再也无法回到格陵兰岛威胁出现之前的状态了。"更值得关注的 是，这种变化不仅体现在美欧关系上。英国《金融时报》发表评论文章指出，在特朗普政府无底线霸凌 之下，全球格局正呈现加速"去美国化"趋势——政治上，美国盟友体系加速瓦解。特朗普政府高举"美 国优先"原则，追求近乎极致的国家短期利益，导致美国从全球规则主导者，迅速滑向现实利益掠夺 者，引发国际社会强烈不满。这一转变造成的直接恶果，就是美国历经数十年打造的盟友体系出现了明 显裂隙。就在刚刚闭幕的达沃斯论坛，特朗普高调启动所谓"和平委员 ...

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Defense has released a new National Defense Strategy (NDS), prioritizing homeland security and emphasizing the need for allies to take on more responsibilities while increasing investment in the defense industrial base [3]. Group 1: National Defense Strategy Highlights - The NDS identifies homeland security as the primary task of the Department of Defense, stating that the Western Hemisphere has been a "neglected" area in past efforts [3]. - The document refutes any inclination towards "isolationism" and calls for greater responsibility from U.S. allies [3]. - Key measures for "defending the homeland" include ensuring border security, combating drug terrorism, and protecting airspace [3]. Group 2: Context and Background - The NDS aligns with the U.S. National Security Strategy report released in December 2025, which outlines President Trump's "America First" foreign policy and focuses on core national interests [3]. - The strategy reflects a shift in U.S. global security priorities following Trump's return to the White House [3].

Group 1: International Relations and Defense Spending - Trump's approach to NATO has shifted from a shared value system to a transactional relationship, demanding European allies increase defense spending from 2% to over 5% of GDP, which exceeds current military budgets of most European countries [1][2] - The U.S. President has publicly questioned why the U.S. should provide security for countries that do not contribute adequately, suggesting a potential U.S. withdrawal from NATO if demands are not met [2] - Canada is also under pressure, with Trump implying that its economic and security reliance on the U.S. must be reciprocated with tangible benefits, exacerbating existing trade tensions [2] Group 2: Greenland and Strategic Assets - Trump's interest in purchasing Greenland is framed as a matter of national security, with the island's strategic location and resources being pivotal for U.S. interests in the Arctic [3][5] - The geographical significance of Greenland includes its control over the shortest air corridor between North America and Europe, as well as access to emerging Arctic shipping routes, which are becoming increasingly valuable due to climate change [5] - Greenland's existing military infrastructure, such as the Thule Air Base, is crucial for U.S. missile defense systems, further emphasizing its strategic importance [5] Group 3: Domestic Energy Policy - The establishment of the National Energy Council marks a new phase in Trump's energy policy, aimed at achieving U.S. energy dominance by removing regulatory barriers and reversing previous administrations' clean energy initiatives [7][9] - The council's agenda includes opening federal waters for oil and gas exploration and reducing fees for extraction activities, while also promoting traditional energy sources like coal and nuclear power [9] - Policies targeting renewable energy, such as the termination of tax credits for electric vehicles and solar projects, reflect a focus on lowering energy costs to enhance U.S. manufacturing competitiveness [9] Group 4: Monetary Policy and Economic Strategy - Trump's relationship with the Federal Reserve has become increasingly contentious, with calls for significant interest rate cuts to stimulate investment and reduce government debt servicing costs [10][11] - The Fed, led by Jerome Powell, maintains a higher interest rate to combat inflation, creating a fundamental disagreement with Trump's economic agenda [10] - Trump's pressure tactics include direct negotiations with the Fed and threats of legal action, challenging the independence of the central bank and emphasizing a results-oriented economic philosophy [11]

马克龙接二连三和美国"唱反调"后，特朗普突然对法国下重手。路透社报道称，特朗普要对法国葡萄酒 和香槟征收200%的关税。万万没想到，关税战打到现在，法国居然成了最大输家。那么，特朗普为何 突然将矛头对准法国？他有何目的？ 第一个原因，就是格陵兰岛。这些日子以来，美国几次三番发出威胁，对格陵兰岛势在必得，为了声援 丹麦，包括法国在内的欧洲7国，向格陵兰岛派遣军队。其中法国派兵人数最多，首批人员足足有15 人，这把特朗普气的够呛； 而法国在其中当仁不让地打头阵，马克龙高调派兵，这无异于当众打特朗普的脸。特朗普随即对七国加 税10%，是一次标准的敲打警告，任何阻碍其"美国优先"的行为，都要付出代价。但马克龙的这次行 动，并不仅仅是为了丹麦，更是法国乃至欧盟，在向美国宣示战略自主，表明欧洲不会在所有问题上听 命于美国。 如果说格陵兰岛是地缘战略考量，那拒绝加入"和平委员会"，则是全球治理规则上对特朗普的明确否 定。根据美方介绍，这个委员会特朗普任终身主席，成员国任期只有三年，还得交10亿美元才能获得永 久资格。 因此，美方成立这个委员会，意图可谓非常明显了，就是要加沙问题乃至其他地区热点问题上，绕开联 合国框架，建立 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the backlash against Trump's unilateral foreign policy, particularly regarding the Greenland acquisition plan and proposed tariffs on French goods, which have led to a significant shift in European attitudes towards the U.S. [1][3] - European nations, including Denmark and the EU, have taken concrete actions in response to Trump's threats, such as increasing military presence in Greenland and initiating retaliatory measures against U.S. products worth €93 billion [1][3] - The article notes a strategic shift in Europe, moving from passive responses to active countermeasures, indicating a desire for greater autonomy in defense and foreign policy [3][5] Group 2 - The article discusses the growing rifts within NATO, as even traditional allies like the UK have begun to openly criticize Trump's actions, leading to a diplomatic trust crisis [5][10] - Canada and Mexico are also responding to U.S. policies with military preparations and public opposition, reflecting a broader regional discontent with Trump's approach [7][8] - The article emphasizes that Trump's foreign policy has not only failed to stabilize international relations but has also weakened the U.S.'s position as a global leader, with NATO's unity increasingly challenged [8][10] Group 3 - Domestically, Trump faces rising tensions, including conflicts with state governments and public protests, exacerbated by economic pressures from his high tariff policies [10][12] - The article points out a rare bipartisan consensus forming against Trump's policies, posing a significant threat to his political standing as midterm elections approach [12] - Trump's approval ratings have plummeted to 36%, indicating a disconnect between his administration's actions and the public's perception of economic conditions [12]

当地时间21日，美国发起的所谓加沙"和平委员会"首次会议在瑞士达沃斯举行。美国总统特朗普与多国元首和代表将签署和平委员会宪章。 画面显示，美国已与18国签署 值得一提的是，就在前一天（即1月20日），特朗普签署行政命令，宣布美国退出世卫组织。联合国于同年1月22日收到这一通知。根据世卫组织章程规 定，成员国在提交退出申请一年后方可正式退出。今年1月22日是美国正式向联合国提交退出世卫组织申请满一年的时间点。根据世卫组织章程，这意味 着美国在程序上已经正式退出了世卫组织。世界卫生组织一名新闻官说，虽然美国提出退出世卫组织已满一年，但尚未结清其拖欠的2.78亿美元会费。世 卫组织将在2月初召开的执行委员会会议上讨论美国退出事宜。 特朗普启动所谓"和平委员会" 美国总统特朗普22日与十余个国家和地区的代表在瑞士达沃斯签署文件，启动所谓"和平委员会"。签字方中不包括巴勒斯坦和以色列代表。 据参考消息援引俄罗斯卫星社1月22日报道，视频转播画面显示，19个国家在达沃斯签署了由美国组建的加沙"和平委员会"的章程。报道说，除美国外， 匈牙利、阿根廷、巴林、摩洛哥、亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆、保加利亚、印尼、约旦、哈萨克斯坦、巴基斯 ...

Group 1 - The core focus of the article is on Trump's aggressive foreign policy approach, which emphasizes a transactional view of international relations, particularly with NATO allies and energy resources [1][4][12] - Trump has shifted the NATO defense spending target from 2% of GDP to over 5%, causing significant concern among European nations [4][5] - The U.S. administration's stance on Greenland highlights the strategic importance of the island for national security and resource acquisition, with Trump expressing a desire to purchase it [5][10][11] Group 2 - The establishment of the National Energy Council marks a new phase in U.S. energy policy, aiming to enhance energy dominance by removing regulatory barriers and promoting fossil fuels [12][14] - The administration plans to cut fees for extraction activities and support traditional energy sources while tightening policies on renewable energy [14][15] - Trump's ongoing conflict with the Federal Reserve over interest rates reflects a fundamental disagreement on economic policy, with Trump advocating for lower rates to stimulate growth [15][18]