更多资料加入知识星球:水木调研纪要 关注公众号:水木纪要 2026:资本市场有哪些"预期差"值得重视?20260104 线 澳门赌场 澳门娱乐平台登录 » 大发 | 店民对俄可预期较低但逐步试水的心情 » | 亚洲 » | 亚洲 » | 亚洲 » | 亚洲 » | 亚洲 » | 亚 斯 | 维持,预计呈现震荡上行态势,主题轮动较换,关注机器人、核电等细分 领域。 童 匆 Q&A 节日期间全球地缘政治和国内政策信号对市场的影响如何? 节日期间,全球地缘政治出现了明显波动,特别是美国强行控制委内瑞拉总统马 杜罗以及伊朗国内的抗议事件。这些事件短期内可能会对"东升西降"的趋势产 生犹动,但从中期来看,对中国和俄罗斯在南美的地缘布局是利好的。委内瑞拉 政权虽然经济状况不佳,但对国内军队和反对派的控制力较强,因此即使马杜罗 被抓捕,其政权依然稳固。特朗普政府采取行动多为选举利益,不愿承担长期成 本,因此其政策往往虎头蛇尾,不会对全球原油价格产生重大影响。 国内方面, 新年贺词和《求是》杂志上的地产政策文章传递了重要信号。今年的新年贺词背 景从以往的库房变为万里长城,强调大国实力和科技突破,而非民生问题。这表 明政策更加 ...

来源：李迅雷金融与投资 引 言 东风浩荡满眼春。2025年，A股市场走出三年调整后的复苏行情，沪指从年内低位起步，一度在下半年冲破4000点大关，全年涨幅约18.41%，而科创板与 创业板指涨幅更是分别录得46.30%、49.57%。这轮复苏行情的独特之处在于：推动估值重估的不是盈利改善或流动性泛滥，而是国家制度层面风险偏好 的深刻变化。 2026年是美国中期选举的关键年份。根据2025年末的多项民调，特朗普政府的支持率已跌至36%-41%的"危险区间"，多数民众对生活成本和物价的容忍度 已达极限。基于中期选举压力，特朗普的核心动机或将从"治国"转向"政治自救"。 25年伊始，我们关于资本市场的"铁与火之歌"的十大猜想中，亦大部分得到了验证。如，黄金的大级别趋势将进一步强化；"铁"（红利/建筑/银行）： 银 行板块PB修复显著，化债驱动建筑蓝筹估值重构；"火"（硬科技/AI）： 科技板块成为全年核心引擎，尤其是AI硬件和机器人产业链。 那么，展望2026年，骏马扬蹄，东风正劲，资本市场仍或将有哪些"预期差"？基于政策逻辑演绎及市场博弈分析，放开脑洞，本文尝试进行猜想。 猜想一——中美关系： 特朗普"政治自救" ...

东风浩荡满眼春。2025年，A股市场走出三年调整后的复苏行情,沪指从年内低位起步,一度在下半年冲破4000点大关,全年涨幅约18.41%，而科创板与创业 板指涨幅更是分别录得46.30%、49.57%。这轮复苏行情的独特之处在于：推动估值重估的不是盈利改善或流动性泛滥,而是国家制度层面风险偏好的深刻 变化。 那么，展望2026年，骏马扬蹄，东风正劲，资本市场仍或将有哪些"预期差"？基于政策逻辑演绎及市场博弈分析，放开脑洞，本文尝试进行猜想。 猜想一——中美关系： 特朗普"政治自救"或加大"东升西降"趋势，注意两个缓和窗口 2026年是美国中期选举的关键年份。根据2025年末的多项民调，特朗普政府的支持率已跌至36%-41%的"危险区间"，多数民众对生活成本和物价的容忍度 已达极限。基于中期选举压力，特朗普的核心动机或将从"治国"转向"政治自救"。 为了稳住基本盘，特朗普将采取一种极致的"反秩序化"策略。对内，他可能通过制造移民、族裔及福利制度的激进话题来煽动社会对立，将内部矛盾引向 特定群体；对外，他将频繁动用关税工具，并对乌克兰、欧洲甚至拉美施加极限压力。这种策略短期内能凝聚其忠诚度极高的基本盘，但代价是美 ...

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is expected to continue its recovery in 2026, driven by changes in risk appetite at the institutional level rather than just profit improvements or liquidity increases [1] Group 1: Market Recovery and Trends - The A-share market experienced a recovery in 2025, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising approximately 18.41%, while the STAR Market and ChiNext recorded gains of 46.30% and 49.57% respectively [1] - The recovery is characterized by a significant change in risk appetite at the institutional level, which is seen as a fundamental driver of valuation reassessment [1] Group 2: U.S.-China Relations - The political dynamics in the U.S., particularly under Trump's administration, may exacerbate the "East rises, West declines" narrative, with potential for two key windows of easing in U.S.-China relations [2][3] - The first window could occur with high-level visits early in the year, while the second may arise as the midterm elections approach, necessitating compromises in trade [6] Group 3: Federal Reserve's Monetary Policy - The nomination of a new Federal Reserve Chair in May 2026 is anticipated to be a pivotal moment for market liquidity and policy direction [7][8] - The first phase of the nomination process may lead to speculation about aggressive rate cuts, impacting risk assets positively [11] Group 4: Fiscal and Monetary Policy - Fiscal policy in 2026 may see a marginal increase in deficit rates, but the focus will shift towards targeted investments rather than broad-based infrastructure spending [12][13] - Monetary policy is expected to face dual constraints, balancing liquidity needs with maintaining a strong RMB to uphold national credit asset pricing [13] Group 5: Capital Market Management - A-shares are likely to benefit from capital market policies aimed at managing expectations, with a focus on long-term funds supporting the market [14][15] - The tightening of IPO approvals and regulations on share reductions will create a "healthy" slow bull market framework [16] Group 6: Global Technology Trends - The global technology sector, particularly AI, is expected to continue its upward trajectory, but with increased volatility and a shift towards application-based investments [20][21] - The Nasdaq 100 index is projected to maintain an upward trend, but with significant fluctuations influenced by U.S. political dynamics [25] Group 7: Domestic Technology Developments - The investment logic in AI is shifting from foundational computing power to application deployment, with a focus on domestic sectors that can match U.S. advancements [26][27] - Key areas of growth include humanoid robots, innovative pharmaceuticals, and upstream materials, driven by domestic supply chain advantages [28] Group 8: Gold and Commodities - Gold prices are expected to rise due to geopolitical risks and declining monetary credibility, with a focus on strategic resources like copper and other metals [34][37] - The demand for commodities will be driven by supply constraints and strategic needs, particularly in the context of global supply chain restructuring [37] Group 9: New Consumption Trends - The demographic shift towards lower birth rates and an increase in single-person households is reshaping consumption patterns, emphasizing emotional value over traditional family-oriented spending [38][39] - New consumption categories, such as pet-related products and AI companions, are anticipated to see significant growth as consumer preferences evolve [39]

（转载请注明出处：微信公众号 lixunlei0722 ） 引 言 东风浩荡满眼春。2025年，A股市场走出三年调整后的复苏行情,沪指从年内低位起步,一度在下半年冲破 4000点大关,全年涨幅约18.41%，而科创板与创业板指涨幅更是分别录得46.30%、49.57%。这轮复苏行 情的独特之处在于：推动估值重估的不是盈利改善或流动性泛滥,而是国家制度层面风险偏好的深刻变化。 25年伊始，我们关于资本市场的"铁与火之歌"的十大猜想中，亦大部分得到了验证。如，黄金的大级别趋 势将进一步强化；"铁"（红利/建筑/银行）： 银行板块PB修复显著，化债驱动建筑蓝筹估值重 构；"火"（硬科技/AI）： 科技板块成为全年核心引擎，尤其是AI硬件和机器人产业链。 那么，展望2026年，骏马扬蹄，东风正劲，资本市场仍或将有哪些"预期差"？基于政策逻辑演绎及市场博 弈分析，放开脑洞，本文尝试进行猜想。 猜想一——中美关系： 特朗普"政治自救"或加大"东升西降"趋势，注意两个缓和窗口 2026年是美国中期选举的关键年份。根据2025年末的多项民调，特朗普政府的支持率已跌至36%-41% 的"危险区间"，多数民众对生活成本和物价的容 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of continuous research iteration to approach the truth, highlighting that growth comes from persistent denial and reconstruction [2][26]. Group 1: Research Framework and Goals - The team is undergoing a comprehensive upgrade in 2025, focusing on restructuring the research framework and systematically displaying research outcomes [2]. - The guiding principle is to provide valuable independent research results that are grounded in reality and actionable [2]. Group 2: Economic Insights - The article discusses the shift in the economic "three drivers" from manufacturing to services, indicating that as GDP per capita reaches $10,000 to $30,000 and urbanization hits 70%, service sector demand will accelerate [28]. - It notes that new consumption policies emphasize long-term strategies for domestic demand expansion rather than short-term stimuli, while also providing support for manufacturing to counter tariff impacts [29]. - The concept of "anti-involution" is presented as a new phase of supply-side structural reform, with increased government and industry focus, broader coverage, and stronger coordination among policies and market mechanisms [31]. Group 3: Global Economic Trends - The article highlights that the biggest expectation gap in the global macroeconomic landscape for the first half of 2025 is the disproof of the "American exceptionalism" narrative [21]. - It mentions that the focus of tariffs may shift towards validating economic data, with potential concerns about recession if the U.S. unemployment rate rises to 4.6% [21]. - The impact of geopolitical risks, particularly since the Russia-Ukraine conflict, is noted as a significant factor in global macroeconomic conditions and asset pricing [23].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of continuous research iteration to approach the truth, highlighting that growth comes from persistent denial and reconstruction in research [2][26]. Group 1: Research Framework and Goals - The team is undergoing a comprehensive upgrade in 2025, focusing on restructuring the research framework and systematically displaying research outcomes [2]. - The guiding principle is to provide valuable independent research results that are grounded in reality and actionable [2]. Group 2: Economic Insights - The article discusses the shift in the economic "three drivers" from manufacturing to services, indicating that as GDP per capita reaches $10,000 to $30,000 and urbanization hits 70%, service sector demand will accelerate [28]. - It notes that new consumption policies emphasize long-term strategies for domestic demand expansion rather than short-term stimuli, while also providing support for manufacturing to counter tariff impacts [29]. Group 3: Structural Reforms - The concept of "anti-involution" is presented as a new phase of supply-side structural reform, which is gaining more attention from both the government and industry, with a broader scope and stronger coordination [31].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of continuous research and iteration in approaching the truth, highlighting the commitment to independent and valuable research outcomes in the evolving landscape of 2025 [2][26]. Group 1: Research Framework and Goals - The team is undergoing a comprehensive upgrade in 2025, focusing on restructuring the research framework and systematically presenting research results [2]. - The guiding principle is "research with reason, grounded in reality," aiming to provide genuinely valuable independent research [2]. Group 2: Economic Insights - The article discusses the shift in the economic "three drivers" from manufacturing to services, indicating that as GDP per capita reaches $10,000 to $30,000 and urbanization hits 70%, service demand will accelerate [28]. - It notes that new consumption policies emphasize long-term strategies for domestic demand expansion rather than short-term stimuli, with ongoing support for manufacturing to counter tariff impacts [29]. Group 3: Structural Reforms - The concept of "anti-involution" is presented as a new phase of supply-side structural reform, with increased government and industry focus, broader coverage, and stronger coordination among policies and market mechanisms [31].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the global landscape is changing, and there are four main lines to grasp these changes: international currency, asset prices, modern industries, and trade markets, all closely related to the rise of Asia represented by China [1] - The capital market changes are characterized by the rise of A-shares and Hong Kong stocks, driven by the "four bulls" which include capital inflow, technological innovation, institutional reform, and consumption upgrade [1]

Core Insights - The recent revision of the U.S. non-farm payroll data, which erased 910,000 jobs, indicates potential manipulation, suggesting that half of the 1.8 million jobs added last year may have been fabricated [2][4] - Employment and the Consumer Price Index (CPI) are identified as the two most critical indicators of the U.S. economy, with the recent data revision raising concerns about a possible recession [4][11] - Historical patterns show that the U.S. often engages in global interventions during economic downturns, with past examples including military actions and financial crises [5][7] Economic Indicators - The non-farm payroll data is crucial as it reflects the ability of Americans to consume, which is foundational to the U.S. economy [4] - The recent downward revision of employment data suggests a significant deterioration in economic conditions, potentially leading to a recession [2][4] Federal Reserve Actions - The upcoming Federal Reserve meeting on September 17 is anticipated to result in interest rate cuts, a common response to signs of recession [4][8] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary's call for the Fed to include long-term interest rates in its responsibilities indicates a shift towards Yield Curve Control (YCC) to manage national debt interest payments [8][10] Global Implications - The potential for the U.S. to print an additional $4 trillion to purchase government bonds could lead to a significant increase in global liquidity, impacting international markets [8][10] - The relationship between U.S. economic policies and Japan's financial strategies is highlighted, suggesting that Japan may be pressured to buy U.S. debt following recent agreements [10] Market Reactions - The revision of employment data and anticipated Fed actions have contributed to a surge in international gold prices, reflecting investor concerns over U.S. economic stability [8][10] - The potential for a "stagflation" scenario in the U.S. could open up opportunities for other markets, particularly in real estate and monetary policy adjustments in China [11][13]