应看到，当前我国在数据流动治理上制度保障体系不够完善，碎片化和分散性比较明显；在全球数据治 理规则制定上的主导权和话语权不足，现行规则与国际规则的兼容性不够；与其他国家或地区数据跨境 流动的合作共享还存在壁垒；等等。针对此，应多措并举。 推动数据跨境流动治理应完善相关制度保障。立足本国国情，继续完善相关立法，适时修补法律法规漏 洞或填补法律法规空白，整合内容重复的法律条文，形成符合数字经济发展水平并同本国文化传统相适 应的数据流动法律制度体系。完善法律法规的实施细则，推进《数据出境安全评估办法》与DEPA中数 据跨境流动规则的衔接，及时回应国际数字贸易治理的最新需求。坚持统筹发展和安全，制定与完善跨 境数据安全审查标准，建立国内数据审查的决策机制与协调机制，加强跨境数据安全审查技术的研发和 应用，实现数据跨境风险的精准控制。 我国还积极倡导、参与数据跨境国际规则的制定，推动数据跨境流动双边多边协商，为全球数字经济发 展注入新动能。《全球数据安全倡议》《全球人工智能治理倡议》和《全球数据跨境流动合作倡议》的 提出，展示了我国在国际数据治理上的大国主张。我国申请加入了《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》 （RCEP）、积 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China emphasizes the enhancement of international commercial dispute resolution mechanisms and the improvement of judicial measures against sanctions and extraterritorial jurisdiction [1] Group 1: Judicial Enhancements - Strengthening the Supreme People's Court and key regions' international commercial trial work to create a preferred location for international commercial dispute resolution [1] - Improving the connection mechanisms with international commercial mediation and arbitration [1] - Establishing a high-level, specialized foreign law verification system [1] Group 2: Legal Framework Improvements - Enhancing the judicial adjudication system for parties to agree on jurisdiction and applicable foreign laws in foreign civil legal relations [1] - Improving maritime trial work and the layout of maritime court branches to protect China's maritime rights [1] Group 3: International Cooperation and Protection - Perfecting judicial protection mechanisms for overseas interests and enhancing judicial protection for overseas Chinese [1] - Strengthening international exchanges and cooperation in the judicial field [1] - Actively participating in the formulation of international rules in trade, intellectual property, environmental protection, and cyberspace [1] Group 4: Regional Focus - Deepening judicial exchanges and cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, reinforcing rule alignment and mechanism connection [1] - Enhancing judicial work related to Taiwan and promoting cross-strait integration and development [1]

Core Viewpoint - Arbitration is increasingly important in resolving cross-border commercial disputes amid a changing international economic environment, providing efficient, flexible, and fair solutions [1][2]. Group 1: Current State of Arbitration in China - The China Maritime Arbitration Commission (CMAC) has seen significant growth, with over 60,000 arbitrators and cases involving parties from over 100 countries and regions [1]. - In 2024, CMAC ranked among the top international maritime arbitration institutions, with foreign-related cases accounting for 39% of total cases, a 55% year-on-year increase [1]. Group 2: Future Development and Strategic Initiatives - The Chinese arbitration sector is at a unique opportunity for growth, with new reforms and innovations being prioritized by the government [2]. - Key areas for development include leveraging digital technology and artificial intelligence to enhance arbitration processes, strengthening rule research to represent Chinese business interests internationally, and fostering communication platforms between business and legal communities [2]. Group 3: Practical Applications and Case Studies - CMAC released a collection of typical cases involving free trade zone enterprises, highlighting representative disputes in shipbuilding, chartering, multimodal transport, freight forwarding, and marine insurance [3]. - The case collection aims to summarize CMAC's unique practices in resolving maritime disputes and offers practical recommendations [3].