本文首发于公众号"私募排排网"。 （点击↑↑ 上图查看详情 ） 近年来，在人工智能和量化技术深度融合的驱动下，量化投资热度持续高涨，一众量化新锐也随之崭露头角。私募排排网数据显示，截至2025 年11月14日，量化私募共有852家，近5年成立（2020年11月14日后成立）的新锐量化私募达135家，占比约16%。 其中， 有业绩展示的新锐量化私募近半年、近 1年收益均值分别为21.11%、36.05%，均显著高于2020年11月14日前成立且有业绩展示的量化 私募收益（近半年、收益均值分别为17.99%、27.46%）。 为了给予读者更多参考，笔者盘点了截至11月14日近5年成立的新锐量化私募，并梳理出近半年、近1年收益前10的量化新锐。 （ 注：本文业绩 数据截至 2025年11月14日，近5年成立的新锐量化私募即2020年11月14日后成立的量化私募 ） 0 1 量化新锐135家！齐家、正定、睿量、磐松、波克迅速进入百亿阵营！ 根据私募排排网数据，截至11月14日，近5年成立的135家新锐量化私募，成立时间大多分布在2021-2022年，期间数量达118家，占比近九成。 从最新管理规模看，0-5亿规模组的 ...

Group 1 - The 2025 Global Futures Traders Conference and the 19th National Futures (Options) Real Trading Competition attracted nearly 170,000 traders, with 196 outstanding participants emerging after months of competition [1] - The competition has evolved beyond a simple contest to become a core platform connecting market demand, talent cultivation, and industry ecosystem development, fostering a multi-win ecological value chain [2][3] - The competition serves as a mirror reflecting the dynamics and needs of traders, showcasing the evolution of trading behaviors and the modern risk management market [2][3] Group 2 - The futures industry is tasked with high-quality development and the creation of a specialized talent pool to provide efficient risk management services for the real economy [3] - The competition assists futures companies in grasping market trends and pressures them to innovate in technology and services, acting as a comprehensive stress test for their capabilities [3] - The event is positioned as a historical mission to promote the healthy development of the futures market, with future iterations expected to incorporate financial technology and artificial intelligence [3] Group 3 - The competition is recognized as a significant platform for observing market dynamics and driving industry innovation, having been held for 19 years [4] - The event provides an opportunity for futures companies to showcase their professional service capabilities and attract talented traders, enhancing brand recognition [5] - The competition is seen as a microcosm of the Chinese futures market, facilitating the exchange of diverse trading styles and strategies, and promoting overall improvement in derivative trading levels [6] Group 4 - Gold has become a focal point for traders, with significant central bank actions supporting its price increase, and a structural low allocation in asset management portfolios indicating potential for future growth [7] - The market dynamics suggest that gold's bullish trend is likely to continue unless significant geopolitical or monetary policy changes occur [7] - The recognition of the importance of understanding market logic and personal risk tolerance is emphasized as crucial for successful trading strategies [8] Group 5 - The CTA strategy is characterized by low correlation with traditional assets, providing a diversified source of returns and opportunities in both bull and bear markets [9] - The recent shift from a tightening to a loosening monetary policy environment is favorable for trading strategies, particularly for CTA products [9] - The performance of CTA products has shown a diversification in sources of returns across various sectors, including equities, bonds, and commodities [9]

Core Viewpoint - Since 2025, global gold assets have maintained a strong market driven by three main factors: a phase of declining real interest rates, persistent geopolitical risks and uncertainty in U.S. domestic policies, and continued buying by global central banks, particularly from emerging economies [2][3]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - The decline in global real interest rates is influenced by the U.S. fiscal deficit and long-term debt structure, making it difficult for real rates to rise further, while persistent inflation enhances long-term demand for gold [2]. - Geopolitical risks, including conflicts in the Middle East and deteriorating security in Europe, along with uncertainties following the Trump administration's policies, have structurally increased demand for safe-haven assets like gold [2]. - Central banks remain the largest buyers of gold, with emerging market central banks continuing to purchase gold, providing long-term support for gold prices [3]. Group 2: Policy Impact - Recent tax policy adjustments in China regarding gold transactions mark a significant structural change in the gold market, effective from November 1, 2025, to December 31, 2027, affecting standard gold transactions [5][6]. - The new tax policies aim to clarify the tax burden and usage of gold, impacting costs for off-exchange gold, price differentials, retail premiums, and the structure of futures and ETFs, rather than directly altering domestic gold prices [6]. - Gold ETFs are expected to be the most affected by the new policies, as the attractiveness of physical gold for secondary sales diminishes, while virtual gold instruments like paper gold and ETFs remain unaffected by the VAT adjustments [10]. Group 3: Investment Strategies - The high beta sensitivity of gold assets to macroeconomic trends makes them a preferred choice for quantitative CTA, multi-asset strategies, and discretionary long strategies [5]. - The stricter regulations on gold withdrawal and usage declarations may lead to a decrease in arbitrage scale in futures, potentially increasing price volatility and enhancing the correlation of futures with international gold prices during trending markets [10].

Report Industry Investment Ratings - Index Futures: ☆☆☆ [1] - Treasury Bond Futures: ☆☆☆ [1] Core Views - As of the week ending October 31, index futures rose, with this week showing differentiation. IH2511 decreased by 0.89%, while IC2511 and IM2511 increased by 1.47% and 1.31% respectively. The basis of large - and small - cap index futures showed differentiation last week, reflecting investors' trading divergence. The valuation of the Shanghai Stock Exchange 50 Index is in the high historical quantile range [1]. - From the high - frequency macro - fundamental factor scores, for index futures, the inflation indicator scored 8 points, the liquidity indicator 9 points, the valuation indicator 11 points, and the market sentiment indicator 9 points. For treasury bond futures, the inflation indicator scored 8 points, the liquidity indicator 10 points, and the market sentiment indicator 8 points [1]. - The net value of the financial derivatives quantitative CTA strategy increased by 0.92% last week, with the gain coming from opening a long position in IC on Wednesday and closing it intraday. In the long - term, the PMI unexpectedly declined, which has a negative impact on IF and IM. In the short - term, the real estate and consumption data remain weak, the exchange rate is in a low range, and the capital situation remains relatively loose, showing a short - term low - level rebound [1]. - In terms of positions, IC and IM increased marginally, while IF and IH remained neutral. The overall market risk appetite decreased compared to the beginning of the week, and the overall comprehensive signal is in a neutral oscillation. For treasury bond futures, the capital situation remains loose, the market risk appetite is conducive to bond market recovery, the stock - bond seesaw effect is significant, the position factor rebounded, but institutions are still cautious about allocation, and the comprehensive signal is above neutral [1]. Summary by Related Content Macro - fundamental High - frequency Factor Scores - **Economic Momentum**: The blast furnace operating rate and PTA operating rate increased by 1.37%, while the refinery operating rate in Shandong decreased by 1.18%, and the all - steel tire operating rate decreased by 0.02%. The operating rate of downstream looms for polyester filament in the Jiangsu and Zhejiang regions increased by 6.46%. The index futures score was 7, and the treasury bond futures score was 0 [2]. - **Inflation Indicators**: The vegetable basket product wholesale price index increased by 1.20%, while the coking coal index decreased by 0.91%. The market price of 1 electrolytic copper decreased by 0.57%. The South China Styrene Index decreased by 0.08%. The CIF price of liquefied natural gas in China remained unchanged. The compound fertilizer index increased by 2.61%. The settlement price of natural rubber decreased by 0.88%. Both index futures and treasury bond futures scored 8 [3]. - **Liquidity**: DR007 increased by 3.13%, while DR001 decreased by 0.28%. The weighted average of GC001 decreased by 3.13%, and that of GC007 decreased by 5.85%. SHIBOR overnight increased by 0.08%, and SHIBOR 1 - week increased by 1.77%. The US dollar index increased by 0.80%. The inter - bank certificate of deposit yield (AAA) for 1 - month remained unchanged. The index futures score was 9 [4]. - **Index Valuation**: The price - earnings ratio (TTM) decreased by 3.33%, the price - sales ratio (TTM) decreased by 1.60%, the dividend yield (last 12 months) increased by 0.72%, and the price - cash - flow ratio (operating cash flow TTM) increased by 6.28%. The index futures score was 10 [5]. - **Market Sentiment (Index)**: The margin trading balance increased by 1.19%, the short - selling balance increased by 0.63%. The net purchase amount of northbound funds was unchanged at - 67.75, and the selling amount was unchanged at 494.16. The trading volume of A - shares on the Shanghai Stock Exchange increased by 23.53%. The treasury bond futures score was 9 [6]. - **Market Sentiment (Bond)**: The yield to maturity of 10 - year China Development Bank bonds decreased by 3.51%, the S&P 500 Volatility Index increased by 6.54%. The credit spread (median) of all industrial bonds remained unchanged. The trading volume of the Shanghai Treasury Bond Index decreased by 3.79%. The treasury bond futures score was 8 [7]. Strategy Introduction - The product pool includes index futures and treasury bond futures. The goal is to use a multi - strategy model to allocate contracts in the financial futures market for stable net value growth. The short - term model focuses on market style, external factors, and capital flow, while the long - term model focuses on market expectations and macro - economic data. The position is calculated based on institutional long and short positions [16]. Prediction Signals - According to the short - term model, the prediction signals for IF, IH, IC, IM, T, and TF were 0.51, 0.51, 0.52, 0.53, 0.53, and 0.52 respectively. The position indicators were all 0. According to the long - term model, the signals were 0.52, 0.51, 0.52, 0.53, 0.5, and 0.51 respectively. The comprehensive signals were 0.53, 0.51, 0.53, 0.52, 0.52, and 0.51 respectively [17]. Last Week's Situation - From October 27 to October 31, 2025, the signals for IF, IH, IC, IM, T, and TF were mostly 0, except that IC had a signal of 1 on October 29 [19]. Treasury Bond Futures Cross - variety Arbitrage Strategy - **Strategy Introduction**: The cross - variety arbitrage strategy is based on the signal resonance of the fundamental three - factor model and the trend regression model. The fundamental factors use the instantaneous forward - rate function proposed by Nelson and Siegel, which decomposes the interest - rate term structure into level, slope, and curvature. The signals are divided into three types: '1' (the spread may decrease), '0' (the spread trend is uncertain or oscillating), and '-1' (the spread may increase). The trend regression model is used to filter signals, and trades are made when there is resonance. In practice, a duration - neutral ratio of 1:1.8 is used to adjust the 10 - 5Y spread [20]. - **Market Quotes and Trading Signals**: From October 27 to October 31, 2025, the N - S model and trend regression model signals for TF and T were mostly 0, except that the N - S model signal for TF and T was - 1 on October 28 [23].

Core Viewpoint - The article analyzes the economic cycle in the U.S. from June 2004 to July 2025 based on the Pring cycle classification, indicating that leading indicators are bottoming out and recovering, while coincident indicators are slightly weakening, and lagging indicators remain resilient. Future attention should be on the status of coincident indicators to determine the economic cycle's progression [4][41]. Group 1: U.S. Economic Cycle Analysis - The U.S. economic cycle is divided into six stages based on leading, coincident, and lagging indicators, with specific characteristics for each stage [7][11]. - As of July 2025, if the loose monetary policy improves the fundamentals and coincident indicators rise, the economy may enter the second or third stage of recovery; otherwise, it may face stagflation risks [4][16]. - The asset rotation pattern shows that during the recovery phase, equities outperform commodities, while in the stagflation phase, commodities exhibit anti-inflation advantages [4][17]. Group 2: Comparison of U.S. and China Economic Cycles - Both the U.S. and China are currently in a phase where leading indicators are rising, but the U.S. faces weakening coincident indicators, while China is in a low-level bottoming process [5][21]. - If leading indicators rise significantly in both countries, it could lead to a synchronized recovery phase; otherwise, the U.S. may enter stagflation, and China may remain in a weak economic state [5][22]. - The sensitivity of domestic assets to U.S. indicators is highlighted, with commodities responding more to U.S. coincident indicators, while the Shanghai Composite Index is more sensitive to domestic indicators [6][42]. Group 3: Asset Performance and Strategies - The article outlines that during different stages of the economic cycle, various asset classes perform differently, with equities leading during recovery and commodities performing well during stagflation [4][17]. - Quantitative CTA strategies perform best during periods of synchronized rising leading indicators, suggesting a potential increase in returns and the necessity for such strategies in the current market environment [6][43]. - The performance of major asset classes from June 2004 to July 2025 is summarized, showing varying returns across different economic phases [20][41].

Core Viewpoint - The recent "anti-involution" trend in the Hangzhou futures market has led to significant drawdowns in the net value of several subjective CTA products from private equity institutions, highlighting the need for improved responsiveness to market changes despite a strong foundation in industrial fundamental analysis [1] Group 1: Market Dynamics - The Hangzhou futures market is characterized by a unique ecosystem formed since 2015, integrating "industrial capital + private equity funds + futures asset management" [1] - Major private equity firms such as Donghe Asset Management and Qiantang Yongli Asset Management have deep ties with Yong'an Futures, leveraging frontline intelligence in "warehousing-logistics-production line" [1] - The recent market changes have challenged traditional advantages, with losses attributed to a lag in responding to policy rhythms, emotional capital, and quantitative fund behaviors [1] Group 2: Performance Data - As of August 15, there are 690 futures and derivatives strategy products with performance data this year, with 79 from Hangzhou, ranking third in quantity [2] - The average return for Hangzhou products this year is 11.69%, placing them second overall, while they have shown resilience in the past month [2] - Among the 79 products in Hangzhou, the number of quantitative CTA and subjective CTA products is roughly equal, with subjective CTA strategies yielding higher average returns [2] Group 3: Strategy Breakdown - In Hangzhou, the top ten performing futures and derivatives strategy products have a high entry threshold, with subjective CTA products dominating the rankings [3] - The proportion of products achieving positive returns in the past month among subjective CTA products is 62.07%, indicating the agility of smaller private equity firms [4] - Qiantang Yongli Asset Management stands out as the only private equity firm in the 20-50 billion scale category, showcasing strong investment capabilities [4] Group 4: Institutional Insights - Eight private equity institutions in Hangzhou meet the ranking criteria, with the top three being mixed-type (subjective + quantitative) firms, reflecting the advantages of mixed strategies [4] - Junfu Investment and Qiantang Yongli Asset Management rank second and fifth respectively among 20-50 billion scale private equity firms, demonstrating robust investment styles [4] - Win Private Equity has emerged as a standout institution over the past year, advocating for counter-cyclical investments and showcasing exceptional performance in strategy and risk management [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent volatility in the commodity market, highlighting the impact of market sentiment and policy changes on investment strategies, particularly in the context of CTA (Commodity Trading Advisor) strategies [5][23]. Market Environment - The commodity market experienced a reversal due to various factors, including liquidity conditions and economic recovery expectations, leading to a significant price drop in some commodities, with weekly declines reaching up to 20% [5][6]. - The market's recent downturn is seen as a correction of expectations returning to reality, despite underlying support from liquidity and economic factors [5][6]. Investment Strategies - Several CTA strategies are analyzed, showcasing their diverse approaches to capturing market opportunities while managing risks [8][20]. - Strategy A employs a multi-strategy approach with a focus on traditional trend-following and fundamental analysis, maintaining a diversified portfolio across approximately 40 commodities, stock indices, and treasury futures [8][10]. - Strategy B utilizes high-frequency trading with a focus on short-term opportunities, achieving an annualized return of 14.68% since its inception, although it faced challenges in the current low-volatility environment [14][15][17]. - Strategy C, a well-established player, has shown resilience with a 10.2% annualized return since 2017, maintaining a diversified portfolio across over 60 trading instruments [20][21]. Performance Metrics - Strategy A reported an annualized return of 15.73% since March 2023, with a maximum drawdown of 11.52% [12]. - Strategy B's performance was impacted by market conditions, resulting in a return of less than 1% year-to-date, with a recent drawdown of 3.62% due to market reversals [17][18]. - Strategy C achieved an 8.06% return in the current year, demonstrating strong performance amidst market fluctuations [21]. Conclusion - The article concludes that the recent commodity market reversal was primarily driven by emotional trading rather than policy changes, emphasizing the importance of market sentiment in shaping investment outcomes [23].

Core Insights - Guangdong Hongxi Fund Management Co., Ltd. announced the suspension of fundraising for certain traditional quantitative CTA product lines starting August 1, due to increasing global macroeconomic volatility and the strategic value of CTA strategies in asset allocation [1] - The company aims to ensure a long-term holding experience for investors and will continue to operate existing products normally, allowing current investors to redeem their shares without impact [1] - The fund management company has maintained a focus on quantitative CTA strategies and absolute returns over its 10-year history, emphasizing prudent management of strategy capacity limits [1] Company Strategy - The company will keep the cross-sectional quantitative CTA strategy products, options strategy products, and commodity index enhancement strategy products available for normal subscription and redemption [1] - Future adjustments to product fundraising and issuance plans will be based on strategy optimization, market conditions, and investor demand [1] - The current management scale of Hongxi Fund is reported to be between 5 billion to 10 billion [1]

Company Overview - Zhixin Rongke was established in 2013 by two core founders who previously worked at the renowned hedge fund company WorldQuant, focusing on strategy research as its core competitive advantage [2][6] - The company has developed a highly efficient investment research and trading system, accumulating a diverse range of strategies [2] Performance Highlights - Zhixin Rongke's quantitative CTA strategy has achieved good returns during weak market conditions (2022-2023) and demonstrated strong explosive potential in relatively strong years (2024-2025) [2] - As of May 2025, the "Zhixin Rongke Multi-Strategy No. 8 Class A" managed by Wu Zhengpeng has achieved a remarkable return of ***% over the past year, ranking first among the top ten quantitative CTA funds [2] Development Timeline - 2013: Company registration - 2016: Registration and filing - 2021: Initiated asset management business focusing on CTA strategies - 2023: Launched quantitative stock selection strategy - 2024: Completed upgrade of CTA strategy, adding stock index and treasury futures strategies - 2025: Launched mixed multi-strategy (quantitative CTA + stock selection strategy) and flexible hedging strategy [5] Core Team - The two founders hold PhDs from prestigious universities and have over ten years of quantitative trading experience, having worked as senior scientists at WorldQuant [6][7] Competitive Advantages - **Solid Foundation**: The founders' strong academic backgrounds and experience at WorldQuant contribute to a robust quantitative trading system, with a deep understanding of market dynamics [8] - **Rich Strategy Reserve and High Research Efficiency**: The company has developed a highly efficient backtesting and live trading system over more than a decade, resulting in a well-balanced and extensive strategy library [9] - **Complementary and Stable Core Team**: The founders' complementary expertise and clear division of labor have been crucial for maintaining long-term leadership in the industry [10] Product Lines - **Composite CTA Strategy**: The "Zhixin Rongke CTA No. 7 Class A" fund, established on June 8, 2021, consists of a combination of various low-correlation sub-strategies, covering over 50 futures products [12] - **Quantitative Stock Selection Strategy**: The "Zhixin Rongke Quantitative Stock Selection No. 1" fund, launched on October 14, 2022, employs a multi-factor strategy to select quality stocks while incorporating flexible hedging strategies [14] - **Mixed Multi-Strategy**: The "Zhixin Rongke Multi-Strategy No. 8 Class A" fund, established on September 8, 2022, combines 70% composite CTA strategy and 30% quantitative stock selection strategy to achieve stable overall returns [15]

Group 1: Investment Rating - No investment rating is mentioned in the report. Group 2: Core Viewpoints - The performance of the subjective CTA strategy line in the second half of 2025 will continue the trend of the first half. The consistency between macro and industrial directions benefits subjective CTA managers, and the source of income will not decline significantly. Also, the probability of position limits is low, which is conducive to the recovery of market liquidity [2][32][35] Group 3: Summary by Directory 1. 2025 H1 Subjective CTA Review 1.1 Subjective CTA Strategy Net Value Performance - In H1 2025, the net value performance of managers in the observation pool was basically the same as that in H1 2024, and the maximum weekly drawdown was smaller. By sector, black and multi - sector managers had prominent returns. By scale, larger - scale managers had more obvious returns [8][11][14] 1.2 2025 H1 Subjective CTA Strategy Income Attribution - In H1 2025, the Nanhua Commodity Index weakened. The decline of coal drove the cost collapse of domestic industrial products. The income acquisition of subjective CTA was divided into two stages. In the first stage (Jan - Mar 2025), precious and non - ferrous metals rose, while domestic industrial products weakened. In the second stage (Apr - May 2025), after the Tomb - sweeping Festival, the market volatility increased, and subjective CTA managers performed well. The cost collapse of industrial products also promoted the performance of quantitative CTA factors [17][19][22] 2. Subjective CTA Strategy Industry Ecological Changes 2.1 Managers' Positions are Generally Low, Paying More Attention to Net Value Drawdown Management - Managers' positions are generally low, focusing on net value drawdown management. The income in H1 2025 came from the smooth trend of some varieties and the improvement of trading win - rate. Changes in trading habits are related to past commodity price fluctuations and capital requirements [26] 2.2 The Proportion of Industrial Hedging has Increased, Possibly Increasing Industrial Discourse Power - As the prices of industrial products such as coal decline, the industrial demand for hedging against price decline risks has increased. The reduction of the inventory transfer ability of factories through traders makes futures hedging a choice, which may increase industrial discourse power in subsequent pricing [30] 3. 2025 H2 Subjective CTA Outlook - The performance of the subjective CTA strategy line in H2 2025 will continue the trend of H1. The consistency between macro and industrial directions remains, and the decline trend of domestic industrial products has not changed. The probability of position limits is low, which is conducive to the recovery of market liquidity [32][33][35]