11月11日，胖东来通过官方账号发布侵权处理结果公告称，自今年3月起，网红"柴怼怼"在短视频平台持续发布针对胖东来及其创始人于东来的侵权内容， 相关行为已被法院判决构成侵权。 胖东来称，柴怼怼通过使用温某某实名注册的"柴怼怼"视频账号，发布涉及商业诋毁和名誉权侵权的内容包括，编造胖东来玉石"成本几百块钱的东西卖几 千、几万，利润有几十甚至上百倍"等无事实依据的虚假信息；使用侮辱性语言攻击于东来个人；通过视频合集、直播引流等方式扩大传播面，谋取不正当 竞争利益。 | 序号 | 案由 | 侵权主体 | 案情简介 | 诉讼编辑 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | | | 1.四被告立即停止侵权 | | | | | 被告柴某某使用温某某实名注 | 并删除"柴怼怼"账 | | | | | 册的"柴怼怼" 账号,自2025 | 涉诉视频; | | | | | 年3月起持续发布针对胖东来、于东 | 2.柴某某在 10 日内通 | | | | | 来先生的侵权内容,具体行为包括: | 过"柴怼怼"账号置顶 | | | | | 编造胖东来玉石"成本几百块钱的东 | 发布经法院核准的道 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal actions taken against the influencer "Chai Dui Dui" for defamation and selling counterfeit products, highlighting the consequences of malicious marketing tactics in the digital space [2][5][19]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Outcomes - The court ruled that the four defendants must immediately cease their infringing activities and delete the videos related to the "Chai Dui Dui" account [2][4]. - Chai Dui Dui is required to post a court-approved apology on his account within ten days [2][4]. - The defendants are ordered to collectively compensate the affected parties a total of 2.6 million yuan, which includes 2 million yuan to the company "Pang Dong Lai," 400,000 yuan to Mr. Yu Dong Lai, and 200,000 yuan for reasonable expenses [2][4]. - One of the defendants, Wen XX, is held jointly liable for 520,000 yuan of the compensation [2][4]. Group 2: Background of the Case - Chai Dui Dui, a self-proclaimed "anti-fraud blogger," gained attention by making unfounded claims about the pricing and quality of jade products sold by the well-known supermarket "Pang Dong Lai" [5][9]. - His actions included spreading false information about the company's products, alleging that they were sold at exorbitant prices compared to their actual cost [5][9]. - Following these claims, the local market regulatory authority conducted inspections and confirmed that "Pang Dong Lai" had transparent pricing with a gross profit margin of less than 20% [9]. Group 3: Consequences of Malicious Marketing - The actions of Chai Dui Dui have been criticized for damaging public trust in legitimate businesses and disrupting normal market competition [19]. - His marketing tactics, which included selling counterfeit jade products while claiming to expose fraud, have led to legal repercussions and public backlash [22]. - The article emphasizes the negative impact of such influencers on the business environment and consumer trust [19][22].

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute between Zongheng Co., Ltd. and Yuandu Technology has concluded, with the court ruling in favor of Zongheng, determining that Yuandu's statements constituted commercial defamation [1][2][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit originated from a statement made by Yuandu Technology in May 2024, accusing Zongheng's subsidiary of forgery and improper conduct in a bidding process [3][4]. - The court found that Yuandu failed to provide sufficient evidence to support its claims, particularly regarding the authenticity of a QQ account screenshot used as evidence [4][5]. - The court ruled that Yuandu's statements misled the public about Zongheng's relationship with local government and falsely accused Zongheng of misconduct, leading to a judgment of commercial defamation [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Implications - As a result of the ruling, Yuandu is required to publish a statement to mitigate the impact of its defamatory claims and compensate Zongheng and its subsidiary for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 320,000 yuan [5][6]. - Zongheng announced that the lawsuit's outcome would not negatively affect its daily operations or financial performance [6].

Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute involving Zongheng Co., known as the "first industrial drone stock," has concluded with a court ruling against Yuandu Technology, which was found to have engaged in commercial defamation against Zongheng Co. and its subsidiary, Dapeng Company [2][6][14]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit originated from a statement made by Yuandu Technology in May 2024, accusing Dapeng Company of illegal activities, which Zongheng Co. refuted as malicious defamation [2][10]. - The Beijing Shijingshan District People's Court ruled that Yuandu Technology's claims were unfounded, particularly regarding the alleged forgery of company seals and improper relationships with local government [12][14]. - The court determined that Yuandu Technology's statements misled the public and lacked factual basis, leading to a judgment that required Yuandu Technology to publish a statement to mitigate the damage caused [12][14]. Group 2: Financial Implications - As part of the ruling, Yuandu Technology is required to compensate Zongheng Co. and Dapeng Company for economic losses and reasonable expenses totaling 320,000 yuan [14]. - Zongheng Co. announced that the lawsuit's outcome would not negatively impact its daily operations or financial performance [14]. Group 3: Evidence and Claims - The court found that the evidence provided by Yuandu Technology, particularly a QQ account screenshot, was insufficient and unverifiable, undermining their claims [11][12]. - The court highlighted that Yuandu Technology's assertions about Dapeng Company’s bidding violations and administrative penalties were not supported by evidence and exceeded normal commentary limits, constituting defamation [12][14].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the arrest of a controversial internet celebrity known as "Chai Dui Dui" for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit products, highlighting the irony of a self-proclaimed "anti-fraud blogger" engaging in fraudulent activities [3][23]. Group 1: Background and Initial Actions - Chai Dui Dui, a self-identified anti-fraud influencer with over 200,000 followers, accused a well-known supermarket chain, Pang Dong Lai, of selling overpriced jade products without factual basis [3][4]. - His claims led to public scrutiny, with many accusing him of malicious marketing to gain followers and traffic [4][6]. Group 2: Investigation and Findings - Following Chai's accusations, local market regulators conducted surprise inspections at Pang Dong Lai, confirming that all jade products were clearly priced with a gross margin of less than 20% [7]. - While claiming to expose fraud, Chai Dui Dui was simultaneously promoting and selling his own jade products through live streams, asserting their high quality [9]. Group 3: Consumer Reactions and Legal Consequences - Consumers who purchased jade items from Chai's live streams reported that the products were dyed and lost color over time, leading to dissatisfaction and further investigations [11][13]. - Pang Dong Lai filed a lawsuit against Chai Dui Dui for commercial defamation and infringement of reputation rights, resulting in a court ruling that required the removal of infringing videos and the closure of related accounts [15][16][18]. Group 4: Regulatory Actions and Arrest - Chai Dui Dui's wife, who is the legal representative of a related company, faced fines for false advertising and selling unlabelled products [22]. - Following consumer complaints and investigations, Chai Dui Dui was arrested for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit jade products, with the case still under investigation [23].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the Chinese cosmetics brand "Hua Xizi" escalated after a live-streaming incident involving popular host Li Jiaqi, leading to a lawsuit against a self-media entity for alleged commercial defamation [1][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On September 10, 2023, Li Jiaqi commented on the pricing of Hua Xizi's eyebrow pencil during a live stream, which sparked public outrage and trending topics online [2][4]. - Following the incident, Hua Xizi's parent company, Hangzhou Yige Cosmetics Co., Ltd., issued a public relations letter titled "A Letter" on September 19, 2023 [4][5]. - A self-media article criticized the PR letter, claiming it resembled a "primary school essay" and highlighted the departure of several PR staff members [4][5]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - On December 9, 2024, Hua Xizi filed a lawsuit against the self-media entity for commercial defamation, seeking a total of 580,000 yuan in damages [1][6]. - The first-instance court ruled on June 27, 2025, ordering the self-media's sole shareholder, Zhao, to pay 300,000 yuan in damages and 20,000 yuan in reasonable expenses [7]. - Zhao appealed the decision, and the second-instance hearing took place on October 17, 2025, with new evidence submitted by Zhao's legal team [8][10]. Group 3: Court Findings - The court found that the self-media's article contained defamatory statements that harmed Hua Xizi's brand reputation, as it misrepresented the number of PR staff departures [7][8]. - The court noted that Zhao failed to verify the information provided by interviewees, which contributed to the misleading nature of the article [8][14]. - The court emphasized that commercial defamation requires proof of false information dissemination that damages commercial reputation, while Zhao argued for a reclassification of the case as a defamation of character [12][14]. Group 4: Implications for the Industry - The case highlights the challenges of balancing public commentary and commercial reputation in the digital age, particularly for brands in competitive industries like cosmetics [13][14]. - Legal experts suggest that self-media entities must exercise due diligence in verifying information to avoid potential legal repercussions related to defamation [14].

跨境支付圈近两日一则消息引发关注，两家支付公司竟"打起来"了。近日，国内跨境支付公司杭州乒乓智能技术有限公司（以下简称"PingPong"）以"商业 诋毁纠纷"为由，将上海夺境网络技术有限公司（以下简称"夺境"）、上海夺汇网络技术有限公司（以下简称"夺汇"）诉至杭州市滨江区人民法院。 一场官司引发市场对两方公司的热议，从业务来看，二者存在不少重合度。专家分析，此次行业头部企业对簿公堂，不仅关乎涉事双方的商业信誉与市场份 额，更折射出跨境支付行业竞争进入深水区后，服务同质化、合规成本高企等痛点。业内认为，跨境支付竞争边界亟待规范。 对簿公堂 近日，杭州市滨江区人民法院一则开庭公告显示，PingPong以"商业诋毁纠纷"为由，将夺境、夺汇两家公司诉至法院，案件定于9月19日正式开庭审理。 | 温泉 | 温庭 | 开庭日期 | 排期日期 | 案号 | 案由 | 承办部门 | 审判长/主审人 | 公诉人/原告/上 诉人/申请人 | 被告/被告人 人/被申请人 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 杭州市滨 江区人民 | | ...

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the influencer "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Xiangqian) and the company "Pang Dong Lai" has escalated, leading to legal actions and investigations regarding allegations of selling counterfeit products and defamation [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - Chai Dui Dui accused Pang Dong Lai of selling jade products at inflated prices, claiming the cost was only a few hundred yuan while selling for thousands or even tens of thousands [2]. - Pang Dong Lai filed a lawsuit against Chai Dui Dui for commercial defamation and infringement of reputation, seeking compensation of no less than 5 million yuan [2]. - Following the lawsuit, Chai Dui Dui expressed willingness to take responsibility for his statements and hoped for a court trial to reveal the truth about high-priced jade [2]. Group 2: Impact on Chai Dui Dui - Chai Dui Dui reported experiencing severe online harassment, including rumors, personal attacks, and harassment calls since the controversy began [3]. - In response to the complaints against his products, particularly a herbal tea claimed to treat various diseases, local authorities initiated investigations and found exaggerated claims, leading to legal actions against him [5]. - Chai Dui Dui's social media accounts were shut down following a campaign by the National Internet Information Office, which identified him as a typical case of online misconduct [3][5]. Group 3: Business Operations and Financial Data - Pang Dong Lai reported a sales figure of 21.9 million yuan for its Hetian jade in the first quarter, with a gross margin of 20%, which constituted only 3.6% of the jewelry department's sales and 0.34% of the group's total sales [2]. - Chai Dui Dui is associated with 25 companies, with 15 as a legal representative, indicating a significant business presence despite the controversies [5].

Group 1 - The influencer "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Xiangqian) and associates are under investigation by the Pingyang County Public Security Bureau for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit products [1] - Multiple consumers have reported issues, leading to the police investigation, confirming the situation [1] - A consumer named Ms. Zhang is involved in two civil lawsuits against companies associated with "Chai Dui Dui," with hearings scheduled for September 11 [2] Group 2 - Ms. Zhang claims to have spent 3,596 yuan on "Qi Shi Tea" based on false health claims, leading to health complications and hospitalization [2] - She also alleges that after paying 8,000 yuan to join a wine sales program, she faced issues with refunds and product delivery [2] - Ms. Zhang is seeking triple compensation and 3,000 yuan for emotional distress in her lawsuits [3] Group 3 - The Pingyang County Market Supervision Administration previously fined the company associated with "Chai Dui Dui" 220,000 yuan for false advertising and selling unlabelled products [3] - The company has faced multiple legal challenges, including a defamation lawsuit from a competitor, "Pang Dong Lai," for disparaging remarks made by "Chai Dui Dui" [3][5] - The company has been penalized for advertising containing false content, resulting in fines totaling 6,000 yuan [7]

Core Viewpoint - Usmile, a well-known oral care brand, has been fined 250,000 yuan for commercial defamation against Laifen, a competitor, due to misleading information disseminated through social media [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Details - Usmile's parent company, Guangzhou Xingji Yuedong Co., Ltd., was penalized by the Tianhe District Market Supervision Administration of Guangzhou for spreading misleading information about Laifen's electric toothbrushes [2][3]. - The misleading content included claims that Laifen's toothbrush heads were "all barbs" and "you dare to use this?" during a live broadcast on Douyin [2][3]. - The regulatory body determined that Usmile's actions violated Article 11 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, which prohibits the fabrication and dissemination of false or misleading information that harms a competitor's commercial reputation [2][3]. Group 2: Company Background - Usmile was established in 2016, initially focusing on electric toothbrushes, and has since expanded its product line to include oral irrigators, toothpaste, and brush head accessories [4][6]. - Laifen Technology, founded in 2019, entered the electric toothbrush market in October 2023, having previously focused on hair dryers and shavers [6]. - Laifen reported revenues of 1.3 billion yuan in 2021 and 1.567 billion yuan in 2022, but is projected to incur a net loss of 80 million yuan for its toothbrush product line in 2024 [6].