中新社北京1月6日电 题：中韩元首会谈，习近平为何提到这两个成语？ 中新社记者 郭超凯 "作为朋友和邻居，中韩应该多走动、常来往、勤沟通。"1月5日，中国国家主席习近平在北京同来华进行国事访问的韩国总统李在 明举行会谈。 此访是李在明就任韩国总统后首次访华，也是他2026年首次出访。会谈中，习近平提到两个成语："中韩两国长期坚持'以和为贵''和 而不同'，超越社会制度和意识形态差异，相互成就、共同发展。" 中国国际问题研究院研究员杨希雨表示，李在明此番表态，正是希望消除影响双边关系的负面因素，坚持"以和为贵"的相处之道。 "和而不同"也是中韩相互成就、共同发展的基础。 1月5日下午，中国国家主席习近平在北京人民大会堂同来华进行国事访问的韩国总统李在明举行会谈。会谈前，习近平和夫人 彭丽媛同李在明和夫人金惠景合影。 中新社记者 盛佳鹏 摄 中韩地缘相近、文化相通，同属儒家文化圈的深厚渊源，让"以和为贵""和而不同"理念成为双方共通的文化认知。 回望历史，"以和为贵""和而不同"是中韩关系发展历程的真实写照。 1992年，中韩两国以前瞻战略眼光打破冷战坚冰，正式建立外交关系，这正是"以和为贵""和而不同"理念的生 ...

Group 1 - The phrase "in principle" reflects a cultural tendency in China to maintain harmony and emphasize interpersonal relationships, allowing for flexibility in communication [2] - "In principle not possible" serves as a gentle refusal, while "in principle possible" conveys goodwill but also indicates potential difficulties, thus avoiding absolute statements [2] - The phenomenon of "in principle" illustrates a balance between adhering to rules and recognizing practical realities, highlighting the importance of sincerity in communication [2] Group 2 - The use of "in principle" allows for a buffer in conversations, providing leeway for exceptions while establishing clear boundaries [1] - Chinese communication often involves indirect expressions that preserve face and maintain a friendly atmosphere, such as "not to say you" or "next time I will treat you" [2] - It is crucial to recognize that not all situations can be adjusted by the phrase "in principle," especially in legal contexts where principles must be strictly adhered to [2]

Group 1 - The core theme of the events is to reflect on history and promote peace, as emphasized by President Xi Jinping during the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War [3][41] - President Xi held multiple bilateral meetings with over 30 foreign leaders, reinforcing the importance of historical memory and international cooperation [5][31] - The meetings highlighted the significance of maintaining the achievements of World War II and promoting international justice [9][32] Group 2 - Strengthening political mutual trust among socialist countries was a key focus, with Xi emphasizing the exchange of governance experiences to guide bilateral relations [11] - Practical cooperation in emerging sectors like artificial intelligence and renewable energy was discussed, aiming to enhance collaboration in these critical areas [13] - The bilateral relations with Zimbabwe and Congo were elevated to a "high-level community of shared destiny," indicating a commitment to deeper ties and mutual prosperity [15][18] Group 3 - The meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un marked a significant moment, emphasizing the enduring friendship and cooperation between China and North Korea [16][20] - Both leaders reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining strong ties regardless of changing international circumstances [21] - The discussions included enhancing strategic communication and cooperation in governance, aiming to promote regional peace and stability [23][25] Group 4 - The Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit and the commemoration of the anti-fascist victory were highlighted as major diplomatic events for China this year [26][28] - Xi's global governance initiative was a focal point, aiming to promote a fairer and more effective international governance system [37][39] - Leaders from various countries expressed strong support for Xi's governance initiative, recognizing its significance in addressing current global challenges [39]

Group 1 - Dong Mingzhu's controversial statement about not hiring "overseas returnees" due to concerns about espionage has sparked significant public debate, with many media figures criticizing her views as lacking common sense and reflecting her own inadequacies [2][4] - The response from Dong Mingzhu's social media account emphasizes a philosophy of "struggle" in addressing "bad behavior," which raises questions about the appropriateness of such a mindset in corporate culture [4][6] - The article draws parallels between Dong Mingzhu's views and historical philosophies in China, suggesting that her emphasis on struggle contrasts with the contemporary goal of building a harmonious society [6][8] Group 2 - The article questions why a corporate leader like Dong Mingzhu would prioritize a "struggle philosophy" over a culture of unity and harmony, suggesting that this could lead to a distorted social environment [6][8] - Dong Mingzhu's management style is critiqued for potentially reflecting traditional family business practices, which may not align with modern corporate governance principles [8][9] - A response from Xiaomi's public relations representative highlights the potential consequences of being out of touch with the evolving business landscape, suggesting that such attitudes may lead to isolation [9]