苗得雨阐述中方在伊朗问题上的原则立场，表示中方密切关注伊朗局势，支持伊方捍卫主权、安全和民 族尊严，维护正当权益。中方反对在国际关系中搞单边霸凌和武力施压，反对干涉别国内政。中方愿同 包括伊朗在内的各方加强沟通协调，维护联合国宪章宗旨原则和国际关系基本准则，维护主权平等原 则，维护国际公平正义。 加里布阿巴迪通报了伊朗国内局势及伊朗核问题相关情况，强调伊方致力于通过外交途径解决问题，愿 在公平公正基础上推进谈判。伊方反对外部威慑施压，赞赏中方为维护地区和世界和平稳定所作贡献， 欢迎中方发挥更大作用。 外交部网站消息，2月5日，外交部副部长苗得雨在北京会见伊朗外交部副部长加里布阿巴迪。 双方还就中伊各领域合作交换了意见。 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. government has demanded that Venezuela sever economic ties with countries like China, Russia, Iran, and Cuba, insisting that Venezuela only cooperate with the U.S. in oil production [1] - This demand is seen as a blatant politicization of economic cooperation and weaponization of energy issues, violating international law and infringing on Venezuela's sovereignty [1] - The U.S. has a history of imposing unilateral sanctions and economic blockades on Venezuela, disrupting its international trade and limiting energy exports, which directly impacts local livelihoods and social stability [1] Group 2 - China's economic cooperation with Venezuela is based on principles of equality, mutual benefit, and legality, aimed at supporting local economic development without political conditions [2] - The U.S. attempts to cut off Venezuela's economic relations with China are viewed as efforts to maintain its hegemony and disrupt normal international trade order, harming the legitimate rights of other countries [2] - Historical evidence shows that external powers using sanctions and coercion to reshape other countries' economies lead to instability and poverty, emphasizing that international relations should not revert to a "survival of the fittest" mentality [2]

Group 1 - The article discusses a recent incident where the US military seized a large oil tanker flying the Russian flag in the North Atlantic, highlighting the assertive actions of the US even far from its shores [1][31] - The seizure of the tanker, which was allegedly attempting to transport oil from Venezuela, underscores the US's stance that its sanctions on Venezuelan oil are effective globally [5][35] - The incident raises questions about international maritime law and the implications of one nation's domestic laws being enforced on the high seas [4][36] Group 2 - The tanker, originally named "Bella 1," was under Russian protection, with Russian naval vessels escorting it at the time of the seizure, indicating a significant geopolitical tension [7][38] - The US's actions are seen as a dangerous precedent, potentially altering the rules of engagement on the high seas and showcasing a display of military power [8][39] - The response from Russia has been one of strong condemnation, asserting that the US's actions violate international law and calling for the humane treatment of the crew [14][45] Group 3 - The US's focus on Venezuela is evident, as it aims to cut off all oil exports from the country, thereby exerting economic pressure [20][52] - The US Secretary of State explicitly stated that Venezuela must cooperate with the US to transport oil and generate revenue, indicating a strategy of economic coercion [21][53] - The implications for Russia are severe, as the seizure undermines its efforts to maintain a network for transporting oil amidst Western sanctions, potentially leading to a significant economic impact [24][55]

Group 1 - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, where the UN Secretary-General expressed concern over the U.S. military actions that allegedly violated international law [1] - The Venezuelan representative condemned the U.S. actions as a blatant violation of the UN Charter and demanded the immediate release of President Maduro and his wife, who are under U.S. control [1] - The Chinese representative criticized the U.S. for disregarding international concerns and violating principles of sovereignty, non-interference, and peaceful resolution of disputes, urging dialogue instead [1] - The Russian representative strongly condemned the U.S. armed aggression, claiming the true aim is to control Venezuela's natural resources [1] - The French representative stated that U.S. military actions undermine the principles of peaceful dispute resolution and non-use of force, threatening international peace and security [1] Group 2 - The Brazilian representative warned that the U.S. actions set a dangerous precedent for the international community, calling for strong condemnation of armed intervention in other countries' sovereignty [2] - Representatives from Cuba, Colombia, Chile, Pakistan, Denmark, and South Africa also expressed opposition or condemnation of U.S. interference [2] Group 3 - President Maduro and his wife rejected U.S. criminal charges in a New York court, while protests against U.S. interference occurred outside the courthouse [3] - Delsy Rodríguez was sworn in as acting president of Venezuela, and the government issued a decree for police to search for individuals involved in supporting U.S. armed attacks, implementing military management of the oil industry and other critical sectors [3] Group 4 - Gunfire was reported near the presidential palace in Venezuela due to a drone entering a no-fly zone, with police firing warning shots; the situation was described as calm overall [4]

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency public meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, where multiple countries condemned the U.S. military actions as violations of international law [1][3][4]. Group 1: International Reactions - The UN Under-Secretary-General for Political and Peacebuilding Affairs, DiCarlo, stated that the U.S. military actions on January 3 did not respect international law, as the UN Charter prohibits the use or threat of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state [1]. - Russia's permanent representative to the UN, Nebenzya, indicated that the U.S. actions reveal its true intentions to exert unlimited control over Venezuela's natural resources and establish hegemony in Latin America [3]. - China's temporary representative to the UN, Sun Lei, expressed strong condemnation of the U.S.'s unilateral and illegal actions, emphasizing violations of principles such as sovereignty equality and non-interference in internal affairs [3]. - France's temporary representative to the UN, Damadikar, noted that the U.S. military actions undermine the principles of peaceful dispute resolution and non-use of force, threatening the foundation of international order [3]. - Colombia's permanent representative to the UN, Zarabato, strongly condemned the U.S. military actions, stating they pose a serious threat to the international order established after World War II [4]. Group 2: Venezuela's Position - The Venezuelan permanent representative to the UN, Moncada, asserted that the U.S. actions blatantly violate the UN Charter and international law, framing the situation as a threat of colonialism and neo-colonialism [5]. - Moncada demanded the immediate release of Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, emphasizing that tolerating or downplaying such actions would send a devastating message to the world [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the UN strongly condemns the unilateral and illegal actions of the United States regarding Venezuela, emphasizing the need for adherence to international law and the UN Charter [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and International Response - The international community has expressed significant concern over U.S. sanctions and military threats against Venezuela, with calls for peaceful resolution and respect for sovereignty [1][2]. - The U.S. is accused of disregarding international concerns and violating principles of sovereignty, non-interference, and peaceful dispute resolution [1][2]. Group 2: China's Position and Recommendations - China urges the U.S. to acknowledge the overwhelming international call for compliance with international law and to cease actions that undermine Venezuela's sovereignty [2][3]. - The Chinese representative emphasizes that military solutions are not viable and that the U.S. should return to dialogue and negotiation to resolve issues [2][3]. Group 3: Support for Venezuela and Regional Stability - China reaffirms its support for the Venezuelan government and people's rights to defend their sovereignty and dignity [3]. - The importance of Latin American and Caribbean nations in maintaining global peace and stability is highlighted, along with a call for mutual respect and cooperation among nations [3].

Core Viewpoint - China strongly condemns the unilateral and illegal actions of the United States regarding Venezuela, emphasizing the need for respect for international law and the sovereignty of nations [1][2]. Group 1: China's Position on U.S. Actions - China expresses deep shock and strong condemnation of the U.S. sanctions and military threats against Venezuela, highlighting the international community's concerns [1]. - The Chinese representative urges the U.S. to acknowledge the overwhelming calls from the international community to stop infringing on Venezuela's sovereignty and to return to dialogue for political resolution [2]. - Historical lessons indicate that military means are not a solution, as past U.S. actions have led to prolonged conflicts and humanitarian crises in various regions [2]. Group 2: Support for Venezuela and Regional Stability - Venezuela is recognized as an independent sovereign nation with the right to defend its sovereignty and dignity, and Latin American countries have the right to choose their development paths [3]. - China firmly supports the Venezuelan government and people in maintaining their sovereignty and legitimate rights, advocating for respect and non-interference in internal affairs [3]. - The call for the U.S. to change its approach emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and cooperation among nations in the region to maintain peace and stability [3].

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Security Council held an emergency public meeting regarding the situation in Venezuela, where China's representative criticized the U.S. for violating international principles and threatening regional peace and security [1][2]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and International Principles - The U.S. is accused of disregarding international concerns and violating Venezuela's sovereignty, security, and legitimate rights, which undermines the principles of sovereign equality and non-interference in internal affairs [1]. - China's representative urged the U.S. to recognize the overwhelming calls from the international community to adhere to international law and the principles of the UN Charter, and to cease actions that infringe on other countries' sovereignty [1][2]. Group 2: Call for Dialogue and Cooperation - China emphasizes that military means are not a solution and that the abuse of force leads to greater crises, referencing past U.S. military actions in Iraq and Iran that resulted in ongoing conflicts and humanitarian suffering [2]. - China expresses firm support for the Venezuelan government and people in maintaining their sovereignty and security, advocating for a return to dialogue and cooperation based on mutual respect and non-interference [2].

Core Viewpoint - The United States is using visa restrictions as a tool to exert political and economic pressure on Central American countries that maintain close relations with China, undermining international law and norms [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Reactions - The U.S. Ambassador to Panama stated that U.S. visas are privileges rather than rights, reflecting a condescending attitude [1]. - Panama's President, Laurentino Cortizo, expressed frustration, stating that U.S. actions contradict his desire for good relations with the U.S. [1]. Group 2: International Law and Sovereignty - The U.S. actions are seen as a violation of international law, particularly the principles outlined in the United Nations Charter, which prohibits interference in the internal affairs of sovereign nations [2][3]. - The U.S. is accused of undermining the principle of sovereign equality among nations by using its power to coerce Central American countries [3][4]. Group 3: China-Central America Relations - China's cooperation with Central American countries has been deepening, leading to various development projects that benefit local populations and contribute to regional stability [4]. - The U.S. is perceived as acting against its own interests by attempting to disrupt beneficial relations between China and Central America, which could help alleviate issues like illegal immigration [4]. Group 4: Historical Context - Historical references highlight past U.S. interventions in Panama, suggesting that current actions are part of a long-standing pattern of U.S. dominance and disregard for local sovereignty [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government, represented by Vice Minister Hua Chunying, emphasizes the importance of upholding international law and the authority of the United Nations, advocating for a fairer global governance system [1] Group 1: International Relations - China expresses willingness to collaborate with Global South countries to maintain the authority of the UN and international law [1] - The principle of sovereign equality is highlighted, asserting that no individual or nation has the right to override international law [1] - Attempts to distort UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 are viewed as infringements on China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as provocations against the post-war international order [1] Group 2: Conflict Resolution and Development - The importance of peaceful dispute resolution is stressed, with an invitation for more countries to actively participate in international mediation [1] - There is a call for promoting sustainable and shared development while upholding international fairness and justice [1]