Core Viewpoint - The team-based management model for fund managers is recognized as a key approach to enhance the research and investment capabilities of public funds in the context of high-quality development [1][2]. Group 1: Implementation and Exploration - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has released an action plan that emphasizes the team-based management model as a crucial part of strengthening the core research and investment capabilities of public funds [2]. - Some fund companies have already begun exploring integrated research practices, with notable examples including the industrialized and intelligent research platform of China Europe Fund and the technology research team integration of Nuoan Fund [2]. - The emergence of a four-person co-management fund, the ICBC Leading Navigator Three-Year Holding Mixed Fund, marks a significant innovation in the fund industry to address the limitations of single-manager strategies [3]. Group 2: Challenges and Coordination - Despite the benefits of co-management, there are significant challenges that need to be addressed, such as unclear role definitions, high coordination costs, and potential decision-making conflicts among fund managers [4]. - Current co-managed funds have not yet demonstrated the "1+1 greater than 2" effect, indicating that the integration of multiple managers may not always lead to improved performance [4][5]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Competition - Fund managers face significant challenges in a competitive market characterized by a large number of companies and products, which complicates the investment decision-making process [7]. - The rise of passive and quantitative funds has intensified competition for actively managed funds, making it increasingly difficult to generate excess returns [7]. Group 4: Future Development and Mechanism Innovation - The development of the team-based management model requires a higher-level mechanism transformation, which is gradually being implemented [8]. - Effective team-based investment emphasizes risk-return matching and requires fund managers to possess complementary skills, such as macro analysis, industry trends, and risk control [8].

Core Viewpoint - The team-based management model for fund managers is recognized as a crucial approach to enhance the research and investment capabilities of public funds in the context of high-quality development [1][6]. Group 1: Implementation and Exploration - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has proposed an action plan to support the establishment of a team-based management model for fund managers, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive research and investment system [2][6]. - Some fund companies have already begun to explore integrated research practices and the co-management model among fund managers to address the limitations of single-strategy funds [2][5]. - The trend of co-management is increasing, with examples of funds being managed by two or three managers, indicating a shift towards collaborative management [2][5]. Group 2: Advantages of Team-Based Management - Team-based management can enhance the stability of fund performance by leveraging the complementary strengths of different fund managers, thus improving compatibility with various investment styles [3][6]. - The collaborative approach aims to mitigate risks associated with individual fund managers, such as personal biases and the impact of manager turnover on performance [3][6]. Group 3: Challenges and Limitations - Despite the potential benefits, the current co-management model has not yet demonstrated significant advantages, with concerns about decision-making conflicts and unclear responsibilities among managers [4][5]. - The effectiveness of co-management is hindered by the reluctance of established fund managers to share control and the potential for coordination challenges [4][5]. Group 4: Future Directions - The development of a team-based management model requires a fundamental change in the investment research mechanism, emphasizing the need for a structured approach to integrate various analytical strengths [6][7]. - The future of team-based management in public funds will depend on the establishment of a supportive culture and governance framework that encourages collaboration and effective resource allocation [7].

Group 1 - The public fund industry is experiencing a trend of "de-starring," with notable fund managers like Bao Wuke leaving their positions, indicating a shift from the previous "talent promotion" culture [2][6] - As of May 19, 141 fund managers have left their positions this year, surpassing the number from the same period last year, with a total of 361 departures in 2024, marking a 15% increase from 2023 [7] - Regulatory changes encouraging team-based management among fund managers are contributing to this trend, promoting transparency and strategy sharing within teams [6][8] Group 2 - Bao Wuke, a prominent fund manager with 17 years of experience, has officially left Invesco Great Wall Fund, managing assets totaling 16.207 billion yuan, and is recognized for his strong performance [3][5] - The departure of Bao Wuke has raised questions about the future performance of the funds he managed, with his successors now overseeing a total of 10 funds, reflecting a talent shortage in the industry [5][6] - Recent regulatory reforms have increased performance assessment pressures on fund managers, with a focus on long-term performance metrics, leading to a sense of uncertainty among active equity fund managers [7][8]