玉石
Search documents
一周仅开一天门!嘉兴闹市里的“神秘”小店,5元就能淘到宝……
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-24 20:40
在嘉兴月河历史街区建银大桥下, 有一家颇有年代感的书店—— 樨香旧书店。 这家店的主人叫武克风, 来源:市场资讯 (来源:南湖晚报) 武克风的生活节奏在上海和嘉兴之间摆动。眼下他租住在上海闵行区,周一至周六在上海收旧书、陈年书画和老物件,周日清晨6点,嘉兴的旧书店开门 营业。 他有10多个亲戚在上海从事搬家、废品回收行业,亲戚们经常会直接进到居民家里收货,时常会遇到旧书、书画和老物件,客户要当废品卖。这时,他们 就会第一时间联系武克风把消息告诉他,武克风就会尽快赶到,挑选自己看中的书籍和旧玩意儿,和亲戚或者业主谈妥价格,收入囊中。武克风说: "经营旧书店不是件简单的事,最怕货源不够,这点与新书店相同,书得在一定时间内批量更新,不然,老是一些'老面孔',客户就会慢慢流失。" 目前,樨香旧书店里常备五六千册旧书、几百幅画卷,还有一些古玩物件。武克风坚持做到书籍每周更新。每周日,樨香旧书店都会"上新",更新书籍通 常有20麻袋,每袋30多公斤,总量超过600多公斤。 1981年出生, 安徽亳州人。 他和妻子夫唱妇随经营着 这家20多平方米的旧书店。 一周一天开门迎客 武克风到嘉兴打拼快10年了,这家旧书店是夫妇俩3 ...
胖东来公布“柴怼怼”案诉讼结果:柴怼怼等被判赔偿胖东来200万元、赔偿于东来60万元
新浪财经· 2025-11-11 10:10
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal actions taken against the influencer "Chai Dui Dui" for defamation and selling counterfeit products, highlighting the consequences of malicious marketing tactics in the digital space [2][5][19]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Outcomes - The court ruled that the four defendants must immediately cease their infringing activities and delete the videos related to the "Chai Dui Dui" account [2][4]. - Chai Dui Dui is required to post a court-approved apology on his account within ten days [2][4]. - The defendants are ordered to collectively compensate the affected parties a total of 2.6 million yuan, which includes 2 million yuan to the company "Pang Dong Lai," 400,000 yuan to Mr. Yu Dong Lai, and 200,000 yuan for reasonable expenses [2][4]. - One of the defendants, Wen XX, is held jointly liable for 520,000 yuan of the compensation [2][4]. Group 2: Background of the Case - Chai Dui Dui, a self-proclaimed "anti-fraud blogger," gained attention by making unfounded claims about the pricing and quality of jade products sold by the well-known supermarket "Pang Dong Lai" [5][9]. - His actions included spreading false information about the company's products, alleging that they were sold at exorbitant prices compared to their actual cost [5][9]. - Following these claims, the local market regulatory authority conducted inspections and confirmed that "Pang Dong Lai" had transparent pricing with a gross profit margin of less than 20% [9]. Group 3: Consequences of Malicious Marketing - The actions of Chai Dui Dui have been criticized for damaging public trust in legitimate businesses and disrupting normal market competition [19]. - His marketing tactics, which included selling counterfeit jade products while claiming to expose fraud, have led to legal repercussions and public backlash [22]. - The article emphasizes the negative impact of such influencers on the business environment and consumer trust [19][22].
“柴怼怼”恶意营销碰瓷“胖东来”,案件详情披露
第一财经· 2025-11-05 10:02
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the arrest of a controversial internet celebrity known as "Chai Dui Dui" for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit products, highlighting the irony of a self-proclaimed "anti-fraud blogger" engaging in fraudulent activities [3][23]. Group 1: Background and Initial Actions - Chai Dui Dui, a self-identified anti-fraud influencer with over 200,000 followers, accused a well-known supermarket chain, Pang Dong Lai, of selling overpriced jade products without factual basis [3][4]. - His claims led to public scrutiny, with many accusing him of malicious marketing to gain followers and traffic [4][6]. Group 2: Investigation and Findings - Following Chai's accusations, local market regulators conducted surprise inspections at Pang Dong Lai, confirming that all jade products were clearly priced with a gross margin of less than 20% [7]. - While claiming to expose fraud, Chai Dui Dui was simultaneously promoting and selling his own jade products through live streams, asserting their high quality [9]. Group 3: Consumer Reactions and Legal Consequences - Consumers who purchased jade items from Chai's live streams reported that the products were dyed and lost color over time, leading to dissatisfaction and further investigations [11][13]. - Pang Dong Lai filed a lawsuit against Chai Dui Dui for commercial defamation and infringement of reputation rights, resulting in a court ruling that required the removal of infringing videos and the closure of related accounts [15][16][18]. Group 4: Regulatory Actions and Arrest - Chai Dui Dui's wife, who is the legal representative of a related company, faced fines for false advertising and selling unlabelled products [22]. - Following consumer complaints and investigations, Chai Dui Dui was arrested for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit jade products, with the case still under investigation [23].
“柴怼怼”被逮捕
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-10-19 05:43
Group 1 - The key development in the case involving internet celebrity "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Mou Qian) and others suspected of producing and selling counterfeit products is the formal arrest of Chai Mou Qian and his wife, Xiao Mou, on October 17 [1] - "Chai Dui Dui" is a jade stone influencer with over 200,000 followers on short video platforms, who publicly criticized the product quality of another company, claiming it profited excessively from low-cost jade [3] - On July 2, "Chai Dui Dui" was named by the Cyberspace Administration of China for fabricating false information about a company, maliciously defaming its product quality and damaging the reputation of the enterprise and its founder [5] Group 2 - Following the accusations, "Chai Dui Dui" and his wife were taken away for investigation by the police on September 8, and were criminally detained the next day [5]
网红夫妻被逮捕
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-18 01:11
Core Points - The case involving internet celebrity Chai Dui Dui and his wife Xiao has progressed, with both being arrested on October 17 [2] - Consumers who were defrauded by Chai Dui Dui expressed relief at the arrest, indicating a desire to return to normal life after significant financial losses [5] - The case has seen over 300 consumers collectively complain about the sale of inferior jade products, with total spending reaching 5 million [6] Group 1: Arrest and Legal Proceedings - Chai Dui Dui and his wife were arrested following a decision by the procuratorate, indicating sufficient evidence of criminal behavior [2][3] - The arrest is a significant step in addressing consumer complaints regarding the sale of counterfeit products [2] Group 2: Consumer Impact - Consumers reported substantial financial losses, with one individual spending nearly 100,000 yuan and still awaiting a refund of over 80,000 yuan [5] - The official appraisal of jade products purchased by consumers revealed stark discrepancies, with one item valued at 367 yuan despite a purchase price of 16,800 yuan [5] - Many consumers plan to pursue civil lawsuits to recover their losses after the criminal proceedings conclude [6] Group 3: Industry Implications - The case highlights issues within the jade and gemstone market, particularly concerning product authenticity and consumer protection [6] - The actions taken against Chai Dui Dui reflect broader regulatory efforts to combat fraudulent practices in e-commerce and social media marketing [6]
网红“柴怼怼”被刑拘!
证券时报· 2025-09-16 09:18
Group 1 - The internet celebrity "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Xiangqian) and others are under investigation by the police for allegedly producing and selling counterfeit products [1][2] - Initial investigations revealed that over 30 jade products were appraised, with prices ranging from 30 to 500 yuan, and 15 of these were identified as "dyed Hetian jade" [2] - Chai Dui Dui and his wife were detained on September 8 and subsequently arrested on September 9 [2] Group 2 - In April, Chai Dui Dui publicly criticized another internet celebrity, "Fat Donglai," claiming he profited excessively from jade at low costs and disparaged the quality of his products [4] - On May 14, "Fat Donglai" responded to the controversy, stating that individuals like Chai Dui Dui, who spread falsehoods, represent a disgrace to society [5] - In July, it was reported that Chai Dui Dui's accounts on various social media platforms were closed for maliciously defaming a company's product quality without evidence [7]
诋毁胖东来的网红“柴怼怼”,涉嫌销售伪劣产品被查
Guan Cha Zhe Wang· 2025-09-10 11:56
Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the influencer "Chai Dui Dui" (real name Chai Xiangqian) and the company "Pang Dong Lai" has escalated, leading to legal actions and investigations regarding allegations of selling counterfeit products and defamation [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - Chai Dui Dui accused Pang Dong Lai of selling jade products at inflated prices, claiming the cost was only a few hundred yuan while selling for thousands or even tens of thousands [2]. - Pang Dong Lai filed a lawsuit against Chai Dui Dui for commercial defamation and infringement of reputation, seeking compensation of no less than 5 million yuan [2]. - Following the lawsuit, Chai Dui Dui expressed willingness to take responsibility for his statements and hoped for a court trial to reveal the truth about high-priced jade [2]. Group 2: Impact on Chai Dui Dui - Chai Dui Dui reported experiencing severe online harassment, including rumors, personal attacks, and harassment calls since the controversy began [3]. - In response to the complaints against his products, particularly a herbal tea claimed to treat various diseases, local authorities initiated investigations and found exaggerated claims, leading to legal actions against him [5]. - Chai Dui Dui's social media accounts were shut down following a campaign by the National Internet Information Office, which identified him as a typical case of online misconduct [3][5]. Group 3: Business Operations and Financial Data - Pang Dong Lai reported a sales figure of 21.9 million yuan for its Hetian jade in the first quarter, with a gross margin of 20%, which constituted only 3.6% of the jewelry department's sales and 0.34% of the group's total sales [2]. - Chai Dui Dui is associated with 25 companies, with 15 as a legal representative, indicating a significant business presence despite the controversies [5].
马上评:莫让“水深”遮玉瑕
2 1 Shi Ji Jing Ji Bao Dao· 2025-08-23 06:23
Core Viewpoint - The jade market in Shifosi Town, Nanyang, Henan, which is one of the largest processing and trading hubs for Hetian jade in China, has become a haven for fraudsters, undermining consumer trust and damaging the industry's reputation [1] Group 1: Market Conditions - The jade and crystal consumption has been rising in recent years, driven by emotional value, aesthetic demand, and high investment and collectible value [1] - However, the prevalence of counterfeit products, including low-quality Qinghai and Han jade being sold as genuine Hetian jade, has created a toxic environment where honest businesses struggle to survive [1] Group 2: Fraud and Consumer Trust - The exposure of a full chain of fraud has shattered consumer confidence, with scripted sales tactics making it difficult for consumers to protect themselves [1] - The industry is facing a vicious cycle where bad practices drive out good ones, leading to a polluted market environment [1] Group 3: Regulatory Challenges - Despite previous exposés, such as the 2022 March 15 Gala revealing issues in the jade market, fraudulent businesses continue to re-emerge under new names, indicating weak regulatory enforcement and low penalties for violations [1] - The intertwining of interests within the industry complicates the enforcement of regulations, allowing fraud to persist [1] Group 4: Industry Outlook - The jade industry must move away from its current murky state towards a clearer, more professional environment to restore its reputation and the trust of consumers [1]
财经调查丨玉满江河珠宝店直播间演大片,虚假宣传玉石有疗效,公司赚得盆满钵满
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-17 13:00
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the deceptive practices of jewelry companies that utilize scripted performances and false advertising to manipulate consumer behavior and drive sales through live streaming platforms [1] Group 1: Company Practices - The company "Wang'er Jewelry" employs multiple live streaming accounts to create competitive pricing scenarios among hosts, which are pre-scripted to stimulate consumer purchases [1] - In the "Baibaifu Jewelry" live stream, an employee pretends to be a foreign jade merchant, using a local dialect to mislead viewers about the authenticity of the products [1] - The company promotes exaggerated claims about the health benefits of their jade products, specifically targeting consumers over 50 years old, suggesting that wearing the jade can detoxify internal organs [1] Group 2: Consumer Manipulation - The live streaming hosts engage in discussions post-broadcast to plan future deceptive performances aimed at further misleading consumers [1] - The scripted nature of the performances and the false claims made during the live streams contribute significantly to the company's financial success [1]
玉石类投诉量增长明显 直播间虚假宣传成“重灾区”
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-08-06 09:38
Core Insights - The National Consumer Association reported a significant increase in consumer complaints in the first half of 2025, with a total of 995,971 complaints received, marking a year-on-year growth of 27.23% [1] - The association resolved 509,655 complaints, recovering economic losses amounting to 452 million yuan for consumers [1] - The number of consumer visits and consultations reached 330,000 [1] Group 1: Complaint Trends - Complaints related to jade products have seen a notable increase, with live streaming platforms identified as a major area of concern [2] - Key issues include merchants intentionally hiding product flaws during live sales, misleading consumers about the quality and origin of jade, and inducing off-platform transactions [2] - There are also instances of counterfeit certification documents being sold alongside jade products, and merchants failing to honor after-sales commitments [2] Group 2: Recommendations - The National Consumer Association recommends that relevant authorities enhance regulatory oversight of false advertising in live streaming, particularly regarding misrepresentation of origin, exaggerated value, and counterfeit certification [3] - It suggests that suspected illegal activities should be promptly referred to law enforcement to increase the cost of unlawful operations for offenders [3] - Platforms are advised to strengthen their responsibilities by monitoring keywords related to off-platform transactions and taking action against merchants who engage in such practices [3] - Consumers are encouraged to adhere to the "three no principles": do not engage in off-platform transactions, do not trust verbal promises, and do not make payments to private accounts [3]