2月6日，中国机电商会发布关于欧盟对中国风电企业启动《外国补贴条例》深度调查的声明。 该商会指出，其注意到，欧盟委员会近期依据欧盟《外国补贴条例》对一家中国风电企业启动深度调 查，这是继去年12月欧方对一家中国安检设备企业发起深度调查后又一起调查。中国机电商会对此表示 强烈关切和反对。 自该条例实施以来，中国企业频繁遭遇调查，欧方在调查中存在补贴范围宽泛、认定标准模糊、举证责 任倒置、程序缺乏正当性及透明度严重不足等问题。欧方歧视性做法已严重损害中国企业在欧正常经营 与合法权益，严重影响中国企业赴欧投资信心，阻碍欧方绿色产业转型及中欧产业合作，也不利于欧盟 整体利益。 中国机电商会强烈呼吁欧方秉持客观、公正立场，慎用单边调查工具，为中国企业在欧经营提供非歧 视、可预期的营商环境，共同促进中欧产业共融互通，实现全球绿色可持续发展目标。 中国风电等绿色产业企业凭借持续的技术创新、完备的产业链供应链，以及贴合欧洲市场和消费者需求 的产品拓展欧洲市场，对欧洲绿色转型及应对全球气候变化做出了重要贡献。中欧在绿色能源与数字基 础设施建设领域合作潜力巨大。 ...

欧方相关调查泛化"外国补贴"，存在立案证据不足、程序不透明等诸多问题，是典型的以"公平竞 争"之名行"保护主义"之实。2025年1月，商务部经调查，已依法认定欧方相关做法构成贸易投资壁垒。 欧方不仅没有纠正，反而在错误的道路上越走越远。 2月4日，商务部新闻发言人就欧委会对中国风电企业启动《外国补贴条例》深入调查答记者问。 中国风电等绿色产业企业依靠持续的技术创新、完善的产业体系和充分的市场竞争，为全球应对气 候变化提供优质绿色产品，作出积极贡献。欧方滥用调查，不仅严重干扰中欧产业互利合作，影响中国 企业赴欧投资的信心，还将迟滞自身乃至全球绿色转型的进程。 有记者问：近日，欧委会宣布，根据《外国补贴条例》（FSR），对中国风电企业启动深入调查。 请问中方对此有何评论？ 中方一贯主张通过对话协商解决分歧，反对将经贸问题政治化、泛安全化。我们敦促欧方立即纠正 错误做法，慎用FSR单边调查工具，为中欧合作创造公平、公正、可预期的市场环境。中方将密切关注 后续进展，并采取必要措施坚决维护中国企业正当权益。 答：中方注意到有关情况。近期，欧方频繁使用《外国补贴条例》调查工具对中国企业发起调查， 还将对风电、安检设备企业 ...

商务部新闻发言人就欧委会对中国风电企业启动《外国补贴条例》深入调查答记者问 有记者问：近日，欧委会宣布，根据《外国补贴条例》（FSR），对中国风电企业启动深入调查。请问中 方对此有何评论？ 答：中方注意到有关情况。近期，欧方频繁使用《外国补贴条例》调查工具对中国企业发起调查，还将对 风电、安检设备企业的调查升级为深入调查，具有明显针对性和歧视性，中方对此高度关切，强烈不满。 欧方相关调查泛化"外国补贴"，存在立案证据不足、程序不透明等诸多问题，是典型的以"公平竞争"之名 行"保护主义"之实。2025年1月，商务部经调查，已依法认定欧方相关做法构成贸易投资壁垒。欧方不仅 没有纠正，反而在错误的道路上越走越远。 看券商中国 知天下财经 F 来源：商务部 责编：刘珺宇 校对：冉燕青 百万用户都在看 午后突发，20%涨停！马斯克，突传重磅消息！ 利好来了！多只A股，突发公告！ AI，突传重磅！四大巨头，同时出手！ 直线拉升！光刻机巨头，传来重磅利好！AI，再度引爆！ 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 券中社 × 券商中国 券 中 社 扫码下载券中社APP 扫码关注券商 ...

中国风电等绿色产业企业依靠持续的技术创新、完善的产业体系和充分的市场竞争，为全球应对气候变 化提供优质绿色产品，作出积极贡献。欧方滥用调查，不仅严重干扰中欧产业互利合作，影响中国企业 赴欧投资的信心，还将迟滞自身乃至全球绿色转型的进程。 商务部网站4日消息，商务部新闻发言人就欧委会对中国风电企业启动《外国补贴条例》深入调查答记 者问。 中方一贯主张通过对话协商解决分歧，反对将经贸问题政治化、泛安全化。我们敦促欧方立即纠正错误 做法，慎用FSR单边调查工具，为中欧合作创造公平、公正、可预期的市场环境。中方将密切关注后续 进展，并采取必要措施坚决维护中国企业正当权益。 有记者问：近日，欧委会宣布，根据《外国补贴条例》（FSR），对中国风电企业启动深入调查。请问 中方对此有何评论？ 答：中方注意到有关情况。近期，欧方频繁使用《外国补贴条例》调查工具对中国企业发起调查，还将 对风电、安检设备企业的调查升级为深入调查，具有明显针对性和歧视性，中方对此高度关切，强烈不 满。 欧方相关调查泛化"外国补贴"，存在立案证据不足、程序不透明等诸多问题，是典型的以"公平竞争"之 名行"保护主义"之实。2025年1月，商务部经调查， ...

中国风电等绿色产业企业依靠持续的技术创新、完善的产业体系和充分的市场竞争，为全球应对气候变 化提供优质绿色产品，作出积极贡献。欧方滥用调查，不仅严重干扰中欧产业互利合作，影响中国企业 赴欧投资的信心，还将迟滞自身乃至全球绿色转型的进程。 答：中方注意到有关情况。近期，欧方频繁使用《外国补贴条例》调查工具对中国企业发起调查，还将 对风电、安检设备企业的调查升级为深入调查，具有明显针对性和歧视性，中方对此高度关切，强烈不 满。 欧方相关调查泛化"外国补贴"，存在立案证据不足、程序不透明等诸多问题，是典型的以"公平竞 争"之名行"保护主义"之实。2025年1月，商务部经调查，已依法认定欧方相关做法构成贸易投资壁 垒。欧方不仅没有纠正，反而在错误的道路上越走越远。 2月4日，据商务部网站， 商务部新闻发言人就欧委会对中国风电企业启动《外国补贴条例》深入调查 答记者问。 有记者问：近日，欧委会宣布，根据《外国补贴条例》（FSR），对中国风电企业启动深入调查。请问 中方对此有何评论？ 编辑丨瑜见 中方一贯主张通过对话协商解决分歧，反对将经贸问题政治化、泛安全化。我们敦促欧方立即纠正错误 做法，慎用FSR单边调查工具，为中 ...

中方一贯主张通过对话协商解决分歧，反对将经贸问题政治化、泛安全化。我们敦促欧方立即纠正错误 做法，慎用FSR单边调查工具，为中欧合作创造公平、公正、可预期的市场环境。中方将密切关注后续 进展，并采取必要措施坚决维护中国企业正当权益。 答：中方注意到有关情况。近期，欧方频繁使用《外国补贴条例》调查工具对中国企业发起调查，还将 对风电、安检设备企业的调查升级为深入调查，具有明显针对性和歧视性，中方对此高度关切，强烈不 满。 欧方相关调查泛化"外国补贴"，存在立案证据不足、程序不透明等诸多问题，是典型的以"公平竞争"之 名行"保护主义"之实。2025年1月，商务部经调查，已依法认定欧方相关做法构成贸易投资壁垒。欧方 不仅没有纠正，反而在错误的道路上越走越远。 中国风电等绿色产业企业依靠持续的技术创新、完善的产业体系和充分的市场竞争，为全球应对气候变 化提供优质绿色产品，作出积极贡献。欧方滥用调查，不仅严重干扰中欧产业互利合作，影响中国企业 赴欧投资的信心，还将迟滞自身乃至全球绿色转型的进程。 央视网消息：据商务部网站消息，2月4日，商务部新闻发言人就欧委会对中国风电企业启动《外国补贴 条例》深入调查答记者问。 有记 ...

Group 1 - The proposed merger between Anglo American and Teck Resources has been submitted to the EU for antitrust review, indicating that the EU does not foresee significant competition issues with the merger [1] - The European Commission is expected to make a decision on the antitrust matters by February 10, while Canada has already approved the transaction [1] - The European Commission is also evaluating the merger under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation, aimed at preventing unfair competition from non-EU companies receiving government subsidies, with a decision due on February 3 [1] Group 2 - The merger was announced in September of last year, aiming to create the fifth-largest copper company globally and marking the second-largest merger in mining history [1]

Group 1 - The European Union (EU) has decided to impose a fixed tariff of 3 euros on all small packages imported directly from non-EU countries with a declared value below 150 euros, effective from July 1, 2026, paving the way for a permanent tariff arrangement [1][3][5] - This temporary measure is aimed primarily at Chinese platforms that rely on low-value direct mail, indicating a significant shift towards regular customs duties and increased regulatory scrutiny [3][5][12] - The EU received 4.6 billion low-value packages in 2024, with approximately 90% originating from China, highlighting the growing gap between regulatory capabilities and the volume of small packages [5][7] Group 2 - Recent enforcement actions include unannounced inspections of Temu's European headquarters in Dublin and investigations into Nuctech under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, indicating a tightening regulatory environment for Chinese companies operating in Europe [3][7][12] - French President Macron has emphasized the need for stronger tools, including tariffs, to address the trade imbalance with China, reflecting a broader sentiment among EU member states regarding consumer protection and fair competition [8][10][12] - The EU's regulatory framework is evolving, with potential implications for compliance costs and operational transparency for platforms and supply chains, as the focus shifts from low-cost advantages to higher compliance requirements [13][15][19] Group 3 - The EU's approach may lead to a "political bargaining" scenario where platforms can negotiate compliance measures in exchange for regulatory predictability, while also addressing external competitive pressures [15][16] - If tariffs and enforcement actions expand to more product categories, European consumers may face price increases, and Chinese companies could experience tighter supply chain constraints, accelerating geographical reallocation of orders and investments [19][21] - The relationship between China and the EU may experience short-term friction, particularly in e-commerce and technology sectors, but the long-term trajectory will depend on the implementation of temporary tariffs and the handling of subsidy cases [21]

Core Viewpoint - The EU Chamber of Commerce in China strongly opposes the recent intensive investigations by the EU into alleged subsidies for Chinese enterprises, calling for an immediate halt to discriminatory and arbitrary enforcement actions against Chinese companies [1][2]. Group 1: Investigations and Regulations - The EU has launched a series of deep investigations and "dawn raids" on Chinese state-controlled enterprises under its Foreign Subsidies Regulation, which the EU Chamber claims is a misuse of regulatory tools targeting Chinese firms [1]. - The definition of "foreign subsidies" under the EU's regulation is criticized for being overly vague and broad, potentially exceeding reasonable bounds of current international trade and subsidy rules [1]. Group 2: Impact on Chinese Enterprises - Since the implementation of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, most investigations initiated by the EU have targeted Chinese enterprises, leading to several companies being forced to withdraw from EU public procurement projects [1]. - A survey conducted by the EU Chamber among 205 Chinese enterprises and institutions revealed that 63% reported their business being affected by the EU's regulation, including direct impacts, loss of business opportunities, or operational risks due to potential investigations [2]. - Additionally, 51% of the surveyed enterprises believe that the regulation has indirectly harmed their commercial reputation and market image [2]. Group 3: Call for Fair Practices - The EU Chamber urges the EU to exercise caution in using the investigative powers granted by the Foreign Subsidies Regulation and to stop discriminatory and unfounded enforcement actions against Chinese enterprises [2]. - There is a call for the EU to reduce compliance burdens on companies and to provide a fair, just, and transparent business environment for foreign investors, promoting healthy and stable development of Sino-European investment and trade relations [2].

Core Points - The EU Chamber of Commerce in China expressed deep concern over the EU's investigation into alleged subsidies for Chinese companies, emphasizing that the EU's Foreign Subsidies Regulation should not become a tool for protectionism or exclusion from procurement [1][2] - The EU announced an investigation into CRRC Tangshan's alleged subsidies related to the bidding for the Lisbon light rail project, which the EU Chamber opposes [1] - The Chamber highlighted that the EU's regulation grants excessive discretionary power to the EU, leading to significant compliance burdens for non-EU companies, particularly Chinese firms [1] - There are concerns that the regulation creates substantial market access barriers in public procurement, potentially distorting fair competition [1] - Feedback from Chinese companies indicates they face disproportionate, discriminatory, and non-transparent treatment in investigations related to the EU's regulation, which could send negative signals to international investors [1] Summary by Sections - **Concerns Over EU Regulation**: The EU Chamber urges the EU to implement the Foreign Subsidies Regulation in an objective, fair, and non-discriminatory manner to avoid it being used as a unilateral tool for protectionism [2] - **Chinese Companies' Competitiveness**: The statement asserts that Chinese companies have demonstrated strong competitiveness, compliance awareness, and commitment to sustainable development in Europe, advocating for openness and cooperation as the path to mutually beneficial Sino-European trade relations [2]