破解信息不对称的核心机制 《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十五个五年规划的建议》提出，"十五五"时期应"在发 展中固安全，在安全中谋发展，强化底线思维，有效防范化解各类风险，增强经济和社会韧性，以新安 全格局保障新发展格局。"在这一总体部署下，完善金融体系、优化资本市场布局、增强市场内在稳定 性和应对冲击的能力，已成为关键着力点。其中，积极引导耐心资本进入市场，被视为优化市场生态、 提升市场长期韧性和抵御系统性风险能力的重要路径。 然而，当前我国耐心资本发展远滞后于国家战略要求、科技创新步伐与市场实际需求，其根本症结 在于前沿科技领域存在难以通过传统估值模型弥合的信息不对称。因此，战略科学家作为兼具深厚学术 积淀、前沿洞察力与产业转化视野的"关键少数"，其个人信用已成为穿透信息不对称壁垒、承载科技信 用的人格化载体。深刻理解战略科学家在科技信用生成与传导中的独特作用机制，构建与之适配的赋能 体系与制度安排，不仅是立足国情破解耐心资本供给不足的创新路径，更是重塑金融支持科技创新底层 逻辑、实现"科技—金融"双向奔赴的现实选择，对建设科技强国与金融强国具有重大战略意义。 深刻理解战略科学家 在科技信用形成中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The importance of investing in problem discovery is as crucial as solving problems, emphasizing the need for a scientific community to foster innovation and collaboration in artificial intelligence [1][9][12]. Group 1: Conference Overview - The inaugural Mingzhu Lake Conference, themed "Multidimensional Breakthroughs and Collaborative Innovation in Artificial Intelligence," will take place from June 12-16, 2025, in Shanghai, attracting nearly 60 global scholars and industry leaders [1][12]. - The conference aims to establish the Xinghe Academic Community, focusing on problem discovery and fostering discussions to generate a list of key scientific questions [1][12][46]. Group 2: Historical Context of Scientific Communities - Historical examples, such as the Royal Society and the Lunar Society, illustrate the significance of scientific communities in driving innovation through collaboration and knowledge exchange [4][5]. - The ARPA Community, which contributed to the development of the internet, exemplifies how close-knit groups of researchers can lead to groundbreaking advancements [8][12]. Group 3: Key Questions in AI Development - The conference identified ten critical questions regarding the future of AI, including the balance between overall intelligence and unit intelligence, the resource paradox in deep reinforcement learning, and the relationship between agents and foundational models [7][15][17]. - These questions aim to address the challenges and opportunities in AI development over the next 3-5 years, focusing on systematization, diversification, and advancement of intelligent capabilities [15][16]. Group 4: Strategic Scientist Emergence - The emergence of strategic scientists is crucial for addressing significant scientific challenges, with historical examples highlighting the importance of collaborative efforts in major projects [44][45]. - The conference seeks to cultivate a new generation of strategic scientists through a problem-driven approach, linking domestic and international research teams to foster innovation [45][46].

Core Viewpoint - High-level research universities are essential for fostering innovative talent, conducting fundamental research, and driving significant technological breakthroughs, thus playing a crucial role in national strategic scientific power [5][6][10]. Group 1: Strengthening Support for Technological Independence - High-level research universities must enhance their role as the primary force in technological independence by cultivating top innovative talent and producing original innovative results [6][7]. - The integration of talent cultivation and scientific research is vital, with a focus on attracting excellent faculty and providing robust support for innovative talent development [7][9]. - Universities should balance goal-oriented approaches with free exploration in research, adapting strategies based on historical context and disciplinary characteristics [8][9]. Group 2: Improving Evaluation and Optimizing Ecosystems - Research universities need to align their services with national needs, emphasizing quality, performance, and contribution in evaluations to reflect innovation levels and societal impact [9][10]. - A shift from quantity-based to quality-based research evaluation is necessary, fostering a healthy academic ecosystem that encourages innovation and scientific spirit [9][10]. Group 3: Promoting Interdisciplinary Integration - Interdisciplinary integration is crucial for enhancing technological innovation capabilities, as many significant breakthroughs occur at the intersection of disciplines [10][11]. - Research universities should break down disciplinary barriers and adjust their academic structures to seize technological advantages and address critical challenges [10][11]. Group 4: Organized Research and Innovation Platforms - Organized research is essential for systematic responses to national and regional strategic needs, requiring universities to enhance their research innovation frameworks [11][12]. - Establishing major technological innovation platforms is necessary to gather national strategic scientific resources and improve innovation capabilities [12][13]. Group 5: Cultivating Strategic Scientists - Strategic scientists are key resources for achieving high-level technological independence, necessitating a focus on nurturing and utilizing such talent within research universities [13][14]. - Universities should develop mechanisms for cultivating strategic scientists and ensure their involvement in significant scientific decision-making [13][14]. Group 6: Pursuing Excellence and National Integration - Research universities must align their missions with national modernization goals, exploring mechanisms to enhance the synergy between education, technology, and talent development [14][15]. - Deep integration into the national innovation system is essential for universities to contribute effectively to the development of a strong educational and technological nation [15][16]. Group 7: Building Collaborative Ecosystems - Research universities should create collaborative ecosystems with regional economies, fostering innovation-driven development and enhancing educational and technological support [16][17]. - Active participation in regional development initiatives, such as the construction of innovation centers, is crucial for aligning university capabilities with local industry needs [16][17]. Group 8: Transforming into Strategic Research Universities - Research universities are encouraged to evolve into strategic research institutions, focusing on systematic reforms to enhance their educational and research capabilities [17][18]. - Continuous improvement in governance and management structures is necessary to support the transition towards a world-class university model [17][18].