炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 来源：中国基金报 【导读】基金公司探索基金经理团队制 中国基金报记者 方丽 陆慧婧 公募基金高质量发展行动方案明确支持基金经理团队制管理模式。近年来，部分基金公司开始试水以基 金经理团队制替代传统的"明星基金经理"单打独斗模式。 近期，睿远基金发行成立的睿远研选均衡三年持有混合发起式基金由3位基金经理共同管理，更早之前 成立的工银领航三年持有混合基金则由四位基金经理共同管理。Wind数据显示，截至1月25日，全市场 的普通股票型基金、偏股混合型基金、平衡混合型基金中，有25只基金由3位及以上的基金经理共同管 理。 在业内人士看来，将投资从"明星基金经理"升级为"投研体系化"，本质上是通过系统化协作降低对个体 的依赖。这种发展趋势是资管行业走向成熟的必由之路，也体现了行业对长期性的追求。 基金公司加大力度探索基金经理团队制 公募基金高质量发展行动方案提出，加快"平台式、一体化、多策略"投研体系建设，支持基金经理团队 制管理模式，做大做强投研团队。基金公司纷纷响应号召，加大力度探索基金经理团队制。 近期，睿远基金发行成立了睿远研选均衡三年持 ...

【导读】基金公司探索基金经理团队制 中国基金报记者 方丽 陆慧婧 公募基金高质量发展行动方案明确支持基金经理团队制管理模式。近年来，部分基金公司开 始试水以基金经理团队制替代传统的"明星基金经理"单打独斗模式。 近期，睿远基金发行成立的睿远研选均衡三年持有混合发起式基金由3位基金经理共同管理， 更早之前成立的工银领航三年持有混合基金则由四位基金经理共同管理。Wind数据显示，截 至1月25日，全市场的普通股票型基金、偏股混合型基金、平衡混合型基金中，有25只基金 由3位及以上的基金经理共同管理。 在业内人士看来，将投资从"明星基金经理"升级为"投研体系化"，本质上是通过系统化协作 降低对个体的依赖。这种发展趋势是资管行业走向成熟的必由之路，也体现了行业对长期性 的追求。 基金公司加大力度探索基金经理团队制 公募基金高质量发展行动方案提出，加快"平台式、一体化、多策略"投研体系建设，支持基 金经理团队制管理模式，做大做强投研团队。基金公司纷纷响应号召，加大力度探索基金经 理团队制。 近期，睿远基金发行成立了睿远研选均衡三年持有混合发起式基金，据悉，该基金将采用基 金经理团队制管理模式，3位基金经理分别为董春峰、 ...

Core Viewpoint - The issuance of the Ruiyuan Research Balanced Three-Year Holding Mixed Fund reflects the company's commitment to exploring a team-based fund management model and a cautious approach to fund establishment [1][2]. Fund Structure and Management - The Ruiyuan Research Balanced Three-Year Holding Mixed Fund is a mixed equity fund primarily investing in A-shares and Hong Kong stocks, with an equity asset investment ratio of 60%-95%, and a maximum of 50% of equity assets in Hong Kong Stock Connect targets [2]. - The fund will adopt an active management philosophy, focusing on identifying value investment targets with competitive advantages across various industries, aiming for long-term stable asset appreciation and excess returns beyond performance benchmarks [2][3]. - The fund will be managed by a team of three fund managers, who will collaborate through a cooperative mechanism and manage their respective units independently, with performance based on the aggregate contributions of each manager [2][7]. Fee Structure - The fund employs a floating management fee model, with fees determined based on the holding period and annualized return of each fund share, categorized into three tiers depending on performance relative to benchmarks [3]. Strategic Rationale - The exploration of the team-based fund management model aligns with regulatory guidance aimed at enhancing core investment research capabilities and supporting diversified management strategies [4][6]. - The fund's management team believes that a multi-manager approach can reduce risk and enhance returns by leveraging diverse investment styles and expertise [5][8]. Historical Context and Future Direction - The team-based management model has been successfully implemented by firms like Capital Group, which utilizes a multi-advisor system to achieve superior long-term investment performance [7]. - The Ruiyuan Research Balanced Fund represents a significant step in the company's ongoing exploration of this management model, with a focus on continuous improvement and adaptation based on operational experiences [8].

Core Viewpoint - The team-based management model for fund managers is recognized as a key approach to enhance the research and investment capabilities of public funds in the context of high-quality development [1][2]. Group 1: Implementation and Exploration - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has released an action plan that emphasizes the team-based management model as a crucial part of strengthening the core research and investment capabilities of public funds [2]. - Some fund companies have already begun exploring integrated research practices, with notable examples including the industrialized and intelligent research platform of China Europe Fund and the technology research team integration of Nuoan Fund [2]. - The emergence of a four-person co-management fund, the ICBC Leading Navigator Three-Year Holding Mixed Fund, marks a significant innovation in the fund industry to address the limitations of single-manager strategies [3]. Group 2: Challenges and Coordination - Despite the benefits of co-management, there are significant challenges that need to be addressed, such as unclear role definitions, high coordination costs, and potential decision-making conflicts among fund managers [4]. - Current co-managed funds have not yet demonstrated the "1+1 greater than 2" effect, indicating that the integration of multiple managers may not always lead to improved performance [4][5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Competition - Fund managers face significant challenges in a competitive market characterized by a large number of companies and products, which complicates the investment decision-making process [7]. - The rise of passive and quantitative funds has intensified competition for actively managed funds, making it increasingly difficult to generate excess returns [7]. Group 4: Future Development and Mechanism Innovation - The development of the team-based management model requires a higher-level mechanism transformation, which is gradually being implemented [8]. - Effective team-based investment emphasizes risk-return matching and requires fund managers to possess complementary skills, such as macro analysis, industry trends, and risk control [8].

Core Viewpoint - The team-based management model for fund managers is recognized as a crucial approach to enhance the research and investment capabilities of public funds in the context of high-quality development [1][6]. Group 1: Implementation and Exploration - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has proposed an action plan to support the establishment of a team-based management model for fund managers, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive research and investment system [2][6]. - Some fund companies have already begun to explore integrated research practices and the co-management model among fund managers to address the limitations of single-strategy funds [2][5]. - The trend of co-management is increasing, with examples of funds being managed by two or three managers, indicating a shift towards collaborative management [2][5]. Group 2: Advantages of Team-Based Management - Team-based management can enhance the stability of fund performance by leveraging the complementary strengths of different fund managers, thus improving compatibility with various investment styles [3][6]. - The collaborative approach aims to mitigate risks associated with individual fund managers, such as personal biases and the impact of manager turnover on performance [3][6]. Group 3: Challenges and Limitations - Despite the potential benefits, the current co-management model has not yet demonstrated significant advantages, with concerns about decision-making conflicts and unclear responsibilities among managers [4][5]. - The effectiveness of co-management is hindered by the reluctance of established fund managers to share control and the potential for coordination challenges [4][5]. Group 4: Future Directions - The development of a team-based management model requires a fundamental change in the investment research mechanism, emphasizing the need for a structured approach to integrate various analytical strengths [6][7]. - The future of team-based management in public funds will depend on the establishment of a supportive culture and governance framework that encourages collaboration and effective resource allocation [7].

Group 1 - The public fund industry is experiencing a trend of "de-starring," with notable fund managers like Bao Wuke leaving their positions, indicating a shift from the previous "talent promotion" culture [2][6] - As of May 19, 141 fund managers have left their positions this year, surpassing the number from the same period last year, with a total of 361 departures in 2024, marking a 15% increase from 2023 [7] - Regulatory changes encouraging team-based management among fund managers are contributing to this trend, promoting transparency and strategy sharing within teams [6][8] Group 2 - Bao Wuke, a prominent fund manager with 17 years of experience, has officially left Invesco Great Wall Fund, managing assets totaling 16.207 billion yuan, and is recognized for his strong performance [3][5] - The departure of Bao Wuke has raised questions about the future performance of the funds he managed, with his successors now overseeing a total of 10 funds, reflecting a talent shortage in the industry [5][6] - Recent regulatory reforms have increased performance assessment pressures on fund managers, with a focus on long-term performance metrics, leading to a sense of uncertainty among active equity fund managers [7][8]