Core Insights - The article discusses the investment strategies and reflections of Li Bei, the head of Banxia Investment, focusing on her current investment portfolio and logic [1] Investment Strategy - Over 80% of the stock holdings are characterized by being cyclical, high-dividend, and low price-to-book ratio, with representative stocks including undervalued state-owned construction enterprises and global building materials leaders [1] - The investment portfolio will maintain a 10%-15% allocation to gold as a strategic component, considering the decline of the dollar system [1] Future Investment Approach - The company plans to continuously track foreign institutional investors' sentiment and position surveys, engaging in direct communication with foreign institutions to enhance understanding [1] - There will be an increase in stock selection standards, focusing on companies with alpha [1] - The company will adhere to its value framework and risk control system, and will not participate in small-cap stocks [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the characteristics of value strategies and the differences among various value indices in the A-share market, including their investment value in the current context [1][3]. Group 1: Types of Indices - A-shares are categorized into four main types of indices: broad-based indices, strategy indices, industry indices, and thematic indices, each serving different investment needs [3][4][5][6][7]. - Broad-based indices cover a wide range of stocks based on market capitalization, while strategy indices apply specific investment strategies on top of broad-based indices [4][5]. - Industry indices focus on stocks within specific sectors, and thematic indices are related to particular themes, often spanning multiple industries [6][7]. Group 2: Common Strategy Indices - The article identifies six main strategy indices, with the value strategy index originating from Benjamin Graham's teachings, emphasizing low P/E and P/B stocks [8][9][12]. - The three common value strategy indices discussed are the 300 Value Index, the Preferred 300 Index, and the CSI Value Index, each with distinct characteristics and selection criteria [13][18]. Group 3: Basic Information of Value Indices - The 300 Value Index, launched in 2008, selects stocks from the CSI 300 based on low P/E, low P/B, and high dividend yield [14]. - The Preferred 300 Index, introduced in 2018, combines multiple strategies, including dividend, growth, and quality [15]. - The CSI Value Index, established in 2017, uses an equal-weighting method, ensuring each stock has the same proportion [16]. Group 4: Stock Selection Rules - The selection rules for the 300 Value Index involve calculating four key metrics: dividend yield, P/B ratio, cash flow yield, and P/E ratio, followed by selecting the top 100 stocks based on these metrics [20]. - The Preferred 300 Index requires stocks to have low valuations and a certain level of growth, while the CSI Value Index emphasizes a minimum ROE of 12% [21][23][24]. Group 5: Industry Distribution - The industry distribution of the 300 Value and Preferred 300 indices is similar, with significant allocations in finance, industrials, and consumer discretionary sectors, while the CSI Value Index has a higher concentration in industrials and materials [30]. Group 6: Top Holdings - The top ten holdings of the three indices show that the 300 Value Index has a higher concentration in major financial institutions, while the CSI Value Index has a more balanced distribution among its holdings [32]. Group 7: Long-term Performance - All three indices have outperformed the CSI 300 Index over the long term, indicating the effectiveness of value investing strategies in the A-share market [33]. Group 8: Historical Valuation - The historical valuation data indicates that the P/E ratios of these indices are generally higher than their P/B ratios, suggesting that P/B may be a more reliable metric in the current market context [36]. Group 9: Index Rebalancing - Index rebalancing tends to lower the valuation of value strategy indices, as seen in the adjustments made to the 300 Value Index, which involved replacing higher P/E stocks with lower P/E alternatives [37][38]. Group 10: Index Funds - The article notes that the scale of index funds related to these value indices is relatively small, collectively amounting to less than 10 billion, which is less than 1% of the total A-share stock fund market [40].