Core Points - The Chinese Ambassador to the U.S., Xie Feng, emphasized the importance of maintaining a baseline of no conflict and no confrontation between China and the U.S. to enhance global stability [1][3] - Xie highlighted the historical roles of both nations as major contributors to World War II victory and as key architects of the post-war international order, urging for strengthened communication and cooperation for mutual benefit and global peace [3] Group 1 - Xie Feng stated that both countries should deepen their interests integration and act as partners for mutual success [3] - He called for the management of differences and conflicts to maintain peace and stability [3] - The ambassador stressed the need to respect each other's core interests and major concerns, particularly regarding the Taiwan issue, which he described as the political foundation of U.S.-China relations [3] Group 2 - Xie pointed out that trade wars and tariff battles yield no winners and that artificial decoupling disrupts the world, ultimately harming both nations [3] - He noted that recent progress in U.S.-China economic and trade talks indicates that equal negotiation is the correct path to resolving issues [3] - The event was attended by over 700 representatives from various sectors, including U.S. government officials and international diplomats, highlighting the significance of U.S.-China relations [4]

Group 1 - The 12th Beijing Xiangshan Forum concluded with a theme of "jointly safeguarding international order and promoting peaceful development," coinciding with the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War [1][2] - The forum served as a platform for dialogue on historical lessons and contemporary issues, emphasizing China's significant contributions to the global anti-fascist struggle during World War II [1][2] - Scholars highlighted the importance of global cooperation and dialogue to maintain peace, reflecting on the failures of early alliances during World War II that allowed fascism to thrive [2][3] Group 2 - The forum addressed current global conflicts, including those in Europe, the Middle East, and East Asia, underscoring the ongoing threats of terrorism and militarism [3][4] - The event showcased China's role in facilitating dialogue and conflict resolution, with examples such as the ASEAN scholar's reference to the quick resolution of the Thai-Cambodian conflict through dialogue [5] - Discussions included the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with experts debating the implications of military actions and the need for peaceful resolutions [5][6] Group 3 - Chinese scholars proposed that possessing military strength should be aligned with the pursuit of lasting peace, referencing the strategic wisdom of former Israeli Prime Minister Rabin [6] - The concept of "strong but not hegemonic" was emphasized, with a focus on transforming adversaries into partners rather than engaging in conflict [6][7] - The Chinese military's role as a stabilizing force for peace was highlighted, with a commitment to cooperation and dialogue rather than revenge or confrontation [7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the meetings held in Madrid emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and equal consultation between China and the U.S. to enhance consensus and promote win-win outcomes in economic and trade relations [1] - The discussions resulted in a basic framework consensus on addressing the TikTok issue through cooperative means, reducing investment barriers, and promoting economic cooperation [1][2] - Both parties recognized the significance of a stable China-U.S. economic relationship for both nations and its critical impact on global economic stability and development [1] Group 2 - The TikTok issue was a key topic, with both sides agreeing to resolve it through methods that respect corporate intentions and market rules, such as operational delegation of user data and content security [2] - China maintains a constructive and responsible attitude, emphasizing that any agreements should not compromise principles, corporate interests, or international fairness [2] - The U.S. is urged to provide an open, fair, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese companies, including TikTok, in line with the consensus reached [2] Group 3 - Concerns were raised regarding the U.S. unilateral trade restrictions and the expansion of sanctions against Chinese entities, which are viewed as violations of international law and norms [3] - The importance of continuing equal dialogue and seeking mutual cooperation to bridge differences and resolve issues was highlighted [3] - Both parties are encouraged to implement the important consensus reached by their leaders and previous economic discussions to foster a healthy, stable, and sustainable China-U.S. economic relationship [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the meetings held in Madrid emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and equal consultation between China and the U.S. to enhance consensus and promote win-win outcomes in economic and trade relations [1][2] - The discussions resulted in a basic framework consensus on addressing the TikTok issue through cooperative means, reducing investment barriers, and promoting economic cooperation [1][2] - Both parties recognized the significance of a stable China-U.S. economic relationship for both nations and its critical impact on global economic stability and development [1][2] Group 2 - The TikTok issue was a key focus of the talks, with both sides agreeing on a collaborative approach to resolve related concerns, highlighting that pressure tactics are not effective [2] - China maintains a constructive and responsible attitude, emphasizing the need for an open, fair, and non-discriminatory business environment for Chinese companies operating in the U.S. [2] - The meetings underscored the importance of continued communication and mutual efforts to foster a healthy and stable economic relationship between China and the U.S. [3]