中国驻美大使：中美要恪守不冲突不对抗底线，为世界增添稳定性 中新社华盛顿9月30日电 (记者 陈孟统)中国驻美大使谢锋29日在华盛顿表示，中美合，世界安；中美 斗，世界忧。双方要恪守不冲突不对抗的底线，为本已动荡的世界增添稳定性。 中国驻美国大使馆29日举行庆祝中华人民共和国成立76周年招待会。谢锋在致辞时作上述表示。 当地时间9月29日，华盛顿，中国驻美国大使馆举行庆祝中华人民共和国成立76周年招待会。图为 中国驻美大使谢锋致辞。中新社记者 陈孟统 摄 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 谢锋称，事实证明，关税战、贸易战没有赢家，人为脱钩断链扰乱世界，只会损人害己。两国经贸会谈 取得积极进展表明，平等协商才是解决问题正确之道。 当晚，美国务院、白宫国安会、商务部等部门代表，华盛顿特区、马里兰州政府代表，世界银行行长彭 安杰、伊利诺伊州联邦众议员杰克逊、各界友好人士、外国驻美使节等700多人出席。(完) 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：董文博 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容， ...

王晓秋表示，构建产业生态当持续深化合作。他以上汽集团为例：近年来上汽集团一方面推动合资品牌 加快焕新升级，另一方面则与跨界企业联手共建产业生态。 合资品牌方面，去年上汽与大众汽车已将上汽大众延长合作协议至2040年，未来五年，将面向中国市场 开发近20余款的全新产品；上汽与奥迪共同打造全新整车平台和全新的奥迪电动架构；上汽与通用汽车 形成一致的战略合作方向，未来三年将联合开发近十款纯电混动产品。 【文/观察者网 潘昱辰 编辑/高莘】9月27日，在2025年世界新能源汽车大会上，上汽集团董事长王晓秋 在"NEV50@2035：多元路径与协同发展"论坛上发言时表示，新能源汽车的多元化发展，既是路径的多 元化也是全球市场的多元化。在此过程中，行业也面临着诸如贸易政策壁垒，标准法规差异，供应链韧 性不足，基础设施不均衡等风险挑战。对此他提出三点建议：一是坚持开放合作，反对"脱钩断链"；二 是坚定绿色理念，共担社会责任；三是加强产业协同，优化创新生态。 上汽集团董事长王晓秋 2025世界新能源汽车大会 王晓秋表示，汽车产业是高度全球化的产业，应当共同维护多边贸易体系，消除贸易壁垒，推动形成公 平透明的国际市场环境。他强 ...

更重要的是，中国持续深化改革开放，不断提升营商环境市场化、法治化、国际化水平，从缩减外资准 入负面清单到落实《中华人民共和国外商投资法》，一系列扎实举措让外资企业信心倍增，更愿长远布 局。报告显示，71%的受访企业在2024年实现盈利。48%的企业认为中国市场监管环境透明度较高，较 去年大幅提升13个百分点；41%的企业对中国进一步开放市场充满信心。 事实上，不仅是在华美企，美国本土企业也越来越质疑美加征关税政策。他们清醒认识到，加征关税的 成本最终由美国企业和消费者承担，不仅削弱其产品竞争力，更导致供应链额外成本上升。以汽车行业 为例，2025年二季度，福特、通用和斯泰兰蒂斯因关税损失合计22.5亿美元，全年预计损失将达70亿美 元。利益受损的现实，促使更多企业呼吁取消不合理关税，正因为其违背市场规律、损害商业本质，是 保护主义短视之举。 上海美国商会9月中旬发布报告显示，尽管近年美国政府对华加征关税并推动所谓"供应链回流"，但绝 大多数在华美企仍选择深耕中国市场，这场单方面发起的贸易战并未触发大规模企业回流。这一客观事 实，无疑是对"脱钩断链"论调的有力反驳，凸显出中国市场在全球经济格局中不可替代的战略价 ...

Group 1 - The core focus of the negotiations is to reach a comprehensive agreement, indicating both parties' willingness to stabilize trade relations [5][7] - U.S. Treasury Secretary Becerra mentioned that the U.S. and China are very close to resolving the TikTok issue, suggesting significant progress in trade agreement details [3][5] - The discussions included general talks on "trade imbalance," but no solutions were found, reflecting ongoing tensions regarding trade deficits [3][7] Group 2 - China's proposal of a "very aggressive request" during the talks indicates a shift in confidence and strategic initiative from the Chinese side [7] - The outcome of these negotiations is crucial as it may influence the potential for a direct meeting between top leaders during the upcoming APEC summit [7][8] - The timing of the negotiations coinciding with the Federal Reserve's interest rate decision highlights the interconnectedness of trade negotiations and monetary policy [8]

Group 1 - The spokesperson of the Taiwan Affairs Office criticized the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for ignoring the economic struggles of local businesses affected by tariffs and exchange rates while promoting the narrative of "mainland economic collapse" [1] - The DPP's predictions about the mainland's economic downturn have consistently proven false, with the mainland's economic indicators showing positive growth, including a GDP increase of 5.3% year-on-year in the first half of the year [1] - Key economic indicators for the mainland include a 6.3% year-on-year increase in industrial added value from January to July, a 4.8% increase in retail sales, a 1.6% increase in fixed asset investment, and a 3.5% increase in foreign trade [1] Group 2 - The Taiwan Industrial Association's "2025 White Paper" reflects concerns from the Taiwanese business community regarding the current cross-strait situation and questions the DPP's policies [2] - The DPP's policies are seen as detrimental to local industries, with many facing survival challenges due to increased tariffs from the U.S., while the mainland market presents opportunities for recovery and growth [2] - The DPP's approach of creating a "non-red supply chain" and aligning closely with the U.S. is criticized for neglecting market economic principles and harming local businesses [2] Group 3 - The DPP's opposition to the use of mainland-made products, such as robotic dogs for patrols, is viewed as a hindrance to market order and consumer welfare, driven by self-interest rather than public benefit [3] - The DPP's intimidation of Taiwanese artists who engage with the mainland is seen as an attempt to suppress their voices and reflects the party's fear of cross-strait exchanges [3] - The willingness of Taiwanese performers to develop their careers in the mainland is highlighted as a sign of their recognition of shared identity and opposition to separatism, with a call for the DPP to reflect on its policies [3]

Group 1: Trade Relations and Tariffs - The U.S. has extended the tariff exemption period for certain Chinese goods until November 29, indicating a willingness to negotiate and showing its economic dependence on China [3][5] - The U.S. is not able to effectively pressure China in the trade war, as evidenced by the latest concessions made by the U.S. in the ongoing negotiations [4][5] - The U.S. imports approximately $500 billion worth of goods from China, highlighting the deep-rooted economic ties between the two countries [12] Group 2: Strategic Concerns and Industry Impact - The U.S. semiconductor industry has expressed concerns that restrictions on Chinese rare earth exports could lead to a loss of $300 billion in revenue, showcasing the industry's reliance on Chinese materials [8] - The U.S. government's mixed signals in negotiations reflect a strategic anxiety, as it seeks to balance pressure tactics with the necessity of maintaining supply chain relationships with China [6][12] - China's dominance in the rare earth market, controlling about 70% of global production and 90% of refining, poses a significant challenge for U.S. economic strategies [12] Group 3: Future Outlook - The future of U.S.-China economic relations will depend on the U.S. recognizing the interdependent nature of their economies and finding better cooperation methods [13]

Group 1 - China's rare earth exports to the US surged from 46 tons in May to 619 tons in July, indicating a significant willingness to cooperate [1][3] - In July, China's rare earth magnet exports reached 5,577 tons, a 75% increase from June, highlighting the critical role of rare earths in various industries, including defense and electric vehicles [3][12] - Despite the increase in exports, the US labeled China as a "hostile nation," escalating diplomatic tensions [5][8] Group 2 - The US has accused China of exporting "illegal e-cigarette products" and engaging in "genetic engineering," which reflects a broader strategy of public relations warfare against China [6][9] - The US has implemented discriminatory checks on Chinese students and imposed sanctions on Chinese companies under the pretext of assisting Iran, showcasing a multifaceted approach to counter China [9][10] - Historically, the US has shifted its stance on China from "constructive partnership" to "strategic competitor," indicating a long-term trend of increasing hostility [10][12] Group 3 - The US's reliance on Chinese rare earths is evident, as 80% of its rare earth demand is met through imports, making China's supply crucial for US military and technological needs [3][20] - The US's strategy appears to involve leveraging its dependence on Chinese resources while simultaneously attempting to undermine China's geopolitical influence [20][22] - China's past actions, such as implementing export controls on rare earths, have demonstrated its ability to impact global supply chains significantly [24][26] Group 4 - The current geopolitical landscape reflects a shift from globalization to a more fragmented approach, with the US seeking to reduce its dependence on China while facing challenges in replacing Chinese supply chains [32][34] - The US's strategy of "decoupling" from China may lead to significant economic costs, as alternatives to Chinese rare earths are not readily available [36][39] - China's investments in global rare earth projects and partnerships indicate a strategic move to strengthen its position in the global supply chain [41][43] Group 5 - The ongoing rare earth competition illustrates a transition in US policy from "cooperation" to "zero-sum thinking," revealing a fundamental change in its approach to international relations [45] - The future of global resource diplomacy will likely see a reconfiguration of geopolitical alliances, with countries possessing critical resources gaining leverage [45]

Core Points - The third China International Supply Chain Promotion Expo opened in Beijing on July 16, themed "Linking the World, Creating the Future" [1] - The expo is a national-level event focused on supply chains, held annually starting from 2023, with this year's event taking place in summer for the first time [1] - The exhibitors at the expo represent 75 countries, regions, and international organizations, with foreign exhibitors accounting for 35%, an increase of three percentage points from the previous year [1] - The number of U.S. participating companies increased by 15% compared to the last edition, maintaining the highest number of foreign exhibitors [1] - Despite attempts by some countries to decouple from China and politicize supply chains, the participation of numerous foreign companies in the expo indicates that decoupling is not a viable path for business development [1] Industry Insights - The expo highlights the importance of supply chains, encompassing all stages from raw materials to customer service, showcasing the interconnectedness of global trade [1] - The participation of international exhibitors reflects a continued interest in engaging with the Chinese market, countering narratives of supply chain decoupling [1] - The event serves as a platform for promoting global supply chain collaboration and innovation, reinforcing China's role in the global supply chain ecosystem [1]

新华社北京7月17日电 新华时评｜携手维护全球发展"共赢链" 面对机遇和挑战，各国企业更加期待合作共赢。当前，科技创新与产业发展共融共生，产供链长度 延伸、广度拓展，给企业发展带来无限可能。以新能源汽车产业为例，其发展大大拓宽产业链上下游领 域、催生出基于新质生产力、涵盖更多新兴产业的超长链条，并通过智能汽车零部件的规模化应用赋能 低空出行和人形机器人产业，孕育出一个聚合型智能产业，带来更多发展机遇。 当前全球产供链正处在重塑的关键节点，中国凭借供给端和需求端的双重优势以及各环节深度整合 能力，成为全球供应链"稳定锚"。经过多年发展，中国构建了规模大、体系全、竞争力较强的产业体 系，是全球唯一拥有联合国产业分类全部门类的国家，制造业增加值占全球比重近30%。不仅如此，中 国持续推动科技、金融、人才等优质要素汇聚，培育一批世界先进制造业集群，助力全球产业链供应链 高效协同发展。 中国始终坚持经济全球化正确方向，以自身发展为世界创造新机遇。一直以来，中国坚持高水平对 外开放，不仅与全球企业共同建设开放的产业链供应链，还以超大市场规模、高效的创新能力，给全球 企业投资兴业提供广阔空间和优质回报，并持续打造开放、稳定 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the U.S. has implemented a comprehensive industrial blockade against China since 2018, which is part of a historical pattern where leading nations impose restrictions on developing countries [1][2][3] - The U.S. blockade is not solely aimed at China but is a response to any rapidly developing nation that threatens the U.S. industrial dominance, following historical precedents like the U.S. blockade against the Soviet Union [2][3] - The blockade has intensified as China's development has accelerated, indicating that the U.S. perceives a significant threat to its technological and industrial leadership [3][10] Group 2 - The U.S. believes that by restricting advanced technologies, it can hinder China's overall industrial development, but this perspective is flawed as industries do not always require the most advanced technologies to thrive [6][10] - China's industrial strength lies in its comprehensive manufacturing system, which allows it to produce a wide range of products, from basic components to advanced technologies [9][11] - The U.S. blockade primarily targets high-end technologies, but China's extensive manufacturing capabilities ensure that it can still produce and innovate across various sectors [10][11] Group 3 - The U.S. GDP figures may appear strong, but a significant portion is derived from the service sector, which is dependent on a robust manufacturing base [12][14] - The manufacturing sector is considered the foundation of a nation's wealth and strength, and as China continues to develop its manufacturing capabilities, it is expected to challenge the U.S. service sector's dominance [12][14] - China's approach to development emphasizes sharing its technological advancements and infrastructure experiences with other countries, contrasting with the historical exploitative practices of Western nations [19][20] Group 4 - The current geopolitical landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for China, as the U.S. policies of decoupling and protectionism force China to develop a self-sufficient innovation system [20][21] - There is a growing consensus within China that core technologies cannot be acquired through external means, necessitating the establishment of a robust domestic technological and industrial framework [21] - China's strategy moving forward will focus on creating a larger, more stable market for innovation while promoting shared technological advancements with developing nations [21]