新华社北京9月30日电(记者刘赞 耿学鹏)第80届联合国大会高级别周9月22日至30日在纽约联合国总部 举行，100多位国家元首和政府首脑在活动期间发表讲话。其间，联合国内外发生的一系列事情，或让 人愤怒，或令人振奋，或使人啼笑皆非，或引人深刻思考。 有人说，联合国是这个世界的缩影。在本届联大系列活动中，贯穿始终的激辩折射多边合作潮流与单边 霸权逆流的对撞，揭示联合国成立80年后世界面临的深刻变化。 一只"黑手" 最戏剧性的一幕，出现在26日以色列总理内塔尼亚胡在一般性辩论发言时。他刚上台，许多会员国代表 就纷纷起身退场，以示对以色列在加沙地带战争暴行的愤怒。不少人径直从内塔尼亚胡面前走开，代表 席顿时空空荡荡。 发言中，内塔尼亚胡拿起一张中东地图，一边宣称多个"敌对势力"领导人已被或将被以军清除，一边用 马克笔对相应国家一一划勾。以色列总理一只沾染黑色墨水的手，呈现在现场所剩无几的听众面前。 会场外，数以千计的巴勒斯坦支持者在纽约时报广场附近游行，挥舞巴勒斯坦国旗，举着"停止让加沙 挨饿"等横幅。同一天，以军宣布24小时内袭击了加沙地带140多个目标，巴方确认至少50人在袭击中死 亡。 加沙冲突是本届联大会 ...

Group 1 - The upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit in Tianjin is expected to be the largest in history, with over 20 national leaders attending, including the UN Secretary-General [1][2] - The participation of non-member countries such as Indonesia, Vietnam, and Malaysia indicates a strong interest in economic cooperation rather than political alignment [3][5] - The presence of UN Secretary-General António Guterres adds significant weight to the summit, symbolizing international recognition of the SCO and the emergence of a new multilateralism [7] Group 2 - The timing of the U.S. sanctions against two Chinese energy companies, accused of assisting Iran in oil transportation, raises questions about the effectiveness of such measures in the face of growing international cooperation [9][12] - Countries are prioritizing economic benefits from the SCO over U.S. sanctions, as evidenced by leaders like Turkey's Erdoğan attending despite NATO affiliations [11] - The SCO's focus on practical cooperation in areas like energy, digital economy, and supply chain stability contrasts sharply with the U.S. approach, which has been criticized for lacking concrete projects [11][12] Group 3 - The SCO's inclusive approach allows for participation from various countries, regardless of their membership status, emphasizing collaboration over ideological divides [16][19] - The summit reflects a shift in global economic power towards Asia, with the SCO representing a significant portion of global GDP and resources [22][26] - The Tianjin summit may mark a pivotal moment in establishing the SCO as a viable alternative for global governance, characterized by inclusivity and mutual respect [28][30]

Group 1 - Brazilian President Lula opposes tariff bullying and advocates for equal rules in trade [1][3] - The U.S. government imposed a 40% tariff on Brazilian products starting August 6, raising the total tariff rate on most Brazilian exports to 50% [1] - Lula claims the U.S. accusations against Brazil are unfounded and reflect a unilateral hegemonic mindset [1][3] Group 2 - Lula emphasizes Brazil's commitment to multilateralism and aims to maintain a stable, open, and predictable business environment [4] - The Brazilian government seeks to create more cooperation opportunities and development space for investors from around the world [4]

Group 1 - The core issue in the US-India trade negotiations is the unreasonable demands from the US, which include imposing tariffs on Indian automotive parts, steel, textiles, and requiring India to open its market to US products with zero tariffs [3] - India's manufacturing sector, which heavily relies on labor-intensive exports like textiles and footwear, is already struggling, with its contribution to GDP falling to 14.7%, the lowest since 1968 [3] - Agriculture and dairy products are critical sectors for India, accounting for 16% of GDP, and the Indian government has made it clear that zero tariffs on these products is a non-negotiable point in the trade talks [3][5] Group 2 - In response to US pressure, India has announced retaliatory tariffs and has filed a complaint with the WTO, positioning its actions as a compliant countermeasure [5] - Indian Prime Minister Modi is actively seeking support from BRICS nations, emphasizing the importance of this group in counterbalancing US unilateralism and advocating for a multipolar world order [5][6] - The effectiveness of BRICS in providing sufficient support to India remains uncertain, but India's willingness to stand firm against the US and seek allies marks a significant shift from previous conciliatory approaches [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's response to the U.S. tariffs, highlighting its assertive measures and the implications for global trade dynamics, particularly in relation to the EU's position and strategy [1][3][9]. Group 1: China's Response - China has announced reciprocal measures against the U.S., including imposing similar tariffs on U.S. goods and tightening rare earth export controls [3][6]. - The U.S. administration, led by Trump, reacted by raising tariffs on China to 104%, indicating a willingness to escalate the trade conflict [3][9]. Group 2: EU's Position - The article suggests that the EU faces a dilemma: either retaliate against the U.S. or withdraw from confrontation, with the latter being a more likely option given its weakened state [6][9]. - The EU is portrayed as lacking the military and political strength to confront the U.S. effectively, which may lead to it being sidelined in global power dynamics [7][9]. Group 3: Global Power Dynamics - The commentary emphasizes that only a strong nation, specifically referring to China, has the capability to stand up to the U.S. in this trade conflict [6][14]. - The article critiques the EU's potential response as inadequate, suggesting that symbolic measures against the U.S. may be the only feasible approach without escalating tensions [9][10].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that the ongoing trade tensions between the US and China are becoming increasingly untenable, with expectations of a de-escalation in the near future as both sides express willingness to negotiate [1][3][5] - US Treasury Secretary acknowledged the difficulties of the current tariff standoff and anticipated a period of easing tensions, which aligns with President Trump's recent signals to cool down the situation [1][3] - The Chinese government, represented by its finance minister, emphasized the importance of equal dialogue and negotiation to resolve trade disputes, countering the US's unilateral tariff actions [3][5] Group 2 - The articles highlight that the US's aggressive tariff policies have not only harmed its own economy but have also led to a backlash from traditional allies, who are now opposing US's unilateralism [5][7] - Data shows that China's total foreign trade continues to rise, while its trade share with the US is gradually declining, indicating a reduced dependency on the US and a strengthening of China's economic resilience [5][7] - The call for multilateralism and cooperation among nations at recent meetings underscores a collective push against US's trade practices, with a focus on maintaining a rules-based international trading system [7]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting held by China at the UN aimed to address the impacts of unilateralism and bullying on international relations, with a focus on criticizing the United States' recent tariff policies [1][3][6]. Group 1: Meeting Overview - The meeting was conducted in the "Arria Formula" format, allowing for informal discussions among UN member states, with over 80 countries represented, setting a new record for participation [5]. - The meeting highlighted the ongoing geopolitical tensions between China and the US, with both sides exchanging strong criticisms [3][6]. Group 2: China's Position - China's UN representative, Fu Cong, emphasized the need for countries to work together to counter unilateralism and uphold the international order based on international law [3][6]. - Fu criticized the US for its tariff policies, claiming they violate WTO rules and disrupt global economic stability [3][6]. Group 3: US Response - The US representative, Wu Ting, attempted to defend US actions by listing accusations against China, including its trade policies and international security threats, but faced skepticism from most attending countries [3][6]. Group 4: Global Economic Context - Recent reports from the International Monetary Fund and the UN Conference on Trade and Development indicate a downward revision of global economic growth forecasts for 2025, reflecting a potential economic downturn affecting all countries [8].

Group 1 - The Trump administration is considering a tiered approach to tariffs on Chinese goods, proposing a 35% tariff on non-security threat items and at least a 100% tariff on strategically significant items, to be implemented over five years [1] - Discussions are ongoing, and Trump has not made a final decision, with potential reductions of tariffs on Chinese imports being considered, possibly down to 50% to 65% [1] - The motivations behind these tariff considerations include signaling positive economic prospects to the U.S. stock market, pressuring other countries for concessions, and maintaining Trump's public image of success [1] Group 2 - China's response to U.S. threats emphasizes the need for dialogue based on equality and respect, criticizing the U.S. for its unilateral pressure tactics [3] - The global trade tensions have escalated since Trump's announcement of "reciprocal tariffs," leading to significant declines in global stock markets [3] - Former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis warns that the U.S. strategy is aimed at maintaining its global dominance, and the shift in policy will only occur when the costs to the U.S. ruling class become unbearable [3] Group 3 - At a UN meeting, China strongly refuted U.S. accusations of unilateralism and proposed constructive solutions to global issues, advocating for true multilateralism [5] - China has initiated the "Global Development Initiative Friends Group," which aims to reduce the gap between rich and poor countries, with over 100 nations already participating [5] - The emphasis is on cooperation and dialogue rather than confrontation, highlighting China's role as a builder of peace and contributor to global development [7]