宏观对冲与主观CTA策略： 多资产配置新纪元 金 韬 国 泰 君 安 期 货 资 深 分 析 师 投 资 咨 询 从 业 资 格 号 ： Z 0 0 0 2 9 8 2 日期： 2 0 2 5 年 1 2 月 目录 CONTENTS 01 宏观对冲策略投研与展望 Global Macro Strategy Research & Market Outlook 02 主观CTA策略投研与展望 Discretionary CTA Strategy Research & Market Outlook 01 宏观对冲策略投研与展望 宏观对冲策略投研与展望 受益于2023年以来国内资方对海外资产的投资诉求，以及2024年国内宏观对冲策略线的优异表现，宏观对冲策略管理人规模迅速扩张，部 分国内宏观对冲管理人管理规模迅速冲上百亿。我们将广义宏观对冲管理人归为以下三类： 风险平价型：以风险平价作为模型打底，根据各家的优势对风险平价模型进行增强，这类管理人业绩表现有较高的一致性； 资产轮动型：以美林时钟等资产轮动框架为基础，强调资产间的择时配置，管理人业绩一致性较弱； 多资产多策略型：量化CTA为代表的策略叠加组合系列，主观管理 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. Core View of the Report - The performance of the subjective CTA strategy line in 2026 will be better than that in 2025. The decline in Sino-US macro uncertainty and the rise in commodity volatility in a low-interest rate environment are favorable for subjective CTA managers in the commodity sector [1][37]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs 1. 2025 Subjective CTA Review 1.1 Subjective CTA Strategy Net Value Performance - In 2025, the net value performance of managers in the observation pool was weaker than that in the same period of 2024. Due to the interference of Sino-US trade friction uncertainty, the trading certainty of managers based on industrial supply and demand research declined significantly, resulting in weakened position-holding confidence and reduced income [7]. - In terms of sectors, black sector managers were relatively prominent in 2025. In the first half of the year, the cost collapse of coal drove the downward trend of black sector prices, and some black managers obtained trading opportunities with industrial and macro resonance. In the second half of the year, the divergence between the futures market sentiment and the spot market led to a significant decline in the net value of black sector managers. Agricultural product managers were greatly affected by foreign trade frictions, and the predictability of agricultural product imports was extremely poor, which affected their income acquisition [9][10]. - In terms of scale, there was little difference in the income performance of managers of different scales in 2025. The large-scale multi-sector managers did not show more obvious investment research advantages, and the small-scale managers did not show more income acquisition ability [14]. 1.2 2025 Subjective CTA Strategy Income Attribution - In 2025, the Nanhua Commodity Index fluctuated throughout the year, and some varieties showed structural differentiation, but the overall commodity index did not show a trending market. In the first half of the year, affected by Sino-US trade friction, the commodity index was under pressure to decline. After June, with the stalemate of Sino-US trade friction, "anti-involution" became a new theme, driving the commodity index to stabilize and rebound [17][18]. - The annual commodity index fluctuation and subjective CTA income acquisition in 2025 were mainly divided into two stages: - From January to May 2025, driven by the uncertainty brought by Sino-US trade friction, precious metals continued the upward trend at the end of 2024, with the London Spot Gold Index rising by 25.5% from January to May. At the same time, domestic industrial products, mainly domestic demand, weakened, with the CSI Steel Index falling by 13% from January to May. Managers mainly trading precious metals and black sector managers who shorted coal and coke or held positions such as buying ore and shorting coal obtained good income [20]. - From June to December 2025, Sino-US trade friction entered a stalemate stage, and the market generally expected that there would be no more negative news. "Anti-involution" became the core driving force in domestic industrial policies. There was a great divergence between subjective CTA private equity managers and industrial participants on whether "anti-involution" could be compared with the supply-side reform in 2016 - 2021. The net value of black sector managers declined significantly after June. In the agricultural product sector, the income of some managers was damaged due to the decline in palm oil prices. In the non-ferrous sector, managers using unilateral trading strategies performed better than those using arbitrage trading strategies [24][25]. 2. Subjective CTA Strategy Industry Ecological Changes 2.1 Head Managers Iterate towards Multi-Asset and Multi-Strategy - Head managers are rapidly iterating towards multi-asset and multi-strategy. The reasons may include limited capital capacity of single-asset futures trading, quarterly income convergence of single-commodity assets, increasing linkage between the equity market and the commodity market, and the need to reduce the impact of single-asset judgment errors on the net value and obtain beta opportunities of other assets [30]. - Expanding the ability circle does not necessarily lead to a significant decline in income. For commodity managers aiming at the asset management path, expanding the trading ability of other sectors can form a positive iteration between asset management scale and investment research [31]. 2.2 Start-up Private Equity Shows Strong Drawdown Control Ability in the Early Stage - In 2025, start-up private equity showed strong drawdown control ability in the early stage. Small-scale managers' weekly drawdown control ability was not weaker than that of large-scale managers. Domestic subjective futures private equity asset management has an obvious sample effect, and small-scale managers are clear about the subsequent asset management path and pay attention to controlling drawdown to improve investors' holding experience [33]. 2.3 In the Market with a Diverse Structure, Single-Industry Logic is Slightly Weak in Trading, Requiring Managers to Have More Comprehensive Abilities - The pricing ability of industrial logic in commodity futures has been weakened, and non-industrial logic forces such as macro strategies and multi-asset strategies have entered the market, making it difficult for teams relying solely on industrial logic to trade [35]. - From the perspective of capital allocation, industry is still the basis for studying subjective CTA managers, but managers should not have obvious shortcomings in macro judgment, trading, and risk control. Research determines the winning rate, trading and risk control determine the profit-loss ratio, and excellent traders are not necessarily excellent asset management managers [35][36]. 3. 2026 Subjective CTA Outlook - The decline in Sino-US macro uncertainty will make the commodity's own supply and demand the dominant factor, which is beneficial to subjective CTA managers based on industrial supply and demand research. There may be industrial contradictions in coking coal, iron ore in the black sector, and lithium carbonate in the new energy sector [37]. - In a low-interest rate environment, the rise in commodity volatility is conducive to managers to create better income. In 2026, the domestic low-interest rate environment will continue, and the main line of commodity trading may shift from precious metals in 2025 to basic bulk commodities [38]. - Subjective CTA managers are extending towards multi-asset and multi-strategy to provide better holding experience for investors. This change also makes the scale of subjective CTA managers further included in the capital allocation options [39].

Core Viewpoint - The recent "anti-involution" trend in the Hangzhou futures market has led to significant drawdowns in the net value of several subjective CTA products from private equity institutions, highlighting the need for improved responsiveness to market changes despite a strong foundation in industrial fundamental analysis [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The Hangzhou futures market is characterized by a unique ecosystem formed since 2015, integrating "industrial capital + private equity funds + futures asset management" [1] - Major private equity firms such as Donghe Asset Management and Qiantang Yongli Asset Management have deep ties with Yong'an Futures, leveraging frontline intelligence in "warehousing-logistics-production line" [1] - The recent market changes have challenged traditional advantages, with losses attributed to a lag in responding to policy rhythms, emotional capital, and quantitative fund behaviors [1] Group 2: Performance Data - As of August 15, there are 690 futures and derivatives strategy products with performance data this year, with 79 from Hangzhou, ranking third in quantity [2] - The average return for Hangzhou products this year is 11.69%, placing them second overall, while they have shown resilience in the past month [2] - Among the 79 products in Hangzhou, the number of quantitative CTA and subjective CTA products is roughly equal, with subjective CTA strategies yielding higher average returns [2] Group 3: Strategy Breakdown - In Hangzhou, the top ten performing futures and derivatives strategy products have a high entry threshold, with subjective CTA products dominating the rankings [3] - The proportion of products achieving positive returns in the past month among subjective CTA products is 62.07%, indicating the agility of smaller private equity firms [4] - Qiantang Yongli Asset Management stands out as the only private equity firm in the 20-50 billion scale category, showcasing strong investment capabilities [4] Group 4: Institutional Insights - Eight private equity institutions in Hangzhou meet the ranking criteria, with the top three being mixed-type (subjective + quantitative) firms, reflecting the advantages of mixed strategies [4] - Junfu Investment and Qiantang Yongli Asset Management rank second and fifth respectively among 20-50 billion scale private equity firms, demonstrating robust investment styles [4] - Win Private Equity has emerged as a standout institution over the past year, advocating for counter-cyclical investments and showcasing exceptional performance in strategy and risk management [4]

Group 1: Investment Rating - No investment rating is mentioned in the report. Group 2: Core Viewpoints - The performance of the subjective CTA strategy line in the second half of 2025 will continue the trend of the first half. The consistency between macro and industrial directions benefits subjective CTA managers, and the source of income will not decline significantly. Also, the probability of position limits is low, which is conducive to the recovery of market liquidity [2][32][35] Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. 2025 H1 Subjective CTA Review 1.1 Subjective CTA Strategy Net Value Performance - In H1 2025, the net value performance of managers in the observation pool was basically the same as that in H1 2024, and the maximum weekly drawdown was smaller. By sector, black and multi - sector managers had prominent returns. By scale, larger - scale managers had more obvious returns [8][11][14] 1.2 2025 H1 Subjective CTA Strategy Income Attribution - In H1 2025, the Nanhua Commodity Index weakened. The decline of coal drove the cost collapse of domestic industrial products. The income acquisition of subjective CTA was divided into two stages. In the first stage (Jan - Mar 2025), precious and non - ferrous metals rose, while domestic industrial products weakened. In the second stage (Apr - May 2025), after the Tomb - sweeping Festival, the market volatility increased, and subjective CTA managers performed well. The cost collapse of industrial products also promoted the performance of quantitative CTA factors [17][19][22] 2. Subjective CTA Strategy Industry Ecological Changes 2.1 Managers' Positions are Generally Low, Paying More Attention to Net Value Drawdown Management - Managers' positions are generally low, focusing on net value drawdown management. The income in H1 2025 came from the smooth trend of some varieties and the improvement of trading win - rate. Changes in trading habits are related to past commodity price fluctuations and capital requirements [26] 2.2 The Proportion of Industrial Hedging has Increased, Possibly Increasing Industrial Discourse Power - As the prices of industrial products such as coal decline, the industrial demand for hedging against price decline risks has increased. The reduction of the inventory transfer ability of factories through traders makes futures hedging a choice, which may increase industrial discourse power in subsequent pricing [30] 3. 2025 H2 Subjective CTA Outlook - The performance of the subjective CTA strategy line in H2 2025 will continue the trend of H1. The consistency between macro and industrial directions remains, and the decline trend of domestic industrial products has not changed. The probability of position limits is low, which is conducive to the recovery of market liquidity [32][33][35]